her gown sleeve and her cloak sleeve make for multiple sleeves per arm? I'll see if I can't change the sleeves just to be safe though (I don't visualize a cloak as something with sleeves. By definition, that would be a coat. (unless you know something about English clothing that I don't. Besides, woven wool AND a dress sleeve to go through...I don't know if the arrow would score her that badly. Either way, I would expect the shaft to get caught in the fabric)
-- blonde moment where my fingers and my brain disconnected - I was referring to a doublet used by females for riding, similar to the male version, just without the eyelets to attach breeches; on second thought, she would probably be wearing a shirt underneath over her chemise, but I don't want to have readers get drowned in details, so I'm going to change "sleeves" to something else to be safe
-- the arrow getting caught in the fabric: it would depend on the arrow; I've changed tact assuming the bad guy would be using an arrow that could pierce armour, and I doubt fabric not designed for the purpose would be much of a problem
she had to belief she’ll make it to alston.(no clue where this is. is it the hamlet? not sure if i've seen this name before.)
*** I wasn't sure about this one - it's a town closest to the hamlet - given you have a "problem", I'll see what I can do (Just mention the name of the town earlier and put it in relation to the hamlet)
-- yep, that would be the way to go! :-)
either the messenger was mistaken or the messenger’s lordship was (mention c's brother by name and implicate him here.)
*** This means I'm introducing Matthew, Henry, George and Anthony (not too many?) - if not, then I'll also have to make sure the connection between Anthony and Catherine is clearly stated here (Just state 'C's brother' instead of a name, then. The key thing is to have the reader realize that C's brother sent the false message for help. 'Lordship' isn't clear enough because the reader isn't used to the titles yet)
-- sounds easy enough!
He has, but they have never touched and he didn't "realise" until now she has grown up really nicely ... As you've also mentioned, they would've seen each other at C's father funeral - is this too hard to believe? (Just mention that C was dressed in mourning clothes and face smudged with crying...either way, it is a good teaching moment because you can go into funerals and what that involves. Also, this would be a chance for the villain to get a mention...)
-- mmmm, will see what I can do!
This is after a defense is in place and George had "found" the attacker, so the torch should be okay?(George 'found' a trail but no attacker. The person is assumed gone but could easily double back and finish the job. Don't let the characters feel safe until a roof is over their heads. Remember the Reivers. No one is safe at night in these wild lands. Oh, feel free to use that line if you feel it appropriate) NO TORCH PLEASE.
-- you would be the best person to confirm whether they would be able to check her wound without a torch, remember it's overcast and only bits of moonlight breaks through every so often ...
Also note that the weather is rainy and humid. A torch would have to be started by a flint and stone. Not a very reliable source of fire. Also note that the flame would obscure the night vision of everyone, making it harder to see if the upcoming trail is safe. To prove it to yourself, walk along a dark path in the woods on a night with no moon. Then take out a flashlight, point it to the upcoming path, and try to see as far into the trees.
-- in the next chapter, they will be lighting torches galore before they get going; it's also been used by reivers to display their numbers and install fear in those watching them approach (yeah, sometimes they didn't do it all that stealthy, the arrogant bastards!); Matthew has a enough men to feel safe, as much as I know where you're coming from to keep the tension up
-- also, they grew up in the rain and humidity, surely they can light a torch if need be by now ...
It feels to me as if I'm being difficult here on a few points ... not my intent at all, but you probably know me by now and is ok with this and know that whether I agree or disagree, I appreciate it equally!
Thanks!
xx