351

(35 replies, posted in Close friends)

I have created this group because I would like to tighten bonds with certain TNBW authors. Beyond simply reviewing our stories, I think we can know each other a bit better, despite living far away. As writers, knowing each other a bit more as persons may also help to better understand the motivations and messages behind our stories. I also think that, using the Group's forum, we can hold group discussions about the story of   one of us, proving group and creating an actual community.

I created the group as a closed group in order to make sure the people participating really want to be part of it and are willing to participate, rather than joining just because.

Kiss

Gacela

352

(11 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

If new people who only signed up for the contest aren't polite enough to read and reply the reviews they receive, then I wonder what are they looking for. Winning the contest with their perfect-at-the-first-try entries? Don't they know this is a community, not the Reader's Digest competition webpage where you drop your entry and forget about it until results are published?

Tsk, tsk.

Gacela

353

(11 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Dan, you're not giving the new site an opportunity--you're only being reactive. There are tonnes of new features improving the quality of the reviewing process, which is the reason why all of us are here. The new site is now over a year old. If you're discovering its new look just now, it means you weren't particularly assiduous to the old one,despite liking it more than this one.

Give the site a try. It's worth it.

Kiss,

Gacela

354

(5 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

In Scribophile, our competence, rather than money, you win publishing points. For example, if the entry fee is two points and 10 people are participating, the price is 20 points. An editor can be chosen as judge. The advantage for the editor is that he or she gets known in the site and that's free publicity for him/her. Of course, this doesn't work for novels, only for short stories, and even then you need to limit the amount of words to 1000 or 2000 at the most. But even then, I think it would be fun.

Kiss,

Gacela

355

(4 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Yes... I noticed it when I couldn't find the story I am reading, until I realised it's now book two.

No biggie.

Kiss,

Gacela

356

(7 replies, posted in Young Adult Writers)

Congratulations!

The problem with editors and agents is always their shortsightedness, which has lead to the current, vast self-publishing industry. Several bestsellers were rejected by several publishers and agents before their success.

The self-marketing part is certainly the most difficult one and the most expensive, but it if's properly done, you're in the right track to become a bestselling author.

Kudos!

Kiss,

Gacela

357

(32 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Excellent find, njc. I read a few of the articles and they're really useful. It's cool somebody takes the time to support authors in this way.

Kiss,

Gacela

Robert feared the worst when opened the door and Christina was nowhere to be seen; she should have climbed down the window again, hope with her clothes on this time.

359

(172 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

max keanu wrote:

The fictional character Jesus may overtake the popularity of the fictional character Scout, but then this makes Harper Lee into a Goddess who wrote the present-day bible of redemptive fiction that assuaged many of us to better understand the complexities good and evil, and love and hate.

Max, when you say "the fictional character Jesus" do you actually mean if? If so, I think the comment doesn't belong to this thread. This thread is about the  loss of a great author, not a religious discussion. I really feel it's disrespectful to introduce this kind of out-of-context comments which  may hurt the beliefs of part of the people reading them, moreover because not being this thread a religious discussion, they're absolutely not called for.

If it was a joke, it was a very poor one.

Kiss,

Gacela

360

(52 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Two friends are talking about last night's party.

John: "My goodness, Bill. You were so drunk you urinated in my car."
Bill: "That's not true. I opened the car's door."
John: "Yes, but you were standing outside."

361

(7 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Suin, you may also find interesting The Snow Flake method, which is another approach to planning a story before writing it. http://www.advancedfictionwriting.com/a … ke-method/

Kiss

Gacela

362

(8 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Have you tried Dragon Naturally Speaking? It's software that allows you to dictate to the computer instead of typing. It costs around $100, but the product is worth its price.

You only need a mic and you can star dictating right out of the box. It even has an option to mouse with voice commands, but it's very tricky. On mousing, my advice would be to start practicing with your left hand, but everything else can pretty much get done using your voice.

Get well soon!

Kiss,

Gacela

363

(10 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Despite all Windows flaws, I think it's the best available software for writers. I think you made the right decision, Norm. Apple lovers, I'm sorry but a Mac is not worth its price  if you're only looking for a word processor.

Kiss

Gacela

364

(17 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Congrats to everyone!

365

(5 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

very cool and useful.

366

(296 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

corra wrote:
Charles_F_Bell wrote:

Going down the slippery slope to youre from you're goes on down to ur with no trace of proper English and the beginnings of an argument of why have proper English anyway.

There is no such thing as "proper English." There is standard written English, there is stuffy academic English, there is "no one can even focus on what you're saying because your placement of prepositions is so distracting" English, & there are a great many spoken variants upon standard written English which communicate quite beautifully to their listeners. All of which can be captured artistically with a clever finagling of letters and punctuation, and all of which are "proper."

You mention the rule about not ending a sentence with a preposition somewhere above. That, sir, is archaic. Rules change as language matures. In standard written English? Yes, the preposition thing is still discouraged in academic circles -- but in many dialects within spoken English, to tuck the preposition deep within the sentence sounds silly and pompous. I think it's on its way out of standard written English, too.


I have a comment about "proper English". Of course, labelling the language as "proper" immediately creates the image of the "improper English", or the one you must avoid because it's not correct. While this is clear in some cases ("I didn't come" vs "I didn't came") it is not so clear in some others because of spoken variants. However, I would adventure saying that the proper English is the one everybody understands. Among so many local variations (from Brit to American, to Australian, not to mention  all the variations on the islands), one of the objectives of having grammar rules is to make sure everybody understands the language. Without them, it would be impossible to understand ourselves.

Punctuation obeys the same purpose. Commas, for example. When you speak, you make pauses that emphasise your message. These pauses are graphically represented by commas in the written language. Long ago, somebody issued rules about commas. In the end, these rules are the way in which the spoken language inflections are translated to written language, which otherwise would be cold and convey every message the wrong way ("Let's eat grandma" vs "Let's eat, grandma").

From my standpoint, proper English exists. It's the written language following a set of common sense rules that allow all of us understand it.

Kiss

Gacela

367

(296 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Dill Carver wrote:
corra wrote:
Dill Carver wrote:

Creative use of punctuation?

http://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tena … =f&l=f

Or is it just bad grammar on the bad grandma?

Creative! It says "I'm fine" one way, and "Save Me" the other way, with the apostrophe in "I'm" acting as a teardrop in the "Save Me" version.

A cheap nonsensical vehicle£ to post my 'bad grammar, bad grandma' play on words is all.

Although, seriously (a genuine enquiry); I've recently been working in a regional extremity of England (South-West) where the dialect or common use of the language has some subtle differences. One mannerism that prevails amongst the locals is the tendency to end a sentence with a re-affirmation (If you’ve seen any of the Harry Potter movies, Hagrid, the large fellow with the beard plays the part with this accent).

They'll say things like:

"It's a nice day today -- it is."
or
"We were thinking of going down the pub -- we were."
or
"You'll regret that in the morning -- you will."

or one I heard this morning:

That's not right that isn't.

Within my own writing I'm always looking for dialogue traits or manners of speech that might add more character or dimension to the dialogue, but by using proper words (used differently) within mannerisms and ‘turn of phrase’ rather than spelling out the accent phonetically.

So, what is the 'correct' or best way to punctuate this reiteration dialect?

That’s not right that isn’t.

That’s not right— that isn’t.

That’s not right, that isn’t.

That’s not right; that isn’t.

I vote for the em dash.

Kiss

Gacela

368

(15 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Congrats to all winners. Well deserved.

Kiss,

Gacela

369

(10 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Basic)

While I agree with Vern that googling up editors is a good way to find many of them, I think it would be nice to have a section here where we share our experience with particular editors. We can share what a certain editor focuses on, how they work, etc. In that way we can approach editors with whom other fellow TNBW writers have already worked, rather than guessing whether an editor fits our needs or not.

Kiss

Gacela

370

(99 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I have to admit that I'm hopeless parking my car. I fit in the stereotype.

Kiss,

Gacela

371

(28 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

My deepest condolecens. My prayers are with you and your family. Please remember that you've not alone.

Kiss

Gacela

372

(10 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Welcome! I'm sure you will find very helpful authors and wonderful people here.

Kiss,
Gacela

373

(28 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Create space needs the info so they can pay you your royalties, and for tax purposes with the ISR. It's the regular procedure. If you don't prove the info they won't be able to pay your royalties and you'd cash nothing.

Kiss,

Gacela

374

(28 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Stay away from Lulu as if they were infected. I've read they are a huge scam for indie writers.  Create space is where you want to be.

Kiss,

Gacela

375

(23 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

If I recall correctly from one time Sol addressed exactly that same situation in the old site, publishing a poem costs way more than posting a novel's chapter /short story because of the by-design short amount of words in a poem. 

In this world, there are several very well guarded secrets: the Coca-Cola formula, Col. Sanders KFC recipe, and the way in which Sol awards points in TNBW. I don't think you'll ever get to know the calculation process.

Kiss,

Gacela.