j p lundstrom wrote:Nobody's perfect. As I recall from Sunday school, Jesus Christ had quite a temper. He lit into some money-changers at the temple, and even gave some pigs hell. Let him show his righteous anger, possibly get carried away, and maybe even get arrested for causing a scene in Starbucks.
Jesus was exorcizing a man when he put the demons into swine. The demons asked to be put there. Yes, there are morally problematic elements to that--the Gentiles who owned the swine were out their herd, the swine, all two thousand of them, thundered to their death in the sea. This raises both human and animal rights issues. Neither property rights nor animals rights are absolute, though, so by itself, it isn't an immoral (or sinful) act to have demons possess pigs. Although perhaps callus about the Gentiles and the pigs, this wasn't an expression of anger on Jesus' part. I had a valve repair using pigskin. I'm sure the pig wasn't pleased that it had to die so that I might live. However, the surgeons who performed the act, the insurance that paid for it, nor myself, who asked for this to be done were being sinful. It was in this spirit that Jesus "gave the pigs hell." Imperfect? Maybe. (Although it could be a variation on the--Where were you when I laid the foundations of the Earth? That is, who are you to judge the divine?) The Buddha wouldn't have done it, but he probably would have admonished the man to meditate and just sit and let the madness overwhelm him until he died. Which way is better? So I'm not seeing the pig parable to be a clear example of a character flaw in Jesus. Maybe a limit on his magic. He had no other way to perform the exorcism.(That, of course, raises theological issues, but my thought about Dirk's using Jesus as a role model was about the historical Jesus, not the divine one, although, taking the stories as true, there are inescapable supernatural, or at least paranormal, elements to Jesus.)