1,526

(1,528 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

Oh, I forgot to mention the time on the voltage stabilization for the head amp.  I've got an idea that might work, and an offshoot to consider.  It depends on using the low-voltage exponential behavior of BJTs balanced against the linear behavior of resistors.

Barsoom

1,528

(1,528 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

Okay, I see I have to get more new stuff out for you!

Just to tell you what's up here: I had my trip to visit my brother and his wife.  I was able to overlap my father's visit, so we got an evening together.  I was able to do several reviews and do a little work on my notes.

My notes have been taking a lot of my writing time.  I have dozens of small notepad notes not trasferred to rolodex-cut cards, and probably over 500 of those cards to file and organize.  Some things, like plot bits, will more or less organize themselves.  Others will be harder.

And I've not been getting that much writing time.  That little electronics project--the regulated 12V charger--has grown tentacles.  The plug is too short to fit the socket extender where it needs to go, so I need a different plug.  The LDO regulator doesn't shut off well enough on low voltage, so I need to put that in, and I decided that for safety I want the cutoff devices to break the hot side rather than the ground.

The interrupting devices are power mosfets.  Unfortunately, the positive-side ones (P-channel) that I have in stock have a very limited gate voltage--8 volts.  (NDP6020).  The max drain-source voltage is a bit low, too, so I may end up finding new ones for future work.  For the present, I can use high-resistance voltage dividers on the input, wasting a few (tens of) microamps for them.

But I need undervoltage detection.  I let myself tinker on paper with a couple of circuit topologies derived from the Schmidt trigger, but I put them aside.  I'll play with them another time.  (Among other things, they require two transistors and seven or eight resistors.  That would be a VERY cramped board.)  So I turned to a pair of similar ICs, one by ON Semi (previously Motorola) and one by Seiko.  The Seiko device operates on a tenth or less the current of the ON Semi device, but the ON Semi device has more complete documentation.

Either way I need a voltage divider, which will waste some current.  The Seiko device would waste less, but I can use the ON Semi documentation to reduce that waste, including an approximation of the device's internal behavior in the circuit theory model of the divider.  That, unfortunately, yields a messy quadratic, but I found, after a few hours of sleep, that I can simplify it greatly.  It's still a pain, but it should only cost me an hour or two to get all the terms into their proper places.

These monitor circuits have the wrong polarity for the need (ground the output when the voltage is too low) so I'll need another transistor to invert the output.  An N-channel low-power mosfet will do.  Ironically, the one I stock is the TN0620.  The output will require another voltage divider to the NDP6020's gate.

Sigh.  Such a simple little thing.  The circuit board will be VERY busy, but it will be a very solid design--up to 20 volts.  I'll also replace the input side tantalum capacitor with a 25 volt job.  (I ordered a variety when I ordered the voltage monitors.)

That stuff will be in in a day or so.  Right now I'll finish the algebra and select the resistor values, and finish up the modified perfboard layout.

Later today I have to take my car to the dealer.  The check-engine light is on.  I fear that a gas station attendent has reuined another charcoal cannister.  If that, I'd let it go except that it will mask other trouble indications.  And, of course, it might be something else.

I have to find out what Best Buy/Geek Squad will charge to swap in a new hard disk on my flaptop, transferring all the content to the new one--if I buy the new disk from them, and if I don't.  (I'd like to go to a 1TB drive, but I'll only buy drives with 5-year manufacturer's warranties, which mostly means WD Black.  BB only offers a 750GB drive, but Newegg has a 1TB WD Black at a very decent price.)

And I will reduce the backlog of notes.  (I produced about seven more last night.)

And that is why Paddy has been away from work.

You've been reading PDQ's Missa Hilarious, discovered by Schickle in the archives of the Vatican, along with other documents related to PDQ's excommunication?

Highbrow

MrsPiddles wrote:

...I am following this thread with joy in my heart and a bowl of popcorn!

I feel the rapier of well-earned humiliation!

Does she wear the Pantheist's boots?  If so, perhaps I should rest my case?

The Man Who wasThursday wrote:

... the Professor, finding that the learned and mysterious method left him rather at the mercy of an enemy slightly deficient in scruples, fell back upon a more popular form of wit. 'I see,' he sneered, 'you prevail like the false pig in Aesop.' 'And you fail,' I answered, smiling, 'like the hedgehog in Montaigne.' Need I say that there is no hedgehog in Montaigne? 'Your claptrap comes off,' he said; 'so would your beard.' I had no intelligent answer to this, which was quite true and rather witty. But I laughed heartily, answered, 'Like the Pantheist's boots,' at random, and turned on my heel with all the honours of victory. The real Professor was thrown out, but not with violence, though one man tried very patiently to pull off his nose.

Coal train.

corra wrote:
njc wrote:

I did share a particular opinion: That part of the masculine/feminine divide is a difference in how men and women manage their personal boundaries.  You dismissed it, without counter-argument, without exploration, without asking what in thunder I meant by it.

You assume I dismissed it. I countered. Clearly.

I would say rather that you deflected it, by addressing the words taken in a different context, rather than by addressing the point intended.

Is deflecting a point dismissing that point?  Since the deflection refuses to address the substance of the point, to the degree that it does not acknowledge that substance even far enough to simply deny it, I assert that deflecting the point is (one way of) dismissing it.

I did share a particular opinion: That part of the masculine/feminine divide is a difference in how men and women manage their personal boundaries.  You dismissed it, without counter-argument, without exploration, without asking what in thunder I meant by it.

- Sincerely, SHE. (The better pronoun)

Which you selfishly keep to yourselves, while we males are forced to share smile

I'm Doing A Bad Thing, replying to an author instead of to the comment--because I'm replying to two successive comments.

corra wrote:
njc wrote:

Try this: women have a far greater need than men to control AND adjust AND manage their boundaries than men have.

I have to agree with this. History is filled with gentlemen shaking hands over border disputes and tipping their top hats.

My posting was a serious and polemic comment, cutting (I think) to a deep masculine/feminine divide.  Your response dismisses it with mild humor.  The humor isn't the big point: the dismissal is.

I have no problem with that.  If you don't think the point is worth discussion, I'm fine with that.

corra wrote:
Mariana Reuter wrote:

"He" been used as the generic pronoun for ages. It's a kinda common place.

SO IS THE COMMON COLD?

This response takes another author's evaluation, and masks a polemic response under what might be mild humor or might be sarcasm.

So now, with the discussion framed in your terms, it's as serious as an illness?

A refusal to meet and discuss at a common point is one of the essences of polarization.

I'm reminded of a Chesterton story--I think The Man with Two Beards--in which a character is convinced she can see spirit manifestations.  Her family dismisses her beliefs, but she is drawn to Father Brown, who also disagrees with her, but (paraphrasing) disagrees as though her ideas do matter, instead of disagreeing as though they don't matter.

I hope that this has been polite.  If you feel it is bitter, perhaps it is.  I think it is a matter that will sooner or later elicit bitterness, and I prefer it to be sooner, and more respectful.

I close with a quote from Trudeau's Zonker Harris, at the opening of one of his Tanning Competitions: We who are about to fry salute you!

You're lumping me in with Aristotle?  Now I know I don't merit that!

I don't recall that part, though, and I'm split on it.  Since humor about others means that one is judging them, or at least evaluating them, one can argue for the sense of superiority.  But does it mean a permanent sense of superiority, or just a moment of privilege for being able to apply that judgement?  And what happens when one laughs at oneself?  Really laughs, as in "If you want to make God laugh, tell Him your plans?"

And how does that relate to puns?  When one winces at a pun, what does one feel superior to--or inferior to?

Incorrigible Punster.  Do Not Incorrige.

Ogden Nash wrote:

There is not much about the hamster
To stimulate the epigramster.
The essence of his simple story: he populates the laboratory
Leaving his offspring in the lurch,
Martyrs to medical research.   But if he were as smart as people am
New York would be New Hamsterdam.

Does Nash celebrate our superiority to the hamster?  Or is there something deeper and more subtle at work?

Monty Python's typical humor involves the kind of stupidity that would cause its subject the sort of humiliation that leads the victim to search for the nearest beaker of cyanide.  Where bureaucrats meet the public I sympathize, but in general I'd rather expose children to bloody violence than to Python.  Once can only survive Python by a sense of superiority that requires total disconnection from the fate of others.

1,540

(1,217 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

I'd make it two.  You have his internal thoughts.  Then you have an action and Apollo's reaction.  I'd group the latter two together.

The same thing can happpen with character points.  The best thing is to make the point in question serve some immediate purpose, whether description or character.  Or humor: John Dickson Carr wrote two farces about murder, one with Dr. Gideon Fell--=The Blind Barber=-- and one with Sir Henry Merrivale--=The Punch and Judy Murders=.  (I had to look it up just now.)  A  lot of the HM stories have elements of farce, but this one runs from end to end.

They're both great stories.

1,542

(6 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Thanks, Sol.

Try this: women have a far greater need than men to control AND adjust AND manage their boundaries than men have. (That noise you hear in the background is the Feminist Outrage and Vendetta Engine firing up.)

It's like one of those things you know you want to get around to fixing one of these days ...

Annoying, perhaps, but grammatical.  Heck, males could be annoyed that they have to share their pronoun!  And why are women always taking mens' names?  'Beverly' used to be a masculine name, not all that long ago.

Point is, these femto-grievances cut both ways.

"You have left 1 in-line comments" .  The plural is suitable for zero and two and three, and all the rest--except one.

Yeah, HTML doesn't make this easy.  I don't recall enough now to see whether there's a slick little way with Javascript, or whether it becomes a SMOP (Small Matter of Programming) (synonym: BMJ--Big Messy Job).  Maybe playing some particularly backhanded CSS games?  (I feel dirty already.)

1,547

(1,528 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

To my reviewees--I owe you right now, but I need sleep before my trip.  I'll try to get a few done while I'm away.

Orphans?

Norm d'Plume wrote:

The AI is damaged. Assuming it's giving correct answers to the three numbers (a HUGE if), that would include automatic emergency procedures, assuming it can initiate them. Exploring those details would detract from the real purpose of the scene.

So use that for tension and uncertainty.

1,550

(1,528 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

Can it spell?