Hi Pamela
No need to explain, your intent comes across very clearly! And hey, it's my opinion, so it's out there to be challenged to the max!
Benefit is probably the wrong word to use, my bad, sorry! What I mean is, the in-line reviews have made life easier for reviewers without due consideration to the writers. Or that's what it feels to me at least. But like I said, I'll still take in-line reviews!!! Just hope Sol is working on something to make it easier on the business end too ...
In-line reviews, from both reviewer and writer perspectives, involves a lot of clicking, another reason why I'm prone to use regular reviews. Or it could be I'm old and got used to regular reviews and don't want to change! I do running commentary, in-line/nits and overall feedback within a regular review - the strength of the in-line review does come through when the number of comments/suggestions start to get big, I'll give you in-liners that! LOL
I should also probably mention that I sometimes use Word to do reviews and it's then easy-as to copy and paste it into a regular review. That's also why I won't be surprised if it's only me that has this "problem". Although the number of regular reviews to in-line reviews I receive do not support this too much.
And fully agree with you on the growth in both reviewing and writing as part of this site! So irrespective of the format, the benefit (getting better at reviewing and as a result, writing) would be the same.
Between you and Vern we're going to get to the bottom of what I'm trying to say! Thanks!