Search options (Page 151 of 151)

THERE MAY BE A SECURITY BUG HERE!
I reviewed The Mantle of Magic by Amy_s, chapter 9.1.  I copied sections from the chapter into my review and quoted them with double angle brackets.

I see only single angle brackets and no content.  I fear that the HTML generator has converted only the outer angle brackets to the ampersand-escapes, leaving the inner part to be sent to the browser as a tag.  I'm on the smartphone now and cannot check.

While hunting for a way to read authors' replies to reviews on the mobile, I clicked on the link for the chapter.  Instead, I was taken to the first chapter, with no warning that I would have to remember the secong part of the link (chapter) in order to finish the navigation.

Not a bug exactly, but a feature oddity.

Why does an old-style review need a title?  It's not necessarily an essay or a thesis.  I don't mind being able to put a title on, but needing one seems, well, needless.

Not a wish, an attaboy! for putting the regular review panel next to a scrolling copy of the text of the work.

This is an old problem, not a new one.  Time stamps appear to be either in the originating user's time, or the site's time, not the time zone of the user reading them.  I haven't studied this part of web tech so I'm not sure where the solution would lie.

I haven't figured out what connections are for except letting someone send me private mail.  On that basis, I should connect with as many people as possible, in which case I'll have everyone on the site in my  connect list.
In which case, why have the connections?

Oh, I guess I could send a private message in a connection request, asking the recipient to deny the request.  But that doesn't seem like how it was meant to work.

Ouch!  This means that a review after a major revision earns no points!

Allowing a repub would allow the writer to reward reviewers for coming in for a new start.  (And such large revisions might also call for stripping off at least the inlline reviews.

I have similar problems.  I'm guessing that something the ste is doing is earning the distrust of security plugins on the browser.

I hope we get some of these things straightened out so we don't have to bail.  I -really- like working with you and many of the the other people here.

Do you find that the color scheme and font choices trigger eyestrain?  I do.

I get a connetion request.  I click to read the message, which appears tool-tips fashion.  Now I'd like to approve or disapprove the connection, but the control is covered by the message, which cannot be cleared by hitting escape, and does not seem to clear when you click elsewhere.  (I[m using IE right now.)  You have to switch tabs away and then come back.

ESC should clear it.  Clicking elsewhere should clear it.

The site also has the habit of logging me out, and Chrome on the phone cannot verify the site ID, or get a secure connection.

Not a bug, strictly, but a feature I do not want:   In order to exchange messages with people, I have to connect with them.  Once I do, my home page gets cluttered with what they 'shelve'.  I'd really like to be able to shut that second part off, or else not need to connect to send messages.  If the point of this to allow us to manage our interactions, the granularity between 'I can talk with him' and 'his side stuff appears on my page' seems quite coarse.