figure-eight orbit, making one sun dominant at a time to reduce the difficulties

Yes, being able to turn one sun "off" at a time vastly reduces your headaches, and your story has sufficient "magic" / "science magic" to support it.

You still have a minor issue that two suns will want to orbit themselves (If they were stationary with respect to each other, they'd join up, and who needs that headache?). As a result the planet would have to travel faster on some parts of its orbit -- to stay ahead of the creeping sun. In effect your planet's orbit itself would have to be orbitting to stay out of the path of the sun. Now, the planet moving its entire orbit is possible if you introduce mass that will upset the balance. But of course, the question becomes how is that mass moving around to move the orbit where it needs to be.

Fun stuff!

Eh. A story set in Italy that Americanizes the culture for me might as well be set in Little Italy, New York. Audrey voice: "You can dooo eeeet"

In related news, Project L which is set in Earth Prime (eg our Earth) I'm really enjoying the writing process because it has terms like "midnight" and "o'clock". You wouldn't believe how awful it is to write around time references.

On the other hand, it's taught me (forced) to learn to downplay time.

A: When are you headed to the masquerade?
B: When the second hour tolls

So awkward! No way for B to answer this without using Earth terminology, so I make sure A doesn't ask with such precision

A: Are you going to the ball?
B: Tonight's? Of course

You've got what njc calls an impossible situation. You'll need to pull out "magic". And by magic I mean either actual magic or sci-fi-magic such as a self-propelled planet. Here's why...

First of all, understand that Earth's orbit is not just because we're spinning around a stellar body, but because the sun is so heavy, it can yank the entire planet around (and several others) like we're a bunch of pebbles

http://www.skyfire.ca/kwan/tnbw/earth-to-sun.jpg

Our sun (and ours is rather tiny as far as suns go) will crush entire planets to dust if they get into the wrong place. And it would easily eat them all if they slowed down too much and "fell".

Your biggest challenge lies here:

http://www.skyfire.ca/kwan/tnbw/earth-to-sun-2.jpg

Where the little sun is attempting to yank your planet out of the grasp of the bigger sun. Your planet cannot survive two suns acting in different directions. It will become an asteroid belt. Each sun will claim a portion of it.

(Actually, the smaller sun probably won't be able to beat the larger sun unless the planet is moving too quickly for the larger sun to hold it (in which case the smaller sun won't be able to hold it either, and your planet will go spinning into deep space. Wheee!))

There are more issues than that, but I picked the largest. Now I wish to turn the question around and ask what the goal is of this orbit. I ask this, so I can suggest something that may accomplish this goal rather than having to use magic

My take is...

a) if you like the prologue, keep it
b) If you're 50/50 on it, dump
c) If you don't like it, carry it to Diane's collider and toss it into someone else's dimension

430

(20 replies, posted in Close friends)

but it motivates me to write, is largely what I want to express,

Well I'd say you got the most important parts down pat

431

(20 replies, posted in Close friends)

Rachel Parsons wrote:

I've been criticized by one potential publisher as writing humor that lands well but interferes with the serious side. (No examples, of course, were given and that was the occasion of going into self-publishing.) This would be a concern.

Humour getting in the way of the dramatic moment is going to be hard to spot in your own writing by nature as we all have to work to distance ourselves and see our words through another person's eyes. However, I can help by showing you my own mistakes.

When you get time on your hands, consider scene 1 of this v1:
https://www.thenextbigwriter.com/postin … blue-18605
The (roughly) 500 words from the start until she first teleports. During the scene, characters trip over each other, and half-fight, and crack the predictable penis joke. (One character ([G a l i a h])never appears again in the rest of the story which also breaks a writer-reader contract  that if you're going to point out the axe, someone at some point should swing it).

I don't believe there is anything /wrong/ with the v1 approach. But I can certainly get more juice out of it if the characters aren't making fun of themselves. It's kinda hard for the reader to stay in life & death mode if the characters won't take their own situation seriously. She almost need not care about her peril. She says herself "She's leaving to escape the madness" and not primarily because of any implicit danger

In v2 (not posted yet), with the zaniness removed, the MC cannot ignore the reality that she's being hunted by someone faster, stronger, and can who sense her anywhere on the planet. I'll link it here when I get time.

I believe this might be what the publisher was saying. That humour is good but can kill urgency

bonus points if the lover's name is Andrew

Re: Involuntary reactions... as I've hinted before, they don't bother me as a reader, but I don't see them as useful. if a writer could kind of reach out of the book and ask me what I prefer, I'd say I didn't care what the reactions were as much as getting on with the story

involuntary:

Bob saw the rabbit and his eyebrows shot up

Equivalent:

Bob saw the rabbit and was surprised

To me, the above are the same: They both force surprise onto me. It's like an exclamation mark used where there is insufficient context to infer it.

Preferred:

Bob saw the rabbit and drew to a halt, seeking some way to get out of its path

That said, Many mass market high selling authors have sentient body parts. Annette Marie in particular sets records with "My hand reached up to take the letter"and "My feet walked me to the altar" all over the place

Names hidden wrote:

So far, that left Father C, the parish pastor, as the only individual with no confirmed alibi. Aside from the killer or killers, he was the last person to see V alive, the one who reported him missing, and the one who found his grave. C also knew the cemetery staff very well. Clearly the two gravediggers were involved, but who put them up to it? On the face of it, C seemed like a good suspect.

However, he had no obvious motive. The cardinal’s death gave C no clear path for advancement. He wasn’t even a bishop yet. Also, C had been cooperating fully with the investigation. He even consented to have all of his shoes examined for comparison with the footprints lifted from the mud at the gravesite. Still, to be a priest meant he was a very intelligent man and would know not to keep incriminating evidence lying around. Had there been a feud between the two men?

Patched wrote:

Father C followed the agent into the dusty storage room where cabinets seemed to preside in judgement. Inspector C sat behind her desk, and Agent D was hunched over a gritty video feed.
I.C. waved at the wire chair. "Please. Sit. Coffee?"
"Thank you." F.C made himself comfortable. He glanced at the mess of cups but declined. "Makes me too jittery at night"
"Just wanted to ask you a few more questions," said I.C.
"I've already told you everything I know."
"I hope you don't mind if I ask some more."
"Why?"
"You're the last person to see V alive. The one to report him missing. The one who found his grave. You're an important lead."
"Surely you don't think it's me."
"We haven't determined that yet."
"What she means," Agent D drawled, eyes glued to what looked like a camcorder shot, "Is that you're still the best person to help us find the killer."
Fc. Oh, that was a relief. Wait. Were they playing good cop bad cop on him?

Could have a lot of fun with a scene like this. Maybe have them bring up the shoes again. Have the agents note he missed a pair (that he hadn't thought of). Seabrass is famous for hampering the MC too... such as Father C has an ulcer or hasn't eaten or has a tic he worries will make him seem guilty. One of my own tricks is that he's guilty of something unrelated and trying to steer the agents away from it

All users of the system are therefore deemed to have disclaimed or waived all copyright ownership rights in their posts

Nice

Anyway to continue what I was saying, more eyes = better

Funny... the site doesn't let me continue a message once I've replied. There's no way to do a followup reply until you reply back

https://blog.bookbaby.com/2019/05/how-t … e-readers/

#20. I'm guilty as charged

439

(68 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

Naw, I get stuck all the time. Usually when I do, I muck around with [L o r r a i n e]'s story because it's just a senseless man-vs-alien free-for-all and can be written on autopilot. She's kind of my healing character when the others break my head.

I switched tracks though, because I'd sorta like to have J3nn@ hit print in December. That timeline is a little ambitious, but I think I can do it or come close to it

440

(68 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

No... I'm stuck is a better word. I flipped to a different project while I wait for my brain to solve it

441

(20 replies, posted in Close friends)

Rachel Parsons wrote:

not quite that bad.

"Bad" was about the last thing I thought. My boss would likely have agreed though he might have asked what it had to do with the sales report I was supposedly working on.

Images of Africain American women and women of colour in positions of strength can be hard to find. Best to just accept what you get or rewrite the scene

442

(20 replies, posted in Close friends)

heh... chapter  9 has put an end to me browsing from work (my boss can see my screen albeit from a distance)

443

(3 replies, posted in Close friends)

In reply to your other question, I mostly troll deviantart for royalty free or stock images.

I don't think cursing will work unless you're Heather

Hard to judge. Personally, I leave tons of things I think are zany in my early drafts and don't make a final decision until I can see the entire story

445

(8 replies, posted in Close friends)

I'm near the end of the marketing phase for [K i m]. This phase always seems to feel like starting a fire. You rub sticks together, kinda fan the sparks, before long, there's a tiny flame going and you have to feed it baby fuel until the blaze is satisfying. Sometimes when the fire doesn't burn hot you ask yourself if you used woo much wind or too much fuel, or maybe you're supposed to do it on one foot. Who knows. Anyway, she's at the "sparks" stage so time for the fuel (GoodReads Giveaway) and see if it catches.

While I wait for that pot to boil, I'm back to whacking away at development projects. I also find marketing interesting but exhausting. Zzzz.

Applying to your example:
3rd, omniscient/normal:

The elderly man wore an ankle-length black cassock... He often joked the Pope might drop by

The elderly man wore an ankle-length black cassock... Possibly in case the Pope dropped by.

3rd, omniscient/close:

The elderly man wore an ankle-length black cassock... In case the Pope drops by?.

The elderly man wore an ankle-length black cassock... as if fearing a pop in from the Pope.

3rd, subjective:

The elderly man wore an ankle-length black cassock... In case the Pope dropped by.

Note to your question, last example went past perfect instead of present. The narrator's assertion is part of the tale.

Here's an example of doing what will get you tagged for head-hopping on this site, but is really just a subjective narrator

Carrik smiled at Killashandra, daring her to contest his restraint in front of the witness.  (...snip...) Carrik, fully aware of her dilemma, had the audacity to offer her a toast as he took the traditional sample sip of the wine.

Crystal Singer: A Novel (Crystal Singer Trilogy Book 1) (pp. 12-13). Random House Publishing Group. Kindle Edition.

Looking closely, we see the narrator is not in Carrik's head as several of these statements later prove to be false.

Hope this helps

oops posted by accident. Editing.

re your italics question, I would like to side-step it and mention there are different kinds of 3rd person narrators, which affects your choice.

I often use "3rd person subjective" which is wildly unpopular on here and will get you told off. My [L 1] short is one such story. Your 3rd person subjective narrator can sit on the character's shoulder and narrate character thoughts seamlessly without needing to switch to italics. It's borderline having the character narrate the story.

Comparatively, [K i m]'s story is 3rd person omniscient so there's a bit more distant. I'f I was going to do inner thoughts, I would definitely switch to italics or risk what Charles called "an uninvited intrusion into the narration". I might also use "(italic)XYZ, she thought" [which Temple would correctly label filtering]. I also use "likely" and its class of words in my 3rd person omniscient to show the narrator is only guessing.

448

(30 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

SPOILER SPACE



grievance : Cersei. She deserved a better send off. There's a good vulture article on it (same article acknowledges we're all armchair quarterbacking this series).

The exchange between (Cersei and Jaime) is moving, but it also lands as though it were beamed in from some other show.

Cersei: haha! I'm the villain you've hated for years. Arya thinks she can kill me? Bring your worst
Later: *randomly trips down stairs and dies*

That's what I feel like they gave us

I rarely describe a character from their own pov. I think Tia hits chapter 16 or so before she gets one

450

(1,528 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

Years ago, the Alberta government still handled all drivers' license renewals, new drivers' licenses, etc.

ew! Ontario went electronic.

We have a private company running our (only) toll road and it's been a nightmare. Botched data... private company withholding your driver's license for toll fees. Just about as awful as it gets