ins out diary?
No, "outs in" as opposed to "incen (ins in)" diary: to out someone in a diary such as Mommy Dearest.
ins out diary?
No, "outs in" as opposed to "incen (ins in)" diary: to out someone in a diary such as Mommy Dearest.
outs in diary
Firestarter
njc wrote:But see Mickey Mouse Copyright.
Do you mean the distinction between corporate trademarking of an image which is perpetual and an individual's copyright of art that can have a long life but not perpetual after death because the assumption is that a corporation is chartered into perpetuity and a human being cannot be so? Why is a drug patent seven years and Disney's Micky Mouse copyright was 96 years? A patent on a product is seen as most productive within a short time span, but the economic benefit from art may not accrue even within the lifetime of the artist -- in traditional sensibility, that is, and not in the phenomenon of Pop music which is rather more like a patented packaged manufactured product.
Disney has lobbied for and gotten several extensions for the Mickey Mouse copyright, but it will still run out unless extended through further palm greasing by Disney. But even without an extension of the copyright, Mickey Mouse has been trademarked up to his eyeballs and characteristic ears and thus the very mention of Mickey Mouse is now considered by many to be synonymous with corporate Disney. Therefore, Mickey Mouse may likely never enter the public domain as long as the trademark is renewed. Should Disney go bust and/or forget to renew the numerous trademarks, then the immortal Mickey will enter the public domain. Take care. Vern
To meet this legal bar, the specifics of the contest would have to require a parody/satirical nature.
Although I don't particularly care for the fanfic idea, it seems that almost any depiction of two opposing fictional characters who would normally never meet could/would be considered parody/satirical in nature. However, the obvious solution to the gray area being considered for the contest (for any who would want to someday publish outside tnbw) is to simply not use it.Take care. Vern
SolN wrote:How about a closed room murder that must also combine two fanfics that would never go together? I'm liking the idea.
Fanfic is theft of intellectual property. Salinger, et al. vs. John Doe, et al. U.S. District Court, NY. (2010)
Another case addressing Alice Randall's "The Wind Done Gone" had an opposite ruling. The link provided below highlights the difference between the cases for anyone interested. Take care. Vern
Pear-de-farce
I have a great idea!
Fanfiction!
Take an established character and write a 1000 words about it.
Luke Skywalker
Harry Potter
Robert Langdon
Wonder Woman
Sheldon CooperCharacter must be a work of fiction (no, not even Donald Trump) and must be well-known.
To add another twist; combine two fanfics that would never go together. What would Conan the Barbarian meets Hermione Granger or Pinhead from the Hellraiser movies be like?
I'm confused; you say no to Trump and then mention possibly using -- oops, never mind, you used Pinhead and I automatically thought Dickhead which of course would be a Trump calling card. My bad. Take care. Vern
Say, we had a "mystery" contest and nobody knew the genre -- unless they read this thread. Take care. Vern
RIP, Sonny. It's a shame many will never receive a review from one of the best.
The mystery continues.
As for me and grandpa, we know
Not before grandma got run over
Airplane pier
stickrhoid
Jump the broom -- much more dangerous
hilaurus
means big laugh at big jokes
Dinosaur
misdirect
How about something like this: Have a list of all groups (single line for each) show up initially when you click on "Groups" from the home page. Then you click on any number of them you wish (or all) and get the full description of all those checked. You then have to scroll only through those you checked. Never give up. Take care. Vern
Trump and Flynn
Okay, I envisioned that also, but then if you might be interested in more than one group you would have to click back to the list again and then click for that description and so on for any group you might wish to explore more than a name; or alternatively you would scroll through the list with the descriptions. Seems a bit like six in one and 6.999999999... in the other. Works for me. Take care. Vern
Happy nachos
You are probably entirely correct that it might help, but then I fully expect someone would be asking why we can't have more information about the groups listed (I'm assuming name only), which ironically is what the list does now. But to each their own. I'm not voting against it -- I probably would never even notice if it was implemented -- merely playing the devil's advocate wondering about the overall benefit as I'm prone to do; perhaps I'm the only one. Take care. Vern
You have four pages of groups listed when you click on the "Groups" banner at the top of your home page. From the looks of the names I'm not sure how much good an alphabetical list would be if you didn't know exactly what you were looking for when you have names such as Texas Authors, Close Friends, Eternal Enemies, and Mama, Trains and Pickup Trucks to name just a few. Of course if you were already acquainted enough to know the exact name, there is a good chance you could be invited by a current member of such group. Scrolling through the list might also be educational as to other intriguing groups we may have never envisioned. But then I suppose you could scroll through an alphabetical listing also, but doesn't seem nearly as much fun as the random sampling. Just random group thoughts. Take care. Vern