1,001

(11 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

SamFantasyWriter wrote:

Thanks very much. Sorry from your message I didn't quite get it.... Whats the name of that group.... Is it 'The First Chapter Whips'?
Thank you for being encouraging, as I am sure you know, it always help a young or amateur writer. It is difficult when you think you have the perfect start and then it gets constructive criticisms and bad review but as you say, just got to keep plodding through.

Keep Writing

Samuel

p.s nice metaphor with the mud tongue

The First Chapter Whips doesn't exist yet, but I think they should get their act together, combine forces and make TNBW member's first chapters invincible.  It's about time.  *cough-cough*

In any case, I'm really behind with my recip reviews at the moment, quiet times do happen every now and again, so I've dotted your name down to read what you're up to when I can.  Not sure if anyone has told you how this site "works", but best is to guilt other writers into reviewing your work by reviewing their work first ...  smile

1,002

(520 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

These guys know the terrain and area really well, so don't need torches when they're on the move (no lanterns, they used torches when they were travelling in large numbers and couldn't give a shit about being seen - to be exact, I've read and seen pics with torches and without, but their ability to move in darkness is legendary). 

I have never attempted to treat a wound in sporadic moonlight, but I imagine since Matthew has covered the hills to the left, and the right, and is also surrounded by a number of men, he'd rather be able to see what he's doing to help Catherine.  He doesn't need for a torch for any other reason.  And as Philisha says, he can just do it, there is no need to give lengthy explanations on the how and the why.  So I'm going to keep that as is with the Nike slogan in my head.

When they start moving again, neither do they need torches to return home, they got there just fine without.  But I really like the way I've described the light - some of my best work I say.  True!  (just kidding, but I seriously like it).  Ah well, will keep it in the goodies bag for another time.

So I hope we're all good and Matthew isn't a wuss anymore!

1,003

(11 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

SamFantasyWriter wrote:

Thanks a lot. I admit it is discouraging but like you said the first draft is about getting your basic story down and what you want to achieve then go back over it. It means a lot so thank you very much. I will try chapter one one more time but if it doesn't work then I will just keep on writing the story because I am loving it at the moment but that has stalled because I was too busy trying to perfect the start which wasn't needed.
All of your replies have been great and have certainly picked me up out the mud. So thank you

Keep Writing
Samuel

I'm in the same boat at the moment, so don't feel alone!  All I have to offer is, don't give up - with every rewrite you're getting closer to "the one", and when you get there, you'll look back and say it was worth it.  There is a group here on TNBW (who I think should start a new group "The First Chapter Whips" to only accept first chapters and review those - I wouldn't name them, because I might leave someone out, but a good lot of them hang out around here) that's simply brilliant with their suggestions to get first chapters in shape.  Without their inputs, mine would be nowhere near where it is today compared to a few months ago.  And by all means, with every rewrite they find something new to fault (even though you might've been thinking, no way!) - just keep walking; you're one version closer to "the one" where these guys turn around and say:  "All good."  And that's when you know it is "the one".

Also, as with everything, review first chapters.  That way, you can share what you have learned, and keep on learning in the process as well.

Good luck and all the best!

*opens sprinklers to rinse away a little bit more mud*  I hope!  smile

1,004

(1,528 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

KHippolite wrote:

I want it to feel at least a little real.

Reality has no place in fiction

I'd suggest you close your eyes when you read my next Char chapter then ...  hiehiehie

1,005

(1,528 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

njc wrote:

So I need three times as much nothing?

only half of nothing will do ... K doesn't know what is coming.  I'm assuming I know, since I've seen you ask a question if there still is a 5000 word limit per chapter, so if my calculation is correct, three times nothing equals 7500+ words ...  :-)

1,006

(212 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Norm d'Plume wrote:
njc wrote:

Now there's another possibility: a field for the author's requests to reviewers, which will appear over the review buttons and at the top of the review page.

That's what the chapter notes are for. If people aren't even reading those, another text field isn't likely to help much.

In general, I hope we don't keep adding review-related buttons to the top. There are already five buttons up there. Sol has to support tablets and handhelds too, so space is at a premium. He expanded chapter notes specifically so people wouldn't skip it. If they do, you can ask the reviewers in your replies to start reading them. That's what I did and the problem went away.

If we do need more review-related buttons, I suggested changing the existing Leave Inline Review button to a Go to Reviews button at the top, and have that jump to the start of the reviews further down the page. From there, it's just one more click on the existing buttons to leave either an inline or regular review. It's more consistent and we can then group any new review-related buttons directly above the reviews.

Full disclosure: I'm hoping for a Bottom button at the top of that page to jump to the tail end of the reviews. Then I don't have to keep scrolling all the way down to see the latest reviews. I can scroll up. Any long page, like forum threads, should also have that. My joints are too old to constantly scroll from the top of long pages when I really want to be at the bottom.

Thanks
Dirk

This! Great suggestions that also keep other limitations in mind. This will solve most of the navigation "issues" for me too.

1,007

(4 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

TirzahLaughs wrote:

I've been slowly turning stuff off--but it's taking forever. 
And I don't know when I turn it back on--if I'll be point charged for it.

I wish I could just put 'out fishing' sign...for a few weeks.  I don't want someone to leave a review and think I'm ignoring them.
I guess I can try to keep checking in---but I won't have much free time.
T

You won't be charged points to turn it back on! smile

1,008

(74 replies, posted in Fight Club)

C J Driftwood wrote:
janet reid wrote:
C J Driftwood wrote:

~enough CAPS, Janet? smile

Okay, rant over for now- ran out of lunch hour again... dang it!

CJ, some very nice comments on reviewing other genres and returning the favour.  It's exactly how I feel to.

With regards to your post on terrorism, also agree, if a cartoon is so hardcore, well, return it like for like!

But regarding your use of caps lock - I think we need another rule:  One can NEVER USE ENOUGH CAPS.

YOU HAVE FAILED, BUT BECAUSE YOU'RE SO REASONABLE AND DAMN LIKEABLE, WE'LL GIVE YOU ANOTHER CHANCE!  big_smile

AW! THANKS! I'LL DO BETTER IN THE FUTURE! HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT EXCLAMATION POINTS!!!! smile

EXACTLY! THE! SAME! CAN NEVER USE TOO MANY!!!!!! YOU HAD TO ASK?!!!!! LOL You know we can go on like this for like forever<----- see what I did with "like"?  Yeap, can't have enough of them like either smile

1,009

(74 replies, posted in Fight Club)

C J Driftwood wrote:
janet reid wrote:
JL Mo wrote:

I hope I'm not the only one who sees themselves in the complaints of non-reciprocal reviewers. I am guilty, guilty, guilty. I could give my reasons/excuses as to why I haven't been on site often enough, but they wouldn't matter one iota. I've promised to return reviews, and I have failed on that promise time and time again. But... I still plan to.

No! Really! I do!

Now, if only I could get my grandson off of my lap whenever I open my computer...

Added to limited time, my other problem is my shocking memory.  And with this new site, I just can't seem to get my "who to review" system to work. 

The reading list is useless - it takes you to Chapter 1 of the piece and not the next chapter you need to review or the last chapter you had reviewed.  The old reading list saved "chapters", not books, so I used that function on the old site to the max to keep track of who and how much I have reviewed and who or what was next.  So now, I'm using my reading list more like a "to-do" list than anything else.

I also tried to only connect with writers I need to recip - that way, I only needed to keep an eye on my new connection content.  That quickly went down to the drain as I have used the messaging functionality to send private messages to writers that I just simply can not review at the moment because I can't keep up with the recips as it is.

Short of running a paper or Excel reading list on the side, I'm out of ideas to keep it all together on the site.  So if anyone has a suggestion for a fish bowl brain like mine (yes, fish bowl, not goldfish smile ), please let me know!  Who knows, end of 2016 I might just say thank you with a review of your work!

Oh my GOD yes! It's annoying as hell.
And recently I went to reciprocate for several reviewers and got the message that they are no longer members or their posts are no longer available for review. It wasn't that long since their posting. One of which is  Temple Wang (who gave me some very useful comments). I noticed she posted as recently as the 28th. So, I don't know what is going on there- TEMPLE- if you are reading, how can i reciprocate - I certainly don't want to be a hypocrite!
As for a failing memory- yeah, if someone reads mine I immediately tag theirs to read. If nothing is there, I will (sorry to say) forget about it.

CJ, this looks to me like you've been blocked. Easiest way to confirm is to access their homepage - if you can leave quickees or access work or send a connection request, then you have not been blocked, otherwise you've been blocked.

1,010

(520 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic &amp; Sci-Fi)

amy s wrote:

Remember, it's your world.  Whatever you say, goes!

But keep me on my toes! I'm not writing fantasy (yet)?!

1,011

(520 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic &amp; Sci-Fi)

her gown sleeve and her cloak sleeve make for multiple sleeves per arm?  I'll see if I can't change the sleeves just to be safe though (I don't visualize a cloak as something with sleeves.  By definition, that would be a coat.  (unless you know something about English clothing that I don't.  Besides, woven wool AND a dress sleeve to go through...I don't know if the arrow would score her that badly.  Either way, I would expect the shaft to get caught in the fabric)
--  blonde moment where my fingers and my brain disconnected - I was referring to a doublet used by females for riding, similar to the male version, just without the eyelets to attach breeches; on second thought, she would probably be wearing a shirt underneath over her chemise, but I don't want to have readers get drowned in details, so I'm going to change "sleeves" to something else to be safe
--  the arrow getting caught in the fabric:  it would depend on the arrow; I've changed tact assuming the bad guy would be using an arrow that could pierce armour, and I doubt fabric not designed for the purpose would be much of a problem

she had to belief she’ll make it to alston.(no clue where this is. is it the hamlet? not sure if i've seen this name before.)
***  I wasn't sure about this one - it's a town closest to the hamlet - given you have a "problem", I'll see what I can do (Just mention the name of the town earlier and put it in relation to the hamlet)
--  yep, that would be the way to go!  :-)

either the messenger was mistaken or the messenger’s lordship was (mention c's brother by name and implicate him here.)
***  This means I'm introducing Matthew, Henry, George and Anthony (not too many?) - if not, then I'll also have to make sure the connection between Anthony and Catherine is clearly stated here (Just state 'C's brother' instead of a name, then.  The key thing is to have the reader realize that C's brother sent the false message for help.  'Lordship' isn't clear enough because the reader isn't used to the titles yet)
--  sounds easy enough!

He has, but they have never touched and he didn't "realise" until now she has grown up really nicely ...  As you've also mentioned, they would've seen each other at C's father funeral - is this too hard to believe? (Just mention that C was dressed in mourning clothes and face smudged with crying...either way, it is a good teaching moment because you can go into funerals and what that involves.  Also, this would be a chance for the villain to get a mention...)
--  mmmm, will see what I can do!

This is after a defense is in place and George had "found" the attacker, so the torch should be okay?(George 'found' a trail but no attacker.  The person is assumed gone but could easily double back and finish the job.  Don't let the characters feel safe until a roof is over their heads.  Remember the Reivers.  No one is safe at night in these wild lands.  Oh, feel free to use that line if you feel it appropriate)  NO TORCH PLEASE.
--  you would be the best person to confirm whether they would be able to check her wound without a torch, remember it's overcast and only bits of moonlight breaks through every so often ...

Also note that the weather is rainy and humid.  A torch would have to be started by a flint and stone.  Not a very reliable source of fire.  Also note that the flame would obscure the night vision of everyone, making it harder to see if the upcoming trail is safe.  To prove it to yourself, walk along a dark path in the woods on a night with no moon.  Then take out a flashlight, point it to the upcoming path, and try to see as far into the trees.
--  in the next chapter, they will be lighting torches galore before they get going; it's also been used by reivers to display their numbers and install fear in those watching them approach (yeah, sometimes they didn't do it all that stealthy, the arrogant bastards!);  Matthew has a enough men to feel safe, as much as I know where you're coming from to keep the tension up
--  also, they grew up in the rain and humidity, surely they can light a torch if need be by now ...

It feels to me as if I'm being difficult here on a few points ... not my intent at all, but you probably know me by now and is ok with this and know that whether I agree or disagree, I appreciate it equally!

Thanks!
xx

amy s wrote:

I'm not sure where I'm going with these short stories.  It seems that I'm trying to teach other parents as well as celebrate my son.  He doesn't have the words, so I'm his translator.  We'll see how it pans out.

You're also giving people who have limited exposure to Autism some wonderful insight!  And you're doing it so nicely, they won't be offended in the least!

njc wrote:

Our schools protect the aggressor and punish the defender, teaching kids that they need Authority for protection.

This is exactly the reason why my kids have my permission to sort repeated offenders out (and the principal knows this because I had the pleasure to inform him in person once).  The school system over here is also lacking in any common sense.

I hate bullies and people that pick on those "weaker" or "smaller" than them.  But you may have noticed this already?!  LOL

njc wrote:
janet reid wrote:

I like njc's cartoons.  Somehow, there's a cartoon he can use for every situation he needs a cartoon for too!

Not mine, no!

I should've said the links njc supplies us to the cartoons!  LOL, you first have to fix Evalene (probably spelled wrong) and the off-hook gadget before you can go drawing cartoons!  Speaking of which, how is the gadget thingy going lately?

1,015

(520 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic &amp; Sci-Fi)

nits (because you asked for some)
*** and because I knew I've missed a few with the rewrite no matter how many times you read the darn thing!  big_smile

if I don't mention something, it means it will be changed as per your review  smile

warm blood soaked her sleeves. (sleeve-singular- unless c got shot through both arms.)
***  her gown sleeve and her cloak sleeve make for multiple sleeves per arm?  I'll see if I can't change the sleeves just to be safe though

she had to belief she’ll make it to alston.(no clue where this is. is it the hamlet? not sure if i've seen this name before.)
***  I wasn't sure about this one - it's a town closest to the hamlet - given you have a "problem", I'll see what I can do

either the messenger was mistaken or the messenger’s lordship was (mention c's brother by name and implicate him here.)
***  This means I'm introducing Matthew, Henry, George and Anthony (not too many?) - if not, then I'll also have to make sure the connection between Anthony and Catherine is clearly stated here ...

familiar eyes, wide and flooding in tears, the usually sky-blue pools dark, met his when she lifted her chin(this makes it sound like m has seen c since she became an adult. the impression would be shocked recognition after remembering a bratty teen)
***  He has, but they have never touched and he didn't "realise" until now she has grown up really nicely ...  As you've also mentioned, they would've seen each other at C's father funeral - is this too hard to believe?

forget the torch! there is an armed attacker out there. why would they give him a target to shoot at?
***  This is after a defense is in place and George had "found" the attacker, so the torch should be okay?

as much as he wanted immediate answers, he’d have to tend to catherine’s injury first. (nope. he'd alert the other guards. they don't know there is an archer out there.)
***  George is on it!  smile

their families had been friends and allies for as long he could remember. (this confuses me since m hasn't seen c since she was young. if they were close allies, wouldn't m have been to the former aiden's funeral?)
***  would it be clearer if I add something like he didn't pick up on any problems at the funeral or some such?

Thanks, you've really made some brilliant suggestions (as always!)  smile

1,016

(212 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

KHip, that was my understanding of your original suggestion, and the reason why I started to warm up to the idea.  smile

SolN wrote:

I guess this is my main disagreement with those advocating for more forums. I don't see this site's primary mission to foment forum discussions, but rather to help authors fine-tune their writing. In the process, discussions will occur, friendships will be made, but it is all done under the framework of helping one another become better writers.

My understanding is we don't want more forums?  But that we would like to be able to have a single point of reference where we can can have more in detailed discussions to fine-tune our writing without having to go back into in-line reviews and clicking through how many comments to get to the feedback that helps us to fine-tune our writing as per the site's intent.  The existing forum format more than adequately give us access to discussions of a general nature, etc. and I don't think any of the wishes put forward here was referring to anything else but to fine-tune our writing.  Or am I missing something?

In any case, like Vern said, everyone has their own way of doing things - some writers don't want and don't have any further in-detail discussion of their work for example.  So I'm guessing Sol and the team will come up with a solution - and some will have to adapt.  No problem with that.  Hopefully by adding our comments here it helps them to find as good a solution as possible.  Although reading this, I think it only helps to confuse!

njc wrote:

Amy, have a look at the character who is speaking in data balloons.  I don't mean to make light of a serious matter, but what do you think of him?  (If you hadn't noticed, the authors specialize in going over the top often without ever going off the deep end.)

I like njc's cartoons.  Somehow, there's a cartoon he can use for every situation he needs a cartoon for too!

Re this one, I learn something every day (or at my age, sometimes are reminded of a lesson I've learned previously and should've remembered LOL).  I think that's a good thing.  Once you stop learning, you've either stopped breathing or you think you know it all.  Both are equally bad.  IMO

JR

amy s wrote:

Janet,

I renamed and reposted the story under Aut-ku.  I've consolidated using your changes as a guide.  Nearly everything included.  THANKS!

*blushes and drills big toe into sand*

I love make-up words as much as I love road-trips!  (that's lots BTW)  smile  And it was only a pleasure - your Collin stories are only a pleasure to read!

1,019

(212 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

SolN wrote:

If authors really want more feedback, then pray tell why don't they offer some opinion on all the comments left in the inline review instead of only a few words in the final comment section. You can agree or disagree with what was said or even offer a totally different interpretation. You can question why the reviewer sees things that weren't intended at all or show why you chose to do something a particular way and start a conversation in which others could offer various points of view. In other words, you've got a forum built into the review process just as Sol envisioned and implemented.

This is the purpose of in-lines but I don't think we are fully there yet. The problem is that there is no notification when someone posts a comments so the author and others have no reason to go back to the in-line. We're working on a new version of the in-line review system that will address this and hopefully move more towards the vision I have for the tool. I do believe this is the place to focus the site's resources as opposed to building out the forum system.

I'm struggling to get my head around the practicality of using reviews, especially in-reviews, as discussion boards.

Reason for my concern is this:  A novel with 30 chapters, and an average of 5 in-line reviews per chapter, at an average of 10 in-line comments per review = 1500 in-line comments.  I'm not even considering if a writer has more than one novel active.  If only one comment every 2 chapters is discussed in more detail, that's 15 discussions spread over 30 chapters and 1500 in-line comments.  Not mentioning if two reviewers made the same suggestion, yet one group adds their views to review A and another group theirs to review B - and in the process, you now have two of the same conversations that don't follow each other.  From a writer's perspective, especially one that do not incorporate changes as they write on, this would be impossible to manage without going mad or without missing possibly some really good feedback.

So my question is, how would someone manage this?  Email alerts will drive me nuts (but that's just me) - traffic light patterns attached to in-line comments would probably work, but it doesn't negate the navigation require to get to this.  As already mentioned, having a feedback thread in more than one group is already problematic.  And I disagree that it takes the same effort to navigate in-line reviews compared to forums (1500 comments ...) - once you're on the forum page, you're going.  (I think the clicking involved with in-line reviews have been covered, so I'm not mentioning it).  How would this make it easier?

So although this functionality of in-line reviews specifically would be great, is it really what the intent is?  I have seen this many times over where something basic, but really effective morphs into a brilliant system that simply is too complicated and cumbersome to be used for its original purpose.  Fixing this would be even more painful.

KHip's proposal to have a "Facebook" kind of interface for each novel, that isn't part of the forums, seems less complex to me (from a user perspective, not necessarily a programmer's).

So, what am I missing here?  Sol, or is this what you're working on?

1,020

(10 replies, posted in Romance Inc.)

Not sure if this is always true or possible, but based on my struggles to get my first chapter on its legs, I've realised it's probably a good idea to give both the male and female MC's a "voice" in the first chapter.  This is mostly based on how Stephanie Laurens writes - my all time favourite romance author.  It would be interesting to hear everyone's thoughts on this approach.

1,021

(520 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic &amp; Sci-Fi)

Hi everyone

I've uploaded the last Chapter 1 until the story is done.  There will probably be a few more familiar chapters that only have been reshuffled around until about mid-way, and then "new" content will again appear.

I know it is really boring to read the same chapter over and over, but I will appreciate it even if you just give it a quick look-over and then give me your overall impression.  I'll leave the nits for the brave, new members!  But by all means, if you see something, let me know!

A big THANK YOU for your absolutely wonderful support so far!  I owe you guys heaps!

Janet

1,022

(10 replies, posted in Romance Inc.)

Hi Rebecca

I'm not going to enter this year.  Hopefully next year!  smile

JR

1,023

(13 replies, posted in Cop Shop)

Here is my suggestion. But only if you don't laugh. Okay, not really, you guys are the best, and will in any case laugh!

I've just been through a massive slump and got myself out of it by not focussing on that one word, or sentence, or paragraph. Not even on the chapter. I changed back to focussing on the end result. I want to see the story that is currently in my head on paper. So I focus on that mental picture for a bit.

I then go off the rails and imagine really ridiculous stuff like accepting rewards, being invited internationally to share my infinite experience and wisdom (it's a short speech however... there is only so much you can say to tell people to join TNBW) and then bingo! I'm writing again.

So basically, find that one thing that made you want to write and dust it off, young man! If all else fails, I can suggest some excellent needlepoint how-to manuals!

1,024

(212 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Linda Lee wrote:

This thread is for wish listing. If you don't want to take part in giving Sol food for thought, that is your choice, but please keep it classy by stepping back from the thread. There's absolutely no need to berate, or belittle those of us who wish to participate.

Point taken, and will do! J

1,025

(212 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

dagnee wrote:

And if someone should feel a suggestion or idea is not up to whatever the standard it is they hold, that they will give it a cursory glance and no more.

Sorry Janet Reid, to disagree with you but if I disagree with your suggestions for changes to the site, which if implemented I'll have to live with, then I and any other member has the right to object so that SolN knows not everyone agrees, no matter how the objections are stated. smile

Hey dags, we actually agree, so all good!

I was actually referring to sweeping general statements. So by all means if you don't want those buttons I want, just say so. Or agree if that's the case.  This way, Sol will have a much better indication of the ideas that have more support and those that don't. I do admit that my previous comment could've been better worded.

Cheers JR