Drover

202

(18 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Thanks for the warning. I would have opened it!

203

(5 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I show a new quickee. I'm not going to open it, but I assume it's the same person.  I didn't have it yesterday.

Valjean

I see what you're saying about Stockholm Syndrome. I didn't doubt that the girl would be terrified -- fearing he could see her whether he could or not. I found that believable. And I did realize (from the title) she was supposed to have Stockholm Syndrome -- as in, be so accustomed to confinement that she finally suffered inertia in the face of freedom. I simply didn't understand how a reputable kidnapper (not suffering anything) would just leave her in the Laundromat to go off on some errand. That seemed a foolish thing to do (from a kidnapper's perspective.)

Now I understand: it's a power play: he gets a high from leaving her in so obvious a place, knowing she won't say anything.

Very disturbing. I ended up in conversation with someone on the topic of Stockholm Syndrome after reading your story (and your response to my remarks.) This person suggested that a kidnapper in such a situation might slowly give the girl more and more freedom, usually in ordinary outings, like going to the laundromat. Just leave her there to do his laundry, totally free, knowing she'd never run. I've never heard of such a thing. How sickening.

I think you take on a really relevant topic in your story, and one that's quite disturbing for its basis in reality. There's plenty of room for thinking about the larger contextual theme. You've done a lot in 200 words, and now that I understand it better, I'd say it's a strong contender.

Sorry for my unnecessary suggestions twice-offered! You're right: it did get me thinking, which is why we write. Very best wishes in the contest.

All the best, corra

I just finished a collection of some of Lincoln's speeches (Cooper Institute, the First of the Debates with Douglass, The Gettysburg Address, The Emancipation Proclamation, and both Inaugural Addresses). Then I read the new release Lincoln in the Bardo by George Saunders.

{crazy}

Alice in Groceryland

The Emperor’s New Clothes, Which Were Quite Visible & Caused No Scandal

Tom Toe

Snow White and the Seven Unremarkable Bystanders

I've been fairly non-active on this site for a while as I work on my undergrad studies and spend a lot of time thinking about novels I haven't bothered to write, and patter about in the forums smile so first of all, well done writing anything at all and posting it. Completing something and putting it out there for response is a difficult first step, and one many potential writers never achieve. (I refer again to my own very empty portfolio and very scarce activity as a reviewer.)

As you're weighing the pros and cons in your decision, you might consider:

1) that reviewing others' work here can strengthen your own work by offering context and exercising your mind.*
2) that reading published works does the same, even if you find the activity arduous. If you choose to quit the site, my advice is to go to the library and overcome your dislike of reading, immediately. Power through it until you conquer books.
3) that by my count you've given 21 reviews since you joined, and received 24 back. I don't know if I've calculated that right, since I believe reviews disappear if people delete their work. But if what I'm reading is nearly accurate, you have actually done very well on the site. A lot of the reviews you've given have been since April 2017, and a lot of the reciprocated reviews have been since April 2017. You've given 7 reviews in the last three weeks and have gotten 10 back, by my count -- not 2? That includes a few by Marilyn Johnson since this forum post was written seeking additional feedback. It seems like you're planning to base your entire assessment of the site on the response-time of less than a month.

I've been on this site for a while, & have seen people post in a flurry and leave as quickly, claiming disappointment with the scarce response to their work. Sometimes leaving is exactly the right choice. For example, when a writer lacks confidence or a sense of what he or she intends to write, opposing reviews can be extremely confusing and push out the writer's own viewpoint. I see this a lot when people post a work in progress rather than a completed work. The story starts to be written according to the reviewers' opposing tastes rather than the author's, leaving the author dissatisfied and lost. Certainly not what you want! It doesn't sound like that's your issue though: you seem to be extremely confident about your work and just crave more feedback. I expect that's the lot of many writers. There will be peaks and troughs in the writer's journey. The troughs can be frustrating. Only you can decide how best to respond to them.

If you think leaving the site is the best way to achieve success as a writer, I don't think anyone here will try to stop you. Most here would want to see you succeed.

Very best wishes, however, you choose to proceed.

- corra

* Although one of the site's new perks seems to be that a person can review for free when the work is visible to a wide audience of non-paying members. So (if I understand things correctly) you can still do some piping good reviewing exercises as a non-paying member! You don't even have to post your remarks, if you don't want to. You can do that privately, for exercise. I humbly suggest that you've gotten something out of writing reviews even if it wasn't the sort of feedback you wanted or expected when you joined. smile

corra wrote:

I'm reading Fifty Shades of Grey.

corra wrote:

The reader speaks so slowly (I assume it's intended to be sultry) that I never make it through a full sentence before I arrive at my destination. I've lost my lunch SEVERAL TIMES from subject to predicate.

Today I figured out the audio playback on my phone begins at a speed unnaturally slow. To hear the normal speed you have to turn up the speed about halfway! I thought that the extremely slow reading on Fifty Shades was the actual speed of delivery!! My smugness was misplaced! I stand corrected!! lol

Lady Macbeth

Ha! A proper, positive plea! big_smile Welcome to the site.

amoosing

I've also seen the movie with John boy Walton in the lead role. I like it but the novel is translated and the movie is American and although the moral message comes across, I don't know how much is lost in translation from the original German.

I watched this tonight. Thanks for pointing it out. x

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/41/PeterRabbit8.jpg/330px-PeterRabbit8.jpg

"First he ate some lettuces and some French beans; and then he ate some radishes."

I know...  that's why I was teasing you.

Ah! hmmlol

I've developed a deep interest in the American Civil War over the years and am constantly surprised at the savagery of the fight; the degree of animosity, the sheer scale of the violence (in terms of casualties) that these countrymen inflicted upon each other.

Me too. I find it amazing that a country could turn inward on itself like that. I think that's why I'm becoming interested in 1600s London as well. So much happening! The fire, the Interregnum, the plague. I just read Journal of the Plague Year by Daniel Defoe, by the way. (Well, several weeks ago.) I don't see how people lived through that.

One must never become predictable.

You should insist that the battle of Sharpsburg is always to be referred to as Antietam.

I can't! My ancestors fought at Sharpsburg! They'd come haunt me!

I told him that you'd made the suggestion, and he grinned, however. Then he started to say tell me why the battles have different names, referring to the war as "The Civil War," and I interrupted him to ask, "Which civil war? The one in 1600s England?" to which he responded, "Well, when I talk about it here in America, I assume everyone knows what I'm talking about, but good point. Down here, though, it's either 'The War of Northern Aggression' or 'The War of Southern Independence.'" #themoreyouknow smile

Incredible when you consider that this war was fought mainly with muzzle-loading rifles and percussion cap side-arms; blades and slow to load (muzzle) artillery.

I've taken a couple ACW classes. One in the North, one in the South, actually. I held a (very heavy) gun from the war (the kind that takes a Minié ball), and the professor demonstrated how long it would take to reload. Incredible is right.

I mentioned to a friend here that I hope to see Antietam in the spring. He says I give myself away as a Yankee by calling it "Antietam." In the South, they call it "Sharpsburg."

He added, "That's how they caught spies, you know. If this was 1863, you'd have been shot for that slip."

Oh!

I really should have thought of that...

C J Driftwood wrote:

I started using my phone to take dictation. It even types the words out for me.

I've done this! I love the voice to text feature. But I'm almost always with a crowd, so I feel funny, like I'm sending a note to the mother ship or something.

I've had this happen! A LOT. I used to scribble everything down on a scrap of paper and stuff it into my pocket, if I could. I would often come home with papers flying everywhere. I hated to lose those excellent ideas. *

Often even when I captured them, though, the scene wanted to go a different way once it came to the writing. I think sometimes it's a good thing to lose those inspirations. Then you're not wedded to them.

It is frustrating though. smile

*Okay, I still do this.