I notice a lot of objections based on theology have arisen to Norm's book. Let me say a couple of things. After emerging from the theatre having watched what is now called "Star Wars: a New Hope," but was just Star Wars back then, I was truly enraptured (pun intended). But then I talked to others, who went on and on about the noises in space, the pitch and yaw in a vacuum, and lightsabers. I had an epiphany when talking to them. It was a movie; it wasn't real. Get my point?
On to theology. The Apostle Paul, whom I find more definititive than say, Pope Francis, on the subject of Christ in the flesh, argued that the centerpiece of Christianty was the resurrection--both the past one of Jesus and the future one of Christians. He said in Corinthians (forget which one) that for Christians to not believe in a bodily resurrection meant that all the apostles were lying and that Christians themselves were living a lie--as their morality is based on a future bodily existence. That the Catholic church might not believe this any more simply means that they are now in apostasy. As to the symbolic character of Revelation--clearly, it is intended as symbolic, (a third of the stars thrown down), as exhortative (the admonitions to the seven churches), but as LaHaye (author of "Left Behind" but not nearly as authoritative as the Apostle Paul) points out, it is incoherent and makes no sense except as future history--in other words, it is meant as prophecy. How to understand that prophecy? Takes hermeneutics, i.e., understanding the times John of Patmos wrote and applying it to modern times). For example, at the time, in Aramaic, you could transnumerate names. '666' transnumerates to 'Nero.' So is the Beast Nero or someone like Nero? Guess we'll find out. lol
But to repeat. Relax on the theology. It's fiction. Doesn't have to be true.