Frankrijk

Whitwoman

Whittler

"If I knew what that meant, I'd be inclined to take offence."

... and then, God intervened.
Har!

Fidlum Ben

Abgoosht

Oops... my clothes fell off.

smart arse

"If you want justice, go to a whorehouse. If you wanna get fucked, go to court."

William Diehl

max keanu wrote:

Every picture tells a story, but not every story creates a pictures within the mind in real time. The reverberations of Hamlet, Gone With the Wind or TO Kill A Mocking Bird resonate throughout a person's lifetime. I walk out of Pixar products happy and satisfied with the entertainment values. But these are a minor titillation that lasts for minutes, maybe a few hours; of nothing earth-shaking compared to say the novel aspects of Blade Runner or the profundity of books by the masters (Cervantes, Dante, Goethe, Shakespeare, other etc).

However, the rules of writing are like me teaching a guitar student ten, twenty rules to capture an audience from the start, but knowing all the time that controlling elements of performance fly right out the window when the first note is struck. The gut (or internal mind) takes over and the song works or it doesn't.

TO me, a novel works if it flows from the start and I can't stop writing it. Something in me takes over the process (and I leave the rest to AutoCrit, lol).

Fiction writing is a fine art, it flows from within and flows best after all rules and regulations are internalized and then muted/smursched from conscious thinking. But of course, basic rules must function in the background, perhaps at the sub-conscious level are rules that are best learned from reactions/reviews to work put out to be read, i.e. reviews from this site, publisher's comments and most important are the bruises and burns on the nose after they've been put to the grindstone. Ha-ha, one sharpens their writing nose through hard-learned grinding (breaking rules and playing with rules) to then sniff out the way towards the final word and THE END.

True.

Writing to 'must include' rules, 'best practice' and checklists can make for some contrived sounding, stinky prose. As you read some pieces, you notice the author ticking the boxes as they go. Applying the 'must do' list becomes the agenda and the flowing gut driven spiel plays second fiddle.

I feel there is a big difference between analyzing a great work and finding that it is 'naturally' inclusive of the 'best practices' (because such works define such lists)... and setting out to write a piece with the intention that it 'conforms' to such lists.

Ride

http://img.tapatalk.com/d/13/08/16/6u3ure6u.jpg

Breast

Supercilious

Shakespeare. The concise guide; all you need to know.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ds25sJS6HY

killer haemorrhoid

Don't forget your loofah

http://www.jarofquotes.com/img/quotes/1 … d6cd1b.jpg

How very dare you ruin my topic with your pigs arses?

smile

http://buzzfarmers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/shakespeare_8.png

Bolo de Bolacha tongue and Arroz Doce tongue tongue

corra wrote:

Tace! tongue

December 8, 1980

Dill Carver wrote:

Blue Monday by Nicci French

Psychotherapist-Detective/thriller pulp and very good entertainment for the commute.


And a GREAT twist in the tail. Totally worth the read for that ending.

corra wrote:

lol concedo

concēdō?

quando omni flunkus, mortati. wink

Stercus accidit

corra wrote:

Marian to her friends... smile

Martian? wink

Even today, some readers are unaware that George is a Georgette.