151

(38 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I disagree with expanding the free trial period. In fact I think it is more of a hindrance to being a meaningful member. The free trial only encourages those who aren't already serious about writing. They see an opportunity to throw something out and get some "applause" without really having to commit to reading and reviewing to gain enough points to publish beyond a sparse beginning. And then when they don't receive the expected accolades, they simply quit without any investment having been made. Yes, there are/may be exceptions to my skepticism, but if so, they are few and far between.

On the old site, I read and reviewed for months before publishing anything in order to get a head start on the many credits I would need to post an entire novel which was already written at least in draft form so that I could sustain a regular posting every few days. It was frowned on to post multiple works at once since the home page was a bit more limited. Of course I never did accept the rationale for that particular unwritten rule since you could click to another page and get all the posted works not just a top ten list. But I digress. Anyway, I would suggest doing away with the free trial to post writing and leave the free option of reading and reviewing to accumulate points. Like putting your words in the bank. Take care. Vern

152

(5 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Welcome back, LL. Good to see you getting back in action. My eyes are not new, figuratively or literally, lol, but I'll drop in for another look, hopefully over the weekend. Take care. Vern

You don't copyright a name, it would be a trademark. In the case of trademark, the name would have to be uniquely associated with a brand or business, not a common name. I couldn't just trademark Jimmy Smith as it is a very common name. I could trademark it in conjunction with a specific business such as say, Jimmy Smith's Old Winery so that no one else could then open another Jimmy Smith's Old Winery within an area in which you have registered the trademark. You can get the trademark for each state or you can go for a national trademark if it hasn't been trademarked in any state previously.

In my past business I had a name trademarked for several states in which I operated, but did not have a national trademark. Another company was trying to get a national trademark using the same name. We worked out an arrangement whereas my company would retain the trademark for specific products and they would retain it for other products in the beverage category. If we had not reached an agreement, I would not have been able to expand under that name into other states where I didn't have the registered trademark and they would not have been able to use it in the states where I owned a trademark prior to their filing for the national trademark. A simple characters name in a book, have at it. Take care. Vern

Our paths crossed only occasionally but she always left a good impression. May she rest in peace. Take care. Vern

I would suggest that unless the description actually adds something to the story other than description it is probably too much. If I turn my back, I most likely couldn't tell you what my wife is wearing or how her how is fixed; I can't describe the details of a street I just walked down, or the details of the policeman's uniform I met along the way; I can't recall what pictures are hanging on the wall in my house, or how many steps attached to the deck. But I do remember what an old girlfriend was wearing on a particular date a half century ago because it made an impact. Ordinary detail in ordinary circumstance don't really make an impact so I could care less about reading them in a story; it only bogs it down.

Yes, I'm sure some folks can name famous authors who go on ad nauseum with details which are irrelevant, but I don't read those and I doubt agents/publishers or most casual readers give a flip about them. Our minds fill in details from sparse info. I read somewhere that people were asked what color hair a character had in a story they had read and most came up with a definite color when none was mentioned in the story. That's the type description which is relevant to the reader imho. Take care. Vern

156

(2 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Good advice on giving too many specifics, like telling every turn while driving down the street. Along with the dialogue itself, this could be said of the speaker tags also. My mantra for them is: Let the words and actions show the tone of voice and/or state of mind of the speaker. Some folks don't like to hear that and would rather tell about the silvery voice instead. But you can't find that silver until you dig away the dirt. Take care. Vern

157

(5 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

From Daily Writing Tips:
Here are some guidelines for the use of italics with foreign words in an English text.
1. If only one unfamiliar foreign word or brief phrase is being used, italicize it.
2. If an entire sentence or passage of two or more sentences appear in a foreign language, type the passage in plain type and put the passage in quotation marks.
3. If the foreign word is a proper noun, do not italicize it.
4. If you are using two foreign words or phrases, one familiar and one unfamiliar, italicize both of them for consistency and appearance.
5. Common Latin words and abbreviations like etc., et al., and ibid. need not be italicized. An exception is sic, which should be italicized and placed in square brackets.

It would seem you could use italics of foreign words when needed or expected and any overuse -- or not -- will take care of itself. Take care. Vern

Clairedeplume wrote:

Not Temple!  You can’t be serious, Vern.

I was just curious; most folks are serious about their chocolate, lol. Take care. Vern

Clairedeplume wrote:

Temple, ground up Skittles?  I’d volunteer if they were using Hershey kisses.

You do know she's joshing, right? Take care. Vern

Temple Wang wrote:
vern wrote:

Well, Vern's been on vacation all week but so glad I was missed. Not sure what me "detailing" the thread has to do with anything, but since my advice has been so eagerly sought out, I'll offer it. In the future, if you know the problem is with programming a character which doesn't want to be programmed, it would be a simple fix to substitute something which does work -- in this case "and" for "&" -- until you can get Sol's obviously hard to get attention. You're welcome. Please hold applause. Take care. Vern

I love you, man ...


Awww. Likewise, I'm sure. Who said you ain't sweet? Don't let the word get out, lol. Take care. Vern

Lung cancer

Goodpasture syndrome

Valley fever -- rash involved

Take care. Dr. Vern

PS: A google search will produce more, but if you need specific symptoms you should just make up your own "newly discovered" disease.

Well, Vern's been on vacation all week but so glad I was missed. Not sure what me "detailing" the thread has to do with anything, but since my advice has been so eagerly sought out, I'll offer it. In the future, if you know the problem is with programming a character which doesn't want to be programmed, it would be a simple fix to substitute something which does work -- in this case "and" for "&" -- until you can get Sol's obviously hard to get attention. You're welcome. Please hold applause. Take care. Vern

Okay, this entire thread has been based on a false premise, that being unable to access the Premium "forum" when it turns out it is actually about not being able to post writing without having enough credits which is a whole nuther ballgame with a slow pitch to knock out of the park. Nuff said. Take care. Vern

Perhaps he is "Too Young to Know." Take care. Vern

I would say that most any contest which charges a fee is in it for the up front money. Your odds of substantial benefit are probably better with the lottery. But, having said that, if you would like to enter my contest, the entry fee is a paltry hundred bucks, no refunds, or promises. You may enter as many times as you wish or can afford. Any genre, length, or format is acceptable. I will be sole judge and my opinion is final. My personal entry should not be looked upon as getting preferential treatment and should I win, it is purely the writers talent Just send your payment to the site and I will give Sol a handlers fee should he accept the service. Good luck to all who enter. Take care. Vern

njc wrote:

Maybe not.  Ambiguity, like evil, can never be completely extirpated.

Do you think that "We get the legislature that we deserve"?

Only if you think we deserve a bunch of crooks and ass kissers. Take care. Vern

njc wrote:

In Chapter 3 of A Republic, If You Can Keep It, under the heading United States v. Rentz, Neil Gorsuch demonstrates how diagramming a sentence reveals the subtleties of meaning created in a statute by the legislature.  (p 174 in the hardcover edition; the case was before the 10th Circuit.)

If you must diagram a sentence to understand a statute created by the legislature, then not only the statute should be thrown out, but all the members who voted for its passing should also be thrown out. Oh, never mind, they all should be thrown out anyway. Carry on. Take care. Vern

njc wrote:

Dirk, it's a question of the orbital velocity.  Is there enough kinetic energy to bring the orbiting body back out--is the perigee above the atmosphere (corona) of the orbited body?  Think of a highly elliptical orbit.  Misscrf, is the planetary orbit in or near the plane of the suns' mutual orbit?  Vern, for quasistability see Strange Attractors.  I don't know if it can apply to the three-body problem, which has only recently gotten a general solution.

There are some stable three-body configurations.  Look up Lagrange Points.   Misscrf, would a Lagrange Point solution work for you?

"Three-body configurations" per se is not the same as a "figure eight" orbit. Yes, there is a specific circumstance where it might be stable but would it remain stable enough to support intelligent life over a long period? And since it is such a narrow range of possibility, why try to pass it off to the reader when it is unnecessary to build an alien world which would be credible. Trying to explain the technicality as presented in this post would appear as an info dump for the casual reader imho. That is my only issue. But as stated in my initial response, it is the authors choice to do as they please. Take care. Vern

Though theoretically possible, such an orbit is generally considered unstable -- from my research. My question thus becomes: Why would you want to create such a system which would require such a technical explanation for the reader. You could simply say it orbited binary stars without getting into the minutia of orbital detail which most readers could live without. If you make a generalization of the system, then the reader can visualize whatever details they need to accept your version of days and nights as described within the story. But it's your story, so do whatever makes you happy. Take care. Vern

170

(3 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Did you do the hodey pokey and turn yourself around? Heck, I never could get a different cover to work other than the default on site so I just figure that's what it's all about. I'm counting on everyone else doing original covers then my plain jane will stand out as unique, lol. Anyway, good luck. Take care. Vern

171

(4 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Just scratching my head here, but why would you want to save an inline review with no comments? It does tell you how many comments you've left and that you need 5 for the points. Okay, you left the summary comment in a regular review, so still wondering why the inline should be saved? I may be a little slow, but I don't get it. Damn, now my head's bleeding, lol. Take care. Vern

For me, I don't understand why it makes a difference to folks. The credits are the same either way. It takes the same amount of time either way. However, it is easier to get a handle on as one post. If one doesn't have enough time at one sitting they could simply save the draft and continue at their leisure -- at least that's true for the in-line, not sure about a fifty word regular, but if that's all you're gonna leave, you really don't have a time issue, do you? Yeah, I realize that's too much common sense for some reviewers, lol, but hey, it's my opinion and I'm sticking with it.

The way I review, I read the entire post before starting a review and then go back through it with a second read to leave comments. It is easier and more fun to read it through without stopping for suggestions and you get a feel for how things connect so you don't have to question something that's explained later -- though you might wish to say the explanation would work better at an earlier point. Anyway, I think you already have the solution when you say you prefer a single post. A good reviewer will adjust to what you offer. Nuff said. Take care. Vern

Strictly from personal preference, I would say if they only show up once there is really no need to name them if they have a sufficient title to identify them. If they have a recurring role then they probably should have a name, the shorter the better, which would then remain consistent throughout. For me, too many names, especially when bunched, clutter the story so much as to confuse or at least slow down the reader. Not generally a good idea. Just my opinion of course for what it's worth. Take care. Vern

To prologue or not to prologue, that is the question which continues to arise on site quite frequently. And the answer is: well, there is no consensus, so do whatever you think is best for the story, but imho, if the question needs to be asked, then the simplest thing to do is make the prologue chapter one and forget about it. And now you can read the rest of the story. And the beat goes on. Take care. Vern

175

(3 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Big Brother knows all, lol. Take care. Vern