Search options (Page 12 of 15)

I am a member on another website, and the way it gets around this problem is that the dialogue box for the inlines contains two sections.  The top 75% contains the entry text for your critique comments (it also scrolls as the text gets larger than the space).  The bottom 25% shows the text you selected to edit.  This section can be collapsed or expanded to be larger, and also scrolls.  The inline box is also larger overall, so it doesn't feel so cramped.  With this feature, the text you have selected to comment on is ALWAYS just below your comments.  It's very convenient.

I'd say that depends on what you hope to achieve.  I consider historical fiction of the ilk you describe as a subset within general historical fiction, which is a subset itself of the broadest definition of literary fiction.  Some people will slot it differently.  It doesn't really matter how you tag it. The point is, true literary fiction appeals to a far narrower audience than does other forms of long fiction.  Historical fiction's audience is narrower still.  That's not going to change.

So, at best, you are writing for a very, very narrow audience that is shrinking with every word you write.   The chances of finding commercial success in historical fiction (even more so in your niche) is slim to none--purely because you're mining into a narrow vein.  Some people write because they want to sell a zillion copies and get on lists and be famous.  Others of us write because we love what we are writing, others because we have stories in our head that we have to get out, some people want to leave a legacy, some people just love playing with words and sentences and paragraphs..and there a host of other other reasons why people choose to write.  I say:  don't fool yourself, accept reality, and do what makes you happy.

Thank you. I have heard that as well.  Part of it is just to keep me organized, so I can see the sense in that.

A public library is not an apt comparison to a private website that is controlled by a paywall that needs to be accessed by having a credit card or PayPal account.  I know it has a free section, but that is a mistake - and is being rectified.  The question posed was "Is this site suitable for a 12 year old".  The answer is, "No, of course not."  If you want to point out the 0.001% examples of freakishly (emotionally and intellectually) mature kids, then you are just being argumentative.  A public library is designed for 12-year olds.  A site like this is intended for adults.  Letting children on it AND having a free section:
1) dilutes the usefulness of the site for paying, adult members
2) subjects children to situations and media that cannot be controlled
Yes, they can get on of their own accord, but a parent that condones it, is just a parent that isn't acting in their child's best interest

The fundamental structural element of fiction is the scene. One rationale behind chapters is as an organizing structure for scenes (not always).  Some people like an organized structure to their stories—readers and writers alike.  And before you go off on some fourteen-paragraph argumentative diatribe, as you are wont to do—what I am stating is not a rule to be argued, it's simply one answer to your question. (Do try and be civil)

LOL...Why don't you two get a room...

Sol,
I use the iPad almost exclusively.  I have the latest iPad, latest iOS.  In the boxes used for posting, you can't paste unless you are REALLY fast.  You have to press to bring up the menu for [select/select all/paste], for example, but it disappears in a millisecond.  If you anticipate where the word "paste" is, you can hit it, and 1 out 10 times you can be fast enough.  I have seen this on other websites.  The odd thing is, it's not in all text input boxes that this is a problem.  For example, if I want to paste in this box I am in now [write message] it's no problem.  But if I want to post a submission or post comments into a general review box [say, if I write my commments in Draft or Notes and want to cut and paste into the General Review box - can't do that.]
The problem seems to be in those text boxes where you have the ability to format text.  In normal text entry boxes [like this one, or quickees, pasting is not problem] I think I detailed this problem in another post before.

That's not really a good example of a long sentence.  It's merely four, very beautiful, short sentences (complete with their own SVO) connected with semicolons.

"He angrily threw the book on the table"
"He slapped the book down on the table"
Or course not.  You chose the wrong verb and you added a useless word: "down".  Is he going to slam the book "up" on the table - or perhaps sideways?
You just have to select the correct verb and get rid of useless words, then you have economy and a more effective sentence. 
Ergo: He slammed the book on the table.
Stronger sentence, 12.5% reduction in word count.

Most debates about long sentences are much ado about nothing.  Long sentences, wielded by good writers, are works of art in themselves.  Long sentences fumbled by poor writers are like flashlights on ineptitude.  A juggler begins with two balls, perfecting until he can juggle those two blindfolded by feel. Later, it is nothing to juggle two running chainsaws, a bowling ball and three whiffle balls....

An example from a favorite writer of mine who never met a sentence he couldn't turn into art, Peter Matthiessen.  See the long sentence highlighted:

Hollering "Goodbye," to all, and to ensure attention, I rode my big roan off that barge as she touched the shore. A staccato clatter sharp as rifle fire as the horse balked, then a mighty gathering of haunches and a great leap and splash and upward heave onto the bank.  <<These heroics, alas, were spoiled by the hydraulics of my stallion, which lowered its nozzle to release a stream of piss even while it rid itself of gas, hightailing off in a grand salute of horse farts and manure as the women's cries of admiration turned to giggles.>> But finally all cheered as a grim young Edgar was actually seen to laugh.