Dirk B. wrote:

Better than Connor defying the laws of physics with no plausible explanation, the wine from the Garden of Eden will be the source of his boosted power.

Connor beheaded another four demons with one stroke, their bodies flying backward and bowling over another seven others. "What was in that wine?" Connor asked St. Michael, wide-eyed.
Michael grinned. "The power of God!"

I think the solution to how to handle the stench of so many dissolving demon corpses is that Megiddo is considered holy ground. They won't dissolve within its boundaries, or they don't stink when dissolving. Probably the former. Whichever way I go, it needs to be consistent from book one on, where some demons died in a church.

I'm trying to catch up. I like the wine idea. But saying wine from Garden of Eden seems too much. It would be vinegar. How about the place in South American has original seeds and hence plants or pure uncontaminated plants from Eden? Basically, non-hybrid plants. And the wine was made from them.

177

(22 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I like to tell people to keep on writing. In your case, keep on walking. Be blessed.

Dirk B. wrote:

>The only issue is that some people will state that God limited man's age to 120 years. That is up to interpretation.
The oldest person ever whose age has been independently verified is Jeanne Calment (1875–1997) of France, who lived to the age of 122 years and 164 days. It definitely needs reinterpreting. smile

Can't use Mengele's son since he really did have a son, who is still alive. That could get me sued.

Even a bastard son? An unknown bastard son?

>> FYI, the geneticist is a former disciple of Joseph Mengele, spirited out of Germany after WW2. One of the things the geneticist does early on is to adjust his own DNA to extend his lifespan since it's yet unknown when the end will come, and the breeding program has to continue until the Antichrist has been successfully created.

Very interesting historical twist. Could you perhaps have the former disciple of Mengele show up as Mengele's son? The Angel of Death's son. Find an appropriate name of course!

The only issue is that some people will state that God limited man's age to 120 years. That is up to interpretation. Apparently, that might have been the time when the flood was to occur 120 years in the future.

I'm a little nervous about breeding in supernatural powers but will comment later.

What's great about the compound is that it's already there. You don't have to make it and then magically hide it. To me it adds to the mystery and the reality. Hope this makes sense.

Dirk B. wrote:

I had a neat idea for book three. Since Connor needs a human fighting force at the beginning of the final battle, I thought that Connor, being the result of genetic manipulation based on Satan's millennia-old breeding program, would have had predecessors from the breeding program. Turns out, many of them are still alive, even though Satan had ordered them destroyed once Connor was born. The program was run from a compound in the the jungles of South America, run by a trainer who took pity on the last batch of kids created for the program, so he led them to a local priest, who assumed their care.

People have found cities or architectural structures in South Americ. Maybe you could attribute them to the breeding program.

182

(309 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

Okaaaaay. I'll withdraw my complaints... sort of. :-)
But my fav is still the Julius Ceasar comment.

183

(309 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

My fav is Julius Ceasar.
Don't use conquering France or Denmark. How insulting! You fellow citizens (Quebecers) might not like it.

184

(309 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

Stomping on roaches in a roach motel.

Shooting stuffed elites eating stuffed pizza.

Shooting stuffed elites stuffing stuffed pizza down their stuffed throats. (Hmm. Too much?)

185

(148 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I'm having to sign in a lot lately. Is there something you can do? Thanks.

>>In other words, I doubt many gay men were procreating with straight women in the past. To me, that suggests they would be bisexual men, not gay. Few people, if any, would be thinking about the survival of the human race if they didn't procreate. People had kids for personal reasons: kids worked long hours, whether on a farm or elsewhere, to provide cheap labor to support their families; they were also expected to help support their parents in their old age (still true in many countries); and they were a bit of insurance in case disease killed some of them, which was common.

I admit it. I've always just put gay and bisexual in the same boat. You're saying I'm wrong?!?!?! Hmm. Nothing like learning something new. I've heard of hetero men going to prison and doing homo stuff then getting out and returning to hetero. Can't it work with homo men needing to increase the family using women and then doing homo stuff on the side? I was not expecting this conversation!

They may not have been thinking in terms of the human race but like you said in terms of family, tribe, nation. I'd assume family would override almost anything.

>> Teens are horny because teens used to marry for most of human history. Back-checking on google, in 1610 the age of consent was 12. The act of 1653 moved it up to 14 (Women) 16 (Men)

Excellent point K. You had kids early and often. Otherwise, diseases, war, famine, and etc. would have wiped out the human race. I'm of the opinion that even if you were homosexual way back when that generally you were expected to procreate. Everyone needed you to generate children for shear survival. So, my hypothesis is that all homosexuals were bisexual. They would find out who had similar proclivities and spent time with them on the side while generating children. Or the homosexuals just kept quiet and still had some fun generating children.

Dirk B. wrote:

Christians generally don't mind stories that drift a little from accepted beliefs if the changes make it a more uplifting pro-Christian story. For example, Jacob Marley (Scrooge's business partner) appeared as a ghost. Even if one said it was his soul that appeared, what would a soul be doing outside of heaven or hell? The Catholic interpretation treats Marley as someone in purgatory who can't get to heaven until he convinces Scrooge to change his ways. I don't think anyone would have a serious problem with his presence in the story, as written.

Same with "It's a Wonderful Life". An angel took the main character (I forget his name) to see an alternate vision of the future in which the character was present to watch but not interfere, much as Scrooge had to. How many Christians will object to the idea of angels with wings and the idea that an angel has to earn his wings? The idea of wings has been around since the 4th century but it's not in the Bible.

Very good points. I liked both stories.

Dirk B. wrote:

And religions get a lot of things wrong even when they tell themselves their Bible is inerrant. If the Christian Bible is the inspired Word of God, how come Catholics and Protestants can't agree on what books belong in the Bible? They're only inerrant as long as you discount the "false" beliefs of all the other major denominations you disagree with. Lots of things for Connor to work with, and there won't be anyone in the books to challenge his corrupting rhetoric.

In a similar vein, the Catholic Church says teens will go to Hell if they masturbate. Why would God give teens the ability to masturbate, only to turn around and expect kids not to do so?

Sorry for such a slow response. My head is finally above water. I'm not a theologian but I'll try to answer at least some of your comments. Jews, Catholics, and Protestants agree on the OT books. Catholics and Prots agree on the NT books. The apocryphal books are accepted only by Catholics. And they were written between the OT and NT. So, the Christian side of the Bible is agreed upon, 100%.

I'm not a fan of all Catholic teaching. Masturbation is one such instance. But your logic is flawed. Why did God give us sex but then say don't have sex outside of marriage, especially with abortion in the future? He is the creator and hence the definer of usage.

I don't know if any of this is important to you, but I at least wanted to comment on some of it.

190

(22 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Congratulations on your successful surgery. Be blessed and take your time.

191

(5 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Wow. I did a quick peek, and it looks good. The weather should be different than Scotland I imagine.

Dirk B. wrote:

As for your expectations of what the Antichrist is like as a human being, what are you basing it on? A few verses in the Bible? Who's to say he doesn't care about his family? Even Hitler had a family. And as I noted above, my story is only loosely based on Revelation, especially as you go from book to book. That's what the foreword is for. If you want to read a Christian-themed story based loosely on Revelation, great. If you want a faithful telling of Revelation, these aren't the books you want to read.

There is much to comment on with everything you wrote. So, I will pick on a couple items:

>A few verses in the Bible?
I found a website claiming 25 verses on the AC. And they are all bad.

You said something a while ago that I've thought about - if I don't like my own story then there's a problem. So, write what you want. But you also taught me to keep audience in mind. I try to do that BUT I at the core of my Tribe story is something which will possibly piss off large swaths of Christendom. I plan to write about it anyway!

193

(309 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

It is an electromagnetic/gravitational/quantum/time weapon. A Unified-Field-Weapon. That is why it can penetrate through force shields and then crush hulls. It tears up the time space fabric in the process. It consists of quantum particles at hyper relativistic speeds (includes time) enveloped by EM fields and gravitons and are emitted at specific frequencies. And it can be alterphasic to boot.

> This opens up a world of discussions. It's that what you want?
Heck yes!!! Who wouldn't want their story to generate a lot of discussion?

:-) Oops, you're right, let me rephrase that! You brought up the possibility as to whether or not God created homosexuality. Why then create religions that oppose it? Judaism and Islam violently oppose it. Some Christians have also done the same. The thesis is that God possibly made a homosexual gender. That might turn people off.

I admit that I like the bisexual mix. I can see the AC doing heterosexual behavior outside of marriage and homosexual behavior. The Christ did neither. So, both the AC's actions are anti-Christ. I believe Left Behind has the AC getting a woman pregnant. And I've heard it taught that the AC was homosexual. But you mix it together. Interesting.

>>He's also pissed off that Satan raped his mother for sport so Connor could be conceived, which is what ultimately seals Satan's fate.
I'm of the opinion that the AC is so corrupt/evil/vile that he doesn't give a rip about his mother. Again, this is anti-Christ since Jesus loved His mother to the point of telling John to take care of her when He was on the cross. You take the Darth Vader/Luke Skywalker approach. There's some good inside there somewhere. That could be a tough row to hoe.

And of course, I'm taking this as close to what I believe as I can. And your story is your story. That overrides my opinions. However, I think many people will get turned off. It's hard for me to differentiate Connor with the AC I've expected.

I'll try answering more later...

Dirk B. wrote:

I decided Connor will be bisexual, although it won't come up until book two, where it will make a few eyebrow raising scenes possible. This raises the question of whether it is our soul or our DNA+nurture that determines sexual orientation. Since homosexuality is widespread among animals (who don't have a soul), it has to be the latter. I could extend that to ask whether it is God, our soul, or our DNA that determines our gender.

WOW! You don't fool around!

Be careful. A bisexual AC is interesting. I've heard that he could be homosexual but never bisexual. This opens up a world of discussions. Is that what you want? What do you mean by "it is our soul"? Is this the Choice option that Christians like to discuss? Could it be all three (soul, DNA, nurture)? If a boy is somewhat effeminate (DNA?) and has influential homosexual men in his life (nurture), and has a young man in his life that he loves (starting at brotherly love), does this somehow encapsulate all three? I've not had to think of this before so I might be stretching things a bit. Or messing things up! And now...

God? Three of the big religions (Jewish, Christian, Islam), do not support the thesis. This is a huge audience. Christianity says you don't have to die because of it. And I know that not all Christians have been very good about this. Ergo, for God to become the origin of homosexuality seems like a real stretch if not a contradiction.

Another possible issue is defending it from an evolutionary point of view. I'm not a pro so I would have to delve into this more.

196

(309 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

The spacetime gash allows the path to be seen which I was aiming for. Lasers, lightning bolts cannot be seen without debris or whatever. And I don't know how light sabers work. I'm not really sure what a light saber is! The gash allows you to decrease the power by whatever you want as it progresses. Linear decrease, inverse square? Who cares since it's all made up and you can be consistent about it. The ships can now calculate how much blast hits the targets based on distance. They might want to get just a little bit closer... or further away. Have fun rewriting!

197

(309 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

How about a weapon that momentarily rips through or tears up space-time. The tear or gash leaks energy which everyone can see. It's a concentrated Hadron beam weapon. I have no idea if this is feasible.

198

(309 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

How about firing a lightning bolt or a positron bolt (antielectron)? People see lightning storms regularly, so they won't wonder too much about the physics. If the electron and positron bolts collide at the target, then gamma rays are emitted. Bad.

This is a little similar to Star Trek's photon torpedoes that were composed of antimatter hitting matter and gamma rays were emitted.

But I think we only see lightning bolts because of the atmosphere heating up. Hmm. There would have to be debris in space which might be doable if you're a planet... I guess.

Keep on moving forward! It really beats the alternative.

I'm impressed with your creativity with all this. But I'm still thinking about it. Not everything is warm and fuzzy for me.