3,651

(32 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I've learned to stick to books I want to read, or where I want to keep the reviewer. Usually both. As a result, I'm down to about half a dozen readers. That also makes it easier to keep up with reciprocating while also writing.

I do think, though, that being able to give reviewers an occasional boost of points in return for great reviews would be terrific, as well as incremental points provided by the system for later reviews.

3,652

(32 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

The way I deal with great reviewers currently is to try to read more of their work than they read mine. The only downside to that is I usually finish their book before they do mine, so I may lose them later in my story, unless they've got another book online that I also want to read.

If I don't want to deal with someone in real life, I avoid them. Same principle when it comes to blocking. If someone offends me and I want to block them, that should be my decision. I'm paying to be here after all. Why put up with trolls?

3,654

(32 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Adrian Lankford wrote:

I don't even have a book to post and I love this idea.

LOL.

I really like the idea of increasing points as the number of chapters reviewed grows higher. At least that gives us some way to reward long-term reviewers.

I'm not sure about rating reviews. That used to be the case on the old site and most people are too polite to give any less than five stars to avoid insulting/losing reviewers.

3,655

(32 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

What I would love is the ability to give some of my points to reviewers that I most want to hang on to. I don't mind if some of my readers drop off. Usually the ones that drop off have become disinterested in my story and aren't really providing great reviews anymore. I have, however, received tremendous feedback from a couple of my regular reviewers, but can't reciprocate equally because their writing is so much better than mine.

dagnee wrote:

Charles,

If I write a poem on growing old, I don't see how a reviewer's opinion of growing old would improve my writing. As for Hitler, that example further proves my theory if you have a good plot writing style does not matter.

big_smile

Perhaps they might say something about growing old that makes you rethink how to write your poem. Or perhaps you build a relationship that leads to better and ongoing feedback. ... Now you're going to block me, aren't you? tongue

As for Mein Kampf, it's heartening to know even psychopaths can write bestsellers. There's hope for me yet!

3,657

(6 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I'm not an artist, but my favorite image that comes to mind is someone sitting hunched in front a computer, with a clock that says 2 AM, eyes bugging out of the face, and with frazzeled hair. Perhaps a pencil/pen behind the ear. Papers and books lying/stacked everywhere. One book could say dictionary, another thesaurus, and another grammar on the spines.

Oh, you drunk is the perfect time to read Queen Amy. She's DOA, but I left her up to shame you for helping me create her.

3,659

(342 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

vern wrote:
Norm d'Plume wrote:

In doing inline reviews, I often leave two or more comments for the same selected word or sentence (for separate feedback about the same item). I then write my closing comments, which can be long. Today, I wanted to read those secondary and tertiary comments, so I clicked on x-line to see all of them. My very long closing comments were wiped out. Fortunately, I suspected that might happen, so I copied the closing comments to the clipboard. I was then able to paste them back in. Since x-lines are available when leaving reviews, this could easily burn someone. Not sure if there is an easy fix.

Actually, there is an easy fix. Just go ahead and close your review before checking the x-line. Then your closing comment will be saved. You can always go back and add to your comments even after closing. Take care. Vern

That lends itself to an easy programming fix. The system should auto-save the review before switching over. That way you don't leave it for someone else to trip over.

3,660

(342 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I use MS Word 2007 with Times New Roman. What WP do you use, K?

EDIT: I just tried four characters (cut directly from MS Word and pasted into the WP here on the site): e with two dots, e with a bar (again), e with a bowl over it (same as your s), and a French e with an accent. e with two dots worked. French e worked. Interestingly, the e with the bowl didn't work, nor did the e with bar.

EDIT: I just tried K's s with a bowl. It works, even though e with a bowl doesn't.

3,661

(342 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Thank you, both.

3,662

(342 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

njc, does that mean the different languages map different characters to the same (shared) byte(s), or does each language get its own subset of the total byte pool?

Thanks.
Dirk

3,663

(342 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Another issue that may not be easily solvable is foreign fonts. In particular, I'm using some Latin my book, which includes uncommon accents like an e with a horizontal bar over it. It posts as ? on the site when taken from MS Word using Times New Roman. I'll have other Latin words with other uncommon characters, so this will be a pain to deal with. To be honest, I'm not sure CreateSpace or Kindle support them either, so I may have to convert it to something "similiar" using other letters, assuming that's possible (e.g., maybe ae for e+bar).

Please let me know if there is a better solution.

Thanks.
Dirk

3,664

(342 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

In doing inline reviews, I often leave two or more comments for the same selected word or sentence (for separate feedback about the same item). I then write my closing comments, which can be long. Today, I wanted to read those secondary and tertiary comments, so I clicked on x-line to see all of them. My very long closing comments were wiped out. Fortunately, I suspected that might happen, so I copied the closing comments to the clipboard. I was then able to paste them back in. Since x-lines are available when leaving reviews, this could easily burn someone. Not sure if there is an easy fix.

Thank you, sir!

I figured someone else might know and, if not, someone else might like to know. Didn't want to bother the poor man with yet another message.

I can't remember how the site works for new members. Do they get access to inline reviews for any length of time? I have two new writers I want to review and want to do line-level reviews without resorting to a regular review if I can help it.

Thanks.
Dirk

Welcome, Randall, and thanks again for the review. I'll recip shortly.

I use chapter titles to tease the reader, either with a few word summary of a key event in the chapter, or with a little misdirection.

For example, my story builds up over many chapters that one of my MCs, Apollo, is heir to the Imperial throne and is expected to become emperor and lead a holy war. It's pretty much a given that that event will occur, so I give the reader something to look forward to when they check out the table of contents. Through chapter titles, they see his rise and fall, followed by a climax where everything will be decided. As you read it, you know he will fall, but he doesn't. As a result, I have a chapter called Emperor Apollo that includes his coronation, which is the peak of his success before the fall.

It's kind of like when you saw the second death star in Return of the Jedi. You know a big battle will occur, but not the how, including the fact that Emperor Plapatine has planned the whole thing. So, there were still a lot of surprises left to be had in ROTJ. Dune did something similar. It used epigraphs at the top of each chapter (I use them too) to give historical information about Maud'dib, the protagonist. You know from early on that Paul Atreides will become Maud'dib, but you have to tear through the book to get there and see how it happens.

The other example, misdirection, I do for fun (my story tries for a fair bit of humor). I have a title called Joseph Enters Heaven. He's a religious character, so it could be interpreted as him going to Heaven (in some form). In reality Heaven is the name of a prison.

By using both types of chapter titles, I also keep the reader guessing.

If you want the whole story to be a closely held secret and only unfold through the content of the chapters, then leave them out. If you prefer to tease them with some information, then use chapter titles. The latter also gives potential readers a little more information about the book when they're deciding whether or not to buy it. You have the book title and the book summary to sell your novel, but a few interesting chapter titles in a TOC might help seal the deal. In my book, a chapter titled "Worlds Collide" let's the reader know that, as suggested in the book summary, the quests of the two MCs will indeed collide.

Hope that helps.
Dirk

It would have saved me quite a few bucks on Star Wars: Darth Plagueis. Great bedtime reading for those with insomnia. It does pick up after many painful chapters. I only stuck with it because of some interesting writing techniques.

Personally, I have no problem getting paid by the page. The onus is on me to write a story people want to finish. And if they don't like it, perhaps they won't leave a nasty review about having wasted $10 on a doorstop.

3,670

(26 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Dune uses omniscient POV and is the best-selling sci-fi novel of all time. Today, publishers are so focused on a POV style that masterpieces of the past would never even get published.

I started with omniscient because I didn't know any better and was strongly encouraged to drink the cool-aid and switch to 3rd person limited. I'm glad I did because there are several key chapters that wouldn't have worked if I had been inside both MCs heads at the same time.

That aside, I plan to self-publish, so I have no problem breaking a few rules to tell the story the way I would like to read it.

3,671

(37 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Charles_F_Bell wrote:
j p lundstrom wrote:
Mike Roberson wrote:

Checking out the dif in foreword, prologue's and such.  Found this interesting.
http://theeditorsblog.net/2011/07/06/pr … -prologue/

Mike--I just read the article, and I have to say I'm in the group of readers against prologues. My main complaint? I want to read the story, not the  background junk.  JP

Don't worry! Everything alleged in that blog post is wrong.  A writer's prologue is like operatic or broadway musical composer's overture. The concept started in Greek drama to be like a movie trailer, and if the listener/reader is turned off by a overture/prologue, then is it a fact that he had better spend his money elsewhere.   Readers should thank an author for a prologue.

I agree with Charles on this. My prologue isn't something you're meant to slog through to get to the story. It's part of the story. I use it to set the stage for everything that follows, except for the main characters, who aren't born yet. It's set in the era of my MCs' parents and grandparents. It creates history for the MCs.

3,672

(37 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Mike Roberson wrote:

I was raised on brains and eggs, Charles.  I read the article with an eye to removing large flashbacks.  The Prologue would actually hold the crime of years before.  Then the story would lay out the impact on characters years later.  My only thought is to limit the size of flashbacks.  Now I am thinking if I'm good enough I can work the info into the characters thoughts as the story unfolds.  Just a rookie, playing with his new found brain.  Mike

Mike, if it helps, my prologue is 5000 words (about ten pages). I'm going to put up version 4 tomorrow. As NJC mentioned somewhere in this thread, make the prologue a good short story. If you decide not to go with it, you'll have fleshed out the details of the past to use to fill in the rest of the story.

From what I've read of your story, I think the flashbacks would work well as a prologue, unless there's more of the past than I've read so far (Clay's interrogation and guilty plea). There's nothing quite like trying to squeeze a ton of story into 10 little pages. Tonight I deleted a lot of stuff I previously thought was essential to the prologue, all to pick up the pace.

The other way you might consider going is to break up the flashbacks into a long guilt trip for your MC. Have him think of it in short recollections that coincide with your main story unfolding. Only you would know if that makes sense here.

Cow brains and eggs? Now that brings back memories. :-)
Dirk

3,673

(18 replies, posted in Marketing Your Writing)

1. Sell
2. On
3. Amazon

Sorry, couldn't resist. :-)

3,674

(26 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Many articles I've read equate omniscient POV, multiple POV, and head-hopping, as if there were no distinction, which is how I learned it. Interesting to see the subtle differences. To the best of my recollection, Dune (mentioned in the article) uses not just omniscient, but head-hopping. I'll have to look for it again the next time I re-read the book.

3,675

(3 replies, posted in Spirituality & Religion)

Added to my list.