526

(520 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

Rebecca Vaughn wrote:

I don't know. 33% of any population is left eyed but only 10% of any population is left handed. I don't think there can be much of a correlation. My sister is left handed and right eyed and the archery instructor implied that that was common for left handers to be right eyed and have to shoot right handed.

I do know there is so genetics involved (left handedness tends to run in families) so maybe eye dominance does to? If that is so then maybe a particular family could have both a lot of left handers and a lot of left eye dominance? I don't know much about biology so many I shouldn't speculate...

I shoot right-handed too, now that you mention it. Okay, I bat and shoot with my right hand, everything else, left ...

527

(520 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

njc wrote:
Rebecca Vaughn wrote:

You shoot according to you dominant eye. As most people (about 2/3 of the population) are right eyed, they would lean to shoot right handed. People who are lefted eyed would have to learn left handed which would be difficult if they were right handed.

I suspect that most left-eyed people are left-handed.  I'm a southpaw and my eye dominance is mixed: right for reading, left for everything else.  I suspect a lot of lefties have such mixed dominance, and that this contributes greatly to the poor handwriting southpaws are famous for.  We have to learn twice, once with the left eye for the letterforms, and again with the right eye for writing from language.

(Since I started learning shorthand later in life, I was able to observe the process while learning to write all over again.  See my book covers.)

You're won't believe this! I'm also a left-handed! *high five* But I'm right eye dominant for everything, so my handwriting is pretty. tongue

In any case, I bat (like in cricket and base-ball) right-handed, because I was taught to do it that way. Everything else, I do with my left, including opening cans with a right-handed can opener. I'll stop now, the stories I can tell you about being left-handed are plenty. smile

528

(520 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

Rebecca Vaughn wrote:
janet reid wrote:

K, give my cad (and me) some credit! As if he would be using his own stuff and dropping shit all over the place and get identified that way. pffffttttt, way too easy! Not going to happen. But yeah, I'm in a hole, so I have started digging ....

****SPOILER ALERT****
****SPOILER ALERT****
****SPOILER ALERT****

It's not the blackguard's arrow - it's one of Matthew's. I haven't added any specifics, so that is one way to dig me out of the hole (keep it generic and don't list the qualities that makes it Matthew's - as long as it would be possible to identify the arrow as his without doubt). But it would've been nice to say: well, if you look at this feather and this so-and-so, it's mine.

So yeah, the bad guy shot Geordie using one of Matthew's arrows ... Like Black John is going to say: "That is one hell of a message." (to Matthew and the others who is supposed to keep him safe).

Then definitely have the bird feathers unusual and the shaft painted! Matthew is rich, he can afford it!

smile

Thanks for this!

529

(1,528 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

njc wrote:
janet reid wrote:

Mmmm, now if this was the main forum, it would've been personal with a capital P! LOL

Well, to quote what I wrote on another thread, never argue with anything bigger than you can lift ...

To put it another way, I prefer repartee to rapiers. and double-entendre to daggers..

Well, that doesn't leave me with much to argue with! Not even Mr. C ... *chews nail* No, that can't be right. Never argue with anything bigger that you can lift with a small-ish block and tackle? smile

530

(520 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

njc wrote:

Oooh!  You called him a backguard!  I've got shivers up my spine.

I'm busy to thesaurus the hell out of "bad guy" while I'm writing! smile

531

(520 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

K, give my cad (and me) some credit! As if he would be using his own stuff and dropping shit all over the place and get identified that way. pffffttttt, way too easy! Not going to happen. But yeah, I'm in a hole, so I have started digging ....

****SPOILER ALERT****
****SPOILER ALERT****
****SPOILER ALERT****

It's not the blackguard's arrow - it's one of Matthew's. I haven't added any specifics, so that is one way to dig me out of the hole (keep it generic and don't list the qualities that makes it Matthew's - as long as it would be possible to identify the arrow as his without doubt). But it would've been nice to say: well, if you look at this feather and this so-and-so, it's mine.

So yeah, the bad guy shot Geordie using one of Matthew's arrows ... Like Black John is going to say: "That is one hell of a message." (to Matthew and the others who is supposed to keep him safe).

532

(520 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

Rebecca Vaughn wrote:

Archery fell out of use for warfare in the mid 1600s and was replaced by muskets which were being made much better by that time. It then became very popular as a sport for women. (It had always been popular as a sport for men).

However at the time of Northern Skies archery was still used for war. And the bows quite difficult to use by a small or weak person. Draw weight was well over 100 pounds, some bows were as much as 175 pounds. Archers had to be quite strong in the upper body and arms to pull the string back. Women rarely shot (I think Queen Elizabeth learned). It was considered unladylike, masculine, certainly not a weapon for a woman to learn.

If women learned to fight, (and not many did at this time) they would use a small sword or a spear. The spear was actually the traditional weapon for women.

To add, on the Northern Border the use of long bows survived even longer and only came to an end on the other side of 1600 - (1) because the borderers were really good with the long bow but also (2) the wet weather made the use of muskets really tricky (many hands were lost that way).

Also, the bows and strings could be adapted for someone with a weaker upper body, but this would have been typically for tournaments and such, not combat.

It's very hard to say to what extent women could fight on the border given the general decay and lawlessness, but I think it's a safe assumption to make that they also would've had some sort of preferred weapon to defend themselves. There is no doubt that everyone had to do their bit when the time came, children too.

Add: The upper arms and thumbs/fingers of archers from days were also unnaturally large from all the hours of practising and shooting. I'll need to look it up whether it would the right arm and left hand or the other way around, I'm too lazy today. Sorry. But you get the drift.

533

(520 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

KHippolite wrote:

Just to be my usual thorn in your side, you might have pigeon-holed yourself again (the previous time was with Matthew & Catherine's "random" encounter that couldn't be during a roof repair and couldn't be in a town and couldn't be in a cellar).

Well, I got out of that one okay, I think. So far, 2 people (Janet TP and Rebecca), I won't name any names to make those who are falling behind on NS feel bad, had said it worked and didn't come across as forced. So, HA! Take that!

But yes I'm brilliant with getting myself tied into all kinds of knots. Unfortunately, unlike others (K), who I won't name, I can't just go and kill characters when they get in the way. tongue

534

(520 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

amy s wrote:

Re feathers:

Janet, I have GOT to get you to an SCA event. What are you doing in August? Would you be open to a week at the Pennsic war?

You NEED to go shopping with me. You won't have these questions any longer.

Hand crafted arrows are absolutely identifiable by the maker. Enough that your assassin would have bought them from elsewhere rather than being traced back to him. (A bow is a woman's weapon, so I saw that with reservations) fletching, three or four fletching on arrows, the precision of the craftsmanship, how well the goose feathers were glued, etc. Remember that arrows are usually shot into targets and damaging the fletch? Or were they used new? (Unlikely)

Since arrows are used on practice targets, you want to identify your arrows from another so you can collect them after a practice shoot. And find them in the scruff if you miss at distance. (White feathers are much easier to see)

So I would have the person paint the arrows after purchase. Something personal that means something to only them. Key is, arrows are sold in bundles. You lose them during practice all the time. This person is missing one. And there are others out there WITH THE SAME MARK PATTERN. Find those arrows and you find the assassin.

Personally, I would go to where people practice archery and search the grass. You can shoot at a hay bale, but you will lose your arrows all the time. Bundled targets are where this person practices because he/she is good.

You won't know how much I'd like to go! I'll talk to Mr. C and see what happens, but it all depends a lot on what happens at home. There is a chance he's going to commission a project (he designed BTW - poor him, if something turns out to be wrong or not working, he's going to be there to take the flack!) in Kazakstan. If that happens, there is no way I'd be able to do it. But let's see closer to the time (or the time I really need to commit). *crosses fingers*

535

(1,528 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

njc wrote:

Don't worry.  Our disagreements on style aren't (I hope!)  personal.  It's not politics.  Heck, even Wagner admitted, sorta, kinda, that he was influenced by Liszt.

I do wonder, though, whether I'm keeping your attention when you miss the part about Merran being five feet behind.  Not so much the detail of the rafters and the eaves.

Hey, ever think of doing a thread just on what you've learned from the SCA?

Mmmm, now if this was the main forum, it would've been personal with a capital P! LOL

Also, what K said and you have to keep in mind that when people (I) review, they're not "reading". Now some (you) read the chapter before they review, but I think most don't. So in my opinion, with anything else, it's up to you to decide whether it's "reading from a screen", "reading with a review brain" or "reading like a reader" and if you need to take it on board or ignore it. This is something I really struggle with sometimes. If you have multiple reviews and only one reviewer picked on it, then maybe it's not so much of an issue and it could be that the reviewer (Amy - hehehe) was doing it 2am on night shift? Most of the time I have no idea what K is doing other than just being K. smile

My 2 cents that I think you already know and do, but I just thought I'd throw it out here and look like I know what I'm doing. smile

536

(520 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

Medieval peeps, I need help please!

Moving on from medical issues and shafts *snickers* ....

I can't find anything special that would've been done to personalise the arrows of someone like the king or the nobility to use as inspiration or a starting point. So is there any special feathers that could be used, or how can the nock be changed or what can be done in terms of cresting to make (1) the arrows unique/special and (2) really hard to duplicate if you don't know what to look for.

The best I can come up with, is using really expensive materials for the arrows (imported wood?), and expensive paint/dye and an intricate pattern for the cresting that would make it extremely hard and time-consuming to copy. Special feathers? Special dyed feathers? Special shaped fletching? Please help!

I'm also stuck with coming up with a banner for Matthew - lions, dragons and roses are so not on. C'mon, 'tis the Earl of Norwood! Do you guys and girls have any suggestions?

For all your trouble, I'll send some virtual wine or cookies your way.

Thanks! Janet

I have no issue with them as is now which isn't really helping, sorry.

amy s wrote:

Though it is funny that I was the one who noticed this rather than Janet :-)

*coughs importantly* I'm a professional, know when it's fantasy and when it's romance. Oh wait, they're both the same. *coughs again* I'm a professional. I'll just leave it at that.

njc wrote:
janet reid wrote:

I'm not going to ask and just make my own deductions ... *shakes head* Amy, Amy, Amy.

She read the same chapter you did, or nearly.  You read all the same parts.

Read the review. *shakes head* njc, njc, njc.

njc wrote:
amy s wrote:

Rule #1: If you have an automatic car, the average person controls the car with the brake. (A manual controls the car with the accelerator.) When driving in ice, it is a key control point to stay at a steady speed because the acceleration is what makes you spin out.

Don't be afraid to put the automatic in low gear so you don't have to brake as much.  Conversely, there may be times when it helps to push the tranny to a higher gear so the drivetrain can't put the same burst of torque on the wheels.
Be aware that (on most cars) only one pair of wheels pulls or pushes.  Both brake.  I've seen someone stopped in the slushy snow with their rear wheels turning even as they were holding the car with the brake and the front wheels.  Front wheel drive has the advantage that the strongest brakes are on the drive wheels, so that shouldn't happen.

With an automatic tranny, you manage the car's energy state by feeding energy in with the accelerator and bleeding it away with the brakes.  The manual allows you more direct control of the car through the engine.  (But the newer, many-geared manumatics change that a little.)

Remember--the ONLY control you have of your car goes through that 100 or so square inches of contact patch.

It's all physics.

Fun link one
Fun link two (simpler)
Fun link funk

Thanks for the info. I'm leaving those links for the weekend though - my brain is fried by the time I get home from work. It's been a busy couple of weeks - had to think at work a bit - harsh working conditions, I tell you!

Oh, one of our cars is a proper 4WD with low range - we knew we might have some trouble, so spend the extra money when we bought cars. The other car is AWD. So hopefully that would help a little bit too.

njc wrote:

Now, Amy, appropos the pulsating spells on the shaft of Erevain's staff ...

The scene is a schoolroom, a small school from years ago.  It reads best with a Scots burr.

Teacher: Mistress Mary, will you stand up please.

[Mary stands]

Teacher: Now Mary, can you tell me: What part of the human body, when properly stimulated, grows to nine times its normal size?

[Mary blushes]

Teacher: Mary, what part of the human body, when properly stimulated, grows to nine times its normal size?

[Mary looks down at her shoes]

Teacher: Mary, quit your stalling, stand up straight, and answer my question.  What part of the human body, when properly stimulated, grows to nine times its normal size?

[Mary bites her lip and tries to stand straight.]

Teacher: Very well, Mary, you may sit down.  Master Johnny, will you stand up please.

[Johnny stands]

Teacher: Now Master Johnny, let us see if you can answer my question.  What part of the human body, when properly stimulated, grows to nine times its normal size?

Johnny: The pupil of the human eye, when properly stimulated, grows to nine times its normal size.

Teacher:  Very good, Master Johnny.  You may sit down.

Teacher: Mary, I've three things to say to you.  First, you've not done your homework, that much is for certain.  Second, Mary, you've a dirty, dirty mind.  And third ... Mary, I fear you are in for a grave disappointment!

I'm not going to ask and just make my own deductions ... *shakes head* Amy, Amy, Amy.

amy s wrote:

NJC, Just be careful, is all :-)

Janet: It's time to teach about how to drive in the cold. Especially when it is icy. 24 to 32 degrees F is mere inconvenience.

Rule #1: If you have an automatic car, the average person controls the car with the brake. (A manual controls the car with the accelerator.) When driving in ice, it is a key control point to stay at a steady speed because the acceleration is what makes you spin out. If you have antilock brakes, make sure that you press them down in a constant fashion. (No antilock? Then pump the brakes to keep from locking the wheels)

If you spin out, try to steer out of it with slow movements. Turn the wheel in the direction of the spin, even though it isn't the way you want to go. Then you can try to move out once the wheels grab again.

In heavy snow or ice, you drive straight, make wide and slow turns, and avoid lane changes. A big time of danger is during sunset since bridges freeze first because of the airflow beneath. Another is bright sunlight. People think the shiny line of black under their tires is water when in fact it is ice.

If you see ice sticking on your windshield despite the defroster, SLOW DOWN.

If you see semis stopped on the side of the road, SLOW DOWN. They know something you don't.

Put your hazards on if you are going less than the speed limit. Don't worry about stupid people who insist on passing and driving faster. I've seen more than a few spin out in front of me as I drove past them.

Don't stop for an accident unless your car is poised to protect you if someone slides off the road. Cars can be replaced. You can't. Call for help and let someone else deal with it.

If you are in an accident, stay in your car unless everyone is stopped around you. There are a lot of people hit once they get out of their cars.

Carry a shovel and junk towels in your car. Flares will only be useful once, but they will be REALLY useful during that time. Kitty litter is another thing that is handy to put in your trunk (Put it under your wheel if you are stuck and trying to get out of ice.)

Last thought. Don't let ice scare you. It's like fire. You learn to respect it and most of the time, there is no problem.

A

Thanks for the advice! A few people at work have also been giving me training especially keeping an eye on the weather forecast. The kitty litter is a new one! I think the good thing around where I am is that it's mostly ice and not so much snow - if it snows, apparently it's 1-3 inches or so and melts fairly quickly again. Hazards when going slow - got it, I think I'm going to do that a lot.

The areas where snow/ice is prevalent has ice markers that turn blue if there is a chance of ice/snow around here. It even has the 'shape' of a snowflake.

What's really nice is knowing that I can go to work later and wait for daylight if need be to get to work. That helps a lot.

How is your vacation/time-off going? I can't wait, I have two and a half weeks off end of this month. Whoo-hoo. I just need to stop wasting time and get some writing done!

543

(520 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

amy s wrote:

It is. The shot is called Rhogam in the US. It is an autoimmune thing. You know how your blood type is called something like A or B positive or negative?  The + or - antigen is something that causes transfusion reactions (which is why you have to know your 'blood type'.  So an A+ carrier can get a transfusion of A- blood without a big deal, (because they carry the antigen and the (-) blood doesn't.  The reverse is not true. A(-) bloodtypes have to get negative blood.

This is why O negative blood is the universal donor. There are no A, B, or (+) antibodies in it.

Soooooo. If a negative mother has a child by a Rh(+) male, she can successfully carry the first pregnancy. Then the baby/mother's blood gets mixed during birth. Then the Rh (-) mother gets antibodies to the foreign blood and recognizes any further Rh (+) pregnancies as foreign. This makes the mother miscarry the baby.

http://www.rhogam.com/FAQs

SIL= sister in law? Otherwise, you are writing something about my character that I don't know about :-)

Sister in law! smile And yes, this was it, Rhogam sounds familiar. But I'm talking like more than 10 years ago when everyone around my age was having babies.

544

(520 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

njc wrote:
janet reid wrote:

Without H being inconsiderate, I have to think of something else why she would sleep with M after 10 years of not sleeping with anyone else

Ten years is a bit of a stretch.  Less than five seems improbable to the story; ditto more than eight.  And besides, she and M were childhood friends.  She was what, five years younger?  That will make M rather old to be unmarried, no?  And to undertake his various physical adventures?  (I mean with the steel, not in bed!)

You're spot on - more like seven actually. Here's the detailed numbers I'm using for now:

C was 17 when she married H (that was ten years ago from the day of the raid). So C is now 27, H died 7 years earlier when she was 20. The age difference between M and C is 4 years, but that will likely change to make him younger than his current 31 (unless I can convince readers he wants to avoid marriage badly).

amy s wrote:

New chapter is up and awaits some shredding. Any takers?

This one was FUN to write!

I have other reviews to catch up with, but what the heck, why not make Amy feel more guilty about falling behind with NS. Although, you're forgiven with all the help on the Humphrey's 'medical problems', so you're okay, don't worry! wink

I don't think I've replied yet to your other question. I had first dibs - so the fingerless gloves are mine, all mine *gruffy voice* I wear it most days now, especially in the afternoon driving home from work - it's colder than in the mornings, so it's in my bag for work permanently. The two (comfy) sleeveless jumpers are working overtime at home. Christian wears the trappers hat a lot - he agrees, don't care what it looks like, it's warm. Funny enough, it suits him. Gustav, who is still wearing shorts and walking around barefoot (I kid you not), wears the green jumper, gloves and scarf when it's really cold (and then it's effing cold, because he's not one that wears lots of clothes). The beanies are lifesavers, as are all the jackets.

We haven't gone looking for snow yet, but at the rate things are cooling down around our valley, we won't have to drive anywhere to play in the white stuff. I'm also taking my laptop home everyday - if weather is bad, non-essential personnel are allowed to work from home or come in late. So far, so good and haven't had one of those yet. Had a few icy mornings, but not much and the roads I use are well traveled meaning most of the sludge is gone by the time I get there. I still drive slower, wet is also slippery. One morning had icicles on the walking path at our office building (about 10ft or so - distance, not depth), so it was crunchy under my boots when I got to work and when I left. That morning was REALLY cold.

I luvvvvvv central heating, especially on those days when the minimum is something like 22F and the maximum 34F. Spoken to my brother over the weekend who informed me, the insensitive cow he is, that his swimming pool's water temperature is 29C . Well, I doubt he'll be complaining to me when summer really starts to get warm ...

But yeah, so far, we are surviving! And lots of thanks to you. xxx

546

(520 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

Great link Amy.

My SIL miscarried her second baby, but it had something to do with her blood group/type and her GP didn't give her the anti-viral shot that would've prevented this from happening after she had her first child. She had 2 healthy babies after that.

Another close friend had the same problem, and she was having twins - I think this is why it was picked up because she had been expecting twins. In any case, she had to have blood tranfusions every other week. She had one delivered and from memory, they kept the smaller of the two in the womb for another week (with tranfusions still ongoing) and a half before she was delivered too.

When I had my first, my GP checked and double checked my blood type. When I asked why it's important to know, she said it was to make sure whether I needed that shot or not. I didn't.

To me, this seems related somehow.

547

(520 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

amy s wrote:

OK, graphic alert. Anybody who doesn't want to read the dirty details can skip this.

Sustain is the key word.  He could probably wake up with an erection, but can't sustain it long enough to ejaculate. Therefore, his attentions with C were rushed. He had to penetrate with little notice. She wasn't prepped or properly…lubricated. Therefore, sex was painful. Especially since she wasn't experienced.

Then he stops, knowing that the deed isn't done. However, he blames her for his inability to finish. Or (even worse) pretends that he is done to avoid embarrassment. At that point, she has been penetrated and thinks that there is a chance for a baby. I would guess that he wouldn't have the heart to tell her otherwise. Initially, C would be happy that she pleased him.

After multiple failures, she starts noticing that he isn't interested in her. Based on the lack of erections. I would imagine that a virile man with multiple children would be humiliated by this lack and C's presence would be a constant reminder of his deficiency.

NJC, sorry about the Kell (+) antigen. Here is a link. It explains it better than I can.

http://www.history.com/news/did-blood-c … ctive-woes

This is word for word what I was trying to go for. I think I have done it, but K (and now njc) *which is good BTW, because I need to know one way or the other* made me unsure I conveyed it clear enough.

The difficulty is that from C's perspective, it would sound like rape because like you said, she wasn't ready and H knew he had better get going before *sound of a balloon deflating*

What I will change next time around is just make it really uncomfortable for C rather than painful (less rapey) although I still think the first time would have hurted for sure without some dedicated foreplay. And really make it clear H was quick about it and sometimes nothing really happened.

I've also played on the regularity of H's visits when M was ready to go for round 2 and C thought he'd need a week or two or three. I've received a good suggestion and M can ponder about the strangeness of it all to just confirm the underlying message to readers that H had a problem, not C.

The other reason I just don't simply want to make this go away and have C magically get pregnant, is the difference between M and H is what changed her mind to get naked with a guy again. Without H being inconsiderate, I have to think of something else why she would sleep with M after 10 years of not sleeping with anyone else (given her impulsiveness, it'd be a hard sell). Dedication to the children will only go so far me thinks.

Should be possible? K, if you're reading this, I owe you (I think this subject is only second to talking about how it feels being kicked in the nuts for guys or maybe not), and would making it just uncomfortable instead of painful and then have someone state it make a difference in your mind? Enough that the boar can detesticate someone else?

Thanks for this team Medieval fantasy! *group hug but not too close, this is way too personal already LOL*

At this rate, njc might insist I get kicked out of this group LOL I keep on interfering with romancy stuff!

548

(520 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

amy s wrote:

ED is about not getting it up.

Parasympathetic pathways, 'P' ut it up
Sympathetic pathways, 'S' hoot it out.

DIfferent nerve endings are affected. ED can have so many different reasons. Something as simple as a monster prostate gland (which naturally gets bigger as a male ages) can interfere with fertility. It isn't just about the sperm. It can be about the plumbing, the nerves being affected by cancer or chronic disease (like diabetes), the function of the sperm, or the amount of sperm, the shape of the sperm and whether they are good swimmers, etc.

I think that the natural inclination of that time period was to blame the woman. Look at Henry the Eighth. He was the issue. Likely from either syphilis or being Kell (+) in his blood, he fathered only four children despite having multiple wives and mistresses. Yet it was Anne Boleyn who paid the price for not bearing a male heir. (Catherine Howard didn't count. I believe she got caught with her skirts up and went to the chopping block for fooling around with someone other than a king.)

My research says:

Erectile dysfunction, or ED, is the inability to achieve or sustain an erection suitable for sexual intercourse. Causes include medications, chronic illnesses, poor blood flow to the penis, drinking too much alcohol, or being too tired. (WebMD/Wiki)

Inability, in my book, means nothing, as in, 100% nothing. And sustain, in my book, means something for a little bit/few minutes and then *pfffffffftttttt* (sound of a balloon deflating, in case you're wondering). So that's why I have it he could do something for a little bit at times and stopped abruptly, and other times couldn't do anything. So, if I understand you correctly, it's one or the other, not both? Then I definitely have to fix that.

Or what would you propose H has so that he had children by other wives, but not Catherine making everyone thinks Catherine has a problem. At this rate, I'll make her a bloody virgin, previous relationships/marriages just messes around. grrrr

And I owe you dinner with that bottle of wine! You're really invaluable because you also solve problems, you don't just create them. wink [just kidding njc/K!]

549

(520 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

amy s wrote:

How old was H during the conception of his youngest child? How many years between that and his marriage to C?

He married C when he was 42-ish and his youngest child was 8 at the time (I can still play with these numbers).
He also started drinking heavily after his last wife died.

550

(520 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

njc wrote:

But how does anyone in the story know  that H is the problem?  The assumption can always be that it's C's problem, assumption unchallenged until experience proves otherwise.

But I still have to make it plausible unless I kill H's children from his previous marriages ... i.e. when C falls pregnant, readers shouldn't go how the hell and how convenient for the author, they should be going oh yes, all these kluuz and I totally missed it but it makes some sense. ?