Since the shelter assigned my cat a random name recently that I don't like (Pentagon) and to which he doesn't answer anyway, I figure now's the best time to rename him (I get him back in about a week after some medical follow-up at the shelter):

Favorites among my family members so far:
Jaws - because he's the world's sweetest cat, likes to nibble my forearms ever so gently
Phantom - because he has an amazing stealth mode; either that or he can teleport at will

A few of my favorite fictional characters:
Gandalf - best Tolkien character
Connor - 14-year-old supernatural character at the heart of my Apocalypse trilogy
Apollo - my favorite character from Archangel Syndrome, my demented space opera; also 14 years old; heir to the violent, galactic Imperium Romanum; the neurotic but likeable son of Nero, a murderous psychopath
Professor - the Archangel Syndrome genius who created a sterilizing vaccine that caused the collapse of Earth's population to keep the planet from running out of trees for toilet paper; last seen time traveling to 1964 for a 3-hour cruise with Gilligan, where (ironically) there was no toilet paper

Suggested by Gemini for a really sweet cat (tongue in cheek):
Vlad the Impaler - really nasty piece of work from history
Cujo - Stephen King's rabid Saint Bernard
Shredder
Slasher
Killer

Other possibilities:
Furball
Sweet Pea

Randall Krzak wrote:

If members of TNBW are going to start relying on AI to do reviews, I think I'll bow out.

Randy, I think the discussion above morphed into one about whether writers (not reviewers) here should have access to an AI reviewer like the one on Booksie. Admittedly, I've yet to try it. I keep meaning to cross-post over there, but life keeps getting in my way.

The general consensus is that AI should not be used to generate reviews for others; that would make for a rather useless site. Writers can do that themselves. Using an AI to clean up chapters before posting them here is a no-brainer, though, for folks who don't have a good handle on grammar and punctuation. That way, reviewers here can focus on the story rather than writing mechanics.

I don't think there's anything wrong, though, with helping someone figure out how to use an AI to clean up a chapter before posting.

This reminded me of a song I learned in kindergarten fifty-five years ago. I never knew the name, just remembered one verse. I fed it into Gemini, and it said, "That's a classic!" and went on to name the song (The Austrian Yodeler) and explain some of the history. I'm so glad to be retired and not have to worry about competing with AI. Yeesh.

104

(13 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Sorry to hear that, MJ. I almost joined you with a cast (made in Canada, of course). I was trying out a new ladder at home because the old one was too narrow for me due to balance issues. So I climbed a few steps higher, thinking I could finally reach the ceiling to change light bulbs and smoke alarm batteries, which I now can, but I was a little too close to the ceiling fan, which was running at full speed. Damn did that hurt! Even once it heals, my new cat loves to sit in my lap and get petted and scratched, so I'll be typing one-handed for a while. :-)

Get well soon.
Dirk

In Canada it would be A-eye-eh. Sounds like a refrain from "Old MacDonald had a Farm." :-)

106

(68 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

These days, whenever I encounter a word whose exact definition I've never read, especially words that I use from time to time, I like to look them up. Here's the definition for apoplexy, although not the only one: unconsciousness or incapacity resulting from a cerebral hemorrhage or stroke.
All that from a few capitalized nouns, huh? :-)
And the lives of scullery maids were Shit!

Hi Sol.

Having access to an AI directly from the site would be great as long as people can find it easily. In addition to wherever you place the button or menu item to make it generally available, I'd suggest also making it accessible from within the Post/Edit wizard with a label or tooltip suggesting people run their writing through the AI to eliminate the trivial stuff so they don't waste their reviewers' time. As reviewers, I think we should make it a default expectation. If the AI is good and clearly hasn't been used, I'd tell them to run it, fix their mistakes, then post again.

>>Will AI read one chapter of a book and advise me helpfully about arc, plot or character development?
Based on my experience using Gemini for a variety of detailed conversations, I think it might surprise you. :-)

I keep seeing articles in my newsfeed about ways scientists and researchers are using AI, and that it can do in minutes what would take humans months or years to do, assuming we can even do it.

And legitimate publishers will no doubt use AI analysis to help them decide whether to publish legitimate works or not. Makes me wonder how many classics would have received a thumbs down. Assuming a publisher does decide to publish someone's book, they can use the same analysis to help specify what changes the publisher wants from the author.

And you can probably use AI eventually (if not imminantly) to automate much of the creation and self-publishing of AI-generated books. Imagine how much more crap will be dumped into the Amazon Kindle store.

>>Or they're lulled to sleep and get a shock at the end. 'Connor's the AC?!?!'
Nobody would be surprised by that, would they? :-)

I read a bit about the Children's Crusade. Ugh! Many of them sold into slavery. The depravity of the human race knows no bounds, although slavery was a part of society long before that crusade (and still is). Converting your enemy through non-violent means sounds a little like what Pope Nnamani has in mind to retake the Vatican.

I had that age range in mind, although the whole idea of doing so really is just to further the plans of the Unholy Trinity: Connor takes over the Church, kicks out any uncooperative clergymen, and begins to pull together the "Lambs of the Lord" to do "Christ's bidding." Of course, since he bails on Satan halfway through book two, the Lambs never get off the ground.

Yup. All great questions. Care to take a crack at the answers too? :-)
It would be interesting to feed Gemini one of my scenes and ask it how the scene made Gemini "feel". tongue

Some refinements of the story:

- the real Last Challenge, where Connor decides at whom to throw the dagger, Christ or Satan, remains unchanged
- the fake Last Challenge, which is a part of the conspiracy, is that Satan supposedly bet God that the Church would be so corrupt by the End Times that God would be unable to find even one priest worthy of Heaven
- the role of the Holy Emissary, according to the Augustine letter, is therefore to cleanse the Church of corruption before the Final Judgement, become the Last Vicar of Christ, replace the clergy with children (child priests & priestesses), and then dispatch them to every corner of Creation to deliver the Lord’s urgent final call for all to seek refuge from the coming storm in the sheltering arms of the Church, led by Connor
- ostensibly, the reason Christ picked a teenager as the Holy Emissary is that he wanted someone innocent and incorruptible to lead the child priests & priestesses (imagine Connor as innocent and incorruptible, lol); it nicely explains why Christ chose him, though
- the reason Satan and his minions supposedly want Connor either dead or a servant of evil is that the Holy Emissary would essentially guarantee that God will win the (fake) Last Challenge since child priests & priestesses are all (or mostly all) worthy of Heaven; it would totally blow Satan out of the water if it weren't all part of his plan
- the (revised) poison in the Antichrist's dagger is supposed to be one that turns the victim into a servant of evil, which is what Connor will supposedly be fighting throughout his Holy Land trip; I'll probably punt all of the complexity of initially withholding the dagger from Connor, then giving it to him because Romano is desperate, then Connor feels better but becomes megalomaniacal, then is cured at the Sea of Galilee; instead, Connor's descent into evil will be a gradual thing from the beginning of the trip onward until he's cured in the water
- the above ties together Connor's supposed role (Holy Emissary) with his secret role, and allows him to purge the Church of real priests and replace them with children, whom Satan wants Connor to corrupt because they're easier to lead (astray) than real priests
- with the added focus on children in later books, I think the target audience could expand to include younger readers too (down to at least age fourteen if not a bit younger), which is something I always wanted. It's why I used corporeals instead of demon-possessed humans as the Star Wars-like stormtroopers of the story (they can't hit the broad side of a barn, they exist to be shot, and no one living is actually "seen" to die during shootouts); the only rather gross part is that corporeals dissolve into nasty remains when the demons flee the corpses; they'll even have the ability to allow their faces to melt while running at their shooter to terrify them (whenever Detective Campagna does the shooting)
- since Connor is no longer pretending to be Christ, very little (nothing?) will happen in book one that contradicts the Bible, so no more need to explain any of that away (no alternate timelines or any equally dissatisfying complexity); and once the conspiracy is revealed, there's nothing to explain away anyway
- these changes nicely streamline key elements of the story and tie them together much better and more believably than in the first draft; yay!

One thing we can definitely do is put together a template based on AI-style reviews and pin it to the Premium group's forum for people to reference if they're stuck for things to consider/include in a critique. I could have used one of those when I first started doing reviews. Even now, I sometimes struggle to find anything comprehensive to say for some of the more experienced authors here.

I'd volunteer to put a draft template together, but I've been struggling with exhaustion since my bout with COVID. Blood tests suggest my pancreas took a hit, although I'm not diabetic (yet).

Hi Dagny.

Thanks for clarifying. You're not the only one who has used AI to help with reviews. If it wasn't for the potential copyright issue associated with the AIs keeping and reusing copies of our inputs, I think it would be a great way to augment our reviews (eg, do the inline stuff ourselves, then run it through an AI to see if it has anything useful to add to the closing comments). Our long-term members have the experience to know if the advice is useful before including it in a review.

I believe Sol has an AI capability for members of the other site, although I have yet to try it.

A new member expressed concern because one of the reviews they received was largely or totally generated by ChatGPT. Since we want members to read and review each other's work (i.e., a good old-fashioned reciprocal relationship), it defeats the purpose of the site if one person reads and does real reviews while the other simply copies and pastes the other writer's story into an AI to generate a review. The AI-generated ones are pretty obvious.

If you find yourself reviewing something that you think could benefit from a pass through an AI, feel free to suggest that to the person whose work you're reviewing. If you want to show them examples of AI prompts they could use to generate such a review, that's perfectly reasonable, and potentially helpful if the writer hasn't previously used an AI for that purpose. Copying and pasting samples of AI output (based on inputting a sample of your own writing) to show them what it can do is also perfectly reasonable.

But ... if you're going to run someone else's work through an AI and simply paste it into a review as if it were your own, that's not in keeping with the spirit or purpose of the site, and allows the reviewer to collect points without having done the work. Also, there's no guarantee that the AI you just used didn't keep/integrate a copy of that work to give to others as responses to future questions. And voila, you would have just violated the author's copyright.

Google's Gemini claims it doesn't keep copies, but we all know Google will take whatever data it can from anyone it can without adequately informing people when they start doing so. Or it's buried somewhere in forty pages of legalese when they update their terms of service (usually only after they get caught). And Google certainly does keep copies of your inputs, ostensibly only to help Google employees see inputs/outputs they need to improve the AI.

Also, trial members are trying to figure out if the site provides enough added value for them to pay the subscription fee and become a permanent member. If they wanted just the output of an AI, they could run that themselves for free.

Please feel free to add to this, especially if you disagree with me, although we know that never happens. :-)

118

(7 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Have a nice time, Bill. Do you plan to do any bull riding? :-)
Please say hello to Pam for me.

Thanks
Dirk

119

(30 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

All it would take to fix everything that's wrong with the Earth is a monstrous asteroid. I'll allow your imaginations to fill in the blanks. :-)

120

(30 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

George FLC wrote:

We need to be good stewards with what's been given to us.

We're a bit late for that, don't you think? Try to find a piece of land, a river, a lake, a tree, a crop, an animal, a teabag(!), etc. that isn't contaminated by micro-plastics or other industrial pollutants.

Years ago, I thought about writing a story about some chemical/pollutant/GMO crop/etc. that causes all the men on Earth to become sterile. That eventually morphed into the faulty vaccine in Archangel Syndrome that brought civilization to its knees. Good thing too, as the world was running out of trees for toilet paper. A disaster of biblical proportions was narrowly averted thanks to Professor Elroy Winkley and his time travel equation: N=jc^2.

121

(30 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

https://www.amazon.com/chillgo-20000mAh … 7&th=1

smile

122

(30 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

That's what those of us north of the border pray for - colder weather. smile

123

(30 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

George FLC wrote:

I think we only hit 93 degrees, 34 C.

How was Canada Dirk?

It's been raining and cool to cold much of the past few weeks. And I'm glad it has been, otherwise hotter temperatures would make the new indoor paint off-gas more intensely.

Another change I plan to make to book one is that, rather than Connor getting sick without the weapon initially, then seemingly fine once he has it, then megalomaniacal until he's cured at Capernaum, it would be a lot simpler if it was a simple progression from normal to evil to cured. But, that seems rather similar to Frodo and the One Ring, where Frodo grows sicker and more paranoid the longer he wears it, until the volcano when he finally puts it on, until Gollum frees Frodo of it by biting off his finger. In my case, two of my characters (Moses and Antonio) snatch the dagger away.

Key differences between the two are:
- Frodo was clearly a protagonist right from the beginning
- Connor is the hidden antagonist

- The One Ring is a supernatural weapon imbued with Sauron's evil, actively trying to get back to its master
- The dagger is also a supernatural weapon, which in theory, is demonic and created by the Antichrist to stab Connor and introduce a poison that will turn him into a servant of evil, so it seems evil throughout the book
- You don't learn until the end that it was actually created by God the Father for Connor to decide the Last Challenge; thus it's a holy weapon

- The One Ring cannot safely be worn by others and must be destroyed, which can only be done at Mount Doom
- The dagger was supposedly imbued with a spiritual poison in the first draft (which I may change to a more flexible "demonic" poison); it's something people can safely touch (Father Romano, Father Bianchi, and Connor all do so), and they're reluctant to destroy it because they don't know the impact on Connor
- In reality, the dagger cannot be destroyed

- Frodo actually fell under the spell of the ring
- Connor faked falling under the dagger's spell

- Frodo is freed of the ring at Mount Doom but never fully cured
- Connor is "cured" at Capernaum by swallowing water from the Sea of Galilee

- The One Ring is very important to the plot as it's evil and would allow Sauron to take physical form if he gets it, turning Middle Earth to darkness
- The dagger is far less important in book one as it merely determines if Connor falls under the spell of evil; granted the role of the Holy Emissary will be played up as very important, but as an unknown character biblically speaking, the Holy Emissary could fall to darkness, and the Second Coming with all its trimmings would still occur
- even once it's known that the dagger is a holy weapon, it's still not nearly as important to the overall plot as the One Ring, although a dagger that can maim Christ would be a big deal to my target audience, but that would only happen at the end of book three assuming it ever did

- I'm sure there are other differences, but given all of the above, I think I'm safe to simplify/streamline mine; and if not, that's what do-overs are for :-)

Before:
He whittled the end of a fallen branch with the Antichrist’s demonic dagger, recently used by one of that tyrant’s minions to stab Connor. Its addictive poison still flowed through his veins and sickened him, like withdrawal from the fangs of a powerful addiction, whenever he strayed too far from the heinous weapon. There could be no doubt it sought to master him.

After:
He whittled the end of a fallen branch with the Antichrist’s dagger, which the youth had come by honestly enough – from a stab wound to his gut. With the weapon’s poisonous tentacles spreading insidiously throughout his body, seeking to enslave him to evil, and with no known cure, his only hope now lay in finding the source of the healing energy in these lands before time ran out.

The Gathering Darkness Saga or Tales of The Gathering Darkness - by far the best series titles so far (thanks for the push, Kdot), with only a few false hits on Amazon if you include the word saga/tales. I'd love to rename the first novel to "Child of Light" or similar to steer readers away from thinking the kid on the cover is someone dark, but Child of Light and its variants have been heavily used.

Other alternatives for the name of book one might be:

The Holy Emissary
The Coming of the Holy Emissary
Advent of the Holy Emissary - perhaps too close to the idea of the Advent of Christ
Emissary of [the] Light.

Based on the above, I still prefer Connor's title to be the Holy Emissary (to get that clear connection to God), making the title "The Coming of the Holy Emissary" still the best, IMO, albeit just for the first book, not the series.

One advantage of "Child of Light" is that the word "Child" is least suggestive of the Antichrist, unless you recently watched the Omen. :-)