I was hoping not to outright contradict too many pesky laws of physics other than the ones that most space operas usually rely on as well. If something clearly violates physics, then I would have preferred to conjure up a bit of technobabble to explain why.
>After all, if you can "see" a laser being fired, it's probably not a laser but rather something much slower.
I've seen lasers with a continuous beam, mostly in lab photos, but also at concerts. So those must be in the visible spectrum, making the light beam itself visible within visible light, or is none of that the actual laser but rather what the beam passes through, as someone on Quora suggests below as well? Obviously, you can fire something that's not visible to humans at all, but I'm assuming they're firing something visible. So, would all those lasers under Google images be invisible in space? If so, that's cool, but annoying for me.
>from Quora:
>If you fire a laser through perfectly clear, clean air, it's invisible. What you're seeing when you see a beam of light (any beam of light, not just a laser) is >the beam illuminating something in its path - it could be dust, smoke, steam
I had no idea.
I might be able to salvage my current write-up by having the "loss" of energy occur when the incoming EM energy from the annihilator is converted to hokey energy, which is what the new weapon fires, rather than after the weapon is fired and somehow diverges faster than EM energy.
Cacas!