551

(5 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Hi Suin.

Welcome back. Yes, we did a group cleanup after the servers were restored following the crash in October 2023. One of the steps we did was to request input from everyone on the site as to which groups members were still using and wanted retained. The final list of groups to be deleted, merged, and retained was then announced repeatedly well before any changes were made. The groups you see in the system right now are those that survived, give or take any one offs anyone may have created in the meantime ("The custom Military velcro Patches Group" is probably spam and will be removed; the creator was a trial member who never became permanent).

Dirk

Thanks, Bill. What do you do in response to the fluff reviewers. Do you review their work anyway?

Bill, a few more questions for you, if I may: Do you primarily post to the main house on Booksie? Roughly what kind of response do you get in terms of actionable reviews vs fluff? How do you deal with the fluff reviewers? Do they generally expect you to read their stories in return for a "Good job!" from them? I'm curious how you deal with them, and how many you generally encounter for a given piece of posted writing (e.g., a new chapter or new short story). Do the fluff reviews tend to number in the single digits, low double digits, or higher? And have you built up a fan base with whom you regularly trade helpful reviews?

Thanks
Dirk

Booksie doesn't require points to post your writings, Dagny. Yes, we're all going to lose a lot of points if we go elsewhere, but they're not needed if we're able to make the transition to Booksie work, which at this point, seems likely, with a few issues (one of them huge) that I need to speak to Sol about.

Have a look at my last post right above yours (ignore the first sentence). It surprised me at first that Booksie has no points system, but the longer I thought about it, the more I realized that, at least for us, a points system is irrelevant. We trade reviews with one another and would surely continue to do so even if the points system on TNBW disappeared tomorrow. I have a lifetime supply of points, so I don't need to collect them anymore, but the real reason I read the writing of the folks left here is because I know they'll do the same for me and because I've known you all so long and enjoy helping you get your work published.

Have a look at my post at the top of this page. I really don't think we need points. If we're in a group of advanced (serious) writers, we just trade reviews as we would anyway with a points system. It's not going to change how often I review Jack or MJ or you.

A points system might encourage beginners to do a certain minimum amount of commenting, which could help them learn how to do it well, but they won't be in the Advanced Writers group.

If members of Advanced Writers also want feedback from non-group members (not a bad way to find others to invite into the group, by the way), you can post your work in the main group. Members of Advanced Writers would still find your work as long as you're fans of each other.

That's probably how I'm going to do it because I want to find more readers for Connor v2, especially Catholic/Christian folks, provided I can find some who are conscientious about giving helpful reviews.

Personally, I don't think it'll be too hard to find other reviewers to give or at least try to give helpful reviews. There will be people who aren't interested in doing the extra work, which is fine.

My own past experience on TNBW, though, is that if they're interested in receiving ongoing helpful feedback from me, they'll realize (or I'll simply tell them) I'm looking for reciprocal reviewers who at least "try" to provide helpful reviews similar to those I try to leave for them.

The barter system; no currency (points) required. smile

Hi Dagny. Wow!  200 is impressive.

That kind of information is very helpful. Who knows? Maybe there's something Sol can do to automate a transfer of works like yours. Do you have an offline backup? Please say yes. smile

By the way, Sol's been on vacation, which is probably why he hasn't commented.

Your don't have to worry about banking information. There are too few of us left to make an automated account transfer worth doing. It would take much longer to code and test than it would for the rest of us to simply go to Booksie, open an account, and repost our work. Yours appears to be one of the exceptions because 200 is a lot.

Have you ever been able to back up your poems en masse onto a thumb drive? Just curious.

As noted in my original post, Sol hasn't made a decision as to an end date for TNBW, but he doesn't have the time to keep running both indefinitely. Unfortunately, we're not converting enough (any?) new users to replace the folks who've left, and as a result, the site is at a virtual standstill, at least as far as book chapters is concerned.

Are new poems still being posted in any significant numbers by others besides yourself?

I'll be taking over some of the admin and maintenance tasks from him in the coming weeks, but I have neither the full skills nor time to take care of the whole system. And as you may have noticed, we're not getting bug fixes or minor enhancements, to say nothing of the implementation of new features like those he's built/building for Booksie.

Right now, this is fact gathering mode. Given how similar the two systems are, the obvious place for us to go is Booksie, but there are issues that need to be addressed as discussed in this thread. Hopefully, it's just a matter of getting questions answered re how best to do things on Booksie (eg how to prevent exposure of our work to the internet since that would be a show stopper).

There is a TNBW group on Booksie that we should all join so we can find each other over there (user ids may be different). Sol's most recent post on this site (the reminder about the free year on Booksie) includes a link at the top of the thread to that group on Booksie. Be sure to add yourself as a member, otherwise you'll never find it again (it's private).

The most obvious workflow for us on Booksie is an Advanced Writers group of our own as discussed in this thread. I'm trying to work out the details of how and whether that will work, and a list of issues/questions I can take to Sol.

Please keep your feedback coming.

Gone and gone. Thanks, Bill.

Yikes! I have a note in to Sol about this.

Marilyn Johnson wrote:

Sorry, I can't help... it's all Greek to me. I tried to leave a review for someone over there, and their chapter was quite long, so I wanted to copy and paste it into a Word document so I could make the type larger (bad vision and old age go together, but since I'm neither...), but the system wouldn't let me copy it.


Use your browser's zoom capability. I just tested zooming on a Booksie chapter and it worked very well. The only thing you might find from time to time is that clicking to open an inline comment box sometimes puts the box a little too far to the right, so the far right of the box appears cut off, but if you type beyond the end of what's visible in the comment box, the (Chrome) browser scrolls to the right, and you'll see the whole text box.


Maybe if they had to write a minimum of 50 words like we do here.


Awesome idea.



Maybe if they ... worked on a point system like we do here...


I thought so too initially, but after thinking about it for a while, I realized it shouldn't be needed.

The inline reviews of people who just want to pat each other on the back are unlikely to improve much by forcing them to leave 5 comments. We've all had reviews over the years where someone was clearly just making 5 (relatively useless) comments to get the points.

The inline reviews of conscientious people will be conscientious regardless of points. I would include under conscientious those new members who are honestly trying but don't have a lot of experience doing actionable reviews. Also folks who are generally great reviewers but can't find anything helpful to say once in a while.

The best inline reviews are those we trade with other experienced writers/reviewers who'll read our stories through to the end. All that's required for that to work is connections (or fans), to establish a network of reciprocal reviewers.

And that eliminates the need to constantly scrounge for points! I'll bet Terry would love that!

I messaged him this morning. No answer yet. I have his email address, so I'll try that next.

Gone! Thanks

Can anyone tell me if it's possible to create a group/house in Booksie that is essentially public but with a requirement for a moderator's permission to join? According to the on-screen instructions for setting the Access field (where you make a house either public or private), public access means you don't need a moderator's permission to join, so I chose private. Once I clicked the button to actually create the house, it took me to my own home page (no confirmation screen), but I'm neither a member of the new house (assuming it even got created), nor can I find/access it in any way. I named it "Under Construction". It's just not visible.

Thanks
Dirk

Yeah, it was spam. I couldn't read his content either, but the titles of both posts made it clear he was advertising.
Thanks.

Marilyn Johnson wrote:

"Okay, MJ, go drink your coffee and try not to get up on the wrong side of the bed tomorrow."

My old English teacher always had a cup of "coffee" too. smile So much became clear once we realized what else was in it. Apparently he liked to mix in a little sauce. Must have had a large supply left over from Thanksgiving dinner. :-)

I'll talk to Sol; see if I can get some clarity on Facebook integration. The member agreement is very clear that they do not share anyone's writing, except for things like title and, if I remember correctly, snippets to promote our work. Common sense says he's not going to grab working titles and random text from incomplete novels. If he did, just put a curse word in the working title. tongue

Booksie has a number of ways to promote our work; even so, no AI (or person) is going to be smart enough to grab the right snippet from our work without us in the loop. There has to be a step in there where we declare something ready to be advertised and what to advertise. If we never complete that step, then Booksie wouldn't be able to grab anything.

Terry, where did you see that stories are exposed to the internet? I couldn't find it under the member agreement or copyright policy. In fact, the member agreement seems to suggest the exact opposite. Book title and other high level details, yes, but not content from the parts of the member agreement I read.

Thanks
Dirk

Jack, MJ,

I got the same impression as both of you, but an Advanced Writers group on Booksie with a little bit of gatekeeping would give us continued access to each other and (one hopes) to other experienced writers who can replace all the folks we lost here.

Marilyn Johnson wrote:

But, back to today... if a person joins Advanced Writers, and it turns out they're greenhorns in writing, do we kick them out, keep them there in hopes they will re-write their work using some of the suggestions we offer, or what? People love their own words, as we all know. So it's something to think about when we finally morph over to Booksie. Maybe we could consider "by invitation only" for that group and keep it "private" as well. If we find someone willing to exchange reviews and offer worthwhile feedback, we could send them an invitation to join. Whadaya think about that?

I like the idea of a private, invitation only group. But...


If you post a certain written work to Advanced Writers (AW) for feedback, you can't simultaneously post it to another group (house) as well (e.g. to the main part of the site), so we can have at least some interaction with non-members in order to identify the ones to invite in.


Also, Marilyn, how would people like you and me have gotten started with experienced writers if most had been hiding, content in their own silo of other experienced writers?


(Vern's voice): All of this may be much ado about nothing. This wouldn't be the first time we did lots of handwringing and debate about something that never came to pass.


I'd still prefer to start with a public group (requiring permission to join so we can do some gatekeeping) and a note on what's expected of all group members. The note should also specify certain things you can't do as a member (e.g., non-helpful reviews, posting stuff that you haven't proofread first, etc.). I'm sure we can come up with a list of pet peeves to make people stop and think before trying to join. And a big requirement ought to be that you have to be a paying member on the site for at least 30 days (or some other number).


That way, we'd still be visible on the site, giving people a visible list of members whom they can contact to ask questions, as well as visible posted works non-members can look at to compare to their own writing.

Plus we can always go private/invitation-only if we find a public group just doesn't work.

Send a PM to Sol. I don't know if he expected requests to go to this thread.

I mentioned at the beginning of my thread that Sol hasn't made a decision. For now it's about trying to figure out how best to exist on Booksie, hence my thread. Personally, I'd suggest not being among the first handful of people to jump over unless you're okay working with a work in progress (i.e., a suggested workflow for TNBW members). In that case, I'd ask that you provide feedback in my Booksie thread about what works for you and what doesn't).

In the meantime, people can continue writing and posting on TNBW. If you want to dip your toe in the water first, post to both sites for a while. That was my plan.

To avoid having to deal with elitism complaints, I suggest the Advanced Writers group be open to anyone to join but that we document expectations of group members in the group's description and forum. We may get people who join without regard for the expectations, but we can always remind them on a case-by-case basis. That's a lot easier than having to review applications and applicants' writings. The honor system. smile


Bill, what do you think?

Everyone, please use Sol's initial link in the first post of this thread to go over to Booksie and become a member of the TheNextBigWriter group. That's how we'll find each other over there.

For the moment, the above link is the only way I know to get to the TNBW group; it's private, so it doesn't show up in the list of all groups.

See Sol's first post to this thread if you need an account there or want to take advantage of his offer of a free one-year membership with Booksie.

By the way, I just discovered that Booksie has a lot more groups/houses already in existence than I realized. I was looking in the wrong place. To see all of them, click Houses at the top right and then click on the All Houses tab. I didn't see the TNBW group there, probably because it's private.

I just went through the existing groups. Looks like it could use a cleanup/purge here too.

Marilyn, I highlighted your question to Sol above. Hopefully, he'll check into this thread fairly regularly and see it.

To get to the TNBW group, click on the first link in Sol's original post to this thread above. I tried to find it by searching for both TNBW and TheNextBigWriter and neither yielded a result. It may be because it's a private group.


Sol or Bill, how do we get to the TNBW group from within Booksie itself (i.e. assuming we don't have your original link above)?

Thanks
Dirk

Thanks Bill. Good point re elitism. I'm not sure how to set up an advanced writers group without at least someone weeding out unqualified writers/reviewers, though. Of course, the criteria would inevitably be part "art", which is hard to quantify.

That being said, my writing improved on TNBW because I had access to experienced writers to trade reviews with, even though my reviewing and writing skills sucked at the beginning. smile

A good bio seems reasonable. Samples would probably be easy (we go check their account for their writings, or they can tell us which piece(s) of writing to consider).

I joined a Facebook writer's group in Calgary recently, where I had to give reasons why I wanted to be part of that group. I rattled off a list of 8-10 reasons why I'd be a good fit/contributor and how I hope to benefit. I don't know how many people reviewed it, but I got in. Clearly they have low standards. tongue

Think of it as TNBW 1.6. :-)
I can't recall if it's possible to create groups on Booksie as easily as is done on TNBW. The latter always requires a purge of abandoned groups from time to time. It might be better to reserve that functionality to an admin.
As for what groups to create, it depends on whether there are enough people interested in technical discussions. As you know, TNBW forums are barely used (you have to join a group before you see whether there are useful/regular discussions happening there. The Booksie group user interface is the same as TNBW, although groups are called (publishing) houses. From what I've seen, they're not used much.