526

(27 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Thanks, Janet!

527

(27 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

My latest novel, How little We Know, posted on this site, has been released today. amzn.to/1U1uXRX  Thanks to all of you who reviewed it and helped shape the final product.

528

(2 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

We lost another great one. Pat Conroy, author of "The Prince of Tides," "The Lords of Discipline." "The Great Santini," "Beach Music," and others has died at age 70. RIP, Pat Conroy. You turned what made you the man you became into wonderful stories.

529

(52 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Sorry, JL. A "blondes" joke doesn't work with men as the dummies. Nice try, though! smile

530

(8 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I did wonder what happened to Tom Oldman - hadn't forgotten your name yet. Sorry to hear about your injury, but glad to hear you're on the mend.

531

(3 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Good for you, JP! You should give us the Amazon link to the book. Good to see you're still here!

532

(10 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Thanks, D A!  Once you get that first contract, you've got a foot in the door. The publisher gets to know you, and you establish relationships with editors, marketers, et al. Not a guarantee of future contracts, but it helps. The publishing industry is changing rapidly. I self-published my first two books - back when I knew nothing about marketing, and sales were poor. So I went looking for a publisher that didn't require an agent middleman and found one. But after two more books, that publisher sold out to a larger, NY firm that didn't know me. I now have two publishers who differ in their philosophies, giving me more than one option when pitching a new book.

But if you don't mind doing everything yourself - including marketing! - self-publishing can be quite successful. And the advantage is that you control everything. And take all the profits! For me, I'd rather have someone else do some of the heavy lifting.

I'm certainly no publishing expert, but I'd be happy to share my experiences with anyone who's interested.   jdeboer@nc.rr.com

533

(10 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

You deserve it, my friend.

534

(10 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Thanks - both Janets! I WILL be busy again when the editing starts, and then with the marketing when it comes out. The fun part of writing the book is over! sad

535

(10 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Thanks, Randy! I appreciate your support!

536

(10 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I just signed a publishing contract for How Little We Know. I'll be naming those at TNBW who stuck with the novel from beginning to end in the Acknowledgements page: Judy Suchan, Janet Taylor-Perry, C J Driftwood, Janet Reid, Nathan B. Childs, Irene Hamilton, Ann Everett, Philisha Stevens, graymartin, D. A. Amberson, Allenl, Deb Lampi, Mike Jackson, Cobber, Audra Middleton. I've sent private messages to those for whom there was a question as to what name I should use. If you haven't received a message and would like to change the name I have for you here, please let me know. Thanks, everybody!

Jack

537

(3 replies, posted in Thriller/Mystery/Suspense)

Way to go, Joss!

538

(6 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Gig Harbor is a lovely place. Went there by boat a few times when I lived in Washington. Good to see you on the mainland! I probably missed the story of how that came about.

539

(2 replies, posted in Cop Shop)

1. Reindeer Games
2. (This sounds familiar but I can't remember it.)
3. The Ice Harvest
5. Kiss Kiss Bang Bang
9. Die Hard
10. The Long Kiss Goodnight

540

(5 replies, posted in Marketing Your Writing)

My publisher arranged for a NetGalley run. Lots of requests for the book resulted in only two reviews. So you did much better than I, SP.

541

(69 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Well said, CJ!

542

(3 replies, posted in Cop Shop)

Ha! Doivetails with my post for another thread in this group today. I watched True Detective (the second season) and couldn't make it all the way through the first episode. Last year's series was good, but this one wandered way too much and was incoherent, IMO. But I thought Vaughn did a credible job in a serious role.

Never saw The Killing. But I like Seattle!

543

(6 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I had the same trouble, even after I bought the translation software.

544

(12 replies, posted in Thriller/Mystery/Suspense)

When I was a kid, Mel Allen was the voice of the Yankees. Then Garagiola replaced him, and I resented that. But Joe went on to be a great broadcaster.

545

(296 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Perhaps my use of "sneering" was a bit much, but that was the impression I got. I didn't intend to disparage other viewpoints on the piece, only to inquire why those who thought it was a bad example of writing thought so, since I didn't see it. It's supposed to be a discussion, not a vehicle for ad hominem comments.

546

(296 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Dill Carver wrote:
jack the knife wrote:

Jeez, a gazillion posts since the recommendation to preview "The Martian" and see how bad the writing is. Well, I did that this morning. And I didn't find anything outrageous or outre. It was a log, and I thought it read like a log would. No "showing" or dialogue applied. I don't get the sneering. But I only read a few pages. Does the author lose all sense of literacy further on? Just curious, since I didn't see anything, even if it were written by a TNBW author, to nit about.

A piece of commercial writing is reviewed objectively by individuals who then subjectively express their individual opinions about it for the purpose of a discussion (as you do). Why are the opinions that don't conform to your own, labelled sneering? Are you the ultimate authority upon the official quality of prose? It is totally okay that you liked it; that's the point of the discussion. The opinions that are pro or con are valued equally. Nobody is going to call you a shallow minded cheerleader or some such for having an opinion of your own, but why be aggressive and attack other legitimate points of view as sneering? It comes across as if you hold any opinion other than your own in contempt?

There is a broad span of personal taste, opinion and preference when it comes to any art form or media product. Can this community not hold an open minded discussion upon literature and the art or writing within the bounds of respect, understanding and civil minded debate? Where is the professionalism and camaraderie? Why must aggression be injected and points be made with snarky digs at people with opposing views? That kind of behaviour discourages others from entering into a conversation because it is not friendly and not conducive to an open minded community.

547

(296 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Oh, and what's this about closing the thread (presumably because of the increasing vitriol) and then reopening it? I don't get it, Sol.

548

(296 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Jeez, a gazillion posts since the recommendation to preview "The Martian" and see how bad the writing is. Well, I did that this morning. And I didn't find anything outrageous or outre. It was a log, and I thought it read like a log would. No "showing" or dialogue applied. I don't get the sneering. But I only read a few pages. Does the author lose all sense of literacy further on? Just curious, since I didn't see anything, even if it were written by a TNBW author, to nit about.

549

(8 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Consistency is the key. You shouldn't switch back and forth from one form of POV to another. And while that might be deemed a "writing style," it's not one an editor would likely accept. I've been there.

550

(12 replies, posted in Thriller/Mystery/Suspense)

Oops. Good one, Max! Got me!