Topic: What happened?

More years than I care to remember ago, this site bulged out from talented would-be authors, who took their prose serious, and more than just a handful eventually saw their work picked up by agents and publishers. I fondly remember working with a lot of them, and, later, to see my name mentioned in the Author's Notes or Thank Yous. I thankfully reciprocated, feeling as if a manuscript had become a communal effort. It was a time when reviews were serious, very worthwhile, and definitely encouraging, and it was not rare to receive 15, even 20 critiques within days of posting a chapter or a short story. Those pertaining to my own work I used to print out, and I still have most of them, complete reams. When you get older, nostalgia rules.

Today, not so much.

If you have several pieces up for review, and, when after 4, 5 days there's nothing, I must question what's left of The Next Big Writer. Even looking at the actual quality of some of these crits breaks one's heart: the majority only deals with the first, say, quarter of a post, just so the points are collected and in the bank. Other critiques offer nothing but glib remarks (the just over 50 words even contain typos), mere drive-by comments, so to speak.

Hell! Some authors here have contacted me with regards to this or that person leaving a 'mean', 'offensive', or even 'discouraging' review.

Mind you, lately I stumbled across a few fine prose composers, exceptions to the zombie climate, I guess. At the same time, I still find it a challenge to help newbies along when they take their first steps into the damnable business of writing fiction.

And that's all I have to say about that. Cue the derogatory replies: 3, 2, 1:

Re: What happened?

Now that you mention it, I see the trend you pointed out. Over the years I have posted quite a few stories/novels here and had two of them go on to be published, giving credit where credit was due on the Acknowledgements page to those who helped greatly in the success. Beginning early this spring, the level of readership/reviews did seem to drop off. I must include myself as a glaring example of this phenomena however. I've been a total sloth in reviewing as much as I had before. Instead, I find all sorts of excuses to keep from logging in and commenting/reviewing. For that I apologize. I like your phrase "drive-by comments" as it accurately describes many of those I have seen on other's posts.

I have been involved in an ongoing personal health and family struggle, but can now see the light at the end of a very long, dark tunnel. In the past nine months or so I've hardly touched pen to paper, so to speak, and my work on my latest novel, a sequel, has suffered. I hope I will get my act together, overcome my massive writer's block, and continue as before: reading, reviewing, chatting in a forum, and generally returning to this site much more often than I have been lately.

Bill

Re: What happened?

Understand what both Ray and Bill are saying. I still have several loyal reviewers and occasionally a new one will pop in for a chapter or so.  I'm a bit behind on my reciprocal reviews but will be getting back to them hot and heavy as soon as I wrap up the last two chapters of A Cartel's Revenge. They're almost ready for posting, so I'll be back reviewing in a day or so.  Regards, Randall

Re: What happened?

Hey Ray,
I haven't been around for quite some time, but in general I agree with your comments. Even prior to this newer site coming to be, there were cyclical downturns that happened on the old site too. But, I've always chalked it up to it being the nature of the beast when you consider the majority of writers who frequent sites like this aren't full-time writers. Living life naturally takes priority so we're forced to suffer the resulting ebb and flow of active participation.

I think the only viable work-around is to keep widening your circle of reciprocal reviewers. As much as I used to loathe having to continually build new relationships, it was a necessary evil. The downside of this is it ups our read/review commitment to the point it can sometimes be counter productive because there are too many to keep up with.

Either way, I don't know what genre you favor but I'm slowly getting back in the swing and am open to picking up new R/R's. I'm not very helpful with fantasy, sci-fi or heavy historical--but I'd be happy to take a peek at something if you'd like to point the way.

Re: What happened?

Well, I went to see what you were posting most recently and the genre isn't really my cup of tea. That said, one of the issues I saw immediately is that you're creating a new project every time you post a chapter--instead of combining them as chapters in one project. This makes it much more difficult for potential reviewers.

Another issue I saw, which admittedly might be a me thing, but of the two chapters I peeked at, you're using different, hard to read fonts. And they vary in size.  It may just be the way you are capturing them out of your word program, but in general, it's FAR less taxing on the eyes to read things in universal fonts and sizes here on the site so you may want to consider reformatting.

Re: What happened?

My view on this subject:  At the old site, you did get a number of reviews, although there were dry spells and sometimes a lot of waiting. But most were of the "Good job!" variety. The reviewers were fans, not critics. I say this, although there were thoughtful suggestions and proofreading.

At the new site I noticed a difference right away. Fewer reviews, but the ones given were more thoughtful and more holistic (to use current pedagogical jargon). So for me, it's the difference between 20 fan comments (always appreciated) and three or four people willing to work with me to make a great manuscript.  That's better in my opinion.

And with that said--hey, come on. Review my stuff. It's been ages. What's with this site, anyway?  lol

Re: What happened?

One trend I've noticed is that new users leave the site right after their trial period is up. I've lost count of the number of users I've tried to get up to speed only to have them disappear days later. I've always thought that the trial period is too short for such a complex site. Perhaps it could be lengthened to a month? It's not like someone is going to use the site in that month to write and publish a novel without eventually having to pay to continue to workshop here. Let's give them the full tour.

Re: What happened?

Dirk B. wrote:

One trend I've noticed is that new users leave the site right after their trial period is up. I've lost count of the number of users I've tried to get up to speed only to have them disappear days later. I've always thought that the trial period is too short for such a complex site. Perhaps it could be lengthened to a month? It's not like someone is going to use the site in that month to write and publish a novel without eventually having to pay to continue to workshop here. Let's give them the full tour.

Now, that's something I can get behind. The trial period is pretty short. When I first joined, it took me at least a month of heavy posting to get reviews that did some good. Within that month, I spent a lot of time editing and replacing chapters after a critical review. Boost the trial period. And, while we're at it, perhaps some method could be found to "loan" points to some deserving soul who is just too timid to give a meaningful (if any) review to an old hand. Once they build points of their own, the "loan" could be repaid.

Bill

Re: What happened?

I disagree with expanding the free trial period. In fact I think it is more of a hindrance to being a meaningful member. The free trial only encourages those who aren't already serious about writing. They see an opportunity to throw something out and get some "applause" without really having to commit to reading and reviewing to gain enough points to publish beyond a sparse beginning. And then when they don't receive the expected accolades, they simply quit without any investment having been made. Yes, there are/may be exceptions to my skepticism, but if so, they are few and far between.

On the old site, I read and reviewed for months before publishing anything in order to get a head start on the many credits I would need to post an entire novel which was already written at least in draft form so that I could sustain a regular posting every few days. It was frowned on to post multiple works at once since the home page was a bit more limited. Of course I never did accept the rationale for that particular unwritten rule since you could click to another page and get all the posted works not just a top ten list. But I digress. Anyway, I would suggest doing away with the free trial to post writing and leave the free option of reading and reviewing to accumulate points. Like putting your words in the bank. Take care. Vern

10 (edited by Temple Wang 2019-11-09 10:31:24)

Re: What happened?

vern wrote:

I disagree with expanding the free trial period. In fact I think it is more of a hindrance to being a meaningful member. The free trial only encourages those who aren't already serious about writing. They see an opportunity to throw something out and get some "applause" without really having to commit to reading and reviewing to gain enough points to publish beyond a sparse beginning. And then when they don't receive the expected accolades, they simply quit without any investment having been made. Yes, there are/may be exceptions to my skepticism, but if so, they are few and far between.

“Amen,” the lady in Fulham mutters.  “Er um.  Second, I mean.”
*grumbling from the whinging Nays*
*foreman bangs gavel*
“Order!” he shouts. “I have a second.  Those in favor?”
...

Re: What happened?

To anyone who feels you’re not getting the number of reviews or the quality of reviews you believe you “deserve” — rather than blaming the site, the system, or the other members, stop at the next mirror you pass and take a good, long look.   Ask yourself if “you” are part of the problem.  Blaming others is a tactic of the weak ... just read the news ...

Also, consider the flow of work and flow of “contributing” new members is cyclical.  There is no rhyme or reason to the cyclicality as far as I have observed, though there are definite patterns.  For example, there is always a lull in activity going into the holidays; the number of (contributing) new members goes down and the regular members slow their pace.  Any slowdown gets exacerbated because a slowdown naturally puts a constriction on the points system.

Just write ...



All writers are vain, selfish, and lazy, and at the very bottom of their motives there lies a mystery. Writing a book is a horrible, exhausting struggle, like a long bout of some painful illness. One would never undertake such a thing if one were not driven on by some demon whom one can neither resist nor understand.” -George Orwell

Re: What happened?

vern wrote:

I disagree with expanding the free trial period.

Of course you do. :-)  Look around, Vern. This place is a ghost town. I'm worried this site will become unsustainable for Sol. Beyond a longer trial, I would add a monthly paid rate to allow new members to see just how great this site is, then decide to buy a longer membership to save $.

13 (edited by Temple Wang 2019-11-09 18:43:14)

Re: What happened?

Dirk B. wrote:

I would add a monthly paid rate to allow new members to see just how great this site is, then decide to buy a longer membership to save $.

https://www.thenextbigwriter.com/guide/about-us

Monthly Plan: Only $8.95 per month.
Quarterly Plan: Only $21.95 per quarter (less than $7.50 per month).
Yearly Plan: Only $69.95 per year (less than $6.00 per month).

I mean if you aren’t willing to shell out $9, how serious can you be...

I’m curious to hear from you, Dirk, what is it about this site you think makes it so “great” (I’m not disagreeing, mind you, just curious how you’d sell it.).

Re: What happened?

I was curious about other sites, so I did a comparison. I won't name the competitors, but the best one didn't support the concept of books, putting the onus on users to keep it organized. Also, chapters only remain readable/reviewable for thirty days. Then you have to gather more points to republish. That's ridiculous. Like us, they have a lot of dead groups, although more active forums. They also allow users to donate points to others. Hint. :-)

Re: What happened?

I agree, Temple. If they're not willing to shell out $9, then they're either not serious or they didn't see enough in the week-long trial to join. I'd still argue for a longer trial.

Re: What happened?

Dirk B. wrote:

I agree, Temple. If they're not willing to shell out $9, then they're either not serious or they didn't see enough in the week-long trial to join. I'd still argue for a longer trial.

Course, maybe the newbies are reading the opining of the curmudgeons and malcontents on this forum ... LOL

https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--njAVLmzO--/c_fill,fl_progressive,g_center,h_450,q_80,w_800/zthxobpzxeo6eqdzevtk.jpg

PS: Vern, although you are a curmudgeon of the highest order, I am specifically excluding you from this (joking) slight.

Re: What happened?

Temple Wang wrote:

PS: Vern, although you are a curmudgeon of the highest order, I am specifically excluding you from this (joking) slight.

I resemble that, lol. Take care. Vern

Re: What happened?

Usually when we have a lull, we have a contest to perk up interest.  Strongest Start, a flash fiction...
Contests always bring in new blood, and some of them actually stick around a while.

Re: What happened?

Marilyn Johnson wrote:

Usually when we have a lull, we have a contest to perk up interest.  Strongest Start, a flash fiction...
Contests always bring in new blood, and some of them actually stick around a while.

Alas, the contests are getting fewer and further between. Take care. Vern

20 (edited by Temple Wang 2019-11-10 05:50:21)

Re: What happened?

Marilyn Johnson wrote:

Contests always bring in new blood, and some of them actually stick around a while.

I’m not being argumentative, but is that really true?  Maybe a long time ago, but the last few years it seems like contests merely stir the pot of regulars PLUS pull in lurkers (not being derogatory, but referring to those who don’t contribute much otherwise, but pitch in to the forum and seem game for a contest—sorry, Vern, LOL that resembles you too).  I’m not suggesting it’s a bad idea, but I see contests more as making a fluffy meringue of the leftover eggs as opposed to contributing new ingredients for a cake.  Metaphorically speaking ...

Re: What happened?

Temple Wang wrote:
Marilyn Johnson wrote:

Contests always bring in new blood, and some of them actually stick around a while.

I’m not being argumentative, but is that really true?  Maybe a long time ago, but the last few years it seems like contests merely stir the pot of regulars PLUS pull in lurkers (not being derogatory, but referring to those who don’t contribute much otherwise, but pitch in to the forum and seem game for a contest—sorry, Vern, LOL that resembles you too).  I’m not suggesting it’s a bad idea, but I see contests more as making a fluffy meringue of the leftover eggs as opposed to contributing new ingredients for a cake.  Metaphorically speaking ...

Yes, perhaps a slight resemblance, except that Vern does reviews -- as the lucky ones might attest, lol -- in the absence of other posted stories and contests whilst he still works on that master-piece novel, looking for an agent/publisher in fits and starts. Ahh, but aren't we all -- well, at least the ones stubbornly fighting the self-pub route. Take care. Vern

22 (edited by Max Boyce 2019-11-10 06:36:16)

Re: What happened?

8. The Next Big Writer
This is an international forum where writers can receive feedback on their writing and support on every other part of the creative process from drafting to publishing and marketing. The critiques are often thorough and many come from published authors. Keep in mind that there is a monthly cost associated with the membership, but it might be worth it to be able to bend the ear of published authors.

Perfect for: writers seeking in-depth critiques from an international audience.

Re: What happened?

Max Boyce wrote:

8. The Next Big Writer
This is an international forum where writers can receive feedback on their writing and support on every other part of the creative process from drafting to publishing and marketing. The critiques are often thorough and many come from published authors. Keep in mind that there is a monthly cost associated with the membership, but it might be worth it to be able to bend the ear of published authors.

Perfect for: writers seeking in-depth critiques from an international audience.

https://media.giphy.com/media/3uzDaT7fCybK/giphy.gif

Re: What happened?

Perhaps I should use myself as an example.  I came here in 2008 because of the Strongest Start contest.  Though I didn't win, it sure made a better writer out of me when I received those reviews.  The 'regulars' on here have some great ideas and through the years have made very helpful suggestions since we are blind quite often when it comes to our own work.

Ray is correct when he says the old gray mare ain't what she used to be.  My first year here was filled with one review after another, some flowery and full of BS, while others stuck the knife in. I think it's not so much that the membership is falling below normal, but that we as reviewers are also slacking off. It takes both to make this site work.  I for one am guilty.  I'm not reviewing as much due to life at my Animal Sanctuary getting in my way, but when someone posts and gets zero reviews, whether good or bad, it doesn't encourage them to stick around. 

As for the "fly-by" reviews Ray mentioned, I for one have been guilty of starting an in-line, but only getting part of the way through it and realizing I'm rewriting the story, which I don't want to do.  I always leave the door open and in my remarks tell the writer I don't want to rewrite their work and have given examples of what I feel they need to work on, but if they want more help from me, to reach out and I will be happy to help.  And many have, both through private messaging and quickie notes.  I don't do it just to grab points because, after being here for eleven years, I've got more points than I will ever use in a lifetime.  If I point out to someone one time that they need to make sure quotation marks are both before and after their dialogue, I don't feel it necessary to highlight it every time in the remainder of the chapter.  If I point out they are constantly changing tenses, then any writer who is serious about their work will go through the entire chapter and make necessary changes.  I don't see the need to keep pointing it out.  Therefore, your 5,000-word chapter with 25 paragraphs may only be highlighted by me in the first 10 paragraphs if you repeat your mistakes throughout.

MJ

Re: What happened?

I stumbled across this site in April of this year. I was already a member of four other review/critique sites but I wasn't really satisfied with them, for various reasons. In all honesty, if it hadn't been for the free trial offer, I wouldn't have joined. I like to know what I'm buying before I cough up the cash, if at all possible. After the week was up, I coughed up the yearly membership fee, and here I am.

I have been a reading and reviewing fool since I joined. I've amassed enough points now that I can spare the time to read/review postings that don't offer points. These are the ones I read simply because I love the story and want to see where it goes. I've found that most people here reciprocate reviews on a fairly consistent basis. Not everyone jumps right on it when they receive a review. There's not always a pay-back review waiting on me ten minutes after I post a review. And that's fine. I don't expect that. Some never give pay-back reviews at all. And that's fine, too.

I've been a prolific reviewer for several reasons. One, I'm a fast reader and a fast typist, so I can plow through a review in a relatively short time. Two, I'm retired and have wwwaaayyyy too much free time on my hands. I do grab a bit of extra income each month by freelance writing, so that takes a bit of my time. But I do less than ten freelance jobs each month, so I still have a lot of time on my hands. Three, I'm not a big fan of TV so I don't spend a lot of time glued to the idiot box. I'm thus free to do reviews pretty much whenever I want. (I'm also a recluse wanna-be, but that's not working out so well at the moment because family and friends aren't cooperating, but there's still hope.) I understand that everyone's situation in their lives doesn't allow them to spend as much time reading and reviewing as mine does. So when I don't get a pay-back review right away - or even if I don't get one at all - it's all good. I don't get bent out of shape over it (not saying that anyone here does.)

It is a bit disheartening when a reviewer faithfully does reviews chapter after chapter, up until chapter 20 or so, then sort of drifts away. It saddens me but I don't take it personally. People have their reasons. I'm guilty of the same thing in a few instances. It's usually a genre that isn't my favorite or, to be honest, the story just doesn't really hold my attention. But I do try to stick with a book once I start reviewing it. I also try to offer a review for new people to the site. If the free trial users post something, I do my best to review it. That's the only way new members will cough up the fees for an on-going membership. Had I not received several reviews during my free trial, I would not have joined up. So I think it's important to make the effort to review postings from those listed in my 'new members' section on my dashboard.

Right now, I'm not reviewing as much because I simply had to step away for a while if I was ever going to get my own book finished. I sent messages to most of my connections who review my work faithfully, letting them know I wasn't dropping off the face of the earth or abandoning their work. Honestly, I found I was spending so much time reviewing the work of others that I was neglecting my own writing. So I'm taking a bit of "me" time to do some serious editing before jumping into the (potential) publishing pool.

Most of the reviews I've received have been very helpful. I can tell the reviewer put some thought into the remarks. Some have been less-than-flattering, and that's okay. I don't want sugar-coating - it doesn't help me. Some have been soft-ball, but even that can be helpful sometimes. Either way, I appreciate someone taking the time to do it.

As for the forums, I'm not much of a forum participating kind of girl. It's just not usually my thing.

One change I would like to see. I would like to have those who close their accounts, don't renew their accounts, or don't sign up for a subscription after the trial purged from the roles. I've got multiple connections in my connections list that are no longer involved on site. I'd love to see them go bye-bye automatically, if possible. If there's already a way to purge my connections list, I'm not aware of it.

Since joining up here, I've let my other memberships lapse or cancelled them outright. I found it is just too much to try to keep up with more than one active review site. And while I don't always get multiple reviews within minutes of posting a new offering here, I found I got more reviews here than other sites. The caliber of the reviews here are much better. There's more of a sense of community here than the other sites to which I subscribed. So, here I am.

I don't know how things used to be around here but I've been satisfied here, for the most part. I don't like the lulls in the action but I understand it's going to happen from time to time. With the holiday season coming up, I don't expect a lot of reviews. That's one reason I chose now to pull back from reviewing so much to take an editing meat cleaver to my own manuscript. When I need a break from that, I drop a review or two.

Bobbie