Nimrod: the Mighty Hunter Before the Lord

Status: Finished

Nimrod: the Mighty Hunter Before the Lord

Status: Finished

Nimrod: the Mighty Hunter Before the Lord

Book by: J.R. Geiger

Details

Genre: Non-Fiction

Content Summary


"Cush fathered Nimrod; he was the first on earth to be a mighty man. He was a mighty hunter before the LORD."--- Genesis 10:8-9

 

 

Content Summary


"Cush fathered Nimrod; he was the first on earth to be a mighty man. He was a mighty hunter before the LORD."--- Genesis 10:8-9

Chapter Content - ver.0

Submitted: November 06, 2025

Comments: 3

In-Line Reviews: 2

A A A | A A A

Chapter Content - ver.0

Submitted: November 06, 2025

Comments: 3

In-Line Reviews: 2

A A A

A A A

You have to login to receive points for reviewing this content.

"Cush fathered Nimrod; he was the first on earth to be a mighty man. He was a mighty hunter before the LORD."--- Genesis 10:8-9

The Bible isn’t shy about naming kings who fall. Pharaoh hardened his heart. Saul disobeyed. David, beloved of God, sinned and was rebuked in full view of history. When monarchs stumble and/or blessed, Scripture plainly speaks their names, their failings etched into the record as warnings for generations.

But Nimrod is different.

The text calls him “a mighty hunter before the Lord.” It names him as the founder of Babel, Erech, and Nineveh—the first king whose kingdom stretched across the plains of Shinar. And then, the narrative stops. No curse. No blessing. No verdict. Only the bare facts: hunter, king, builder. Period.

Later traditions, NOT Scripture, paint him as a rebel, a tyrant, the architect of Babel’s tower. Yet Genesis itself never says so. His name is absent from the story of the tower, absent from any charge of rebellion, absent from any fall from grace. This silence is striking. If Nimrod had defied God, wouldn’t the text have said so? If he had been blessed, wouldn’t the text have declared it?

This book is the fruit of my own research and reflection. I don’t claim to speak with final authority, only to follow the evidence where it leads. That evidence suggests something overlooked: Nimrod was not the rebel of Babel, but the hunter-king who could not restrain his people when they turned to pride. I believe he saw their ambition to build a tower to heaven as blasphemy against God. Unable to stop them, he left them to their own ends.

This is the Nimrod that I explore: the mighty one before the Lord, whose silence in Scripture isn’t condemnation, but mystery.


© Copyright 2025 J.R. Geiger. All rights reserved.

Write a Regular Review:

Regular reviews are a general comments about the work read. Provide comments on plot, character development, description, etc.

Write Regular Review

Write an In-line Review:

In-line reviews allow you to provide in-context comments to what you have read. You can comment on grammar, word usage, plot, characters, etc.

Write In-Line Review

Submitted Feedback

avatar

Author
Reply

avatar

Author
Reply

avatar

Author
Reply

Share on Twitter

Connections with J.R. Geiger

J.R. Geiger is a member of: