Seems like you've got your book split up into 2-3 with one different chapter in each. Try going back into the first and click "add new chapter"
Disclaimer: I am not a site admin
Seems like you've got your book split up into 2-3 with one different chapter in each. Try going back into the first and click "add new chapter"
Disclaimer: I am not a site admin
have become neutrino-to-energy reactors, usually referred to as neutrino boilers, or just boilers
"boilers" may prove confusing to a lay-reader given your boilers aren't actually boiling but converting
This process can in theory extract up to 20 percent of the black hole's mass energy,
Curious how they arrived at this number
Using some kind of electromagnetic or physical confinement mirrors
wait, what?
runaway effect where particle energy amplifies particle energy in a feedback look
loop*
It would be similar to Hawking radiation, but in this case, it doesn't rely upon quantum gravity.
Isn't this an imposed variant on his research?
There's no way you could use neutrinos to power cell phones and EVs, as suggested in an article I read
Hmm, well the logical extension here is that cell phones and EVs consume less power
The original idea (of converting a neutrino into heat energy (used to boil water to turn microscopic turbines?)) may be a bit flawed in retrospect, yet the concept has some merit
In one of mine I did l,w,h,anode (mirrored cathode).
Past four, things get exponentially complex and you'll have diminishing returns. I remember trying to hit 6-d and re-reading it later, things get incomprehensible.
-55C in Edmonton. Nice.
Btw Jupiter is sitting at -110 right now. You're half way there!
Whichever you choose, may I suggest you merely note plot holes and move on rather then go back and try to fix them? That's my current method. VQF had about half a doren (but all the chapter notes were lost in the Great Crash). The one you might recall is where the team moves from Imager's island to the station and Roberta was there but was supposedly left behind. I merely noted at chapter end "continuity oops!" but ploughed forward.
Just thought of another plot hole, though. If the Hercules wants to dump huge amounts of power into the emitter, all she has to do is install another powertron just for that
Two good options from njc.
A third, more simple: They generate heat which the ships system have to deal with. Two will make too much heat.
(And unlike star wars would have you believe, you can't vent heat from your core into space; it'll just radiate into the core of the vehicle. You need to build a fluid dynamics engine to transfer all that heat to the hull)
I'm considering calling mine extraspace
Both this and 4D space are current terms (4th dimension nominally considered time and extra space is what I get when I clean my closet).
Consider "Pentaspace" (example only -- don't use these ideas lol)
Example: The ship's P-Drive fired up, bringing the ship close to pentaspace translation.
(Reader: "Translation" sounds like this might be hyperspace-like)
(Writer: Similar only. Objects in p-space can be observed from outside)
Example: The ship turned, aiming its pentacannon. St-J had her ships race to keep it broadside. The beam couldn't be stopped by shields or anything in the physical dimension.
(Reader: Ah, so a beam can achieve a sort of hyperspace velocity? So, then they can send a low-power signal home for help?)
(Writer: No. High diffusion rate keeps it within x km)
Every time I think I've accounted for all obvious plot holes, and I write it up, I find new plot holes.
If you had your own terms, you could fudge the rules around any plot hole. I think that's the problem you're running into. Trying to use hyperspace would lock you in as much as using "tardis" because in both cases it ties your hands to someone else's imagination. UNLESS you simply use hyperspace and redefine it as you need rather than use someone else's definition (A rough count in wikipedia easily finds over a dozen variations)
I don't actually mention hyperspace when it comes to the operation of my stardrives.
I think you're onto something profound here. I just need some time for that to percolate.
It's kind of like I don't mention teleportation in my main series because I wanted to define it my own specific way
Did Dune ever explain their drive mechanism?
Dune uses pleeenty of handwavium on that and just gets on with the story. We're given to understand the ship does not travel through normal space and is in a web of cosmic worm holes that would be impossible to navigate without prescience. We don't get how the ship powers itself there and how it exists, or reads energy signatures etc.
Dune's engine therefore would not support a cosmic space battle. The only ship battles I can recall involve the ship entering the atmosphere and operating as a normal object (Except the No-ships, but even the Dune characters would call them magic)
Edit: Dune's power and beauty is part of the original writer's abstractness. When the son came along and explain how the Tleilaxu cloning tanks work, all the magic of the father's build ended in logical but crushing realism.
Whose hyperspace though? Every writer will give you a slightly different nuance of it.
For example in many dimensional travel tales one is referred to as "returning to one's home dimension" not realizing it might be plural
mattergy? Wouldn't that just be plasma?
Some of the green can go. For example, mention of the treaty vs the weapon's development doesn't come up again for what... 15 chapters?
Below is the proposed replacement for those idiotic mattergy weapons in the opening battle.
Aussie said, “She’s charging her new cannons.”
“Analyze!” St. James said [snapped].
“Based on their energy signature, I believe those are hyperspace weapons, able to fire at a target through higher dimensions. Whatever energy makes it through hyperspace to its target would effectively bypass our shields, which don’t exist there. Development and use of such weapons is strictly prohibited by the Neuer Mond Treaty.”
“Since when has that ever stopped the Imperium? Weaknesses?”
“The beam such a weapon fires is known to spread out very quickly in higher dimensions, obeying the inverse cube law. By the time it hits the target back in spacetime, it has lost considerable energy to space. As a result, Such weapons require enormous energy to fire a blast strong enough so that the energy that hits the target still has sufficient punch to penetrate a ship’s hull.
“The Hercules must be bypassing its powertron’s safety limits to concentrate sufficient energy to fire, risking a breach. Many of her other systems are dropping off to compensate.”
No, the idea is they chose something really hot to express/exaggerate what the heat feels like. Although now that you asked the question
I was curious if the appearance of the peppers was part of his descent into madness. It would probably work on the page
>Apollo could feel the heat of California Reapers stalking him in the Amazon.
like literal hot peppers?
You have some self-inflicted wounds in this first scene, but I think easily solved next pass.
For example, Lucifer says '...but You'll never win'
And it really caught my attention because would Lucifer really add the capitalized reverence... or is it a translated reverence (assuming they're speaking some language that existed with romanized letters at inception (Sadly, even Aramaic won't do)). This creates a horrible linguistic rabbit hole.
I cannot tolerate imperfection within My perfect creation.
This launches yet another rabbit hole. If the creation is perfect, then so is Lucifer (being part of that creation?). Thus the perfection means Lucifer can also freely create? Also, would God revere himself?
[whether or not God would refer to Satan as Satan or as Lucifer]
Shaitan sounds distinctly human, and for God to use it is kinda mocking, which is not how he's presented in scripture
Lastly, the speech between them is distinctively modern. Some random examples:
Eg: Your church is so feeble => Your church is feeble
Eg: The church tolerates so much division => Division runs rampart within the ranks of Y/your church
Eg: I won't need to get complicated. They just need to be introduced => ???
I'd consider stripping contractions and pragmatics. Example: I won't get complicated => I need not engage in petty strife (Don't use this, it's a terrible suggestion but best way I could think off the top of my head to dance around the "won't")... the 'just' is also super modern. Maybe "They need but be introduced" or even remove entirely. So the most eye-catching terms: so, just, even, such.
Re contractions example: Hell isn't in my future => Hell lies not in my future
DISCLAIMER!!! All these suggestions are aimed at you wanting the reader to hit the ground running one page 1 paragraph 1 with God and Satan speaking. If this IS how they normally speak and will do so for the rest of the title, it's fine as-is
You ask why I didn't review for the points, I say I need a few more chapters to better grasp the wider context
There will be some effort by Connor in book two to convert them
Muslim would be a tough convert because they don't believe Christ is the Son of God.
It would be like trying to convert a Christian from worshipping Christ to worshipping Moses. (What? Why do want me to start praying to this dude? He's just a prophet!)
Very detailed. I did a casual google of the Holy Land and came up with https://www.seetheholyland.net/ which is not even close
Nope, not moderator. We'll need Sol to fix the groups (again)
Hey JR. What you do this wintery month?
Hey Sol... dun forget invisible Apricots.
I'll just post this regularly
Star Craft used Confederacy but they boldly leaned right into the civil war aspect down to the character's accents. lol
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ftQoP47wTRo
Ugh, Kdot, how do I use that here, where I'm trying to name an interstellar republic?
For example, Simmons (iirc) used simply "The Ousters" even though they were technically a republic.
This option would see the whole group named after a place
Picture my last comment like this:
Elon Musk invents a rocket that can reach the nearest habitable planet. We happily scoot over there and meet a race of talking frogs. How do we introduce ourselves? Earth isn't a republic or much of anything.
Fast forward 100 years and Earth founds a central government and acquires a prefix. Would the Frogees bother changing all their records? Or would they just keep calling us Earthlings?