251

(6 replies, posted in Close friends)

The other day I was counting how many book I have in my Kindle--all of them read. I own over 350 books, and it's only the ones in my Kindle. I've read a lot of normal books when I was a teenager and a kid. My favourites? Alexandre Dumas, The Count of Monte Cristo; Romulo Gallegos, Doña Bárbara; Agatha Christie, The Hollow.

When I was about 10-14 yo, I wrote a series of detective stories. The MC was this English detective who lived with his Watson, his much younger female secretary and assistant.

I remember my mum raised an eyebrow when she read the first story. "Do they live together?"

"Yes, of course," I answered. "Just like Holmes and Watson."

So, they were roommates, not a couple, and not occasional lovers either. I was too young to think of that. I was heavily influenced by Arthur Connan Doyle so I assume my detective HAD to live with his assistant. I wanted a girl to appear in the story, so rather than a male Watson, I created a female one, a girl in her late twenties when the detective was near 50.

Now that I got serious (I published my first novel 1.5 years ago) my genre is YA. Why? Good question. I think I'm influenced by my own teenage years rather than by any particular author. Many of the baroque references in "When Heaven and Hell Meet" are influenced by Carlos Ruiz Zafón opus, mainly his "The Graveyard of Forgotten Books" trilogy.

By the way, I've just purchased  Daphne de Maurier Rebeca audiobook, solely based on Suin's recommendation above. It's on the queue after Neal Stephenson's Snow Crash, which I'm currently listening to.

Kiss,

Gacela

Dear Rachel:

I can't believe I  missed this post! Congratulations! You're such a good writer I'm not surprised you're being published. I checked your previous works in Bewildering Stories since long ago when we first met, and I think they are amazing. Don't forget to inform us when it's gonna be published we all may be able to check it and celebrate.

Does Bewildering Stories pays you? I mean, do they buy the stories or only accept them for publication, thanks a lot for your contribution?

Please share a bit more information of Bewildering Stories, what kind of e-zine it is, and maybe your personal success-story with this e-zine. Feel free to show off a bit--I know they have published SEVERAL of your stories.

Keep us posted.

Kiss,

Gacela

Forum to discuss The Outlaw Who Saved the World The Autobiograffiti of Grandville Rodriquez by Sheriff Norm.

254

(107 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Charles_F_Bell wrote:

  Nevertheless, fanfic is morally theft.

Oh! I'm feeling sooo very bad right now! I enjoyed Gregory Maguire's Wicked both at the theatre and when I read the book. Had I known it was L. Frank Baum's morally stolen material, I would have stayed away from it.

I also feeling sooo disappointed because the society, by and large, acclaimed it as a Broadway hit. How deep has society descended if it praises moral theft? That should be the reason why Trump got elected, our society is upside down.

But, who am I to complain? A one girl who should have had a regular American name had she been American? Another of the TNBW authors who must consider looking up the proper use of italics in the CMS? One of those incompetent authors who hires editors?

Tsk, tsk. Just thinking I wrote years ago some Cats fanfic makes me suicidal.

Kiss

Gacela

255

(107 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Charles_F_Bell wrote:
SolN wrote:

How about a closed room murder that must also combine two fanfics that would never go together? I'm liking the idea.

Fanfic is theft of intellectual property. Salinger, et al. vs. John Doe, et al. U.S. District Court, NY. (2010)

Salinger, et al. vs John Done, et al. is not decided yet, and the judge's decision to stop the publication of a sequel to Catcher in the Rye in the USA was vacated upon the decision was appealed. I don't understand why the conclusion that fanfic is theft of intellectual property.

256

(107 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

That last idea sound terrific, Sol!

257

(107 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Sherlock Holmes's The Sign of the Four, is also another example.

258

(107 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Agree, a locked room mystery. That would be awesome!

259

(107 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

A mystery! Let's try a mystery.

Kiss,

Gacela

260

(60 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

15,000 people in The Critters!!! How many are we in TNBW?

261

(60 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Just voted for TNBW!

262

(63 replies, posted in Close friends)

I've just added three chapters. My intention is to explore deeper into Helga + Athens relationship and to better explain Helga’s motivations. I found a weak point there: if Helga could leave Athens’s body at any time she wished, why didn’t she did it as fast as on page 3 of the story. There ought to be a GOOD reason. I’m trying to make sure such reason exist. Because if not, why should a 3000 YO half-demon care about a bunch of high school kids?
Hope you may find some time to check these chapters and share your opinions with me.

Kiss,

Gacela

I've just voted.

Kiss,

Gacela

264

(25 replies, posted in Close friends)

Suin:  I checked Now Novel, but it's quite expensive!

Congratulations!

266

(63 replies, posted in Close friends)

About Helga and Athens:

Athens appeared in the first chapter, but she's not supped to be there anymore, that's why Sheriff Norm's suggestion about either Athens or Helga alternatively controlling the body, or even talking to each other inside the body they both occupy, is not possible. I don't want the reader to connect with Athens, the girl who wanted to commit suicide, because she's not the main character and there's no story arc for her. Helga is the MC. Helga is the one who will learn and grow. Patrick is also supposed to learn and grow, so in the end I'm not completely sure who is actually the MC, but the idea is everything rotates around Helga, who ends up learning and growing following the YA literature unwritten rules.

Besides, within THIS story's cannon, there is only one way for a demon to abandon a body in which he is trapped: spontaneous combustion. As explained before, the demon cannot leave the body, the very reason why he is "trapped". If the person dies, the demon will remain trapped in the carcass. There's one only chance for the demon to escape from the body: if for some reason the person is in dead peril, for example, in danger to be run over by a car, the demon's self preservation instinct  will try to save him. But the demon is trapped, remember? So, his instinct fuels him to escape before his host is dead and thus the demon abandons the body of his host amidst a sudden combustion. From an eyewitness perspective, it would be spontaneous combustion. Of course, the human being will die, despite he is actually run over by the car or not. The spontaneous combustion is so violent his body ends-up turned into ashes.

Once free, the demon is so weak he remains on the spot previously occupied by the person who is now ashes. In that moment he acquires a physical form and is visible. This is the right momento to seize him, like the ghostbusters did with ghosts, and lock him in an appropriate dungeon whence he cannot escape.

The above is the only way for Helga to leave Athens's body. If the reader has connected with Athens as a character, once Helga leaves her body (and she will, it's part of the story) Athens would die. The reader's perception would be Helga murdered Athens. Even if Athens would voluntarily give her life encouraging Helga to leave, I'm not sure if the reader would end up feeling sympathy for Helga. The reader would feel much more sympathy for Athens who's just gave her life for the greater cause, and I want Helga to be one with whom the reader connects. it's not Athens's story, it's Helga's.

As I am writing this, the above is not sounding that bad to me. I mean, I hadn't thought of it until now. CJ comments have just made me think. Anyway, I'm not sure if I want to rewrite the story following the above lead. I'll think about it.

Thanks CJ for stirring this vein (dunno if this is properly written/conveyed in English, but it would be in Spanish).

Kiss,

Gacela

267

(63 replies, posted in Close friends)

Dear CJ:

Good points all of them. Yes, the thrones are a weakness. You need a truck to transport them somehow, maybe in the back of a van, but then it should be a large one. It could have been folding chairs, but then part of the solemnity would have been lost. This is not a cub-scout meeting.

You're right about The Brotherhood. Their intentions are not good and the people belonging to the group are held together more by fear than by camaraderie. Somehow, the low level chaps (the higher the number the lower the level) are constantly being fooled by the high level leaders who have their own agenda. While the Brotherhood is actually after the demons, the reason why they want to seize them is not to free humanity from evil but in order to channel the demons' power for their own purposes. Ultimately, The Brotherhood wants to rule the world, etc., etc., etc., the usual.

Imagine The Brotherhood as an organisation with ramifications  all agents all around the world. Currently, their headquarters are in America but in the past they were in Europe and before than in Ancient Egypt. While at first The Brotherhood was loyal to their objectives, given enough time they had degenerated and now it's difficult to tell The Brotherhood leaders from the demons they chase.

Patrick's dad motivations are not explained and it's not my intention to study them because  he's not a main character. Let's say he is one those who believe The Brotherhood is good natured and their intentions are legitimate. He introduced Patrick to the group because he truly believes in it.

The Brotherhood minions are indeed expandable, as will be shown afterwards. Buchanan, in particular, has his own agenda, and it's like Frank Herbert indicated in Dune: plans within the plans.

Helga & Athens... From the comments poured by the reviewers I gather it's evident Helga is  "possessing"  Athens. In the revision I'm doing now I'm trying to clarify that. More than a typical possession, Helga is trapped in Athens's body and cannot leave it, at least for the time being. According to the explanations given in the story, if a demon gets trapped in human body the way Helga just got trapped, he cannot leave the said body. In itself this is a risk because, as it is also explained, if the demon remains in trapped in a human after the person owner of the body dies, the demons remains in the dead body. Given enough time, the body would decompose and the demon would end-up scattered and unable to be one single entity again. For practical purposes, the demon would have died.

The above is different from the typical possession where the demon can enter and leave a human body at will. I will make sure this last statement is properly explained. Kindly notice that, while I borrowed some ideas from the demonology cannon, I'm also creating my own. Rhiannon pointed at a coupla facts not in line with the cannon. It's on purpose and not because of my lack of knowledge (my demonology on demonology is certainly little), and I do not pretend to be in line with other stories. Think of Twilight  vampires who can walk on daylight without evaporation, or whatever vampires do under direct sunlight. According to the regular cannon, vampires cannot stand sunlight, not even if the day is cloudy, that's not enough. They can only be outside at night. In the same way, I walked away from the demonology cannon according to my story requirements.

Helga is not a demon. It is mentioned that demons are all male, even though Rhiannon was so kind to point angels, and thus demos who derailed angels, are neither boys nor girls. Once again I walk away from the cannon, and maybe from what Christianity believes, for the sake of my story. Helga is a human girl. A Mycenaean princess who is actually sister to Agamenón, the famous king who directed the war of Troy. At some point in the past, both Mephisto--the bloke we know as the devil--and Senneferi--another of the angels who rebelled against God--had a crush on Helga when she was 16. Of course it's not true love. Demons cannot love. It's lust and both of them wanted to rape her. None of them could because she was able to control them for reasons not explained in this book (this intends to be a trilogy). Because they could not force her, i.e., rape her, they offered her power in exchange. She accepted the power but ultimately fooled them because she has not had sex with either of them.

So far, she has been ambitious and greedy, and has lived for 3000 years. She can be a spirit but also has a body, hers. She has not aged in 3000 and still looks like a 16 year-old girl.

268

(63 replies, posted in Close friends)

Oh Rachel! You always make me laugh sooo much!

269

(63 replies, posted in Close friends)

Muy apologies, Rachel. You know my English is sloppy. I meant 'I can't imagine just how interesting a YA story about Rhiannon might be' meaning I think they would really be interesting.

Spanish and French are specific languages, English is ideological. Words in Spanish convey exact messages. Words in English convey ideas that change depending on the words, like inserting, or not, a "just". It's difficult for non-natives to understand the kind of subtleties you pointed at above. But you people are excellent teachers and I'm learning a lot. That's why I love you all!

Kiss,

Gacela

270

(63 replies, posted in Close friends)

Rachel:  Sure. I didn't suggested it to you, because your story is fantasy and not YA (however young, Rhiannon behaves more like a grown-up rather than the typical YA heroine). But I'll be more than happy to bundle with you as well. Your stories are fantastic! I can'rt imagine how interesting a YA story about Rhiannon might be.

Kiss,

Gacela

271

(63 replies, posted in Close friends)

I'm already republishing edited chapters. So far, I've edited up to chapter 18. I've also added chapter 12, and modified complete chapter 9 (100% rewriting, it's something different). The former chapter 9 will be moved out in the story, and will also be heavily rewritten, albeit keeping the underlying idea. I'm planning to add one or two more chapters in between the ones already published to fill a coupla gaps I've spotted.

Once I'm done republishing this story, and if no further comments either from you people or from new reviewers are received, I'll send it to my editor. My deadline to publish it in Amazon is March 2017.

By the way, Suin, I was wondering: are you planning to self-publish "Being 15"? If so, I'd like to offer you a deal: I publish Where Heaven and Hell Meet and you Being 15, separately. Afterwards, we build a bundle of YA novels (we may contact some other YA incipient writer from TNBW) and publish them together in Amazon as a lower-price bundle. It seems to be a terrific marketing idea and I've know of many indie writers whose individual sales escalated after the public learnt about them through a bundle.

Kiss,

Gacela

272

(7 replies, posted in Close friends)

I've read a couple of them, starting with "Writing Fiction for Dummies". The advice was good, but at a basic level. I read them two or three years ago when I  got seriously into writing my first novel (Amber Eyes). Back then I had no clue about serious writing and about the business. Bottom line, they were helpful and they opened my eyes, but not to the level of "improving my writing". If it comes to improving my writing, the advice so far received at TNBW has been way  more helpful than anything in "how to" books.

That said, I've found a coupla books that are useful tools when you're writing (you might or might not have already read them):

By Angela Ackerman & Becca Puglisi:
The Emotion Thesaurus
Emotion Amplifiers
The Positive Traits Thesaurus

By Val Kovalin:
How to Write Descriptions of Eyes and Faces
How to Write Descriptions of Hair and Skin.

They are more handbooks than influential material on your style, even though they are very useful for the characterisation process.. Allow me to quote from The Emotion Thesaurus to share with you an example:

"DESPERATION

DEFINITION: A state or hopeless that leads to rashness

PHYSICAL SIGNALS:
Feverish, over-bright eyes
A darting gaze
Quick movements
An inability to sleep or eat
...

INTERNAL SENSATIONS:
Racing heartbeat
A dry mouth
A sore throat from pleading, crying, begging
...

MENTAL RESPONSES:
Constant planning and obsessing
Irrational thinking, poor judgement
A willingness to do anything
...

CUES OF ACUTE OR LONG-TERM DESPERATION:
Crying, sobbing, wailing,
Screaming
....

MAY ESCALATE TO: TERROR, DREAD, ANGER, DETERMINATION

CUES OF SUPPRESSED DESPERATION:
Hold oneself tight
Believing a lie if it offers hope
Fidgeting
Retreating internally to cope, shutting the world cut
..."

The above is totally helpful when you're showing how a character "looks" when he/she experiences certain emotion. Also, what he/she feels and thinks of. It helps a lot when you want to show rather than tell.



Kiss,

Gacela.

273

(27 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Number 2, but I agree with NJC that the letters should be larger.

Kiss,

Gacela

274

(12 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

If it's a new chapter, saving it will not publish it (it's two separate steps), meaning you can follow Suin's instructions to view your chapter before you publish it. If the chapter had already been published and you are editing it (making some change or correction, or rewriting it following the reviewers' advice, etc.) once you hit the "SAVE" button it is automatically published and it's visible to everybody. HOWEVER, you are taken immediately to a "view" screen where you can check what has just been published. There you can check whether you're satisfied with the changes.

If you are not, you can hit your browser's backwards button and you'll be back in the editing environment, where you can perform any other correction required before hitting the "save" button again. While it's true your chapter will be visible with "errors" while you check/correct your post, the probability somebody may be reviewing your work exactly in that moment is very low.

Kiss,

Gacela

275

(12 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I don't think it's needed. It could be a problem if, as Sol said, right after publication somebody checks it while there are still corrections needed.

Let's be honest: the probability such might happen is so low, and the consecuences so negligible, I don't think it's worth the amount of work required to modify the site.

Kiss,

Gacela