Haven't tried them, but yes, they are expensive. Google for book editors for cost comparisons. Also, google 'bookbaby complaints' to see what problems others have had with them. On their own website, they advertise themselves as rating four out of five stars.

2,052

(62 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Linda Lee wrote:

Tags aren't only to identify a speaker...they prevent reader confusion, create rhythms, elevate, maintain or break tension (beats), and provide avenues to insert action. But in most cases, if a writer finds themselves explaining too much in the tag, or relying too heavily on a tag to convey the desired sentiment, they should probably consider taking a second look at the quality of the dialogue itself.

Hear! Hear!

There will also be a cab driver named Leonardo. :-)

Character names:

Those keeping up with this thread know that my main character in the new trilogy will be Connor, which I decided is short for Constantino, a common Italian name.

Connor has an uncle who works in the Vatican police, the Gendarmerie. His name is Michelangelo, but he goes by Angelo, which is also a common Italian first name.

The names are tributes to the two characters in the vampire TV series, who inspired the trilogy. I bet most people won't even make the connection.

Thoughts?

2,055

(62 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Mistake #5 - Dialogue Tags: I get it. Using “he said” and “she said” is boring. However, dialogue tags are meant to be functional and not descriptive.
Gee, how about trying tags that are functional and descriptive? If your going to put a word on the page, making it serve more than one purpose seems like common sense.

Or how about the way those tags distract the user? When one of my admirals snapped at one of her subordinates, I didn't hear any feedback from distracted reviewers.

Sure, they can be overused, but having to read a fancy dialogue tag doesn't distract me in the least. Why should I write a sentence showing how my admiral is pissed off when I'm in the middle of a fast-moving battle and short choppy sentences are best suited for the scene?

Technically, I could have written "As you were, Ensign!" the admiral said, and let the exclamation mark serve in lieu of a snapping dialogue tag, but I find that I scan over punctuation marks since they're so small. I use said for regular conversation and other tags to give them added weight.

Language question. The Lord of the Earth is partially set in Rome and includes numerous Italians. Even Constantino ("Connor") De Luca is Italian. I'm debating how best to handle the language spoken throughout the story. Technically most of it should be in Italian, although I'm naturally writing the whole thing in English (except for the names of Italian people, places, and things). However, I want to avoid having to constantly repeat that people are speaking in Italian. The best option I can think of is to slip in the name of the spoken language only when it changes. New characters entering a scene would be expected to speak whatever language I last referenced. Some people in the Holy Land may speak English, so there may be a little back and forth there.

Edit: Basically what this means is that I say once, in the first scene, that they're speaking Italian, and then I don't name the language again until they start speaking English in act two in the Holy Land. There will be a few phone conversations between Father Romano, who accompanies Connor to the Middle East, and a cardinal in Rome. Those will be in Italian, but I doubt I'll mention it.

Thoughts?

2,057

(5 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Alan, I found examples online from a grammar blogger that say your examples are the opposite of what they should be. If you have one wife named Diana, then her name is nonessential to understanding the sentence and requires commas. If you have one son named Scott, that also requires commas. If you have multiple sons, then his name is essential to understanding the sentence, so no commas.

That means, in my case, that the name of the epithet is essential to understanding the sentence as there are many epithets, so no comma.

I'll probably forget these rules in a week and start doing it wrong again.

Thanks
Dirk

2,058

(1,217 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

Now I get it. Thanks.

2,059

(5 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Time to see if there's a consensus on this one:

Is the second comma below (after the word epithet) required? I think it doesn't belong because the name of the epithet, Bastardus Minusculus, is mandatory for understanding which epithet is being referred to. Or am I applying the wrong comma rule? (This is about a future society where the Roman Empire has been resurrected, hence the name Caligula.)

Although it took years for Caligula to be recognized for his brilliance, among the many side effects is that the epithet, Bastardus Minusculus, which had tormented Caligula throughout his youth, became an honorific awarded for extraordinary accomplishments in any field, similar to the coveted Noble Prize of the late second and early third millennia.

Thanks
Dirk

2,060

(1,217 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

I can't delete the first comma in the sentence since that would cause a misread.

Although it took years for Caligula to be recognized for his brilliance among the many side effects...

2,061

(1,217 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

Comma question. Is the second comma (after epithet) required? I think it doesn't belong because the name of the epithet, Bastardus Minusculus, is mandatory for understanding which epithet is being referred to. Or am I applying the wrong comma rule?

Although it took years for Caligula to be recognized for his brilliance, among the many side effects is that the epithet, Bastardus Minusculus, which had tormented Caligula throughout his youth, became an honorific awarded for extraordinary accomplishments in any field, similar to the coveted Noble Prize of the late second and early third millennia.

Thanks
Dirk

2,062

(1,217 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

Chapter 37 of v3, entitled Caligula!, is up. It's all minor changes from v2. However, I previously borrowed from this chapter to write v3 of the act I chapter Attack on New Bethlehem, primarily regarding the how the starlanes work. It needs rethinking. I like star-hopping as a concept and the natural interconnectedness of stars, but not the way the starlanes are described for the reader. I'm leaving it to v4 to properly define the starlanes and remove the redundancy that currently exists between this chapter and the aforementioned battle in act I.

Only four chapters to go in v3!

Quick, go read!
Dirk

I decided to take a break from investigative/CSI research and watch an action film recommended by Netflix. I've already forgotten the title, but it starred Angelina Jolie, Morgan Freeman, and James McAvoy. You'd think with that cast, I would be entertained, but no dice. I turned it off after an hour. I don't remember the last time I saw an action movie that I enjoyed. Maybe the early Terminator films. I binge watched 13 Reasons about bullying and teen suicide. They're out with a second season. Boy that is hard to watch. I had to watch episodes of Friends in between episodes of 13 Reasons because it's so dark. I would not recommend it for young teens, even though they would benefit from a lot of it. There are other ways to talk to kids about bullying and sex than that show.

2,064

(1,528 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

NJC, is photobucket free to use, or do you have to pay for storage?

2,065

(9 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

That is really good, njc!

2,066

(9 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Here's my opening line:

“Battle stations!” Vice Admiral Alexis St. James cried from the bridge of the Realm of Stars destroyer, the RSS Almighty.

I'm almost certainly going to self-publish, so I take the editor's comments with a huge grain of salt. He says prologues suck, but it's okay to have flashbacks. Same damn thing in my opinion, just organized differently. The advantage of the prologue is that it comes at the beginning, before the main story starts, and then you're done with the past. Flashbacks require forcing your reader into the past one or more times in the midst of the main story. Both have their uses, but I prefer the former.

2,067

(9 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I'm a member of a blog written by an experienced book editor. His list of rules of how NOT to open a story includes:

Prologues suck.
Do not start with a character who is going to die.

I guess I'm not going to use him to edit my story. :-)

What not to do: https://thejohnfox.com/2016/11/how-to-start-a-novel/
What to do: https://thejohnfox.com/2017/03/30-super … h-writers/

Kill me now. Countless hours of boring crime/investigative shows and only four pages of notes to show for it.

2,069

(1 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Never mind. I finally found it.

2,070

(1 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Hi. I've maxed out on groups and would like to leave one. Can someone please tell me how to leave a group?

Thanks
Dirk

Well, I'll be damnare! Amazon Canada has finally added video and music to its prime membership. It includes the latest seasons of CSI. I was hoping for the early seasons with the original characters, but it's a start. I have 30 days to cancel, so we'll see what else they've got. No Law & Order or Big Bang Theory, so those are strikes.

Kdot wrote:

My comma separates two thoughts. My teachers always said (Paraphrased) "toss in a comma if you want the reader to pause, even if there wouldn't normally be a comma".
That said, I would normally strike out that comma in a revision

My teacher always said, "Toss in a comma until Seabrass flags it as an error."

But then we have this from a grammar website: A DEPENDENT CLAUSE ALSO HAS A SUBJECT AND A VERB, BUT
LACKS INFORMATION NECESSARY TO CONVEY A COMPLETE IDEA.
Note the comma and the word 'but' in the above sentence. The coordinating conjunction 'but' is used with a dependent clause, all preceded by a comma. This usage matches what Kdot did.

njc wrote:

I wouldn't place a comma there, no matter what the fughazi stylebooks change.  See my lecture over in Premium.

Your lecture was mind-bending. I couldn't follow it. I'll just assume you're correct. Kdot, shame on you for generating so much palace comma intrigue.

I ran this through Grammarly and ProWritingAid, and they had no objections: Tia thought, they might have more, landing areas, closer to, the center, but couldn’t, make any out.