Search options (Page 99 of 152)

I think it cuts a little deeper than that.  He's right about the disconnect.  How many people today are reading =Stranger in a Strange Land= or the =Foundation= series, much less =The Demolished Man=?  Or even Le Guin?

And I think part of what he writes links to, and maybe was influenced by, Tolkien's essay =On Fairy Stories=.   (I might not have the title quite right.)  The uncanny may be marvelous and inviting, but it is parlous nevertheless.  Can we read the collections of the Grimm brothers with the same emotional connection that our grandparents had?

In the cover notes for an LP recorded and pressed behind the Iron Curtain, E. Power Biggs wrote of Bach's audiences and first hearers, "privileged beyond their comprehension."

I'll have to read the new posting at least two more times before commenting on it.  I'm a very visual creature and I'll need that to interpret it.

Or Anti-Couple.

On a purely practical level, a discussion which converges on a few possible solutions is more likely to convince Sol & Co to change things that a discussion in which analysis of proposed solutions leads to criticism of each other's motives, approaches, attitudes and alma maters.

(Ducks.)

I agree that a tweak would be good, but it's nice when the point system is there to remind us of our obligations, not to have us scurrying desperately for points.  It's nice when your have communities of people who enjoy the task of reviewing each  others' work--and care enough about the other to do it conscientiously.

The Glaselle/Lifspynth change will close a small plot hole and give me a way to get her involved in things.  I've been looking for a way to start that since ... well, for a while.  Nothing big.

Old enough that I have to do the calculation!  Just a few weeks older than Sputnik 1, a child of the Atomic Age.

Open a question that gets resolved in the next chapter--but leads to the REAL issue.

Yeah, cheap trick, but if the question seems to follow from what happened before and camouflages the real issue well, it's a good trick bought cheap.

Oh, about twenty years ago, my boss at work called me in.  It seemed that some of my ESL colleagues had complained that I used too many big words.  I said, "Am I being accused of erudition?"

Boss said, "I guess so."

Then there was the time that we got word of a new policy about how we were to develop our software.  It was going to force me to be in the lab in the wee hours every day (it got me a lot of unneccessary OT) and I told my colleagues that "This is going to play merry hob with our development schedule."

For the next two weeks, the phrase "play merry hob" got slipped at least once into every conversation we had.  (Pick your emoticon here.)

As far as the number of comments trailing off as you get to the middle of a chapter:  There are several reasons.  One is that the reviewer is simply getting tired.  Another is that the reviewer has played the same tune in many places, and it is of little benefit to the author to keep pounding.  When I cut off for this reason, I say so and offer to come back if the author wants me to continue.

Another reason is that the chapter is really, really good and the reviewer has stopped reading as a reviewer and is reading as a reader.  In rare cases, this happens.  The author should be pleased when it does, although it does mean that nits get missed.

And, finally, there is the reviewer doing a cheap review for points.  I can only suggest that authors bank some points so they don't have to rush to get points to post their chapters.

Another possibility is to count the length of the final comments.  Just 50 words are needed in an out-line review.  Maybe counting 30 words in the final comment as one inline will allow reviewers to meet the minimum with global analysis.