I agree that merely donating points can become problematic. That's why I suggested the alternative. That way it's not dependent on an exchange- it's just rewarding an author when things are done the normal way here. For authors like me, some of my posts require over twenty credits. I can hardly keep credits in my account. The reward for reviewing some of my posts are substantial sometimes. I rarely see other postings with such substantial credit rewards for the time and effort involved in a review (and people who get my reviews know I do spend time on them). I just think writing material that attracts a good core of reviewers should reward the author in some small way. Particular authors like me who can't hardly keep a credit in my bank. (How the hell do so many of you accumulate hundreds of credits? How many reviews do you do an hour?)
Perhaps for novel publishings, if a reviewer reviews each submission, then maybe there can be an exchange perhaps. A reward for 'sticking through it all'. I'd be happy to go for something like that. Of course, I ain't got doodly in my credit bank, so rewards from me might be slow in being doled out.
Also, anyone know of a way to run a search on posts using the credit reward? If not, then, Sol, is there a way to make the credit reward for a review visible in the list of material for review? That way those of us pressed for time can find credit-rich posts? It still takes time and attention to review those, of course, but sometimes I'm just 1.5 credits from publishing and need just one more review to get that. Be nice to see at a glance possible candidates, rather than having to click on the item to check. I'd rather do one 1.5 credit review, than two .8 reviews, when I'm pressed for time.