Search options (Page 27 of 47)

I read supernova as just a moniker, but I can see where the confusion lies. I suppose it's like star destroyers don't actually have the capability of destroying stars.

bzzt!

This statement is quietly powerful

New profile image made me think of Babylon5

mmk. my thoughts on your thoughts on my thoughts

1. Ok, no problem - as long as you're aware you've made the Skills commonplace and ubiquitous enough to be taken for granted, you grasp the fundamental difficulty in making the story more otherworldly.
2. A "not" is simple and powerful expression ("John was the guy who'd never learned to dance"), but pile 3 into one paragraph...

At some point it becomes clear that the writer is visualizing a lot of action and has either overlooked that the reader can't or is being deliberately cagey.

A more realistic/relevant example: "John didn't believe in the war" in a book set in 1980 probably means Vietnam and works because the modern reader knows what to compare against. In a fantasy novel, this becomes a footnote that the reader is expecting will join up later (big war? Small war? Recurring war? Relevant war? What was the cost? Recent?).
Better: "John lost his wife in the war eighteen years ago" (War occurred once, is not still occurring, and is distant past - here's how it affects John now, and we can expect John to react certain ways because of it).

This is really a snippet of a broader discussion related to the old "Bob saw something" structure. I'm not suggesting don't use them - but rather think about what questions each one raises.

5 Myths Hollywood taught us about the middle ages
https://mic.com/articles/64339/5-bigges … .EDx67SGot

Akachi might be compelling. Your unfortunate job is to sift through his soul and find why. Then help us see it.

Also if Bex won't be back, consider stealing his name from him and just make him "under-thug" or "collector". Otherwise people like me will award him entries in our spreadsheets.

Ya know... after that response I went back and name-counted the Battle of Endor. I expected to get about 30. I lost count at 50. And most of those were new. Makes your 16 look puny!

But the battle is great because you can see the zones so clearly. You have a rebel battle zone (Containing Ackbar - I luv that guy). Imperial Zone, then deep Rebel Zone (contains Leia) and Deep Imperial Zone (Contains Sidious)

So in order from friendly to hostile

1. Deep Rebel (White Queen)
2. Rebel (White Bishop)
3. Imperial (Black knight)
4. Deep Imperial (Black Queen)

Think about how few pieces are allowed to move from one zone to the other. It's quite beautiful when you think of it.

Where exactly is un-deployed "XWing#15"? Who cares - it's probably somewhere in zone 2. Lando is shooting down tie fighters? He must be in Zone 3. No need for complex "up / down / port / starboard" - your activity defines your location.*

Now, Lucas (Or the smart people he paid to make him look smart) really have 8 zones, including Death-Star-near and Death-Star-Inner etc... but you could get that effect with just one "point of significance" such that good guys are happy (safer) to approach it and bad guys would rather stay away. I recommend 3 zones for texture.

* picture these snippets:

(No Need to mention she's far from combatants - it's taken care of. Compared to a free-for-all, where any safe harbour must be described carefully)

(Establishing he's not in main fleet puts him in Zone 3, need in enemy territory)

Awesome sauce!

PS: Yes, I need to take my own advice in Lorraine's recent battle, but that's what 1st drafts are for

Ooh, I don't have a rule. Depends on how much room there is a propos the other shenanigans

First thing I usually target is the environment.

Is there a second sun? > How does this affect time recording > ow does it affect sleep patterns?

or

Does the planet orbit within an asteroid belt? If so, meteor showers might be spectacular and frequent. They might even have a name ("oh here comes another dusting!"). If society is not sufficiently advanced, they may think the storms have deific origins.

Basically I adjust the environment in some significant way then work backwards to find out how the characters have adapted to it.

I've had a chance to peek at chainsaw. Holy points, Batman! Aside from that, you seem comfortable in the style, which is very different style from the Warden story I remember. Impressive range.

Only read the first scene in detail, so I can't justly leave a review.

re the NIT I have reached the insight I was seeking

**************** SPOILER SPACE **********************

I've been comparing the MC to my "evilest good guy". [J e n n a] kills her sister along with her enemies in an elevator. Reviewers were upset, of course. J3nn does it by accident because she hates her enemies. Nit does her evil also by accident because she hates her enemies. The parallels are difficult to ignore.

Where the two characters break pattern is in foreshadowing. It's established in chapter 1 that J3nn has taken lives, and she's consistently evil by nicking things, lying, back-stabbing. That element is not present in the Nit (Her beating up computer mice & answering machines doesn't count - it makes her an angry person but not a murderer).

I shall compare it to Ned Stark. Let's put his approval rating at 80% as-is. If Stark gets angry at something and punches a window or similar inanimate object, his approval rating would probably drop to 79% (This is the equivalent of the mouse). Stark, angry, but in cold, calculating blood, strangles Arya to death. Approval rating plummets.

As a dramatic story, there is a disconnect I can't resolve. If you're going for that, consider foreshadowing it. During the phone call, the sister could mention the family pet MC has killed. Basically make sure not one reader can assign her the good-guy trait. Once a character gets in that slot, the fall from grace really hurts the narrative.

If you're going for any other genre, like noir or crime etc, I wouldn't change a thing - it's perfect as is.

Nb: part of this is I work in technology. I see a lot of people all but hurl mice at walls. I think they're mad that Word deleted their perfect paragraph. I never think they abuse people. If MC would go downstairs, find a car that doesn't belong to her, and smash the headlights and windows, this would have been good foreshadowing. Someone able to break an inanimate object that doesn't belong to them is so far out of the "good person in desperate need of help" slot that the ending resolves well.

Even shorter: Lord of All