Thanks, Bill.

I'm trying to figure out the best way to show a word being stretched out by a speaker, as in: Neeever gonna happen. Technically, that changes the e sound to ie, which is not what I intend. Or is my example generally understood to be just a stretched vowel?

Thanks
Dirk

LOL. Connor is already capable of telekinesis (tk). For example, at Capernaum, he uses tk to tear stones from the old ruins and hurl those with bone-crunching force at the demonic hyenas. He's also the one who topples the Baldacchino in St. Peter's Basilica. Also, I need tk to explain his ability to manipulate clouds (have them form, have them dissipate, have them concentrate into thunderstorms, etc.) and to manipulate water to generate a rainbow over St. Peter's Basilica at the end. He also uses tk during a major fight with his father halfway through book 2, and again at the climax of book 2, when God "cleanses the Temple". smile

I was merely considering whether or not to involve tk in his jump off Megiddo. He'll use tk again in his battle against De Rosa's most powerful lieutenant at the end of book 3.

Cool ability: since Connor can use telekinesis, he ought to be able raise himself off the ground, though I intend to make it a limited ability, but if he can levitate, then he can use that ability (heightened temporarily by the wine from the Garden of Eden) to help him when he runs & jumps off the edge of Megiddo to jump over the attacking horde of demons and come at them from behind, while his cousins attack from the front. In other words, he uses telekinesis to help him stay in the air longer, while his boosted momentum from jumping from Megiddo takes him much farther than he otherwise could, over the hordes to land behind them.

The other option is to ignore telekinesis in this particular scene and make it the wine that allows him to sail over the hordes. An easier explanation.

505

(44 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

Kdot wrote:

I feel so evil

I know the feeling. I'm dying to write bad Connor (first half of book 2).

506

(44 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

Kdot wrote:

The ship's axe-murderer is 10x better now too.

I've added hints of him in two spots (ex: mysterious hulking shadow from odd direction when all characters are accounted for) and given MC plenty of time to wonder who that is.

Going to do one more sighting, this one a blurry / grainy camera snap as he runs past behind her... enough for her to see it's a crew uniform. Then can have her go the captain but he'll be like "No one matching that description on duty" or something. When he finally shows up for the first chase scene, it's going to be such an ah-ha moment.

I feel so evil

I like it. The axe-murderer was a great character. I can't remember his exact demise, but it would be cool if there was some way to hint that maybe he lived and got clear of the ship, without actually confirming it. Of course, then people might expect him to show up later.

Let me know if you post his revised version.

A further refinement of the above is to use first-person narration of the historic scenes. That would really put the reader in Connor's place in the scene. If I can figure out how to do it, the scenes would allow the reader to, for example, walk on water. Walking on water is a very tricky one, though, because in the first draft, Jesus walks on water in the past, whereas Connor walks on water in the present and is attacked by the sudden storm. It'll be hard to show Connor in both the past and the present. I need to think about that some more, but putting the reader into those historic scenes would be really cool.

They'd be very short scenes, though, since I don't have the enthusiasm to research enough historical details to describe anything at the level of detail I use for those locations in the present.

Bill et al, I deleted the latest accounts reported above. I didn't realize I already had that ability. I thought I was just a moderator at the moment.

Power! Unlimited Power!

Please continue to report spam accounts here, and I'll deal with them. I removed Sol's name from the subject line and made this thread sticky at the top of the forum, so it should be easy to find.

Bill, what made you think watkinsayden81 is a spam account? Their profile is empty. Did they post something to one of the forums? Thanks

Dirk

Alan, I updated the subject line to fix the typos you mentioned above (I have extra moderator privileges).

510

(9 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I am so happy for you, MJ. What a relief that must be.
When I finish up here, I'll go do a Snoopy dance. smile

Dirk

511

(44 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

Is this your normal approach to writing? Write a core story, then pad it until you reach the needed wordcount? Are you sure the additions won't feel like padding?

To be clear, I'm not lecturing. Just curious.

The Connor trilogy began with the twist at the end of book 1 in mind. Then I built the story around that, which grew quite naturally into an end times trilogy.

Thank you for the update, Alan. It's sad that Di's health continues to worsen, although it's wonderful to know that you are finally receiving support for her care. I'm sure many of the folks here will keep both of you in our thoughts and prayers.

513

(17 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

George FLC wrote:

I put Abraham Lincoln's Gettysburg address into Grammarly.

Opening sentence:
Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

Corrected by Grammarly:
Four hundred and seven years ago, our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation conceived in Liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

Technically, Grammarly is correct by modern standards, but Abe may very well have inserted the comma after Liberty intentionally to create a pause (it's a speech, not fiction after all), or that comma is the result of a jolt in the train while he wrote it. smile

514

(17 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

jack the knife wrote:

I just finished reading a thriller by Brad Thor, a bestselling novelist. He starts so many sentences with “ing” participles,  it is painful to read. Where are the editors?

Replaced by AI. smile  After all, why not? Apparently AI can already write fiction. At some point, will AI-generated books rival human-written ones? Eventually, each person may have their own "instance" of an AI in the cloud, which they can then ask to generate a book for them matching whatever criteria they want. Why buy books if you can generate them on the fly?

515

(17 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

It's really just some uses of ing verbs that are the problem.
Same is true for -ly adverbs; there's a tendency to use them to tell rather show, but if you know what you're doing, they're fine, especially in scenes or paragraphs where you want to pick up the pace, such as in a battle.
And let's not forget passive sentences. Sometimes it's absolutely the best way to write something (eg when the actor behind an action is unknown). It comes across as tortured writing to do otherwise.
The list goes on...

516

(17 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

From Reddit:
Q: How bad are '-ing' verbs?
A: They're so bad every published novel by popular authors is filled with them. smile

517

(17 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Below is a great, short article on when to use ing verbs and when not to:
https://mythsofthemirror.com/2020/03/08 … n-fiction/

Until now I didn't even notice where I was doing it wrong. Admittedly, readers may not make the distinction either, but publishers very well may. In some cases, even when used correctly, it strengthens the writing when you avoid them.

The article also gives examples of when its okay to use them.

My thanks to Elysse for the push I needed to look into this in more detail.

Awesome idea (if I do say so myself): rather than have Connor make up and show what he's seeing of Christ to the other members of the tour group, I'm going to change it so that the visions are real and Connor is merely showing what he truly sees. I can even switch scenes briefly to put Connor there, meaning a quick jump to the past. Connor will be in the historic scene, pretty much as he describes Christ addressing him across time, but the visions will not show Connor in the past, just that he is there and God is talking to him.

Hopefully, I can come up with things for Christ and Connor to say that have double meanings: to the others in the tour group, it'll reinforce they're growing belief of Connor as Christ (or at least won't give away that Connor is the Antichrist); only Connor knows that the words are intended for the Antichrist. Of course, God could give away Connor's real identity at any time, but He agreed up front not to do so.

I'll have to write up all these interactions up front to ensure it can actually be done in some way. It should be similar to the way Phanuel answers the questions of the group about why Antonio's noble deeds (eg saving Connor from the caracal at the baptism site) aren't really noble. Instead, Phanuel says Connor probably would not have been harmed by the caracal. He also says great deeds await you. Instead, I could put that in the message from Christ at each stop.

An alternative to having Connor and his cousins subject themselves to the switch being turned off is to leave the switch on (there's no way to turn it off without causing instant death). So, Connor will have to fight the effects for the rest of the trilogy. However, I could make his cousins loyal to him by him revealing he is the son of Satan. I'll have to figure out a way to make that loyalty change permanent, meaning once they're loyal to Connor, that won't change even when they see Satan near the edge of the final battle.

520

(6 replies, posted in New Authors)

Welcome to the site, Betsie. I'd suggest joining the Writing Tips & Site Help group as well, where you can ask whatever questions you may have as you try to familiarize yourself with the site, and someone is sure to answer. If your request is urgent, or you want to maximize the number of eyes that see it, feel free to post directly to the Premium forum. That's one of its common uses, and is generally the fastest way to get help.

Since you're probably still in your trial phase, trying to see if the site is worthwhile, here are a few tips for you:

- Be sure to post your chapters to Premium in addition to any other groups that you think are appropriate for the written piece (you must be a member of a group to post your writing to it). The Premium group requires points to post in, but that ensures everyone on the site will see it on their home page. Also, it's where the most experienced writers usually look for posted new work to review. Those are the folks whose eyes you really want on your writing.

- The best way to get reviews is to give reviews. Go to your home page and dive in. The longer the piece, the more points it pays.

- Be sure to thank those who review your work in a timely manner, and reciprocate by reviewing their work in return, unless you really just can't stand their stories. smile It happens, but then let them know it's not something you normally read. However, trading reviews is how to build your network of reciprocating writers (and friends) and gather points to post your own work. Even if points weren't required, you would still need to reciprocate to get other writers to continue to review your work (they need feedback too). And reading their work, even if outside your favorite genres, generally makes you a better writer by having you study the writings of other authors, a number of whom on this site are already published and very experienced.

- The site forums tend to be fairly quiet, although I personally use the Fantasy/Magic & Sci-fi forum for brainstorming with other writers about my works in progress. You may notice that there aren't a lot of posts after 2019. That was the result of a major server crash (the backup disks went down with it), which required our site admin to restore the site all the way back to 2019. Everything (posted works and forum discussions) dated from late 2023 onward is new. Our admin says he put new procedures in place to avoid a repeat.

- Some of the site's veterans have been here over a decade, myself included. While it's a small site, the caliber of the reviewers ranges from quite good to excellent. If, after the trial period, you're still unsure of whether to set up shop here, I'd suggest trying the monthly plan until you're certain one way or another.

- The Quickee communication feature on this site is rather confusing (new members almost always send themselves Quickees at least once, rather than to the person they intended). Still, it's the only way to communicate with someone until you've sent them a connection request (and they've accepted), or they've sent you one. Most members use connection requests and the private messaging feature. Quickees are public, by the way, so anyone can see what's written there. You can delete Quickees sent to you.

That's all I can think of for now.

Welcome and please let us know if you have any questions.
Dirk

521

(124 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I was trying to resurrect a post I had created containing tips on how members can maximize the number of reviews they receive. Spent 1.5 hours finding and importing it from the Way Back Machine and updating it.

As often happens, the site logged me out and my post was lost (I couldn't even access it by pressing the browser's back button). Very frustrating.

Sol, please fix the timeout problem in the forums. Why is a timeout even needed in the forums? As far as I know, no other part of the site does this. Also, it would be cool if the back button took you back to your post (the page you just came from), just in case posting fails for any reason.

Thanks
Dirk

522

(124 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Create New Work is probably better than add, start, or new. When it's a smaller work (short story, poem, essay, article, etc.), you essentially create it and you're done. For a book, you create it and then can come back later to add more chapters (via the action buttons).

523

(124 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Sol, another issue that new users run into is that the Home/Portfolio screen, which is accessed via the Post Your Writing button along the top menu strip, causes confusion because of the big red Add New Content button on that screen. If someone is trying to add a second chapter to a recently created book, new users hit the red button and end up accidentally adding a second book rather than just a new chapter. This costs them even more points to correct it. I've seen new members add as many as three books before realizing their mistake.

Makes me wonder how many trial members we lost after they ran into this that we don't know about.

The fix ought to be easy:

Change the label on the red button to Create New Work and add a warning below the button something like: "To ADD A CHAPTER to an existing book, use the Action buttons below." ADD A CHAPTER really needs to stand out in some way because the red button draws most of the attention. Although not foolproof, this should stop most new members from doing it wrong (the ones who slow down long enough to read).

There is some online help that shows the "Add New Content" button that probably should be updated as well.

Thanks
Dirk

524

(309 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

Oops. You were responding while I was updating above.
A few more that yours bring to mind are "The Road (or Path) to Heaven" or "The Highway (or Expressway) to New Jerusalem".
Shylock might be an odd duck since he converts to Christianity at the end of the play, where followers of the movement think they already are Christians.

I'm still leaning toward Mammonists for Christ. It's the perfect contradiction/assertion for the obliviously rich to make.

525

(309 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

Possible alternatives to the Greedy Gospel (all of these are intended as derogatory terms for the stinking rich):

The Loaded for Christ, The Filthy Rich for Christ, The Stinking Rich for Christ, The Obscenely Rich for Christ
Mammonists for Christ - love this
Money Changers for Christ - like this
Billionaires for Christ, Trillionaires for Christ
Scrooges for Christ
Money Grubbers for Christ
The Greedy for Christ
Capitalists for Christ

EDIT:
I decided to go for Mammonists for Christ. Money Changers for Christ is good, but it is suggestive of just bankers.
Also, a better way to handle the name of that movement is to have it named by the stinking rich as part of their assertion that you can serve both.