Re: New Writing Contest
Is the criteria too challenging? If so, we make it a bit more open.
Sol
TheNextBigWriter Premium → New Writing Contest
Is the criteria too challenging? If so, we make it a bit more open.
Sol
I think the more challenging the better. As one of the people who suggested the criteria (at least the locked room mystery part), I don't have an ace up my sleeve. I'm hoping to have something other than a clinker by the deadline. Challenges are good...
The number of published stories with deaf, mute, or blind investigators is small. It's been done, but it's rare. Of course, the victim or perp could have the handicap ... or a witness.
The number of published stories with deaf, mute, or blind investigators is small. It's been done, but it's rare. Of course, the victim or perp could have the handicap ... or a witness.
Perhaps "mute" would make it more PC, but "dumb" (as stated for the contest) gives it a different dimension derived from the original stereotype.
Sol, I don't think changing the criteria at this stage is necessary -- we are an imaginative bunch -- and possibly could be unfair to any who may have already written or started a story which includes all the parameters. Take care. Vern
I was one of the ones who suggested the contest's topic, and I don't think it's too challenging. I'm already working on my submission.
I agree that a full locked-room mystery might require more than 5000 words, but I'm pretty sure something interesting can be written within the required limit. Sherlock Holmes short-story average word count is 8230 words (source http://www.christianpeccei.com/holmes/). Okay, it's 3230 more words than the contest, but, from my standpoint, it means a decent thing can be done with only 5000. If the average were, for example, 23000, then I'd be worried about writing a decent thing using only 5000.
I think the actual challenge is writing the locked-room mystery. As Vern said, we're an imaginative bunch. Let's see how imaginative we really are.
Kiss,
Gacela
...
I guess they'll be a rush of entries before the deadline.
they'll should be there'll. I only point this out because you made it quite clear this evening your love of correct word usage. Truce?
Really? 4 days and still only 4 entries. I'm liking those odds, but geez folks/writers, you ask for contests and then sit on the sideline. Oh well. Take care. Vern
It's a tough contest. I've been thinking about it, but I don't have a decent idea.
It's a tough contest. I've been thinking about it, but I don't have a decent idea.
Me either.
Well, it's good that we try something new. The next competition will be a bit less challenging though
While the concept of "pay to play" is certainly not new, I feel that a contest with this requirement may have put off a few of the contestants - me, for one. I don't mind putting out funds so I can get back a product or service, but I don't gamble. And, isn't this really a form of gambling that your story will be chosen for the gold?
Bill
With the small number of entries, I decided about 36 hours ago to give this a try. The restrictions are a killer. The reader has to understand the 'world' well enough to see that the solution was possible and credible, and not a handwave invention. That means extraordinary cleverness within an existing world--Sherlock Holmes in Oz, but blind or deaf--or near sci-fi I know that one entry already is outright Fantasy, and it does work, but it has the flavor of a pastiche.
This competition was way too restricted for me. I normally write something in my head before putting it to paper, and nothing rolled around up there that could be expressed in that short amount of words. At least not for me. Catch me on the next one! Good luck to all!
Got a headache just trying to plot this one out in my head, so kudos to the brave and creative souls who entered. On a positive note, there's been some exceptional world-building and creativity in the small group of entries, especially when it comes to the identity of the required "deaf, mute, or blind" main character.
I had fun writing this one, but I have to admit having a background in mystery/crime probably helped a lot. The syfy part I'm not too sure about but it's good, for me at least, to stretch your writing muscles to include genres you haven't written in before. Thanks for the challenge, Sol
Got a headache just trying to plot this one out in my head, so kudos to the brave and creative souls who entered. On a positive note, there's been some exceptional world-building and creativity in the small group of entries, especially when it comes to the identity of the required "deaf, mute, or blind" main character.
Just for the record, the contest lists "dumb" as an option which adds a different dimension than the PC "mute". Take care. Vern
vern wrote:Really? 4 days and still only 4 entries. I'm liking those odds, but geez folks/writers, you ask for contests and then sit on the sideline. Oh well. Take care. Vern
Comment from the side-lines. (Warning; subjective opinion is expressed).
We do ask for competitions, and as you know, I’m always usually up for them. The occasional competitions are possibly the only factor that persuade me to continue my subscription here nowadays. However, this particular competition is not for me. It has strict, specific genre and plot requirements. I’m not knocking that; the few people that asked for such exacting story requirements and criteria are obviously up for it and are happily knocking one out.
However, I don’t think the few who asked for it should ask why ‘others’ are sitting on the side-lines.
I did actually give this competition a go; ideas formed and I even put pen to paper. The classic ‘locked room’ mystery has two main elements the ‘whodunnit’ and the ‘howdunnit’.
IMO the howdunnit without the whys and wherefores of the whodunnit is a half inflated balloon.
The ‘whodunit’ requires a lot of preparation with characterization, character back-story, actions and foreshadowing. The misdirection, the red-herring, the subterfuge and stratagem. The revealing of the perpetrator should be un-obvious and a shock, yet with hindsight the evidence is hidden but readable when carefully back-tracked.
I found (quite quickly) that I couldn’t condense my story into 15,000, let alone 5,000. Deliberately writing something that I, the author am not happy with, is a big compromise, is a non-starter. Time and creative effort are better spent elsewhere.
Fair-play to those who asked for the competition criteria and who entered. It is your competition and you are entitled to enjoy it.
From the side-lines, I’ve had a look at the entries (doesn’t take long) and as much as imaginary worlds populated by biologically diverse intelligent alien lifeforms, talking dragons, naked gnomes and such is so not my thing (or within my comfort zone), I found that the entries all came across as a rushed ‘howdunnit’ with little or no developed ‘whodunnit’ element. A non-descript perp of convenience is hurried-in as the curtain closes.
Personally, I like the traditional more 'general' kind of competition that might ask for (with a finger in the air), maybe a ‘Winter based murder mystery’ within 5,000 words. Or a Summer based story that involves treachery between siblings or blood relations… or something very broadly of that nature. It is non-restrictive allowing all genres, styles and preferences to enter; from off-world fantasy to real-world factual. Heaven forbid, but it would also include poets. Writers would pile into a competition like that. It would guarantee some really good entries too.
In the meantime, I’m on the bench with the people on the side-lines happily letting this particular competition pass by unacknowledged and thinking, “hey-ho; no matter, maybe next time.”
I certainly respect your opinion and obviously would expect no one to enter any contest in which they weren't comfortable. I would add that my statement referred to people asking for "contests" in general not this specific one -- not sure anyone asked for this specific scenario in all it's detail. Although the number to enter this contest is extremely low, it appears to me that most contests in general these days receive less entries than in times past. Although several have stated the strict requirements as a reason for not entering, I'm not sure that small relative number is more a factor than the seemingly diminishing participation overall. Other contests such as drabbles about time travel would seem just as restrictive but received many more entries. Just my observation. Take care. Vern
Among writing, editing (for others and self), marketing, speaking engagements, and trying to form my own LLC, I honestly just don't have the mental time for this one. Good luck to all that entered.
Ouch! I made a last-minute entry (at about 23:35) and realized I'd omitted something, so I edited the version out there. The edit was completed at about 23:53. Does the contest get the edit or not?
Ouch! I made a last-minute entry (at about 23:35) and realized I'd omitted something, so I edited the version out there. The edit was completed at about 23:53. Does the contest get the edit or not?
As long as any edit is in before midnight (the deadline) it should and always has been good to go. You can still edit after the deadline, but the judges won't (should not) see those changes. That's how it has been and I assume will continue to be until/unless we are notified otherwise. Take care. Vern
What happened to the new writing contest? Did I miss something? Haven't heard anything about it in ages.
What happened to the new writing contest? Did I miss something? Haven't heard anything about it in ages.
Should be learning the winner(s) soon; it typically takes about a month after closing deadline and that time frame has now passed.Take care. Vern
Fan fiction, eg. Star Trek pastiches written by Star Trek fans.
TheNextBigWriter Premium → New Writing Contest