Does she wear the Pantheist's boots? If so, perhaps I should rest my case?
1,526 2016-07-26 03:00:48
Re: A minor interface glitch ... how many even noticed? (25 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
1,527 2016-07-26 02:09:34
Re: A minor interface glitch ... how many even noticed? (25 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
... the Professor, finding that the learned and mysterious method left him rather at the mercy of an enemy slightly deficient in scruples, fell back upon a more popular form of wit. 'I see,' he sneered, 'you prevail like the false pig in Aesop.' 'And you fail,' I answered, smiling, 'like the hedgehog in Montaigne.' Need I say that there is no hedgehog in Montaigne? 'Your claptrap comes off,' he said; 'so would your beard.' I had no intelligent answer to this, which was quite true and rather witty. But I laughed heartily, answered, 'Like the Pantheist's boots,' at random, and turned on my heel with all the honours of victory. The real Professor was thrown out, but not with violence, though one man tried very patiently to pull off his nose.
1,528 2016-07-26 01:56:55
Re: Say the first word that comes to mind... (1,634 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
Coal train.
1,529 2016-07-25 20:14:22
Re: A minor interface glitch ... how many even noticed? (25 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
njc wrote:I did share a particular opinion: That part of the masculine/feminine divide is a difference in how men and women manage their personal boundaries. You dismissed it, without counter-argument, without exploration, without asking what in thunder I meant by it.
You assume I dismissed it. I countered. Clearly.
I would say rather that you deflected it, by addressing the words taken in a different context, rather than by addressing the point intended.
Is deflecting a point dismissing that point? Since the deflection refuses to address the substance of the point, to the degree that it does not acknowledge that substance even far enough to simply deny it, I assert that deflecting the point is (one way of) dismissing it.
1,530 2016-07-25 19:54:19
Re: A minor interface glitch ... how many even noticed? (25 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
I did share a particular opinion: That part of the masculine/feminine divide is a difference in how men and women manage their personal boundaries. You dismissed it, without counter-argument, without exploration, without asking what in thunder I meant by it.
- Sincerely, SHE. (The better pronoun)
Which you selfishly keep to yourselves, while we males are forced to share ![]()
1,531 2016-07-25 18:44:33
Re: A minor interface glitch ... how many even noticed? (25 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
I'm Doing A Bad Thing, replying to an author instead of to the comment--because I'm replying to two successive comments.
njc wrote:Try this: women have a far greater need than men to control AND adjust AND manage their boundaries than men have.
I have to agree with this. History is filled with gentlemen shaking hands over border disputes and tipping their top hats.
My posting was a serious and polemic comment, cutting (I think) to a deep masculine/feminine divide. Your response dismisses it with mild humor. The humor isn't the big point: the dismissal is.
I have no problem with that. If you don't think the point is worth discussion, I'm fine with that.
Mariana Reuter wrote:"He" been used as the generic pronoun for ages. It's a kinda common place.
SO IS THE COMMON COLD?
This response takes another author's evaluation, and masks a polemic response under what might be mild humor or might be sarcasm.
So now, with the discussion framed in your terms, it's as serious as an illness?
A refusal to meet and discuss at a common point is one of the essences of polarization.
I'm reminded of a Chesterton story--I think The Man with Two Beards--in which a character is convinced she can see spirit manifestations. Her family dismisses her beliefs, but she is drawn to Father Brown, who also disagrees with her, but (paraphrasing) disagrees as though her ideas do matter, instead of disagreeing as though they don't matter.
I hope that this has been polite. If you feel it is bitter, perhaps it is. I think it is a matter that will sooner or later elicit bitterness, and I prefer it to be sooner, and more respectful.
I close with a quote from Trudeau's Zonker Harris, at the opening of one of his Tanning Competitions: We who are about to fry salute you!
1,532 2016-07-25 06:21:59
Re: A Different Kind of Feedback (16 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
You're lumping me in with Aristotle? Now I know I don't merit that!
I don't recall that part, though, and I'm split on it. Since humor about others means that one is judging them, or at least evaluating them, one can argue for the sense of superiority. But does it mean a permanent sense of superiority, or just a moment of privilege for being able to apply that judgement? And what happens when one laughs at oneself? Really laughs, as in "If you want to make God laugh, tell Him your plans?"
And how does that relate to puns? When one winces at a pun, what does one feel superior to--or inferior to?
Incorrigible Punster. Do Not Incorrige.
There is not much about the hamster
To stimulate the epigramster.
The essence of his simple story: he populates the laboratory
Leaving his offspring in the lurch,
Martyrs to medical research. But if he were as smart as people am
New York would be New Hamsterdam.
Does Nash celebrate our superiority to the hamster? Or is there something deeper and more subtle at work?
1,533 2016-07-25 05:05:07
Re: A Different Kind of Feedback (16 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
Monty Python's typical humor involves the kind of stupidity that would cause its subject the sort of humiliation that leads the victim to search for the nearest beaker of cyanide. Where bureaucrats meet the public I sympathize, but in general I'd rather expose children to bloody violence than to Python. Once can only survive Python by a sense of superiority that requires total disconnection from the fate of others.
1,534 2016-07-25 04:59:05
Re: The Galaxy Tales - Dirk B. (1,217 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)
I'd make it two. You have his internal thoughts. Then you have an action and Apollo's reaction. I'd group the latter two together.
1,535 2016-07-24 22:51:21
Re: A Different Kind of Feedback (16 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
The same thing can happpen with character points. The best thing is to make the point in question serve some immediate purpose, whether description or character. Or humor: John Dickson Carr wrote two farces about murder, one with Dr. Gideon Fell--=The Blind Barber=-- and one with Sir Henry Merrivale--=The Punch and Judy Murders=. (I had to look it up just now.) A lot of the HM stories have elements of farce, but this one runs from end to end.
They're both great stories.
1,536 2016-07-23 22:45:57
Re: Certificate Issue (6 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
Thanks, Sol.
1,537 2016-07-23 22:44:57
Re: A minor interface glitch ... how many even noticed? (25 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
Try this: women have a far greater need than men to control AND adjust AND manage their boundaries than men have. (That noise you hear in the background is the Feminist Outrage and Vendetta Engine firing up.)
1,538 2016-07-21 20:30:19
Re: A minor interface glitch ... how many even noticed? (25 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
It's like one of those things you know you want to get around to fixing one of these days ...
1,539 2016-07-21 20:07:48
Re: A minor interface glitch ... how many even noticed? (25 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
Annoying, perhaps, but grammatical. Heck, males could be annoyed that they have to share their pronoun! And why are women always taking mens' names? 'Beverly' used to be a masculine name, not all that long ago.
Point is, these femto-grievances cut both ways.
1,540 2016-07-21 18:36:08
Topic: A minor interface glitch ... how many even noticed? (25 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
"You have left 1 in-line comments" . The plural is suitable for zero and two and three, and all the rest--except one.
Yeah, HTML doesn't make this easy. I don't recall enough now to see whether there's a slick little way with Javascript, or whether it becomes a SMOP (Small Matter of Programming) (synonym: BMJ--Big Messy Job). Maybe playing some particularly backhanded CSS games? (I feel dirty already.)
1,541 2016-07-18 21:48:02
Re: The Sorcerer's Progress (1,528 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)
To my reviewees--I owe you right now, but I need sleep before my trip. I'll try to get a few done while I'm away.
1,542 2016-07-18 14:13:02
Re: Quiz: Character Traits (6 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)
1,543 2016-07-17 19:57:24
Re: Acts/ Dictates/ Mandates/ Mantle - Amy's Thread (1,905 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)
The AI is damaged. Assuming it's giving correct answers to the three numbers (a HUGE if), that would include automatic emergency procedures, assuming it can initiate them. Exploring those details would detract from the real purpose of the scene.
So use that for tension and uncertainty.
1,544 2016-07-17 19:53:35
Re: The Sorcerer's Progress (1,528 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)
Can it spell?
1,545 2016-07-17 19:52:14
Re: The Galaxy Tales - Dirk B. (1,217 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)
Is the noun, standing where it does, doing the job of a proper noun?
1,546 2016-07-17 18:16:16
Re: The Sorcerer's Progress (1,528 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)
Some years ago, one of the beer brewing megacompanies ran a series of ads based on 'exceptional' people, including the folks who wipe up sweat in NBA games. One of their targets was the guy who was going to invent a "battery-powered battery charger." Of course, I already had such a device in my pocket, a reserve battery pack for charging my cellphone.
This little box's disadvantages are that it charges slowly and that it requires a regulated 12V DC to charge.
That makes charging it in the car a problem. The car has 12V, but it's 'somewhere between 10.8v and 14.8v'. A regulated voltage is generally regulated to either 10% or sometimes to 5%.
Worse, the available voltage swings from below the desired target to above, requiring a more complex regulator circuit. If I had a lot of time, I might look at a switching supply with a flyback design.
But I don't have lots of time. I've had this project in back of the back burner for a long time, and I want it for my trip on Tuesday. So I went with another option. When the car is running, the available voltage should run from 13.2 to 13.8 volts. That's enough to use an LDO regulator.
What's an LDO regulator?
Hmm. Well, to start, one of the widely available and cheap integrated circuits is the three-terminal regulator. It comes in variants with more than three terminals (pdf) and in variants whose output voltage can be adjusted. But in the most basic form, it's simplicity itself. You buy one for the voltage you need (you DO need a bog-standard voltage, don't you?) and the polarity (only two: positive and negative). You hook up the 'common' terminal to your 'ground' and the 'input' to your input, and the regulated voltage appears on the output ... except it's never THAT simple.
These devices need low-esr capacitors on input, output, or both in order to work properly, and that usually means tantalum capacitors. Okay, not hard. And they are designed for limited currents. Fine, I only need half an amp. One-amp regulators are widely available.
But ... the bog-standard three-terminal regulator requires an input at least two volts above the output. I can guarantee only a bit over one. Oops.
Fortunately, there are 'low dropout' (LDO) regulators available. They're just a bit harder to find. Not much harder, but you won't find them at Radio Snack. Fine. I ordered one a while back, and when I couldn't find it I ordered a bunch more, and paid for second-day shipping. Mouser promises that if the order makes it through the warehouse by 20:00 Central, they'll ship that day. I put the order in at about 15:30 Central Time.
The order didn't reach the warehouse in time. At about 03:00 (yes, AM!) I got an email from Mouser saying that they were sorry it was delayed, and they were shipping overnight at their expense. They took a loss on this for a small customer--kudos to them.
Of course, that was about an hour after I found the one I had misfiled. But it never hurts to find spares.
Refer to the PDF above. It's a very nice device for automotive use, including protection against voltage spike that can occur when a load drops off the system, and against voltage inversions. That also protects the output capacitor, but not the input capacitor. I put protection on using the power mosfet trick, which will drop about another 1/10 of a volt with the device in question (see the Saturation Characteristics graph).
What it won't do is protect the input capacitor from overvoltage. I mislaid my small stock of tantalum caps and decided to settle on Radio Snack parts. (Made by LTE, the Budweiser of electronic parts.) And they only have 16v tantalums. I would have chosen 20v, at least. (From 20v to 25v, in 1uf, 10uf, and 100uf, Mouser lists 802 products, most of them stocked, from 37 cents to nine dollars. That's just radial, leaded, not counting axial and surface-mount.)
But 16v will do.
I wired the parts together, along with a couple of LEDs (one on each side of the box--did I mention that I drilled the box, cut a circuit board, epoxied the wired-up LEDs in place ...) that will be daylight-visible on about 4/3 of a milliamp. (At night, the human eye gets a speckle fringe around them.) I had the output-side connector made up on a length of wire. (Did I mention the strain-reliefs that I drilled the holes for?) I had the input-side 'cigarette-lighter' plug with its cut-to-length wire.
I tinned the wire ends.
Then I buzzed the wires and connectors out to make sure that what was connected should be, and what wasn't shouldn't.
And I got a short circuit in the plug. Only when I reversed the meter, I didn't. (Tip: Many meters reverse their polarities on continuity and resistance tests so that you don't get stray currents through semiconductor junctions. It doesn't work as well with the wider range of semiconductor devices available today, and can fail abysmally around junction FETs, whose gate electrodes turn into very delicate diodes when their polarity is reversed.)
So either something was Very Strange or the plug contained some semiconductors. Since I got the connections I should, it seemed very unlikely the plug had a complex device like a regulator. (If you've gotten this far, Amy, you may be thinking Differential Diagnosis.) But a diode to dump current on reversed input?
I carefully took the plug apart. Turns out it was held together by its spec sticker! Well, there is indeed a diode (hidden inside opaque heat-shrink tubing), which will blow the fuse in the plug if the reverse voltage lasts long or is very high. Which makes the polarity protection that I put on superfluous, though better behaved.
I decided to leave the diode--maybe a poor idea--and put a legend on the plug with a paint marker. Now that it's dried (and the epoxy smell has finally dissipated from my apartment) I'll clamp the plug shell halves together with some transparent heat-shrink, and finish assembling the box.
Then I have to test it. Ideally, I would use a very wide range voltage supply and a variable-current load. I have the variable supplies, but one of these days I'll have to build the load device. (The main problem is handling heat dissipation. Mosfets would be ideal for the semiconductor part, but they are prone to thermal runaway. Ideally you arrange things so most of the power is dissipated in resistors rather than in the semiconductors. More things to think about!)
AND I have to get another little demo device fixed (a battery short blew out at least one part, and I plan to replace them all). And get laundry done tomorrow. And adjust my sleep schedule for an early-morning drive to Raleigh.
And I have about eight things to review, courtesy of Oliver Suddin. ![]()
Now pet the shaggy dog and get back to work!
1,547 2016-07-17 16:59:42
Re: Acts/ Dictates/ Mandates/ Mantle - Amy's Thread (1,905 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)
I used a seatback to slow the air loss enough to set the three numbers above to 6, 9, and 11 minutes, although I pulled those three figures out of my hat. Since there is potentially significant loss of air until they slow the leak, the first number (time to unconsciousness) can be as short as I want (e.g., 2 minutes), leaving plenty of time for the other two variables.
It's a good thing your people don't have duct tape. Eight to ten layers of duct tape could reduce the leak rate ten-thousand fold. Even a paper sticker might help.
Have you considered that the environmental systems may have an emergency mode? By carrying far more oxygen than nitrogen, and allowing the partial pressure of nitrogen to drop until it's about equal to the partial pressure of oxygen, you can slow the loss of nitrogen by about two thirds. (Fire becomes a greater danger.)
1,548 2016-07-17 01:28:24
Re: Acts/ Dictates/ Mandates/ Mantle - Amy's Thread (1,905 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)
If
I
Recall
Correctly
1,549 2016-07-16 17:56:17
Re: Acts/ Dictates/ Mandates/ Mantle - Amy's Thread (1,905 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)
Amy will have the exact numbers, but the survival time is figured IIRC at three to six minutes. After three, the chance of permanent damage increases.
1,550 2016-07-15 22:29:56
Re: Question for the community: Male writers writing F/F books (31 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
"How did we get here?" is not the same as "Kill The Navigator!"
Or is it?