Search options (Page 30 of 58)

As for me and grandpa, we know

Airplane pier

Jump the broom -- much more dangerous

Dinosaur

How about something like this: Have a list of all groups (single line for each) show up initially when you click on "Groups" from the home page. Then you click on any number of them you wish (or all) and get the full description of all those checked. You then have to scroll only through those you checked. Never give up. Take care. Vern

Okay, I envisioned that also, but then if you might be interested in more than one group you would have to click back to the list again and then click for that description and so on for any group you might  wish to explore more than a name; or alternatively you would scroll through the list with the descriptions. Seems a bit like six in one and 6.999999999... in the other. Works for me. Take care. Vern

You are probably entirely correct that it might help, but then I fully expect someone would be asking why we can't have more information about the groups listed (I'm assuming name only), which ironically is what the list does now. But to each their own. I'm not voting against it -- I probably would never even notice if it was implemented -- merely playing the devil's advocate wondering about the overall benefit as I'm prone to do; perhaps I'm the only one. Take care. Vern

Hang down your head Tom Dooley
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBSApzDTeRI

abecedarian Trump

Gestation

You obviously missed the part about thinking "a sane person" is going to read such a thing; those are the ones you weed out. Should you have reviewers to point to who have bravely gone where no man has gone before in a blind fog of irrelevance until the last word, I might suggest they have the incentive of the review process and possible reciprocation to lead them on to the promised land and possibly exempt them from the sanity clause -- maybe a pun there, who knows. Take care. Vern