I favor the in-line review because of its efficiency. In the old site, in order to point out nits, I had to write them down as I read, then type them in when I posted the review. Time and paper-consuming! Now I can address nits in situ. But not only nits can be highlighted. Clever turns of phrase, humorous lines, vivid descriptions, etc. can also be pointed out efficiently this way. And in my closing comments, I can say anything I would say in a regular review. So in my opinion, it's a no-brainier.

702

(74 replies, posted in Fight Club)

Okay, I was doing my voyeur thing and saw this thread. So I had to opine. Which meant I had to join this group. No biggie. It looks like a place for some spleen venting! smile So you're talking about writers who gladly take your reviews, and are even effervescent in their gratitude, perhaps - and you never see them review your stuff. A one-way street. The new site lets folk get away with this without what might appear at first to be untoward consequences, because there's always the Free site to pillage and mine, but let me tell you, bubs, an author who does that to me will never get another review from me until that author sees the light. And I'm not insisting on a one-for-one. Like CJ, I've reviewed a whole novella of an author on this site. Have I received even one review in response? No. Another author on this site - I reviewed multiple chapters of her lengthy novel and received one I-paid-my-dues review. Hey, we're no longer shooting for the Top Ten novel list anymore; that's not the issue. The more eyes on a posting, the better the chances that all the nits will be exposed. That's what I'm here for - the "free" editing! smile If I'm willing to use my time and experience to help out a fellow author, why can't said author do the same for me? And I'm not talking about those newbies on the Free site, but "established" writers who should know better. You all know who you are.   Jack

703

(2 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Ditto.

704

(1 replies, posted in Cop Shop)

If the town has no PD, the Sheriff's Office would be in charge. Depending on the severity of the crime, e.g., a manhunt is required, the State Police could be called in. If the crime were committed in a national park or forest, I believe the FBI would handle the investigation.

705

(4 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I'm getting the brackets for the word I touch, but touching it again highlights the rest of the sentence, and all I wanted to comment on was that one word. BTW, Sol, there's no "clicking" with an i-Pad. smile

706

(4 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

This topic may have been covered before, but I've found I can't do in-line reviews from my i-Pad. Unable to highlight the text in question. I'm sure there is a simple fix, but I don't know what it is.

707

(3 replies, posted in Cop Shop)

Answer to question #1: 19

Answer to question #2: 1,2,3,4,9,10,11,12,15,16,17,18,19

708

(13 replies, posted in Thriller/Mystery/Suspense)

Hey, JP - Kilmer isn't really a PI in Spartan, and I'm not sure he could be considered a rancher in Bloodworth. But an excellent try! I didn't think any other answer would be even close. But I took the question out of the list because it was misleading and didn't really involve a cop as a MC. At first, I was thinking Harper was a cop, then realized he was a PI. And Hombre wasn't really a NA, only raised as one. Hud was a rancher. Paul Newman, of course, was the answer to that one.

709

(13 replies, posted in Thriller/Mystery/Suspense)

Correct on #4, JP!  Wrong on #1 & #2. sad

710

(13 replies, posted in Thriller/Mystery/Suspense)

Hey, JP - You got two of my toughest ones - #7&8. In order to get credit for #3, you'll have to give me the movies. #6 is correct. #4 isn't. BTW, it's James Gadolfini - but he's not the right answer.  Thanks for trying!

711

(13 replies, posted in Thriller/Mystery/Suspense)

Oops. I made a mistake in #9. It should read, What famous actor played a PI, a rancher, and a Native American in three movies, each of which has a one-word title? Sorry about that. Not really a cop question, so you get double points if you get it.

712

(13 replies, posted in Thriller/Mystery/Suspense)

My apologies. I meant to post the above in the Cop Shop forum.

713

(13 replies, posted in Thriller/Mystery/Suspense)

Since JP started these quizzes, thought I'd weigh in on one that I know all the answers to. smile

1. What soon-to-be A-list actor played a tiny role as a taxi driver in a classic cop movie starring a box-office star famous in real life for his fast rides?
2. Name the two actors who starred as cop partners in a movie with a song title as its title.
3. What famous actor played gangsters in four movies and cops in four others. (He might not be the only one, but if you can come up with other answers, I'll appreciate it!)
4. What actor who played a cop getting into terrible fixes in a series of movies got his start in a TV series (in which he didn't play a cop)?
5. Name the actor who made famous the carrying of his gun in the small of his back in a TV series. Name the character and the series.
6. Who was the movie star who, in a TV series, played the older partner of a young cop whose father, in real life, was an Oscar winner? What was the name of that TV series?
7. The younger cop in #6 appeared again as a cop in a movie infamous for a certain interrogation scene. Name the actor who played his partner.
8.  Who played the Texas Ranger who was captured by an infamous gang, and then got his revenge, in a classic 1967 movie?

10. Who was the real-life cop portrayed in two movies, one of which won an Oscar for Best Picture, by an actor who also starred in the #8 movie?  This cop also appeared in a TV series. For extra credit, name the movies and the TV series.

714

(11 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I don't copy and paste, just highlight and comment on the highlighted area. But I agree the highlighting can be difficult if not impossible, when the section you want highlighted continues on to the next line. So I've had to account for that in my comments, adding more verbiage than I would otherwise have to do.

715

(7 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Good question, Dirk. I wondered the same thing.

716

(17 replies, posted in Thriller/Mystery/Suspense)

janet reid wrote:

Jack, I'd like to know what the minor plot hole was in "Teammates"?!  Wow, and even your editor missed it.  Makes one wonder why you bother with TNBW and editors, huh?  big_smile

When Jim was researching Cathy in Facebook and discovered she was engaged to Tim Howard, he immediately wondered if this Tim was the same Tim who they had left in the car as a baby. But I'd never mentioned to that point that Jim ever learned the baby's first name! So I had to go back and get that in. Yeah, two editors missed that. smile

What e-mail notifications? I've never gotten any since the site changed, and I understood that feature was gone. Has Sol changed his mind?

718

(61 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

And Janet!

719

(61 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Thanks Sol - and Temple!

720

(61 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I think that it should occur to a newbie that in order to get more reviews, reciprocation is a must. This wasn't spelled out in the old site, per se, either, but beyond common courtesy it was logical to do the payback. I made some friends on the site - including you, Aussie - doing that. There will be those who won't even respond to reviews, let alone reciprocate, but who needs those writers, anyway? They've made their prresence, or lack thereof, known. So live and let live, and let the cream (those sincere in their efforts to improve their craft) rise to the top.

721

(11 replies, posted in Old forums)

I agree that the threads in the old forums tended to wander off into personal tangents. My advice to you, JP, is to ask those who have published their books - both self- and traditional, rather than get opinions - freely given - from those who have not gone through the process and don't know, really, whereof they speak. Hey, it's a free country, right? Everyone entitled to their own opinions? But not their own facts.  You'd have to do some research to find the ones to ask, but it shouldn't be much of a strain.

722

(217 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I agree! And who wants to see posts weeks old, anyway? Is this an archives issue? Can't the early posts be deleted after, say, a couple of weeks? Or name the limit. But there should be a limit, in my view.

723

(14 replies, posted in editorials & commentary)

charles_bell wrote:
mswriter wrote:

Hey Charles, I was just stating my opinion.  Part of which was many people who are not really religious are using the euphemism... just because they hear others use it.   I really doubt that anyone was insulted by it.  And if they were, well, that's what opinions sometimes do.  But as far as opinions (and insults) go, I don't think what I said was particularly heinous.  And thanks for your input and feedback.

It is one of my pet peeves on opinion writing but not always over-the-air which may be extemporaneous.

Is that a sentence? What does it mean?

724

(3 replies, posted in Cop Shop)

There was a TV show back in the day dealing with this very subject. It was a Playhouse 90 or one of those. Anyway, a group of poker-playing buddies got bored with the "risk" involved in their high-stakes games and decided to commit the perfect murder. The victim would be a complete stranger, with no connection to any of them. That's all I can remember! But I'd start with that, then hire a hitman anonymously (like Steve McQueen hired the crew in "The Thomas Crown Affair.") Of course, the only motive involved would be just to do a murder and get away with it. If you're talking about a real reason to kill someone, it gets dicier to accomplish, since that motive could eventually lead to you, and your alibi could break down.

Yeah, that happened to me, too. And since I hadn't yet reached the 5-review minimum, I got no points.