Search options (Page 2 of 151)

Anyone who asks that question doesn't understand participles vs. passives, gerunds vs. progressive aspect--in other words, doesn't know the English language verb system.

Something about virtue, reward, gifts?  In DS9 we learn that the Ferengi believe in a great river of wealth, and they have a need to find it.

Isn't that like the Prosperity Gospel movement?

You mean like "bring", "thing", and "fling" ?  If they are auxiliary verbs, the complaint might have merit.  If they are present participles ("let loose a stinging reply") or gerunds ("He loved singing") then Word can just take its ever-loving de-ing-ing campaign and put it where the pixels never light.

Picking them off like wine goblets at the cardinals' feasts?

Shooting meatballs off a pizza?  Shooting tiramasu at a Roman feast?  Plinking wine goblets at a Roman feast?

I rather like inxplode.  But some self-important editor or, worse, some smaraifishul intelyjint ottokurruptor will change it everywhere to either 'explode' or 'exim bank'.

Heinlein and "shipstone"s

Quanrum Tunneling with some handwavium to let 90% or more of the energy through.

Saw this recently: https://www.sciencealert.com/tapping-in … nsane-bomb

I don't think that a breakthrough in fundamental physics would interest our journalists half as much as a political scandal or a seahorse romance.  Besides, most of then couldn't pass high school physics, much less get Einstein's 1930s work right.  Heck, they couldn't even get it wrong!  (High school physics: show that the units are consistent in e = mc² .)

I read a mostly excellent popular history of precision.  But in discussing electronics, the author applied something about field effect transistors to bipolar junction transistors, or vice versa.  It shook my confidence in the whole book.  Yes, the topic sounds esoteric, but if you know electronics it's like confusing a steam engine with a diesel engine, or an oil filter with an air filter.

But the combined ((tech)) fields might overload local space, or the emitters might interfere with each other in a multidimensional phase relationship.

Did you know that a spectrum is a space of infinite dimension, of the sort called a Hilbert space?   Just throw in Hilbert Phase Space and you can tech-abracadabra almost anything.  Multiple powertrons driving a single load must be aligned in their Hilbert phase space.  Perfect alignment is impossible, and the effect of misalignment grows faster than exponentially with increasing power ... .   (Remember that the factorial grows faster than any exponential in the limit toward infinity.  That's why power series converge.  And the continuous equivalent to the factorial is the gamma function, offset by one in its argument.)