Times may vary slightly, but it is usually about a month from the end of a contest until winners are announced. Interesting name you chose btw. Take care. Vern

1,227

(342 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Norm d'Plume wrote:

Found another 60 second timeout delay. I clicked on The Next Big Writer label at the top of the screen to go to my home page, then changed my mind and clicked on my menu and selected Portfolio instead without waiting for the first operation to finish. It hung. Repeatable. Win7/Google Chrome.

Thanks.
Dirk

Reminds me: Went to the doctor and said, "Doc, my leg hurts in three places." Doc says, "Stay out of those places." lol. Take care. Vern

1,228

(28 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Deepest condolence, Max. Wishing you new strength in time. Take care. Vern

1,229

(212 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

njc wrote:

Group subscriptions are a limited resource.  It wouldn't and shouldn't be -mine-.  And many people already have threads in existing groups.  (I suppose this argues for multiple-appearance threads.)

Isn't everything a limited resource? Not sure why people having other threads should make any difference; if it would stop them from having one in your group why wouldn't it stop them from having one in any other forum? One person's solution is another's puzzle I suppose.  I guess since nothing else works for you, you'll just have to hope Sol has a change of heart. Good luck. Take care. Vern

1,230

(212 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

njc wrote:

Connections clutter the writer's home page.  Allowing the user to shut this off would help, though connections are still based on the writer rather than on the work.  And, as Randall notes, this creates a closed discussion rather than an open one.

Why don't you start your own group (njc's feedback or whatever) and everyone you review can join at your invitation and create their own thread for their work with all the comments back and forth you could wish for. Everyone can subscribe to whatever thread they want and get alerts and if there are any problems, well, at least you know who to call. Good luck. Take care. Vern

1,231

(46 replies, posted in HodgePodge)

GPyrenees wrote:

I'll be slugging away at it with another post on the site, in a week or so...)
wink

Hukhmmm! (clears his throat). Take care. Vern

1,232

(212 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

njc wrote:

You don't get alerts on subsequent updates, and if you did, other reviewers would not see the alert.  Reviews differ from forums in this way.

.

Yes, I understand  you wouldn't get alerts, but if all the reviewers were notified then they would simply have to check. I for one don't rely on alerts to visit the forums, simply look for any action. The same could be true in your simulated forum if folks were interested enough to participate. As stated, it is not ideal, but then what world is. Take care. Vern

If someone doesn't know the difference, I wouldn't be listening to them from a review standpoint. As an author, you can politely point out the difference once, simply ignore it, and/or thank them for their time and perhaps any more helpful comments. Take care. Vern

1,234

(212 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

njc wrote:

I've asked that either reviews, works/chapters, or subscribers be given something like a forum space.  Here's a situation that shows why: I've been reviewing a story by Randall Krzak.  Our discusion in reviews has been carried out by adding additional reviews.  Normally I suggest that an author open a forum for his work in a group he and I share.  But Randall and I share only the Premium group--that is, the Everything/Everybody group.  This doesn't seem to be the best place to open a discussion centered on one author or one work.

Why not join one R. Krzak's groups?  Well, I began to review his story not out of shared topic interest but because he has an interesting story and he seems to be working on skills that I'm still working on, so I hope to help and learn at the same time.  This seems a sound basis for reviewing, and for having a forum.

I know it's not ideal, but since Sol has made his position clear on not changing the forum format (you can still keep your fingers crossed for a change of heart), you could use the inline review to create your own forum. If you select the first word of the first chapter to start your discussion, then you could simply keep adding back and forth comments to create a forum simulation. Anyone could pitch in if so inclined just like other forums - of course they could also be blocked if so desired.  True, it might be like a fly buzzing in your ear at first, but you should become an accomplished swatter fairly quickly. One peripheral benefit could be that since you are already in the work being discussed you could go more quickly to any chapter which might be alluded to by using the options available without having to leave an outside forum to go to the work at hand. Just a thought and better than nothing perhaps. Take care. Vern

1,235

(10 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Hi, Addison, welcome to the asylum - it's a good asylum for the most part, just watch those electrical prods. You should learn a lot here and hopefully offer some sage advice to boot. Take care. Vern

MrsPiddles wrote:

I wonder if my Big Hearts would qualify, since it doesn't really fit the format of a regular romance?
Write On

They have so many imprints, it would probably fit one if there is any type romance. You do have to pick which imprint to submit to for the contest. Take care. Vern

1,237

(342 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Norm d'Plume wrote:

EDIT: Case in point, this post. After I left it, I saw the link appear on the home page. I went in, read it, and then came back to the home page. It's still there. I'm fine with that, as long as it's there long enough for regular (daily) visitors on the site to read them.

The link was there for me to see and read anyway. Take care. Vern

Edit: And now it's gone, replaced by my post about ten seconds later.

Voodoo_Magic wrote:

Hi everyone,

So I've been away from this site for...a while now (I used to be active like eight years ago), and I haven't written much recently, but I'm starting to try and get back into writing again more often and I'm wondering if you all had some tips on dialogue.

I can outline stories pretty well, but when it comes to actually writing for people I tend to have issues at times. Are there any tricks/websites to visit that you can think of to send my way? Thanks!

~VM

Best suggestion is to think of someone you know who would sound like your character, then write the dialogue as you would imagine the familiar voice would say it. Use a distinctly different person for each character. And it doesn't really have to be someone you know on a personal level - could even be another fictional character - just as long as you are familiar with the way they talk; maybe an actor, sports figure, newscaster, etc. But of course the more familiar you are with them, the easier to simulate their dialogue. Take care. Vern

1,239

(260 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I posted the comparison link for Premium vs Basic in a forum thread a little over a week ago, but who would ever know or find it. There were a grand total of two other people responding in the thread:
http://www.thenextbigwriter.com/forums/ … tml#p10570

Just saying, and I know Sol has nixed any changes, but it might say something about the versatility of finding info in the forums. If it wasn't for the "show your posts" link, I probably would have never found it again to show here. Take care. Vern

1,240

(23 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

j p lundstrom wrote:

Vern--don't get mad.

I would never get mad over anything like this; I only try to clarify questions posed and my sometimes obviously not so clear explanations. Take care. Vern

1,241

(23 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

J T-P wrote:  If it takes 7 points for a poem, the review reward should be comparable.

As previously stated the review reward is comparable, just not the same point system as for short story/novels. But the ratio is the same. I've made the comparison several times on the old site, so not going to waste any more time republishing. You can test it yourself. Simply post a poem and compare the credits someone will receive to the credits it cost you to post. Do the same with a short story/novel. You should find that in both cases, you would need to review almost exactly the same number of works in order to get enough points to publish a work of the same length - that number is 4 or so it was on the old site the best I recall (exact number is really irrelevant) and I assume (since I'm not redoing the experiment for the umpteenth time) it is the same on this site barring any glitches.

In other words if you review four poems of the same number of words of the one you wish to publish, then you will earn almost the exact number of points to publish that poem. The same is true of a short story/novel chapter. So they are comparable in ratio; they just seem different when you try to jump from one to the other which is not how the system is set up. If you wish to publish a poem, review poems; if you wish to publish short story/novels then review those and they provide the exact same benefit. If you really want to scam the system, then review only poems and publish short story/novels for the greatest bang for the points on a per word basis. Go in the opposite direction, you're running uphill. Take care. Vern

1,242

(23 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

j p lundstrom wrote:

Vern, are you saying that it costs more to post a poem than prose? and that the reason is to keep a balanced activity? and you are comparing that to artificial stabilization of currency? If I post a poem and label it "Short story," does that circumvent the artificially elevated rates? If, as I have seen, one posts a deconstructed poem (presented in prose form) and calls it "short story," will that cheat the system? And if we can cheat the system, was there ever any real reason to impose such a system?

And finally, should I get the status of Mama, Trains and Pickup Trucks changed to no points? It was meant to provide a source of amusement, not rip off hard-working writers who just want to take a little break and have fun.

Yes, if you post a poem as a short story or novel chapter, then you will "cheat" the system; assuming you are talking about a short poem and not an epic poem, then the very few words would require a fraction of the cost to post those same words as a poem.

You can cheat any system as you should be aware with all the hacking going on in the news. Why impose such a system in the first place is a rather meaningless question unless you think that everything must be done the same way. We write our stories the way we see fit, Sol makes his rules according to what he envisions. We don't all do things the same way; the most we can hope for is to be like Frank and at the end of the day, we can say, "I did it my way." Take care. Vern

1,243

(46 replies, posted in HodgePodge)

GPyrenees wrote:

Who knows, it may turn to shit too.

I'll be slugging away at it with another post on the site, in a week or so...then you can tell me without being too mean (like Vern, lol)
wink

I'm telling you, I don't read shit; if I enjoy it, it's marketable, period. So, you don't need any toilet paper for this book, you just need to finish it. But, yes, I will give you hell with the reviews. Take care. Vern

1,244

(23 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Poems vs novels/short story points: This has been bandied about many times and I doubt Sol is going to change it this time either. The problem is you're comparing apples to oranges as far as points are calculated. But if you review and write only poetry, your ratio of points to publish over points received to review will be almost exactly what you receive to publish and review novels or short stories. Do the math and you will see. How the points are calculated exactly on a per word basis doesn't really matter, it is set up and Sol has explained it before, to keep a more balanced activity between the two different worlds. Think of it as a currency exchange; if you earn money in one country, it is not going to be worth the same amount in another country. So too, on this site, if you earn points in poetry and try to spend them in novels or vice versa, the rate exchange is not going to be the same no matter how much one thinks it unfair. Take care. Vern

1,245

(32 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Mike Roberson wrote:

Some of you "old heads" forgive me ladies.  Experienced reviewers and writers answer this question.  I have gleaned from reviews I have received and given that there are two ways of reviewing.  The writer who is looking to lure a publisher should write by all the rules and write to the quirks and whims of a professional publisher.  The writer who is looking to self publish has a little more freedom to shall we say challenge the rules of thumb, so to speak.  Would it help any of you more experienced reviewers if you knew specifically what type of publishing the writer is going to seek?  It seems to me a self publish review could be done in less time with less attention to problems that may not occur when self publishing.  I would like to know the answer if for not other reason than to get this idea out of my head.  Thanks Mike

You might call me an "old head" just don't do it to my face, lol. To the point, what difference should it make how a book will be published? I'm of course assuming you want it to be bought and read and appreciated however it is published. And to that end, I would assume you would like the best advice a reviewer might be able to give whether you end up using it or not.

I do not and would not change the way I review even if I knew - which I don't unless someone comes out and tells me - how you intend to publish. From what I perceive, most authors on site are going or will go the self-pub route simply because it is way easier and faster to do so and in fact is probably the only way most of us will get published although I still hold out stubbornly for the traditional route.

I review with the intent of giving the most enlightening suggestions I possibly can to help create a more viable story from a mass marketing viewpoint. Of course I'm no expert, but that is the goal and hope that would be the goal for any who reviews me - all we have is our honest opinion of what works or doesn't. And to that end, it makes absolutely no difference in the method of publication as to how I for one undertake a review. Take care. Vern

1,246

(32 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Not the first time and pretty sure it won't be the last, but I'm going against the grain here. I just don't see adding extra points for the later chapters making any significant difference. If someone is reviewing the story merely for points, probably not the best confidence builder. Extra points for later chapters would make no difference to me; if I'm going to review it, then I'll review it regardless.

I treat reciprocal expectation the same way; if I enjoy the work it will make no difference if the author reciprocates or not. I've reviewed several with little or no reciprocation and I've been reviewed by several with little reciprocation - I'm talking entire novels here, not just a few chapters or a short story.

If I were going to pay beyond the predetermined point value, I'd simply hire a professional editor after sampling some of their work to make sure it is what I would expect for the outlay. That is not to say some on this site would not do just as good a job, but very few would if we look at it realistically. And if someone meets your criteria on site you could at least suggest a private arrangement for payment in whatever currency was mutually satisfactory - if points were all they wanted, you could simply let them do drive-by reviews ( to include copy and paste) of everything you write without even reading and stock up the credits until the payment is fulfilled. Just paying someone points from a built up stash is not going to entice very many great reviewers imo. Most of the great reviewers have (or will shortly) accumulated more points than they will probably ever need. And as said, cash could be worked out privately with anyone willing and acceptable.

From a logical standpoint, what would be the difference in actual reviews received if more points were added for later chapters. That would not mean they are going to magically read all your chapters any more than they already are; after all, everybody else is getting those extra points for their chapters too and any mass change in reading patterns is highly unlikely. Everything would still be relatively the same.  I don't see any advantage in the suggested changes, but that is just my opinion. Take care. Vern

1,247

(342 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Norm d'Plume wrote:

In doing inline reviews, I often leave two or more comments for the same selected word or sentence (for separate feedback about the same item). I then write my closing comments, which can be long. Today, I wanted to read those secondary and tertiary comments, so I clicked on x-line to see all of them. My very long closing comments were wiped out. Fortunately, I suspected that might happen, so I copied the closing comments to the clipboard. I was then able to paste them back in. Since x-lines are available when leaving reviews, this could easily burn someone. Not sure if there is an easy fix.

Actually, there is an easy fix. Just go ahead and close your review before checking the x-line. Then your closing comment will be saved. You can always go back and add to your comments even after closing. Take care. Vern

New members get 7 days free Premium membership. Click the link to see the differences between Premium and Basic:

http://www.thenextbigwriter.com/member/ … comparison

Take care. Vern

1,249

(37 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

j p lundstrom wrote:

? It's like going for a walk in the country and having to climb over logs!

As stated earlier, if a prologue is done well, it's totally fine, if not then it doesn't work, but JP, how can you expect to go for - or enjoy - a walk in the country without crossing some logs; you just as well be strolling the city streets, lol. Take care. Vern

1,250

(90 replies, posted in HodgePodge)

GPyrenees wrote:

How the heck are you, anyway, Vern???

wink

I was alright for a while - :  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cQrgeeS_qbo - but then someone quit posting and left all alone with nothing to review, so now I'm crying .... Take care. Vern