Search options (Page 43 of 47)

If we must ram it into the 7 plots, I would suggest Tragedy because of the way Powell's plan --er -- blows up

But their opponents aren't playing by the same rules. I mean instead of fighting man-to-man, the opponent uses his ship as a battering ram. What's the value in fighting fair when the other side fights dirty?

Apparently I reviewed v5 and cherry picked Amy's review of v4

The AIs of VQ are super smart -- I've given them no limitations in that department. However this is merely booksmarts - I didn't give them dominance in every intelligence. For example:
-AIs will beat humans in math accuracy, computations per second, marksmanship, exposure to vacuum, etc
-humans will beat AIs at complex physical tasks (such as swimming the breast stroke. If you let the AI churn water in any fashion like a motor boat, it will win - but not if it has to make a humanlike motion), musical performance (AIs will win if they're allowed to synthesize the music, or if the music is a fixed piece such as Beethoven. When it comes to improv or making new music, humans win), and rapidly dealing with new environmental conditions (such as a volcanic eruption)

I was able to limit my AIs by power - something you might not have the luxury of doing in the 41st century. Basically, the smallest fusion core won't fit in an AI's chest, so they are battery-driven. They're also weak to EMP blasts, and I had their mental cortex made of a rare substance which means they can't replicate to infinity. Basically, I've trapped them into cities and dependent on the same electrical grid as people.

I went with laws against armed AIs because they turned into an army of indiscerning killers X-hundred years ago.

I decided to set my unemployment rate for humans at 90% which means that humans are regularly performing tasks a machine can do better just to scrape out a living. This keeps humans poor and relatively angry at machines, and therefore supportive of administrations that want to keep the machines unarmed.

I've got about 10 chapters of Laurie's tale set aside to explore this dynamic. That's a quarter of her book dedicated just to the machine-human relationship (during which she's pretending to be a pleasure-droid to uncover clues and gets exposed to human's nasty side). I mention this fact so you can see how quickly complex AI-human relations can dominate a story.

If he's that good a cadet, it doesn't matter... he'll be allowed into the funeral. Luke Skywalker snuck into all sorts of high profile situations and no one ever stopped him to ask if he had an invite.

not mentioned is the narration style.

In 3rd omniscient, go ahead... fire away!

But in 3rd limited, it's a little intrusive. Other than resorting to that moment the character looks in a mirror, directly narrating their looks is a step away from the narrator's "home" position. Should be used sparingly.

Compare to a first person limited: "I walked through the front door and my partner looked into my beautiful brown eyes and said, 'hi'". This is weird in a limited POV. THe temptation in 3rd limited is to go ahead and do this because it's easy - no pronoun change. Yet, it's just as much of a shift in gears to omniscient.

I mention all this because ITMG tends to lean to limited. It might be pertinent to your question

Why oh why??

I whole hearetedly agree.
At least one character should find 1000 ways to die (Marsha)
Some characters should cheat death and get the reader's hopes up only to die anyway. Preferably at some inconvenient time for the remainder of the cast
Some characters (Inga) need to find a fate worse than death
Some characters (K-j-) need to be so amazing even Amy and Black John can worship him

Why not both? I have contacts, wrist devices, glasses, hair dongles, tiaras, shoes, ocular implants, and I'm sure I'll have five or six more by the end of this draft. Or are you saying that there's going to be a massive technological convergence in the future?

How's about "watch". Of the category of watch could be watches by different companies such as the Swatch, the Galaxiwatch and the Pepsi-watch. It sounds like you're trying to name all the devices under one trademark, which would be uncommon for a free trade society (you wouldn't want a communications monopoly - that could get ugly).

Ok, then you should nix the contacts. A simpler backdrop allows you a more complex foreground of the descent into possible madness. Take a page out of Janet's book: sometimes a windmill really is just a random here-to-fore unimportant windmill. This puts the spotlight on the characters rather than the tech

Speaking of nixing tech, did Voyager ever have any holodecks?

Hmm this is a legitimate problem. Even numbing the eye, the vibration would still cause vision fluctuation. I also bet you'd get a lot of retinal detachment cases because that pesky thing can come loose for much less provocation.

option a) audio comes from the nearest loudspeaker == audio party line

(Note: This is what I currently use. When Laurie is in the taxi, she has full audio (via the taxi's speakers). The moment she leaves the taxi, she's down to video with subtitles and/or texting. She could speak after that, but everyone around would hear her side of the conversation.)

option b) contacts paired with ear buds

option c) go old school and have flickering Star Wars style holograms. Have people connect via protocol droids instead of hald-held technology (btw why oh why do Star Wars droids need to speak to each other? Don't they come equipeed with Wifi?)

You omitted some variables:

a)  The AI may have given inaccurate numbers due to conditions that weren't present at the time of statement. By the time the AI tried to correct the estimate, Apollo was unconscious. For example, Jack (DoughBoy Red Shirt #15) may have secreted a small can of air into the room. Or the ship was struck by a chunk of debris that caused the size of the hole to change (hopefully smaller!)

b)  The AI may be loopy like some of the other AIs

c)  Stop frying your head. It is not a Chicken McNugget

Congratulations. Writing "the end" is a great feeling. Here's to many more.

These trips... they're voluntary?