501

(11 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Found it. I am blind (not for the first time). I don't regularly read romance, but now is a good time to read one again. smile. I'm just wrapping up a kitchen upgrade today, but will read chapter 1 by the end of the week, if not sooner.

502

(11 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Found it. I am blind. I don't normally read romance, but now is a good time to read one again. smile. I'm just wrapping up a kitchen upgrade today, but will read chapter 1 by the end of the week, if not sooner.

503

(11 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Hi Treewoman61. We did indeed experience a major slowdown in critiques due to a loss of members, especially after the server crash. Sol has just made some policy changes that should bring in new users (easier to gather points, more points for new users, and a longer up front trial), including more contests. Strange thing is, I haven't seen your user name on my home page in a long time. Are you posting to Premium? If so, I must be blind.

Check out a post (thread) In the Premium forum with tips on maximizing the number of reviews you receive (it's posted near the top of the forum).

Also, what's the name of your posted work?

We don't want to lose anyone, so hopefully you can give us a little more time once we find it. Posting here and asking for reviews is exactly the right thing to do.

Why are you paying $20 per month? Is that the cost of the monthly plan? I'm on the yearly plan, which costs way less per month. Perhaps someone else on the site can weigh in with the actual yearly cost.

504

(309 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

I'm just finalizing a few things in act one of Archangel + I have to apply plenty of minor edits I've already received, then I'll stop working on it except for an expected trickle of further feedback from a few new reviewers.

I'm pretty sure you read fairly recent versions of everything in act one of Archangel except the final 3-part chapter. I haven't put all of act one back up yet post-crash to slow the influx of reviews (I'm falling too far behind my reviewers).

I also have plenty of recent suggested edits to add to Connor v1.

Doing all of the above will probably take until the end of August. After that, almost all my time will go toward Connor v2.

505

(35 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Thank you, Sol. That's great news.

Just so there's no confusion, the original list of bugs is higher up in the thread. There are six in total. Marilyn only quoted the two most famous ones.

Thanks
Dirk

506

(35 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Thanks

507

(10 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Longest undefended border in the world. My favorite was a border crossing in either Manitoba or Ontario, where there was no permanent customs and immigration officer. They had an office, but it was unmanned. You were supposed to stop in voluntarily and call someone via a phone located in the office. I kid you not. We take being friendly and welcoming to a whole other level of stupid. smile

I think they subsequently had to add someone once the location made the news.

508

(309 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

I'm looking to finalize the name of the global church on New Bethlehem. I've been using the Libertarian Church, which is ok if I wanted to be totally serious. But why on Earth would I want to start now? smile  The Libertarian Church was founded a few centuries from now based on the Mammonists for Christ Movement of the 21st century, which was begun by the stinking rich for the stinking rich (a tax dodge).

Now, since later supporters of the Mammonist Movement truly came to believe you could serve both mammon and Christ, I figure they would push strongly for that to also be the name of the church: Mammonists for Christ Church. While that may seem ridiculous to outsiders, the members of that denomination believe fervently in their church and its views.

Stranger things have happened, especially in American politics. smile

Thus, I'm inclined to name it the way its followers would: Mammonists for Christ Church.

Thoughts?
Dirk

509

(35 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

For those who haven't had a chance to look at it, there's a (sticky) post in Premium called


"How to Get the Most Reviews of Your Writing"


based on one we had up before the Great Hiccup of 2023. An identical copy also exists in Writing Tips & Site Help.


Please point all trial/new users to it to help them maximize what they get out of the site.


Also, feel free to post replies to either copy of that thread with additional suggestions.

Thanks
Dirk

510

(10 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Randy, your plane took a wrong turn. Surely you intended to come to western Canada? Home of endless forest fires, broken healthcare, brutal winters, and a major political party overrun by (western) separatists. Still, I have to admit, the political entertainment is better where you are.

Enjoy your new home.
Dirk

511

(260 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Short post to push this thread higher in the forum.

Short post to push this thread higher in the forum.

513

(2 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Short post to push this thread higher in the forum.

dagny wrote:

This is a really good idea.
dags:)

Thanks. I've been known to have a few. smile smile smile

515

(35 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Dagny, when you have a few moments, could I ask you to have a look at the sticky thread I'm maintaining in Premium and in Writing Tips/Site Help entitled "How to Get the Most Reviews of Your Writing"? Is there anything you'd like to see added or changed as it relates to poetry?

This article has been moved to the Premium forum for maximum visibility. Please look for it pinned there near the top. All new members should read it, preferably before you post your first written work. It'll save you from common mistakes that might prevent your writing from being seen by others here. It may also prevent you from wasting points on posting something incorrectly.

Existing members, please point all new members to this thread, in case they haven’t already found it.



Below are tips to maximize the number of reviews you receive on the site. Everything here is voluntary, but it’s what works for many people, especially those who are new to the site and have yet to build a network of fellow writers here (using “connections”) with whom to trade reviews.


——————————

Review, review, review. It's the best way to find long-term partners with whom to trade reviews. You’ll want a network of them to give you feedback on an ongoing basis. Building relationships here also regularly leads to new friendships.

The best place to find active members is on your home page, which contains the writing of everyone currently actively posting new work.

There are many casual users of the site (e.g., folks who don't write/post/review here year round), so be sure to check out the writer's personal profile for when they were last online on this site. If it's more than about two months, they may not respond/reciprocate in a timely manner. They may even have left the site for an extended period, which could be months, sometimes years.

Respond to reviews in a timely manner, otherwise reviewers may just move on. It only takes a few minutes to respond to most reviews. However, understand that the turnaround time to actually do so varies from a few hours to a few days because real life often intrudes (e.g., illness, deaths, other crises).

Read stories in your own genre, many of which you may find in the individual groups or by searching for new works by genre. You may get more reciprocal reviewers if they share your interests. But! This is a small site focused on serious writers, so we often review outside of our usual genres to help each other and to get the best reciprocal reviewers for our own work. Feedback from other genres writers is another great way to learn. Many folks here regularly write in several genres.

Post your work in the Premium group. When you do, your work will be visible to all members. Also, reviewers of Premium works are rewarded with points with which to post their own work, which leads to more reviews for you. If you're serious about becoming a writer, Premium is where you need to be. Note that the Premium group contains the Premium forum.

While gathering points to post your own work can seem like a pain, you would have to read the work of other writers anyway to keep them as long-term reviewers (they need feedback too). The points system on this site is much less onerous than on other professional workshop sites. It's main purpose is to keep out folks who just want to post, get feedback, and give nothing back. And it automatically leads you to network with other writers here. If you regularly trade reviews with others here, you will almost always have more points than you actually need.

If you don't review the work of others, you can't expect to get reviewed in return. Most members here are experienced writers and, in many cases, published authors. They don't have the time to review the work of every new trial member, of whom there are many. You may get a free review or two, but the best way to get reviews is to give reviews. It shows you're serious. You are serious, right? :-)

You're not expected to be a great writer or reviewer if all this is new for you. But you are expected to try. That's how everyone else here got started. We all suck at writing and reviewing initially. Trust me! But if you're not willing or able to do even that, then this site isn't for you.

Reviewing the work of others also allows you to study how they write. There are experienced writers on this site to learn from, including published authors. And reviewing makes you a better reviewer, which should allow you to build relationships with the best writers, who generally are among the best reviewers.

Post clean chapters to the extent you know how. That means proper punctuation, grammar, and proofreading. If you're still new to writing, ask for help in the Writing Tips & Site Help or Premium forums. Google for articles on punctuation and grammar, or buy a good book on the subject. You want your reviewers focused on your story, not your writing mechanics.

Use a picture as a cover page in lieu of the default red cover. If default covers worked, there would be no need for real covers on Amazon either. When you look at the home page, it's the pictures that stand out first/most. Free pictures are available online from multiple sites, including pixabay.com.

Have a content summary for your book so people know what it's about. This seems like common sense, but we still see books without a summary posted on the site. Who buys books when they don't know what it's about?

Try to come up with an interesting book title.

Keep a clean portfolio that is easy to peruse. That means inactivating (hiding) or deleting obsolete versions of stories you no longer want reviewed. Or simply rename any obsolete versions (e.g., stick the word OBSOLETE at the end of the title (this is the easiest solution)). Note that deleting chapters also deletes any reviews you received for those chapters, so be sure it’s what you really want.

Don't post massive chapters that take six to eight times as long to review as a regular post. If a member has to choose between reviewing the chapters of six people they regularly review vs. reviewing one massive chapter, the former will usually win out since we're trying to maintain as many reciprocal relationships as possible with only a limited amount of time.

A good chapter length for the site is perhaps 1500 - 2500 words (costs about 5 to 8 points to post).If you have a much longer chapter, break it up and post it in parts, and clearly identify in the chapter names and chapter notes that it is a multi-part chapter, otherwise you'll get repeated comments about how a chapter seems to end abruptly or has a lousy hook. Short chapters generally get the most reviews.

Be patient while waiting for reciprocal reviews. Expect to wait a few days up to a few weeks for people to reciprocate. Most writers do so part-time, which may include writing a chapter or story every few weeks, posting it, and then catching up on reviews owed to others. Many reviewers do it this way. If someone has never reviewed you before, try to reciprocate with them more quickly, since it's a chance to acquire a new permanent reviewer.

If you're not going to reciprocate because the other writer’s book doesn't interest you, please thank them and tell them that it's not something you normally read and/or probably can't be of much help with. The other writer can then move on. And don't be offended if someone doesn't want to read your current work. It happens. With any luck, they’ll read your next one.

Read the work of new members. There's a points bonus, they'll probably be grateful to you and may read your stuff, and they'll be more likely to join the site permanently if they see they're getting helpful reviews. A thriving site helps everyone.

Ask other members about who else might be good to ask for a review, then check out the latest posted work from those writers. Keep in mind that the people you ask may be too busy on any given day or week, so it may take some time for them to provide a review. If someone doesn't reciprocate after two or three attempts, move on. On the flip side, when you review someone new, suggest who else the new member should review to increase their chance of gaining more reciprocal reviewers.

If you’ve tried most or all of the above tips and still have trouble finding enough reviewers, post a message in the Premium forum about that, and ask for reviewers. Give the name of the posted work, a summary of what it’s about (quote some or all of your story’s content summary if you like), and the type of feedback you’re looking for. Since this is a small workshop site, you may find that the best feedback comes from members outside your own genre, so don’t restrict yourself. And be prepared to recip.

——————————

If you don't know how to do some of the things mentioned in this thread, don't hesitate to ask in the Writing Tips & Site Help forum or even in Premium. Note that the Premium forum is where you’ll get the most number of eyeballs on your post and, most likely, the fastest and most number of responses, so don’t be shy about using it. Site members are generally happy to help.

Feel free to reply directly to this thread with any feedback you may have about reviewing and this writeup. Going forward, this article will reside only in the Premium forum to avoid having to maintain two copies (the other was in the Writing Tips & Site Help forum), which can get out of sync. An article by the same name still exists in the latter forum, but it merely directs people here.

One more idea that came to mind might be contests that are open only to trial/new members, with the rest of us focused on reviewing their entries before the contest deadline.

519

(35 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

dagny wrote:

How are you going to revive this site if you don't accept new reviewers?

I have plenty of newer works that people can review, including Archangel Syndrome, but I'll never get v2 of Connor going if I keep getting pulled back to v1. And I hope to begin posting v2 by late August.

The emphasis going forward is indeed on new members (can't revive a site without them). Everything from the policy changes Sol is making (20 points instead of 10 for trial users, increasing the length of the trial to two weeks, up from one, and easing the ratio of how many points the site pays per review vs. how many points the site charges to post); specific bug fixes that new users keep running into; and proposed contest changes (see the separate sticky thread on that here in Premium, which Sol is still thinking about).

Giving plenty of high-quality reviews to trial/new members is also part of it.

520

(35 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Hi Elysse.

If you see draft in red on a previously started inline review, the way to access it is from the Inline Posted tab of the My Reviews screen. Go to your home page and, below your picture, click on New Inline Review Replies. You should see it listed there, marked as draft. From there, you can open it and resume reviewing. It's a goofy place to have to look for it. The question comes up a lot. I'll add it to the list of issues for Sol.

The best way to prevent new reviewers from reading your story is to put a BIG NOTE in the content summary for your book and/or right at the top of your initial chapter. I just did the same for "The Rise of Connor v1". I replaced the prologue with a big note that asked people not to review it as it will soon be replaced with v2. I also made all the early chapters (1-15) inactive, to further reduce the chance of anyone new accidentally reviewing it.

Please let me know if you need any help with the latter. It involves some of the lesser used functionality of the Edit wizard but is fairly straightforward to do. I'll post your suggestions to the ongoing maintenance and minor enhancement threads in the Premium forum.

Thanks
Dirk

521

(35 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Following are the bugs extracted from our Bugs & Maintenance Requests thread that ought to be fixed before the next influx of trial users (preferably before the start of the contests):
1. Label changes on the Quickee interface to prevent new users from leaving themselves quickees that then, naturally, never get answered. See bottom of page 1 of the Bugs & Maintenance Requests thread for details/solution.
2. Label changes needed to prevent users from accidentally creating new books when they intended to add a chapter to an existing book; see my post timestamped 2024-05-19 03:24:56 on page 2 of the Bugs & Maintenance thread for details and the suggested solution (ignore the discussion about this problem that followed the post)
3. Security certificate complaints from my security software (Bitdefender) when clicking the links in TNBW-generated emails. This problem applies to every type of email notification I've received recently (received a TNBW message from another member, received an inline review from another member, and so-and-so has published a new posting); see my post timestamped 2024-04-13 04:15:10 on page 2 of the Bugs & Maintenance Requests thread, as well as the post right after it for details
4. Frequent timeouts while using the forums will log the user out of the site; if the user was writing a new forum post, that one will be lost (even the back button on the Chrome browser won't take you back to it); if the user was replying to an existing forum thread, the reply will be appended to the intended thread, after which the site kicks you out; this doesn't just happen to me; one new user mentioned it to me a while ago, so it probably affects anyone who writes long forum threads (I use the forums for brainstorming related to my books, so those can be quite lengthy)
5. Leaving a closing comment on an inline review with no inline comments in the body of the review confuses the site; the only way to see and access that review is via the usual email sent out by the system to the recipient of the review; once that email gets deleted, access to the review is lost for good; it's unlikely to be happening a lot, although it can be prevented entirely by the site not allowing the user to save an inline review with no inline comments

EDITs:

6. Would it be possible to change the red "draft" label that members see if they have a draft review already in progress for someone else's chapter/story to a button? I've yet to encounter a new user who knows how to find their draft review(s) as it's simply not obvious. Even long-term members sometimes forget where to look. Elysse ran into this most recently. Either that, or add a tooltip to the red "draft" label of where to find it (Home Page->New Inline Review Replies).

522

(309 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

Okay, last one:
- psychiatrists will be brain-masters
- a psychiatric ward will be either a brainial ward or a brain-mastering ward; I lean toward the latter; makes the terminology more consistent

EDIT: Brain-mastering ward is way too long (I use it a lot), so brain-masters and brainial ward win.


My thanks to all.
Dirk

523

(309 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

I googled for famous psychiatrists and there was virtually no one in the list that most people would recognize, certainly not more so than Freud. Barring some inspired term better than brainial, I'm going to go with the latter. Kind of plain but needs little to no explanation.

I'm curious, why do you suggest brainial ward instead of brainial unit?

524

(309 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

Kdot, how do you feel about shrinkers and master-shrink? I tried both (and brainial) but found they were too bland. Hence the reason I'm looking for something sexier. Unlike other sci-fi stories, mine is a demented space opera with no need to remain 100% serious. In fact, going against norms is a hallmark of this story.

Admittedly calling them tsantsas requires a little setup, but all of the setup I've done for other names I've toyed with was indirect: the shrinks are addressed as doctors, Joseph is at the hospital because his parents fear a mental health problem, he's taken to a "branial" unit and is asked whether he considers himself mentally ill, he's placed in a rubber room, his clothes are taken away because someone suicidal could commit suicide using just clothes, and he's at the hospital to evaluate whether he has Archangel Syndrome.

Now, Joseph is not suicidal, but the head shrink takes away the clothes of all new patients to pressure them to cooperate with whatever tests and treatments are deemed appropriate. Joseph has been promised that he'll be given something to wear "soon" as long as he continues to cooperate. Also, he'll be allowed to contact his parents "in a few days" if he continues to cooperate.

In theory, that could allow me to use any of the terms discussed in my previous post (I realized that after posting), but tsantsas are a cool Easter egg in that they are, literally, shrunken heads. Admittedly, it requires a few brain cells to connect the shrunken heads of head hunters with shrinks, but once you've got it, it becomes obvious why this crazy story would use such an odd term for its psychiatrists.

A bit of trivia: There were two real-life cases in the not too distant past where patients hung themselves with just their underwear.

525

(309 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

The main reason for Freudian was simply name recognition. It doesn't mean that in 4017 they'll agree with his beliefs and methods.

I previously considered shrinker, master-shrink, pill-shrinks, and talk-shrinks but didn't like any of them.

I reread some of the internet writings about Kafka. My favorite is this: ''Kafkaesque'' means ''having a nightmarishly complex, bizarre, or illogical quality." smile  Not sure how I would explain how his name became the future term for psychiatrist. Interestingly, Kafka died of tuberculosis at a fairly young age.

This one looks good, but virtually no one will have heard of him: Philippe Pinel is often considered the "father of modern psychiatry." He is most famous for his humane treatment of the mentally ill, as well as his contributions to the diagnosis and treatment of mental disorders. Among other things, he advocated not using chains on the mentally ill. Apparently shrinks of the past needed to be told this? Wow! His work paved the way for modern psychotherapy.

Given how kooky my book is, including a number of its memorable characters, I'd like to find a way to get Pinel's name in the book in some meaningful way. Having psychiatrists called Pinels (or something similar) would probably cause nothing but confusion, though. I could perhaps change the Brainial Unit to the Pinel Unit and leave it to readers to google. Meh.

An article on Bettelheim by one of his former patients/students pretty much paints him as an idiotic dick. He's worse than the head shrink of the Brainial Unit where Joseph is trapped.

I didn't read anything that would suggest why some variant of Sacks would be the word for shrink in the far future. Clearly a smart man and a significant contributor to the field, but if readers of my book were to google his name, they'd be scratching their heads as to why I chose his name. Still, future psychiatrists could then be called Sacksons. smile

Tzan-Tzas is a strong contender. I'd have to get across that these doctors are shrinks, but the reader would have to google the rest. That's the term for the shrunken heads produced by natives of the Amazon region who once practiced head hunting. smile

Brainial remains the boring fallback term.