1 (edited by Norm d'Plume 2016-01-04 18:46:00)

Topic: Group access vs. display vs. visible?

Sol, can you please summarize for everyone what the difference is between group access, display, and visible settings, and how to set each of them so that our forum posts are not accessible to everyone on the Internet.

Right now, the Medieval Fantasy Magic group (run by Amy) is preparing to go completely dark to keep our forum posts private within the TNBW site. Unfortunately, that will mean anyone who likes to read forum posts within the group before joining and posting their work or forum comments there will no longer be able to do so. They won't even know it exists. We'll become even more siloed than we already are.

This is a big deal! Everything we've ever said in any thread on this site is being laid bare for the whole Internet to see. Fat chance ever getting a book publishing deal if every uncensored moment about our writing and participation in these groups is visible to the whole world, including book spoilers and casual messgaes in any of the forums we've used to date.

Book publishers won't touch us because of the potential PR disaster of even one of our comments being taken out of context.

How come a book publishing site that goes to great length to protect the written books, stories, poems, etc., allows everything else we say to be read by non-members of the site. The forum posts are part of the writing process and should be treated just like the written work.

Please let us know how to handle this because, right now, there are quite a few power users of your site scrambling to figure out how to handle this situation and yet still allow for as much collaboration with others on the site to continue.

Thanks.
Dirk

Re: Group access vs. display vs. visible?

I definitely agree, Dirk. I can find posts I made on my books that I would rather not have out there for all to view because of the spoiler potential. Who wants to read a book that has a huge spoiler visible?

~Tom

Re: Group access vs. display vs. visible?

Ditto. Thanks Dirk.

Re: Group access vs. display vs. visible?

You also have to consider posting in any thread where you don't really have much control as to what others say in the same thread. I've been in a number of threads that went off the rails into ranting arguments. Most of us just quietly exit the thread. However, if it's public, your name is tied to its content, including whatever rude or inappropriate comments are being made. Just imagine, everything we've ever said or asked in Premium is public for the whole Internet.

Re: Group access vs. display vs. visible?

Everything you've ever posted, commented on, tweeted, or even 'liked', is available for the world to see if they are ambitious enough to track it all down. And it's always been that way, everywhere on the internet, even on the older version of this site. While I totally agree that having toggle control to keep group forum content away from search engines is an appealing idea, I doubt it would be something Sol would support. His bread and butter marketing for this site relies heavily on internet visibility; i.e. he needs comments and such showing up on random internet searches to keep curiosity clicks lively.

One thing to consider is using a pen name on the internet. One that won't be connected to a potential publishing name. It's not fool proof plan, but it does make it a little more difficult for would-be snoops, or potential agents or publishers to immediately attribute your 'public' internet comments to your professional moniker.

Another idea is if you are concerned (as you should be) about protecting intellectual property, don't use open forums when specifically discussing/dissecting not-for-public-consumption aspects of your work; create a private one expressly for that purpose. You can always use the public side of the group to remind folks the private one is there by invitation. It's not the easiest solution, but it is a solution nonetheless.

I hope this helps.

Re: Group access vs. display vs. visible?

You have a valid point, Linda, and if some of it has to be public, so be it. Buyer beware.

However, we still don't know how to set group access, display, and visibility settings to create a group that is as open as possible to members while keeping the forum private. Sol said the forums can be made private, but the solution he offered didn't work. Several of us have tried. I also couldn't find a definition of access, display, and visibility in the site's help section.

I hope he'll weigh in with a clearer explanation about this.

Re: Group access vs. display vs. visible?

I'm sure he will--he's probably suffering from the black Monday (first day back to work after holidays) blues like everyone else.

Also, there is a small upside to some information being 'public'--One writer recently won a HUGE court case against a Hollywood movie company because of a writers forum. Seems his story was pilfered, slightly rewritten and made into a Hollywood blockbuster. When he tried to claim the story was originally his, he was stonewalled at every turn. Eventually, he took it to court and it was his posts made on a writers forum (which are dated and archived) that ultimately swayed the court to decide in his favor.

Food for thought.

Re: Group access vs. display vs. visible?

If I choose a different pen name, rename my characters (a process that I dread), rename all of my locations, and change my titles, this information shouldn't be easily found. However, I've decided on names that I like and they are distinctive enough that they pop to the top on an internet search. Part of the disadvantages of trying to write fantasy.

Three words, Linda. I can find my forum in three words.

And I don't that public forums are an upside. Your example had his information stolen because of a public forum, requiring massive time and emotional wear-and-tear as he fought to benefit from his ideas. The stored archived and timed information let him win the case, but if it hadn't been public, the whole thing wouldn't have happened. He might have won money for his effort, but how much of it went to lawyers? Will he ever have a career in Hollywood for writing this blockbuster?

Our site is dark now. I can google those same words, and get the same hit to my info popping up at the top. However, the site blocks access now because it is private and requires a password.

I don't find your suggestion helpful of doing plot specific conversations over private messaging. How can you have a forum and not talk about plot? I've found a writers group here. A real group. They know my work and keep track of continuity. This is in large part because we aren't passing notes back and forth under the table. Instead, my experience is like talking over a table with a group of friends. There aren't a whole lot of barriers and we can speak what is on our mind.

And here is an example where things could get uncomfortable for the writer who is 'exposed' by a casual google that reaches the forum. Think of the Romance group, where anatomical questions are debated and sexual positions are discussed.  One of our members is in this group. I googled the name of her characters and the title. Boom. Right at the top of a search. Then I added the search word: Romance. That got me to the Romance page. A quick link got me to the forum list of conversations and straight to the 'adult content' link. Five clicks and I was reading up on p***s sizes. This was done while I was NOT signed in, yet I had full access to this forum.

That much access is inappropriate. If our writing is protected by TNBW, then the forums can be protected. Note that my search didn't reveal my books or the text involved. It also didn't reveal the old information from the forums that Sol took down on the old site.

I discussed deleting the site entirely and starting fresh so that the material wasn't so easy to find. Instead, we're going dark. That will continue until this problem is resolved. I'm doing it to protect friends. I'm also protecting their time and life's work. They have reason to be proud of what they are creating.

A

Re: Group access vs. display vs. visible?

You do realize that when you post on here, you are copyrighted. And an online copyright is only $35. Yeah, there will still be unscrupulous people who might steal your stuff, but that is a chance you take in today's electronic world. Still, if you're copyrighted and find out, you do have legal recourse.

Re: Group access vs. display vs. visible?

Janet Taylor-Perry wrote:

You do realize that when you post on here, you are copyrighted. And an online copyright is only $35. Yeah, there will still be unscrupulous people who might steal your stuff, but that is a chance you take in today's electronic world. Still, if you're copyrighted and find out, you do have legal recourse.

This has nothing to do with this issue Janet. Before I signed up, I made sure my rights would still be intact. However, the main reason of this protection was, you need a password to sign in. The issue is, you don't need a password to access our forum posts. That's a big deal. Yes, anyone can create a profile and have access, but again, they need to dig deeper than a simple Google search to get the brilliant idea and two, they need to go through a bit more effort to gain access compared to clicking on a link. But this is me, because I for one have been using the forums extensively for feedback and advice.

11 (edited by njc 2016-01-04 23:53:30)

Re: Group access vs. display vs. visible?

Yes, but you're chasing a horse out of the Barn Door ... and across borders.

Amy's doing the best thing possible under the circumstances.  It might be worth quickying other group owners with a pointer to the discussion.

And I hope Sol and his team get to work on it.

Re: Group access vs. display vs. visible?

I'm not worried about having my material poached. I'm worried about plot spoilers and sequel information splashed over the internet. I'm working on multiple books at the same time. My forum posts reflect this.

This site is based on the concept that one of us…many of us…somewhere…sometime…are going to make it big. Most of us plan on self-publishing if no agent shows interest. We will see our books in print. For these people, this isn't that big of a deal. However, if any of us ever want to work with a publisher, this is a REALLY big deal. You can bet they will google our names and the names of our characters/ title of our books. They will search out our websites. Finding the plot laid out on a public forum would be cause for dismissal.

Not that I ever expect to follow in JK Rowling's footsteps, but her example is pertinent. She kept the plot a secret for seven years. The release of those books was a world-wide event. I'm not like her because I can't write in a vacuum. I need to unlearn bad habits and polish my writing style.

So I'm in a bind because I need the internet.

I need people. In my hometown, I never found a group so fine as the one I've found in this community. However, our group forum is full of plot discussions. My fault, really. One of my cohorts calls me the 'plot killer' because I read and remember. He has his characters do or say something and I retort, "Um. No. Remember when you said…" He throws food at his computer screen and howls, but he knows that I improve his continuity.

So, as I said, this is a big deal.

Sol, can you weigh in?

13

Re: Group access vs. display vs. visible?

Please?

Re: Group access vs. display vs. visible?

Let's get realistic; nothing is safe on the internet, period. Just being a premium member and posting to only groups/connections does not protect your work. For less than ten bucks, anyone can join for a month and have access to all posted work of premium or basic members and it's doubtful even the private groups would turn down a potential new member should they ask to join. Ten bucks is not going to really thwart anyone so inclined; it's probably cheaper and faster than hacking the old fashioned way.

As Linda pointed out, the automatic copyright on site protects your work as well as anything and can be used in court to defend it and go after anyone who profits from it. Of course using a pen name is a no brainer should your work become famous and someone starts to Google  your name to find non-public info. If I Google my real name, none of my writing shows up since I don't use it, at least in the first million or so entries and should someone want to put that much effort into finding it, then there is probably nothing which can prevent it, and certainly no constraints on this or any other writing site.

Common sense is our best defense, but yeah, I wouldn't mind paying the lawyers after the fact that someone else has made millions from my work when so far I haven't been able to get a traditional publisher or movie mogul interested as the original author. If someone else can knock down the doors, then all they need do is come to me and I'll gladly offer an agent's commission for their efforts.

So, yeah, we can worry ourselves sick over the possibility of our work being hijacked or we can accept that absolutely nothing is safe from prying eyes on the internet and deal with any future stolen property rights with the courts on our side should it come to that. Just my opinion which has been stated in similar forums before this one. Take care. Vern

Re: Group access vs. display vs. visible?

KHippolite wrote:

A number of the counterarguments essentially boil down to "we don't think privacy is useful so you shouldn't either".

No one is saying privacy isn't useful or wanted, only that you are not going to have it completely on the internet. If governments and large corporations can't keep prying eyes out, how exactly do propose doing it on this site? That has nothing to do with the concept of wanting privacy and everything to do with wishful thinking. Take care. Vern

Re: Group access vs. display vs. visible?

vern wrote:

Let's get realistic; nothing is safe on the internet, period. Just being a premium member and posting to only groups/connections does not protect your work. For less than ten bucks, anyone can join for a month and have access to all posted work of premium or basic members and it's doubtful even the private groups would turn down a potential new member should they ask to join. Ten bucks is not going to really thwart anyone so inclined; it's probably cheaper and faster than hacking the old fashioned way.

As Linda pointed out, the automatic copyright on site protects your work as well as anything and can be used in court to defend it and go after anyone who profits from it. Of course using a pen name is a no brainer should your work become famous and someone starts to Google  your name to find non-public info. If I Google my real name, none of my writing shows up since I don't use it, at least in the first million or so entries and should someone want to put that much effort into finding it, then there is probably nothing which can prevent it, and certainly no constraints on this or any other writing site.

Common sense is our best defense, but yeah, I wouldn't mind paying the lawyers after the fact that someone else has made millions from my work when so far I haven't been able to get a traditional publisher or movie mogul interested as the original author. If someone else can knock down the doors, then all they need do is come to me and I'll gladly offer an agent's commission for their efforts.

So, yeah, we can worry ourselves sick over the possibility of our work being hijacked or we can accept that absolutely nothing is safe from prying eyes on the internet and deal with any future stolen property rights with the courts on our side should it come to that. Just my opinion which has been stated in similar forums before this one. Take care. Vern

This is a slightly different issue though Vern. For one, it will (should IMO)  take more than a simple google search to gain access. That is my problem. It doesn't make sense that I have to access the site with a password and have the option to hide my work within the site from the wider internet, but the forums are a free for all. Sure, with sufficient motivation anything can be done, but really, one click? No effort?

Re: Group access vs. display vs. visible?

Vern, a key factor is that no publishing house will even consider us if all the plot spoilers are freely available on the net along with every comment ever made to anyone here in what is supposed to be a protected site. While anyone can join for a few bucks, it's a minimal level of protection to our intellectual property. They can't steal or expose something if they don't know it exists.

18

Re: Group access vs. display vs. visible?

At least registered users have agreed to respect copyright.  This won't help the JKRowlings among us, but those are few.  The rest of us at least have taken the bare minimum or action to assert our rights, and that's the first step to protecting them.

19 (edited by Rebecca Vaughn 2016-01-05 02:32:53)

Re: Group access vs. display vs. visible?

It is not about copyright.

If that was the problem, I doubt many of us would have joined the site in the first place.

It is about protecting yourself and your intellectual property.

Yes people can find ways around it but why make things super easy that anyone can find out spoilers and plot point with no trouble at all.

It is like your things in your house.

Yes some one can break your window and steal your computer, that does not mean you should leave your front door open so the thieves can just walk in and take it.

A forum on a site that requires registration and passwords should not be searchable on Google.

20 (edited by Rebecca Vaughn 2016-01-05 02:32:25)

Re: Group access vs. display vs. visible?

Norm d'Plume wrote:

Vern, a key factor is that no publishing house will even consider us if all the plot spoilers are freely available on the net along with every comment ever made to anyone here in what is supposed to be a protected site. While anyone can join for a few bucks, it's a minimal level of protection to our intellectual property. They can't steal or expose something if they don't know it exists.

This is a huge issue for anyone hoping to get an agent or publisher for their work. If the world can already see the story, why should a publisher waste his time!

Absolutely right. A person is very unlikely to steal something that they don't even know is out there. If a person has to get a membership to access the forums then they have to put a lot more effort into their crookedness then a simple google search that a monkey can do. And they are easier to tack and catch.

Re: Group access vs. display vs. visible?

So, what I'm hearing is that folks accept that people can join the site for practically nothing and have access to everything and that's okay because they have to know it's here to steal it. Well, obviously they would have to know it exists to do a Google search on it also, so what am I missing here? If someone can Google your work, then someone has to tell them what to Google. If they find your work with name and title, etc, someone has to provide it to them as I doubt seriously they just type in random words like monkeys to gain access. I've Googled some of my work using my pen name and a title and or short quotes from a work and it hasn't brought me to this sight unless I was already signed in to it.

And quite frankly I find it difficult to find past things in the forums when I can do a search on site without very specific information to plug in. It would be a whole lot easier and quicker to gain access to everything if one simply paid a pittance to gain access to all the postings rather than having to Google individual works to find it in a forum. Again that is assuming someone has not already provided all the information needed to do a quick search and in that case it is a person providing the info, not the site imho.

And yes, the ones who join the site have arguably signed on to honor copyrights, but since when did that stop someone intent on stealing it? My position is that the risks are no greater on site than passing work around among friends and acquaintances to get their feedback and leaving hard paper trails or emails scattered to who knows where. And at least on site you have timed concrete proof it belongs to you should someone get their hands on it and turn it into a blockbuster. Let's face it, it is unlikely our work will be stolen for a few bucks here and there; a job at Wal-Mart would probably be more efficient. To paraphrase, "Our biggest fear is fear itself." Take care. Vern

22

Re: Group access vs. display vs. visible?

Vern, when you go to sue someone for acting against you, there are defenses that amount to "He left the gate open and didn't even put up a sign."  (See Adverse Possession in real property law.)
What Amy and others here are asking for is to close the gate and put up the sign.  If someone breaks in, it's breaking and entry, and not just a tort of some kind.

Re: Group access vs. display vs. visible?

This was how the old site worked. In the 10+ years the site has been existence I have yet to hear of anyone not receiving a publishing contract or having any issue whatsoever because of information posted in TheNextBigWriter forum. In fact, I have yet to hear of any publisher having an issue with any work posted on the Internet if it has grown popular. In fact, publishers generally fight to sign work that has become popular online.

In talking with publishers and running my own publishing company, your biggest concern as authors is getting enough people to notice and care about what you have written. If a reader takes the time to dig through a message board on an author website to find a plot spoiler about your book, then you are well  on your way.

But if you want to bottle it all up, I'll look into a way of doing it.

Re: Group access vs. display vs. visible?

Fat chance ever getting a book publishing deal if every uncensored moment about our writing and participation in these groups is visible to the whole world, including book spoilers and casual messgaes in any of the forums we've used to date.

What basis or experience leads you to say this?

Re: Group access vs. display vs. visible?

SolN wrote:

This was how the old site worked. In the 10+ years the site has been existence I have yet to hear of anyone not receiving a publishing contract or having any issue whatsoever because of information posted in TheNextBigWriter forum. In fact, I have yet to hear of any publisher having an issue with any work posted on the Internet if it has grown popular. In fact, publishers generally fight to sign work that has become popular online.

In talking with publishers and running my own publishing company, your biggest concern as authors is getting enough people to notice and care about what you have written. If a reader takes the time to dig through a message board on an author website to find a plot spoiler about your book, then you are well  on your way.

But if you want to bottle it all up, I'll look into a way of doing it.

Ultimately Sol, this is your site. And from what I have seen so far, TNBW is by far the best one. I'll rest with your decision, but if you can find a way to give us just a bit more control over what we would like to be visible while keeping the functionality of the forums, that would be absolutely fantastic. If you can't, then so be it, we/I will work around the system to make it work somehow.

I know no system is fool proof. But I'm all for trying as much as possible to not make it too easy too. (wow, this is by far the best writing I have done to date)

Thanks for this.