Search options (Page 18 of 30)

No. A black person may just feel he doesn't like white people generally; and vice-versa.

However, a fictional white lawyer may feel superior to black folk because he is as far he knows better educated and cultured, and as for any  other people who are neither white nor male, they could be equal but also the exceptions which prove the rule.

That is the philosophy of scepticism in your thinking that definitions are subjective and the very foundation for  the political-philosophy behind racism. You are a racist because you think like a racist who by no reasonable definition must think one race is superior to another race..

Brother of slain civil rights leader Medgar Evers endorses Trump

But then there's Winston Churchill, in the wilderness on the Soviet threat, then on the Nazi threat, then on the Soviet threat again.  And there's the railroad-lobbyist lawyer Abe Lincoln on the idea that the federal government has the supreme and indissoluble right for taxation in order to transfer massive wealth from the people to the railway companies. I think both were very clear on their thinking to the voter and transparently decisive in their actions toward their goals.

Is this a reference to T&A?

I agree with this but believe history has taken it further. The popularization of the arts (mostly music, though high-quality reproductions of paintings is in there, too)  through any recording medium has been a cost-v-benefit calculation  up to the digital age. The CD, at first, was a boon because of the enormous signal-to-noise ratio but has so degraded in qualities of other aspects  to the point of 'just getting the stuff out there;' what the 'stuff' is, no longer matters. I saw this even in the concert-hall going classical music listeners that it became a snobby sort of social event and little about the music. There just is 'stuff' going on in the arts that has so little to do with art.  Fiction is different in there being never an end to story-telling, as such,  as much in being human as language, but there has been and ought to be more to the novel than story-telling.  The newer, efficient media of transportation are stripping out everything but the story.

In sense, that is what I mean by the stripping out everything but the story telling, and maybe even that, in the course of 'progressive' education  reducing reading to understanding manuals and government regulations and ignoring all that too-complicated, white eurocentric literature useless stuff.

It's passe. In twenty years all "commercial" fictional story-telling will be in a form other than the novel. What might be left, should there be anybody trained to write it, is literary fiction that provides something other than plot, action, dialog, and kid's/YA books should Common Core not take hold. The only reason reading for light fun, versus serious mind-toning, is still around is because the baby-boom generation has not died out. My sampling of young-folk writing is that it is rudimentary movie/TV making of little literary (in the broadest sens) value. If I am wrong in this, someone please point me to a millennial's example of serious mind-toning fiction and not just another story.

Naturally from you a fascist attempt to coerce attention toward a purported worthy goal.

Nothing like, as I suggest, a reasonable proportionality of review length to reviewed work. It's now 0.3 points or 30 points for 5 comments or 50 words, regardless.

The point system, of freedom to choose the rewards one seeks, is despicable to you.

An unlikely event.

Of course not, being the sort you are - rude, obnoxious, mandating.

And my point would be if the author uses the word "whistle" for the concept "laugh," and if the poor reader looks up "whistle" he will find a completely different concept than what the author intended in "laugh."  Even worse,  is the subjectivist author who in Clinton-esque fashion defends his incorrect use of "whistle" with the claim: It all depends on what "whistle" is. Your "whistle" might different than mine. .  This is cultural nihilism of the order that severely afflicts Western civilization from time to time and the trickle-down effect into politics and science is never good and usually signals collapse. [Weimar -> Nazi Germany]

"Caterwauling" is a combination of noises surrounding the mating of cats. However, isolating the sounds from males from that of females, the males call out the same sounds as their howling in territorial defense, in a sense that is what they are doing here, but the females' sounds are unique and hard to compare to anything else.  It is fair to call the whole mess of sounds is "caterwauling" and is completely different from the sound of a single cat in distress which the original poster requested.

'Caterwauling' is the wrong choice because it a howling sound from a female cat in heat, and also it is likely a typical (moron) reader won't know that, and you've put another word out there (with the help of a moron publishing editor) that does not mean what it really means.

I'd still say 'screech' or 'scream' although I have never heard the sound of a cat being tortured so I can't relate.  I doubt it would be the howling I spoke of.  I say no to 'hissing' and 'spitting'

What evidence do you have that this is true? Or if this is  true, any presence on the internet will lead to comments taken out of context.

In a sense, and with irony, I believe I am the one arguing for the tastes of the commoner, for minimizing -ing words is one of those test-marketed issues of style a reader might not be able to identify as better than otherwise, but once a sentence is fixed, that reader picks the fixed version.  I am perplexed that not a single TNBW author to whom I have broached the topic, and in particular the sub-issue of the ugly dangling participial phrase, has reacted positively, and I believe I had one review deleted, and I was blocked, though certainly I can pause to consider that it might have been my manner of broaching the subject, but, as I said, I thought it would have been a common enough style issue to be more widely accepted on TNBW and authors not so easily offended.

Still friends? ;-)

More than two "happenings" in a paragraph is pushing reader tolerance -- of this reader's tolerance, at least.  However, a rapid succession of events as in Dirk's sample has an internal logic most people get -- if done once in a paragraph.  Describing action in words will never compare with the visual arts for action/adventure, but some authors do well enough, but those same authors, drawing heavily on plot development for the novel's raison d'etre , do not do so well in theme development and other elements of literary fiction and the narration necessary for that.  There's a reason Arthur Conan Doyle's Sherlock Homes is the most filmed character.

I don't understand the resistance to dropping -ing words on TNBW, especially that sloppy dangling [comma] participial phrase. It's use, like the passive tense, marks a major difference between fiction and nonfiction of the technical, bureaucratic, and essayist-journalist sort. I have four -ing words in the above paragraph, for example.