3,876

(10 replies, posted in Marketing Your Writing)

Jack, although I do sometimes give credence to verified purchases, I give the most weight, by far, to the quality/depth of the review and the number of people who found it helpful, including the most positive and the most negative helpful reviews.

Does anyone know, off hand, if Amazon allows authors/sellers to respond to reviews? That might come in handy for those of us with controversial subject matter (e.g., an irreverent look at Christianity in the fifth millenium, a sci-fi story). I have a pretty thick skin, but it would help to know I can respond to flaming reviewers, if supported.

Thanks.
Dirk

I could've sworn I read an article that talked about reprogramming DNA. I thought it referred to doing it in living organisms, but that does seem hopelessly complicated.

Someone I knew had a rare childhood cancer where tumors doubled in size every 24 hours. It was based around a defective gene that, once turned on, couldn't be stopped.

Personally, I always hope there'll be a keyboard for computers. It's the perfect interface for buggy software - something you can hit. Over and over. It never fixes the bug, but it sure feels good. Rumor has it that Sony had to build extra strong keyboards for use with Vista.

Japanese researchers reported a few months ago that they had successfully transmitted power using microwaves, so it's close - as long as you don't get in the way of the microwave blast. Solar and wind power would go a long way toward solving energy needs, provided battery tech to store extra power improves. It's bizarre that oil companies keep fighting it, rather than leading new advances in energy tech to diversify their companies away from one source of revenue.

What's the cure for cancer you're referring to? I know there's research going on that can specifically target cancer cells without killing healthy cells, but I'm guessing the cancer cells will find a way to mutate to survive that too.

I need to pick up the pace of my writing to stay ahead of all the new tech. At one point I had several balding characters until I realized 2000 years ought to be enough to cure that. I do have a military man who shaves his head, but he doesn't live long enough to even warrant mentioning it.

Dirk

3,880

(9 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Thank you, Philisha. I started with alternating POV in chapter 2, where I introduce the two MCs, so I may end up going back to it as the story nears its conclusion. In fact, I can already see problems a couple of chapters ahead where I may have to do so.

Dirk

3,881

(9 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I love it when there's no concensus. :-)

I'll try writing it as I have been and let people tell me if it works.

Thanks all.
Dirk

3,882

(9 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

My book alternates back and forth between two characters, chapter by chapter (i.e., one chapter for Joseph, one chapter for Apollo, then another for Joseph, etc.). I'm having increasing difficulty keeping to a linear timeline as I go back and forth. For example, if a week elapses in Joseph's chapter, and then I return to Apollo, I've generally picked up Apollo's story as if that same week had already elapsed for him too. For most of the book, I've managed to make that linear timeline work. However, I'm now running into the problem that a lot is happening in a short period of time, and I need things to run concurrently for the two characters (i.e., a week elapses for Apollo, then I switch to Joseph and tell his story for that same week), otherwise I have to tell too much of the story as flashbacks. I could switch "scenes" back and forth, featuring both characters going back and forth in the same chapter, although that would break away from the storytelling approach I've been following for 25+ chapters, a pattern I think the reader would expect to continue.

I was wondering what other authors do when one scene (or chapter) gets far ahead of another in time. Do you always maintain a linear timeline as you move forward from scene to scene, or do you allow successive scenes to run concurrently in time?

I hope the question makes sense.

Thanks.
Dirk

3,883

(8 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Basic)

I tend to find balance by standing with both feet on the ground, rather than just with one. :-)

Dirk

3,884

(46 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Thanks Alkemi.

This is along the lines of what I was originally hoping to do. I had an open vat coated with teflon in mind, covered with a force field that would allow me to lower things into the superacid (fluoroantimonic acid), but keep the churning liquid and gases inside, to be be extracted once the solid was dissolved. The force field would be the same tech as on my starship hangar bays that allow fighters (solid objects) to move through, while keeping the atmosphere (a gas) inside.

Based on what I've learned here, the recycled materials will later be extracted by a means I don't plan to explain, since that's where the process becomes too complicated for my story. The temperature in the vat will be such that someone can walk right up to it. There will be an odor from the liquified vehicle (e.g., like the smell of rubber in a tire shop), but not strong enough to be toxic to humans.

For added simplicity, I may even do away with the force field, which rules out a superacid because of the explosive reaction and noxious fumes. I'll have to wave my magic wand and ignore the fact that bacteria or nanoids might release gases too. I'll probably have the liquid bubble a little for effect, perhaps from air trapped in the vehicle as it dissolves.

I ultimately plan to keep the process to a paragraph or two. Something a plant manager could explain to a visitor of a recycling center, without the process being totally impossible in nature. Let's face it, it's already improbable as hell. :-)

Thanks to all.
Dirk

3,885

(46 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I've narrowed it down to espresso or bubble bath. :-)

3,886

(46 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Thanks to all. I'm still mulling over which approach to use: acid, nanoids, or bacteria. Should be fun to write. The last two seem easier to justify the lack of an exlosive, noxious reaction between the vehicle and the goo.

Dirk

3,887

(46 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Thanks, Vern. Also a great idea.

3,888

(46 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

alkemi wrote:

Hello Norm, I am slower on the uptake than others and been left behind by the way this discussion has progressed, but years ago I was an inorganic chemist and actually worked with superacids, mostly fluorosulfuric but also some of the mixtures (stronger acids) with antimony pentafluoride.  Basic answer to your question is that the strongest of these acids will protonate (add proton to make a positive ion, so copper metal reacts to form Cu++ and soluble in the acid, for example).  Same happens to almost anything so you would generate a lot of ions in solution and a lot gases (hydrogen and other gases depending on the nature of the acid that are produced by the disolutions) that will boil off making frothing etc like you suggest.  Separating out all those ions would take engineering solutions that are beyond current day technology (chemists can do it on a small scale, but not an industrial one, at least not cost effectively).
One difficulty you would have  is that all superacids react with water so your vat could not be in our atmosphere  because the acid would react with the moisture in the air.  They would also react with metal containers or glass containers (not all of them, fluorosulfuric  acid and triflic acid are stable in glass but the stronger superacids would not be).  Some fluorocarbon plastics (teflon for example) can be used for containers.
On a different level aren't you asking an old alchemist question, the one about alkahest, the universal solvent.  If that's where you're going I would suggest a superacid that protonates just about anything is as good a bet as anything else.
Hope this is some use.

Alkemi, thanks for the confirmation about superacids. I decided that keeping them contained and capturing the gases produced was too difficult to tell and beyond the scope of what I was hoping to try. I decided to go with a 41st century brew that liquifies everything put imto it, except of course, teflon and air. That way, I won't worry about having to contain fumes, explosive reations and frothing, and extraction of elements from the resulting crystals. I simply invented something that I'll proibably call espresso, to liquify anthing put into it, with no toxic fumes, except for a few bubbles to help visualize the scene. I'm also considering naming it for its inventor, Gaius Olympus Octavian, using his initials, GOO, among other choices.

Thanks
Dirk

3,889

(342 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Sol, is anyone else reported having trouble getting email links to work on Android phones (using the phone's default mail client)? It's the links you provide in emails about new content, new messages, new forum posts, etc. The email shows the link's html text, but it's not clickable. The same email opened in gmail from my desktop has the clickable link and works as expected. I'm running Android KitKat on a Moto G phone.

Thanks.
Dirk

3,890

(46 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

While I have everyone's attention, I'm open to names for my new goo. I usually use tongue-in-cheek type names for something like this. So far all I've got is espresso and rotgut. :-)

There's a Latin theme in my book, so I'm going to look up a few terms in Latin as well.

Thoughts?
Dirk

3,891

(46 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

LOL. Actually, any goo that dissolve cars whole can probably clean up our landfills too.

Dagnee, that quote your responded to wasn't mine, but I will say that according to your definition, all science fiction can be viewed as fantasy, it's just a question of degrees. Are Star Trek transporters sci-fi or fantasy? I lost count of the number of times Commander Data used technobabble to justify the solution to whatever emergency they were facing. What about "aerial" dogfights in the gravityless vacuum of space as pictured in Star Wars? With sound! Those two franchises are generally considered space opera (a subgenre of sci-fi), same place where I put mine.

Besides, the science says that the strongest superacids (nasty stuff) can dissolve anything pretty much instantaneously, so it's doable, albeit complicated. Mine is a simplified variant of that. As Gene Roddenberry is quoted as saying, when a cop pulls out a gun, he doesn't stop to explain it.

Thanks to all.
Dirk

EDIT: In case anyone is curious, the strongest acid is fluoroantimonic acid (20 quintillion times stronger than sulphuric acid). Apparently, the only thing capable of containing it is, oddly enough, teflon.

3,892

(46 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Thanks to everyone for their ideas. Based on the science, a superacid is more complicated than is appropriate for my book, which is more about entertainment (space opera) than it is Asimovian science.

I chose a vat of some of kind of goo (yet to be named) that liquifies whatever you put in it without the frothing and killer fumes that would come from a superacid. It bubbles a little, just to make it look good. As many of you pointed out, it's two thousand years in the future, so who knows what they'll come up with in their chemistry labs.

Thanks
Dirk

3,893

(46 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

It is the far future, but I need an excuse for a very large vat of uncovered acid, big enough to pitch something in about the size of loaf of bread and have it instantly destroyed by the acid. Superacids can do that. I can come up with other reasons for a vat of acid, but there's a particular vehicle I was hoping to dissolve first. The latter isn't critical, but a nice to have.

Either way, it's been decades since I took chemistry, and I need at least a basic understanding of the process. As Charles suggested, I could strip the car first, but modern recycling techniques simply crush and melt the metal frame. I can't use heat in this case. It has to be an acid.


Dirk

3,894

(46 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I'm writing a scene where I use a superacid to dissolve vehicles (e.g., aerial cars) into their constituent elements, which are then separated and reused to create new vehicles.

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm assuming that lowering your average Volkswagen into such an acid would cause the acid to churn like crazy and release a ton of noxious fumes into the air.

But what happens to the elements? Are some of them completely vaporized? Does the acid bind with some of them forming other compounds? What might be a way of separating the elements/compounds from the acid?

Thanks.
Dirk

3,895

(15 replies, posted in Spirituality & Religion)

Thank you both very much. I got my questions answered.

Dirk

3,896

(15 replies, posted in Spirituality & Religion)

JL Mo wrote:

If you're not going to be clear who/what is guiding these children, what difference does it make if it's faith based?

A faith-based argument matters because one of the possibilities throughout this book is that these two teens are really hearing God. Based on your beliefs, what explains or justifies the killing of all life on Earth?

Thanks
Dirk

3,897

(15 replies, posted in Spirituality & Religion)

I'm familiar with Job, and have read many books for and against the existence of God, including some extreme views on both ends of the spectrum.

There are two "versions" of God in the book, one in each of the two characters' heads, telling them different, even conflicting things. The intent is to keep open throughout the book whether this is the real God doing these things for a purpose, or simply mental illness on the part of the two teens. God doesn't really "toy" with them, except for some light humor.

Joseph, the fundamentalist, is the character who is beginning to ask questions. He's been tasked by God to create a revolution in faith for the 41st century, to save mankind from a self-inflicted Apocalypse. Joseph's been told to write a new Bible, new commandments, etc. Everything is on the table.

As part of Joseph's struggle, I want to include faith-based arguments for some of the more troubling aspects of the Bible, including God's wrath. The arguments I've read are usually either 1.) the Bible was written a long time ago and not everything in it is true, or 2.) every word in the Bible is the Word of God, and if you question it, you're going to Hell.

I'm wondering if those of a Christian faith have come across other answers.

Thanks.
Dirk

3,898

(15 replies, posted in Spirituality & Religion)

Wikipedia documents a flood "myth" in many ancient religions, dating back 5000+ years, so they either borrowed from each other, or perhaps there was at least a major, limited flood somewhere in what was then the developing world. Some scientists believe the Black Sea was once a freshwater lake that was flooded by the Mediterranean Sea, with seawater rushing in at a rate ten times that of Niagara Falls.. There is some evidence of a former shoreline as much as 400 feet deep under the Black Sea.

3,899

(10 replies, posted in Spirituality & Religion)

Fair enough.

3,900

(15 replies, posted in Spirituality & Religion)

My two main characters in my sci-fi story, Into the Mind of God, both begin to hear God's voice in their heads at a young age. One, Joseph, a funadamentalist Christian, believes he was chosen by God for a special purpose. Though a believer, he eventually questions God about Noah's Ark. Did God really commit genocide with the Great Flood, killing everyone including children and babies? Based on my research online, there were an estimated 20 million people on Earth by the time of Noah's Ark. If the estimate is correct, that would make the flood the greatest mass killing in history.

What is a faith-based answer to this?

Thanks.
Dirk