926

(309 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

Why do I have to have fusion devices? The Enterprise uses fusion, I believe, but we're talking about a story that includes teleportation of ships across many light years. Mostly, I did that for fun, so I could refer to teleportation as a hackneyed trope of lazy science fiction writers. Granted, I don't do that too often because the book would then seem too unrealistic, so most of my tech isn't too far "out there", except when I flirt with nonsense. There are plenty of things in Star Trek and Star Wars that are totally unrealistic, but you have to admit, they look cool onscreen. Transporters. Hyperspace. Lightsabers.

Yup, hypercapacitor is used in Warcraft. I'm going back to hyperbattery, although even that is used elsewhere, including in Star Wars, but then what isn't? Everyone knows what a battery is and the fact that they store and release energy. I probably don't even need to explain a hyperbattery, although I'll probably give it a sentence (how it's used, not how it works).

Black holes are virtually impossible to create (even our sun can't do it), so I'd rather not use them in the operation of the tech itself. I don't mind using them as the result of a ruptured powertron, though. If I needed it in the story, I'd gladly use the explosion to create a rift in time or an opening to other universes, etc. After all, who knows what a ruptured powertron might do? Whatever it does, it crushes surrounding matter into singularities, and then explodes outward as a little bang.

927

(309 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

Crystalline structure sounds good, but it also sounds too much like dilithium crystals. I don't actually plan to explain anything about atreidite's properties other than to say it can store and release energy as needed. Since I plan (hope?) to move the atreidite out of the stardrive and use it to store and release extra energy for whatever purpose a ship requires, I may no longer need rapid release of energy (tbd). It simply serves to augment the energy provided by the powertron during peak periods of demand such as when a ship goes into battle and needs full shields and fully powered novas and supernovas. The only quirk is that I still need a stardrive to require a delay between jumps for it to work as needed for story purposes. Perhaps it does need to be charged, although at this point, I prefer to use the atreidite as a way to store/release energy to augment available energy for whatever purpose the ship needs extra power. So, either the stardrive needs to be recharged or it needs to cool down between jumps, probably the former.

Based on the descriptions of real powertrons (the name is used for several different products, including backup generator), I'll rename mine to avoid confusion.

Hypercapacitor?

I meant cold fusion or something similar. Regular fusion requires too high a temperature. However, the most important property for my (quasi?)fusion generators is that they produce enough heat that, when coolant runs out (e.g., leaks from a damaged vessel such as a starfighter), the temperature rises sufficiently to cook the human in a starfighter.

I'm going to have to brush up on cold fusion and LENR. LENR drive doesn't make sense, though, since it needs to be a power generator, not a drive. The power generator in small ships/vehicles has to power every system in the ship/vehicle.

Having a power source that powers a powertron adds unnecessary complexity. My powertron is the power generator that probably does not involve fusion, otherwise I could simply call it a fusion reactor. Not sure of the principle behind powertrons, but I don't really care (for now). Whatever it is, it's gotta be big enough to be a useful target on warships for story purposes, and when it blows, it implodes, then explodes, taking the rest of the ship with it. Keep in mind that in two thousand years we'll probably have invented something that goes beyond fusion reactors. Or, maybe it's an advanced fusion reactor. TBD.

Thanks for the feedback.

928

(309 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

For K.dot: Awesome music and video. Called "Women Warriors." Safe for work.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhE31dF … resatesssa

929

(309 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

Since I needed a scarce resource in my story that eventually leads to war over New Bethlehem, I added the mineral atreidite, which functions like a hyperbattery, a type of battery that can release an enormous amount of energy in milliseconds, which is required to power jumps using a stardrive. The quantity of energy and the speed with which it needs to be released rules out simply using a vessel's powertron directly to power a stardrive. The atreidite gets energized from the powertron over a period of many minutes to hours. This has the advantage that military fleets can't simply jump as far as they want in zero time using just a powertron. They usually need multiple jumps, which eventually drains the atreidite's charge, requiring time to recharge. And atreidite can only be recharged so often, which requires the Republic and Imperium to constantly search for more.

Thing is, I had intended to use two kinds of power generators in my ships and flying vehicles. I figured huge ships should have a different power generator than starfighters and Leonardo's taxi, which use fusion. For one thing, the big ships are supposed to implode-explode when a powertron is ruptured in battle. I had therefore envisioned powertrons to be big enough to power warships and big enough to make them an important target in warship-on-warship fighting. The power source in small vehicles can't be that dangerous since the cab gets damaged a lot in Leonardo's chapter, both from enemy fire and his crazy driving. Remember suicidio mode? smile  There are other examples besides the taxi.

A further wrinkle is that interstellar drones have stardrives, meaning they need something powerful enough to charge their atreidite. If I were to say that a fusion generator could charge atreidite, then all spaceships could presumably be fitted with a stardrive since all ships have either a fusion generator or a powertron. I don't want that, though, since I definitely need ships that don't have a stardrive and, therefore, can't jump.

This is making my head spin. One possibility is that anything interstellar has to have a powertron, anything else can use fusion. But if powertrons are small enough to be used by drones, then what prevents warships from using a similary small powertron to power their own stardrives? And the smaller it is, the easier it is to bury deep inside a warship, as far away as possible from the surface of a ship, where it might rupture from enemy fire. Obviously, I don't want to bury it deep within ships since most of my warship battles rely on the powertron to be breachable (or to at least serve as a target).

Another option is to use fusion OR a powertron to charge a stardrive, but if you want to do interstellar jumps with large ships, then you need bigger stardrives than are needed by interstellar drones. The bigger the stardrive, the more atreidite it needs, and the more power it takes to charge the atreidite. So fusion to charge small stardrives and powertron to charge big ones. Obviously big ships also need much more power just to operate.

And, in order to explain why all spaceships don't have stardrives is that atreidite is scarce. So there are small, intrasystem ships with no stardrives (starfighters, shuttles, etc.) and interstellar ships (ranging from drones up to dreadnoughts) with stardrives powered either by fusion (for the small stuff) or by a powertron (for the big ships).

In case you haven't noticed, that's a lot of complexity, which I hate.

Another approach is to continue use atreidite to store power but incorporate the atreidite directly into the vessel's power generation system, rather than just using it inside the stardrive. So, at all times, ships that need a lot of power very quickly, regardless of the purpose (stardrives, heavy cannons, shields, etc.), store some of their power in their atreidite batteries, using them as a reserve power source for when there is an excess demand for power. Non-interstellar ships still won't have atreidite because it's scarce, so they have no reserve power source to handle spikes in power needs such as required to power a stardrive. They simply have to make do with whatever their power generator can put out, and they may have to divert power from one system to another at times (e.g., from weapons to shields, etc.).

I'm going to try using the latter approach. Fortunately, most of the details are within one Galactipedia article. I just have to look at the battles again to be sure nothing breaks.

Wee. What fun. Not.

Yup. Now I back to my excessive posting.

931

(58 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

LonelyWolf, updating the text of an existing chapter has never cost points (use the blue edit "link" on the posting (chapter) view above the existing chapter's text, not the white edit button). If you delete the chapter and post a replacement (i.e., with the same chapter number), then it'll cost points. In the latter case it will also put the chapter back at the top of the home page, and reviewers can review it again for points. But, deleting an existing chapter will also delete any reviews attached to it.

If you have any follow-up questions, let's move the discussion to a new thread, so we don't derail this one. Or, feel free to send me a connection request and we can message outside the forum.

Regards,
Dirk

Sol, can you make this one sticky as well? Somehow it didn't stick. This thread and the maintenance thread are intended to replace the ones we had prior to the crash.

Thanks
Dirk

933

(149 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Thanks, Sol.

934

(58 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Sol, I noticed this morning under my billing profile that I have an account balance of -2024. Is that an error, or just some quirk of how the billing profile is displayed onscreen?

Thanks
Dirk

935

(149 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Before the offtopic discussions get too large, could I ask folks to break out a different thread? The purpose of this thread is outlined in the first post. Sol has to be able to go through these posts and actually find real requests, which is why I hope to keep this and the Minor Enhancement threads on track.

Thanks
Dirk

936

(149 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Sol, when you have a moment, can you please make this thread and the minor enhancements thread sticky?

Thanks
Dirk

Following the crash, the restored site is back to 90 groups, most of which aren't used. We were down to about 10 groups after the cleanup done many months ago. We'll have to redo the cleanup, which included deleting unused groups, combining and/or renaming some of the groups that remain, and assigning new moderators, where needed, for those groups that remain.

If you created a group or are a member of an actively used group that you would like preserved, please repond to this thread with the name of the group, to ensure it doesn't get deleted.

Thanks
Dirk

I'm restoring this thread post-crash. It's intended for reporting bugs and requesting maintenance, including reporting spam acccounts, reassigning group ownership, deleting groups, etc.

Thanks
Dirk

I'm restoring this thread post-crash. It's intended for minor enhancement requests. Please do not get into long discussions in this thread about a given enhancement since Sol can't wade through endless posts, and other enhancement requests may be overlooked. If a discussion goes past 2-3 posts, please break out a separate thread to continue the discussion.

Thanks
Dirk

940

(58 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Barry, assume 1 point is needed to post every 320 words. Can you estimate it based on that?

If anyone else is having problems posting to the forums after your account was restored, try clearing your cookies in Chrome under settings. That fixed the problem for me. Actually, I cleared all my data, although it's usually the cookies that are the problem. Be careful not to delete your passwords, otherwise you may end up having to set new ones everywhere. Also, there's a place under settings somewhere that allows you to delete cookies one at a time. If you want to try that first, begin by deleting all TNBW cookies.

I also found that Microsoft Edge worked for me when Chrome didn't, so feel free to try that first.

If your have any questions and can't post them here, feel free to send me a message (if we're connected) or leave a quickee on my profile page.

Dirk

942

(309 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

It still looks wrong to me on paper. smile

943

(58 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Hi Sol. Can you please upgrade my Booksie account to Premium? My user id is "Dirk B.", same as here.

Thanks
Dirk

944

(309 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

I was trying to remember if Star Wars used rebel fleet or Rebel fleet. Turns out it's the latter, which makes sense since references to Rebel in Star Wars are short for Rebel Alliance. Based in that I took another look at whether they capitalize Imperial and ... they do, all over Wookieepedia and starwars.com, including the starwars.com database. So now I'm wondering how the hell I got that wrong because I remember researching that quite a bit, and only then did I switch to lowercase imperial. The CMOS style guide still says to use lowercase. Dictionary examples do too.

But, screw it, I might as well follow the Star Wars style since it's closer to what I'm doing. At least that eliminates the inconsistancy between Enduring and imperial.

I'm sure Jack will approve. smile

945

(309 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

Then there's things like:

Imperial Fleet - the whole Imperial Fleet
imperial fleet - a subset of the Imperial Fleet
Imperial fleet - too similar to each of the other two?

This example drives me nuts, though: the Enduring fleet battled the imperial fleet. And by the way, Enduring Fleet refers to the Republic's whole fleet, whereas Enduring fleet is a subset of the Enduring Fleet, and enduring fleet doesn't make sense here since Enduring is derived from Enduring Republic, a proper noun.

946

(58 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Sol, I'm seeing a few new bugs in the forums, some of which are serious because if the system times us out (it very often does), anything you were trying to post is lost, which sometimes take a long time to write up (e.g., for brainstorming with other members).

1.)
- prior to the crash, when I spent a little too much time in the forums writing a single post, the post would be accepted, but the site would log me out anyway
- now, if I take too long writing the post, I get an error message to the effect that I don't have permission to access that page (something like that) and my intended post is lost; if I log back in, I can post without the above error, although I then sometimes get error #2, below

2.)
- I'm getting a message when I post to the effect that the site couldn't access email. I'm guessing the site is trying to notify everyone who is following the thread to which I posted that there's a new post in the thread, although I'm just guessing about that

3.) I also sometimes get an error upon posting that "the link is incorrect" (words to that effect).

Thanks
Dirk

Chrome browser
Windows 11 PC

test

948

(309 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

Kill me now. Once upon a time, I used to always capitalize the adjective imperial, such as (the imperial admiral became the Imperial admiral). At the end of the 2nd draft of Galaxy Tales and after a bunch research from many sources, including CMOS and Star Wars novels, I decided capitalizing it was wrong. My book was pretty much the only place I could find it capitalized (outside of proper nouns, of course). So, in the third draft, I switched them all to lowercase, and I thought the matter was settled.

However, Jack, who is currently reading Archangel, felt fairly strongly Imperial should be capitalized. And another online writer once wrote that if a term like imperial galleys refers to galley ships of a specific empire, then Imperial should be capitalized, whereas a reference to the galleys of many empires would be lowercase (imperial galleys), although I don't know if that rule is correct.

Then along came the Enduring Republic of Stars. If I wanted to write a "Republic fleet", Republic should clearly be capitalized since Republic is a proper noun in this case. But, in order to minimize the similarities to Star Wars Republic(s), I decided to use Enduring as the adjective (e.g., Enduring fleet, Enduring worlds, Enduring troops, etc.). Since Enduring is also a proper noun, it should be capitalized as well. That leads to things like this: the Enduring fleet battled the (lowercase) imperial fleet. The latter case comes up a lot.

Thoughts?
Dirk

949

(8 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

For he's a jolly good fellow, for he's a jolly good fellow... smile

Let me add my thanks as well. I'm very happy that the site is going to continue.

Dirk

Alan, I'm so sorry for what you and Di are going through. I can't imagine the stress you both must be under.

All my best wishes for you and Di.
Dirk