Search options (Page 8 of 13)

Wow. Very good. And you have more to write! Keep on writing!!

K and Dirk, good comments. I try to limit names but sometimes it's hard to be super legalistic about it. However, I like the idea of a glossary with names, perhaps Cheyenne words, history, etc. at the front of each chapter. I found out that women in my book's time period married around 22, men married around 26. This was attributed to the Civil War. Lots of younger men got killed. I put that in the glossary. I plan to keep the glossaries.

I like to tell people to keep on writing. In your case, keep on walking. Be blessed.

>> FYI, the geneticist is a former disciple of Joseph Mengele, spirited out of Germany after WW2. One of the things the geneticist does early on is to adjust his own DNA to extend his lifespan since it's yet unknown when the end will come, and the breeding program has to continue until the Antichrist has been successfully created.

Very interesting historical twist. Could you perhaps have the former disciple of Mengele show up as Mengele's son? The Angel of Death's son. Find an appropriate name of course!

The only issue is that some people will state that God limited man's age to 120 years. That is up to interpretation. Apparently, that might have been the time when the flood was to occur 120 years in the future.

I'm a little nervous about breeding in supernatural powers but will comment later.

People have found cities or architectural structures in South Americ. Maybe you could attribute them to the breeding program.

My fav is Julius Ceasar.
Don't use conquering France or Denmark. How insulting! You fellow citizens (Quebecers) might not like it.

I'm having to sign in a lot lately. Is there something you can do? Thanks.

>> Teens are horny because teens used to marry for most of human history. Back-checking on google, in 1610 the age of consent was 12. The act of 1653 moved it up to 14 (Women) 16 (Men)

Excellent point K. You had kids early and often. Otherwise, diseases, war, famine, and etc. would have wiped out the human race. I'm of the opinion that even if you were homosexual way back when that generally you were expected to procreate. Everyone needed you to generate children for shear survival. So, my hypothesis is that all homosexuals were bisexual. They would find out who had similar proclivities and spent time with them on the side while generating children. Or the homosexuals just kept quiet and still had some fun generating children.

Sorry for such a slow response. My head is finally above water. I'm not a theologian but I'll try to answer at least some of your comments. Jews, Catholics, and Protestants agree on the OT books. Catholics and Prots agree on the NT books. The apocryphal books are accepted only by Catholics. And they were written between the OT and NT. So, the Christian side of the Bible is agreed upon, 100%.

I'm not a fan of all Catholic teaching. Masturbation is one such instance. But your logic is flawed. Why did God give us sex but then say don't have sex outside of marriage, especially with abortion in the future? He is the creator and hence the definer of usage.

I don't know if any of this is important to you, but I at least wanted to comment on some of it.

Wow. I did a quick peek, and it looks good. The weather should be different than Scotland I imagine.

It is an electromagnetic/gravitational/quantum/time weapon. A Unified-Field-Weapon. That is why it can penetrate through force shields and then crush hulls. It tears up the time space fabric in the process. It consists of quantum particles at hyper relativistic speeds (includes time) enveloped by EM fields and gravitons and are emitted at specific frequencies. And it can be alterphasic to boot.

WOW! You don't fool around!

Be careful. A bisexual AC is interesting. I've heard that he could be homosexual but never bisexual. This opens up a world of discussions. Is that what you want? What do you mean by "it is our soul"? Is this the Choice option that Christians like to discuss? Could it be all three (soul, DNA, nurture)? If a boy is somewhat effeminate (DNA?) and has influential homosexual men in his life (nurture), and has a young man in his life that he loves (starting at brotherly love), does this somehow encapsulate all three? I've not had to think of this before so I might be stretching things a bit. Or messing things up! And now...

God? Three of the big religions (Jewish, Christian, Islam), do not support the thesis. This is a huge audience. Christianity says you don't have to die because of it. And I know that not all Christians have been very good about this. Ergo, for God to become the origin of homosexuality seems like a real stretch if not a contradiction.

Another possible issue is defending it from an evolutionary point of view. I'm not a pro so I would have to delve into this more.