I'm not a theologian but here goes. Doesn't righteousness mean right living, holiness means a cut above, and virtue means behavior showing high moral standards? I want all three!

If God is holy (a cut way above everyone), then can He order the death of anyone? Yes, since all are sinners then death is deserved by all, and God can kill as He wills. Because we rebel against God, we deserve to die. Death is the penalty of sin. It's by His mercy that anyone lives. Somehow, we have to pay for those sins. That's where the Christian faith comes in and claims that our sins can be paid for by grace through faith via the cross.

In other words, since all those kingdoms in the Canaan were unholy, they all deserved to die. Therefore, God could kill them as He led the Israelites through the land.

Original sin is not easy especially in terms of babies, and I don't know if I can explain it.

Can I still die (martyrdom or other reasons) even though I'm righteous and virtuous, and holy? Yes. I'm not sure how to explain all this either. But we have a great afterlife policy.

77

(20 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I'd be impressed! I wonder if it's a short application process.

78

(20 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Dirk, you should be the Canadian ambassador to the USA.
:-)

79

(20 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I don't really know you much at all, but I know good news when I hear it. Congratulations!

80

(309 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

Dirk B wrote:

EDIT: I went with trirarium and nova nuggets. Although I prefer starstuff, it would make for too many repetitive references to stars in the names (e.g., stardrives powered by starstuff - nyet). Nova nuggets are formed during supernovas, hence their nova name.

Thanks for everyone's help. Now go out and see if you can find any deposits of the mineral. The galaxy awaits!

Do you mean Tritarium?

81

(309 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

I might have found some next to our money tree in the back yard.

82

(309 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

How about using rock instead of stone. Rock sounds tougher. Powerrocks, energyrocks.

83

(309 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

The first miner to find one picks it up and the heat from his hand starts a reaction and it begins to glow and become intensely hot. The miner calls it a handstar. Or perhaps handnova

The engineers that work on them can be called starlords (I could only find Star-Lords on the net). Novalord has been used.

84

(309 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

Preferences?

I like powerstone over the other stones. If you're going to power a starship then you need POWER.
Tritarium or powerstone? I'm prejudicially leaning toward tritarium because it sounds more technical. But if you want to lean more toward Star Trek:

"Give me more power Scotty!"
"I'm hitting the stones with all I got Captain!"

85

(309 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

Dirk B wrote:

I decided a while ago that I'm going to rename atreidite, the mineral that acts as a hyperbattery to power stardrive jumps. While I intend to give some nod to Dune in this story, if I haven't already, atreidite is too obviously close to Atreides. I want something more creative.

The name should suggest its function (an incredibly powerful battery). My first alternative, which I immediately dismissed, was to call the mineral "abattery". :-)

I'm open to suggestions.
Dirk

Let me suggest:
Fusolite (I have a hard time leaving fusion behind)
Helio-gen (go a notch up on hydrogen) Heliogen is taken
Heliofuse
Tritarium (no long i's, long a, and emphasis on second syllable)

86

(309 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

Dirk B wrote:

That reminds me, in addition to the Bunny Divine news broadcast, which only lasts for a few paragraphs, I could write a real short story about the killing of Mama and many other mobsters, with Kay as the protagonist/assassin.

I have a feeling a lot of people will want to hear about them.

It also harkens back to Custer's Last Stand, which might be good. There's a mysterious aspect to it. People might ask what does that mean? So my vote is for Satan's Last Stand.

But I also like Satan's Last Gambit. Or Satan's Last Gamble.

Oh well, think I'll go enjoy NFL football, Thanksgiving, and family. Happy Thanksgiving to all.

A few thoughts:
Lord of the Earth - helps a little bit with shortening it
Earth's Lord - seems too abbreviated.
Earth's Supreme Lord
Final Gambit (gambit means calculated move)

"The Unholy Sheperd" is pretty dark or ominous and hence usable. It's darker and hence better than "The Lesser King."

Too bad! Wasn't Return of the King from LOTR?

How about The End War?

The Revelations of Dirk - a must read :-)
You're probably right in that I was probably too broad to include all Catholics and Orthodox as having figurative interpretations. I just assumed that the Orthodox would be similar to the Catholics.

And I'm not convinced that we will truly understand all the Revelation of John until we go through it. That should give you some freedom in your writing.

Satan is already condemned to hell (Matthew 25:41) where it says that hell has been prepared for him. And there is Revelation 20:10. He is thrown into the lake of fire forever. Satan has seen the glory of the Almighty God and rebelled. There is no excuse and no forgiveness. You can say that Rev 20:10 is figurative, however, if the best figurative description of hell is a forever lake of fire and torment then it must be a bad place. Satan basically commits blasphemy of the Holy Spirit (Mark 3:28–30) but on a grand scale. And there is no turning back.

I know that what I've said in the last paragraph might constrain you mucho, but only you can determine what you want.

Well written stuff, Dirk. Some thoughts:

>>Satan and sinning humans, change your ways or Revelation is what will happen to you. It's God's final warning.>> From what I understand, Satan cannot turn back to the light. It's all over for him and his demons. But this is the quandary because why make the bet if there is no hope anyway? Therefore, I have to wonder if Satan has decayed over the millennia or very long ages ago. Hitler by the end of his life was probably in bad shape. I've heard he was drugged up and under some intense pressure. So perhaps Satan has degraded mentally and is beyond purely logical thinking. He doesn't care if God is omniscient. He is the great and awesome Satan and knows he'll win. This is just a thought...

God can't always say what might happen because where does faith and obedience come in? He basically tells Abraham to sacrifice Isaac and that's it. Abraham trusted in His promises, so he almost killed Isaac. Also, they had a covenant with each other which was very serious.

I did find this: Catholics interpret this final book of the Bible far differently than some of our Christian brethren in that we see its meaning as symbolic, rather than literal.

>>Humans, being smart too, have enough intelligence that they can figure this out as well (hell, I did, and my brain's not exactly firing on all thrusters, lol). It's just that most humans suck at interpreting the Bible correctly (45,000 denominations and counting), so most Christians think Revelation is literally what will happen.>> OUCH! So true that we Protestants have made denominational splitting into an art form. However, just as a minor note, I think most Christians think that Revelations is figurative or symbolic since many Christians are Catholic, Orthodox, and some protestants might agree with them.

I forget, when was the bet made between God and Satan?

Good comments K. But surely omission CAN be a deception.

Dirk:
If God is omniscient then He should know the outcome. So, He won't bet against Himself. Satan is desperate and will try anything.

If there are gaps in Revelations, then can your story fit into those gaps? The Chosen does stuff like that. Ultimately, Revelations states that God wins. We'll see the details as they unfold.

I'm trying to be somewhat theological... I hope this helps.

>>The other alternative I also considered right from the beginning was to sidestep multiple timelines (2 in this case) and have God give the prophets a vision of the future that is identical to our future. The latter would come true only if there was no challenge, which is the real world we live in. So, the Bible prophesies tell our future.

But the challenge changed that, which is a future God chose not to reveal in full. In part, it's to keep Satan from knowing his future. But mostly it's to prevent a crazy time loop. I'll skip the details for now.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
I don't know if you have any other choice. God anticipated the bet and gave the prophecies, but it did not include everything that would happen. I have a hunch that we will not fully understand some parts in Revelations until after something happens. For example, what are those creatures mentioned in Revelations 9? We'll know after they show up.

Kdot wrote:

there might be parts that God fogs Satan's mind...

Except if God fogs someone's mind such that they end up in the lake of fire, is the punishment still fair?

Satan rebelled and started the whole conflict. He is already condemned to hell (Matthew 25:41). Fogging his mind doesn't seem like a big deal to me.

I don't know if it's needed but I've also read that Satan cannot read our minds.

Dirk B wrote:

While it could be argued that this is close to God lying, he gave all those prophets and Satan sufficient intelligence to question the prophecies, yet none of the prophets thought to consider what will happen when Satan reads Revelation. Even Satan should have questioned God's motives. As a result, Satan issued the challenge rather than suffer an eternity in the lake of fire.

Let me comment on at least a part that I can wrap my brain around his late in the afternoon.

I assume that Satan reads the Bible. However, there might be parts that God fogs Satan's mind so that he doesn't really understand it.

I think that Satan would be desperate enough to try anything to avoid the lake of fire. It doesn't matter if he stands a chance. Let's see, I have a choice of being in the lake of fire forever or trying something that has very little or no chance of working.

I'll keep on working on it.

99

(309 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

Dirk B wrote:

A more interesting scene would be if Leonardo (the crazy taxi driver) breaks Joseph out of prison (he does eventually) just as the feds realize who Joseph is and go after him, with him just barely escaping from the planet. Of course, by then, Apollo has already been overthrown, replaced by Caligula, who would definitely want to capture Joseph. It would fix one weak scene after the breakout because there is no further chase involving Leonardo, this time driving a new limo. I could add seriously modern offensive and defensive capabilities to the limo, allowing Leonardo to kick serious ass. "Stronza, engage esplodere mode!"

Ya gotta make room for Leonardo and his taxi. Create some story around him. That guy is a good idea.

100

(309 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

Dirk B wrote:

A more interesting scene would be if Leonardo (the crazy taxi driver) breaks Joseph out of prison (he does eventually) just as the feds realize who Joseph is and go after him, with him just barely escaping from the planet. Of course, by then, Apollo has already been overthrown, replaced by Caligula, who would definitely want to capture Joseph. It would fix one weak scene after the breakout because there is no further chase involving Leonardo, this time driving a new limo. I could add seriously modern offensive and defensive capabilities to the limo, allowing Leonardo to kick serious ass. "Stronza, engage esplodere mode!"

Ya gotta make room for Leonardo and his taxi. Create some story around him. That guy is a good idea.