your ship needs a minimum of 26 minutes to slow down (assuming they have 1970's era propulsion) you only allowed them 9.
Normally I love time limits, but in this case it's a drawback,,, I recommend drop the 9 minute part and just leave us guessing
your ship needs a minimum of 26 minutes to slow down (assuming they have 1970's era propulsion) you only allowed them 9.
Normally I love time limits, but in this case it's a drawback,,, I recommend drop the 9 minute part and just leave us guessing
I have a monitor with bad caps. Every time it flickers I think about pulling an njc and soldering replacements in
would a corpse actually disintegrate in outer space? On Earth, bacteria and stuff like that slowly eat a corpse.
In 3001: A Space Odyssey , they bring back Frank who was drifting dead in deep space after HAL cut his lifeline. Aside from the poor execution of the story (read, flying dinos), it seems plausible
A Star Trek type shuttle would act to plug the leak with some filler material stored in microscopic bladders in a layer on the inside of the hull, which is no fun, so let's assume you don't have that.
Let's also assume your characters don't have a hardening foam gun (the ejected foam would find the leak wherever it is - one need not know that part).
I mention these two facts because the lack of spacesuits implies there are so many failsafes that the spacesuit is statistically useless. Much like the absence of seatbelts in Star Trek style ships implies they never need to brake fast enough to kill passengers.
If you want realism, the enemy shot should contain an active agent to increase the size of the leak. (I know it's an enemy shot due to the source material - I also think it was handled well enough that we can accept the outcome).
Into the woods,
It's time to go,
I hate to leave,
I have to go.
Into the woods-
It's time, and so
I must begin my journey.
Leaving on a jet plane
Don't know if I'll be back again
--oops wrong song

Dear England: Do better
I believe the decision will strengthen the union... UK skuttles too many necessary measures. If they can just get out for a bit and let Germany and France sort things in there, the world will be a much better place
@Janet: Nay... you're still ahead of me in reviews. I've just been buried with work (boo! hiss!) and can't read as much as I'd like
quite a bit of that needs google translate
If the computer detects a massive object ahead of you
This detection... I presume it uses scanners that are faster-than-faster-than light?
force the traveler to circumnavigate massive objects
Turning...
it's a problem that comes up in [K a j o]s story when they learn that Taylor can "turn" and travel curved trajectories in hyperspace. Travel through space -- applying force to create velocity -- it's a concept we might have to leave behind.
I mean... what mass driver can you put on your back that might possibly spew matter away fast enough to propel you forward at that rate?
By simple kinematics, and ignoring gravitation, we might suggest a 1kg object that wishes to travel 15m/s forward must eject 0.5kg of matter backwards at 30m/s.
(This is a dreadful oversimplification since I don't account for a, t, and elasticity)
(Imagine how much more effort it would take for a ship to do this)
(Somehow this long rambling speech boils down to me agrees with your starlanes. Then a stardrive is more of a "raft" that keeps the ship's particile energized enough for it to stay in the starlanes where all distances are shorter)
If you are propagating faster than light (notice I used propagate rather than travel) you would likely translate through smaller objects without interacting with them. By its nature, FTL travel -- competing with the planck distance -- means a small system body cannot bring enough gravitation to bear on you to even cause a ripple in your path of travel (Notice, I've avoided saying momentum).
Neutrinos are much slower than your ships, and if I understand correctly, many of them can sneak through the Earth (I believe this feat is due to their mass, not their velocity) but the average comet vs your ships is not going to be able to compete
*Edited for spelling since my keyboard hates me
Agreed. A distraction.
So what is the age of the person writing on this thread? Hmmm. Maybe three...
If you keep picking on Norm, there will be another Dr Ess
Edit: With some exceptions. Inga is a 7-yr-old but she narrates like 18 (at least, that's the goal)
I write within the age of my narrator, so I can see how the age thing could be misconstrued
Yes, I discussed this at length. The answer I received was basically "hide everything" and that the default would remain "open to public"
Therefore I deleted the thread in question, along with anything else identifying, changed my pen name, changed all my titles, deleted all my forum posts, obfuscated my profile (which cannot be hidden despite the claim that it can), waited about 10 weeks and I see to be mostly free from searches.
I got one foot in the grave
Depends on what the story is about. With a name like Galaxy Tales, and sufficicient prep work, you could get into a Caligula POV here.
Chapter House (book 6) best book I've ever read
I plan to write alternate endings and let people pick.
I pick the one where they're celebrating at the end and then a Mar shows up unexpectedly and eats everyone.
I hate killing my favorite characters
When you read 2-3 Acorna books or anything containing the name "Ender" you come to understand this problem troubles the big names of fiction.
Per K. Don't clarify. =simplify=. You've got a lot of mobile targets. Keep killing them like Game of Thrones until we're at the edge of our seats swearing at you that if you kill another we'll hate you as we buy the next book
Which sets me to wondering... if the next book is going to have the gang together... you're not going to have time to treat all 20+ characters. (Not unless you write a Robert Jordan-style phone book). I presume some of them must be flattened into bystanders. This would seem to imply they need their moment of closure now / here. I'm referring to threads like Tazar-Solace. You could get away with punting Malpiece-Jaylene's closure into another story since one hasn't heavily affected the other. I assume Petra and L are now permanently out of the loop so there's a few less loose ends to tie up.
Just looking at the story mechanics, the story kind of flirts with us that the jar has some effect on Jaylene (whether, for example, she is unable to destroy it at the end and Tazar is the one least affected, and throws it... or whether it's more insidious - a darkening of her spirit that can never be lifted).
Taking a step further back... is the story really about destroying the horror?Or is it about why Jaylene came back and why whatever is commending all the horrors wants to thwart that? Perhaps this question is best left to the greater story. I don't know.
Billy Joel: "Always the good die young"
(instrumental)
(Clarinet enacts the screams of man-eating apes)
Try to sneak in a few civilian deaths and one or more kittens