Search options (Page 111 of 171)

Any further word from/about Amy?

I've experienced both of the following:
- posts I've read remain visible on the home page
- posts I haven't read disappear before I've read them, sometimes in a matter of hours

I'm running the latest version of Google Chrome on a Windows 7 desktop.

Sounds reasonable. However, the algorithm by which new forum posts disappear from the home page is a mystery. It's been inconsistent since the new site went live. Some posts disappear within a few hours while others seem to hang around for about a day (my preference). It's either a weird algorithm or a bug. I'm not sure if time zones are involved.

How many people fail to reply to reviews? Is it a large number? And if they do forget/decline to do so, the reviewer currently has the choice to move on. It would probably help new members learn the ropes, though.

Don't you dare spend the next few days reviewing my crap. It'll keep. Seabrass, K, and Bill will suffice in your absence, although no one rewrites my stuff like you do. Much as I want to tone down the violence in v3, I still can't bring myself to remove the death scene you wrote for Ensign Ecks in chapter one. Chests exploding right and left. Jane Austen should write so well. :-)

Chapters 6 - 8 are up. Ch. 6 is a slightly modified version of the Galactipedia - New Bethlehem article, including a few extra paragraphs at the end to flesh out the society a bit more before we get to ch. 7.  Ch. 7 is a redo of v2's "I Will Shake the Universe", which contains the trial of the traitors who attacked Joseph and his parents at the palace. It also includes the unveiling of Joseph's destiny. The biggest change is Joseph's homophobia and its consequences for Andrew. Also, Aussie makes her first reappearance (in the epigraph) since ejecting from Windsor's ship in Ch. 1.  Ch. 8 is the Galactipedia - Rise of the Julii article that I had up out of sequence. I think only Seabrass reviewed the original before I took it down. It's essentially unchanged, except for the Further Reading section.

Quick, go read!

Thanks
Dirk

Funny thing. As the opinions were rolling in, I realized I needed to change the sentence, eliminating the need for this post. :-)

If you're curious, the final version is:

Thanks to all for their input.

I think caps would work for King where there's clear context (the reader knows we're talking about Joseph), just as the reader would know Regent is Joseph's mother. Otherwise, you get things like: I'm king and my mother was the Regent. That makes it seem like Regent is more important than king.

Based on that, "No king (among many) and much less a regent (among many) has ever pardoned a traitor" should use lowercase for both, since that's the only thing that reads right.

If I understand you correctly, you're definitely saying that "no king (among many)" should be lowercase.

That suggests "You will become a Prophet, not a King" should be "You will become a prophet, not a king." However, that still leaves cases like "You will become a prophet, not the (one) King." So be it.

Let me know if you disagree.

Thanks.
Dirk

Thanks. I went with njc's suggestion. I came across several more instances like this, and they're all clear with just the one comma.

Amy, I can't recall if there has been more than one Lance in your story's history, but if there were, would you refer to them as Lances or lances?

Thanks.
Dirk

I do have a court system, but high-profile treason cases are subject to inquisition and potential Senate trials.