401

(186 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Charles_F_Bell wrote:

I assume you are a foreigner.

She's on the outside!

lol

402

(186 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Charles_F_Bell wrote:
Dill Carver wrote:
Mariana Reuter wrote:

If you meant my name, Mr Charles F. Bell, I'm not American.

Kiss

Gacela

To some Americans there is only America. The universe of America

To all Americans who are Americans, that is.

No, no, Charles. That's not America you see around you. That's your ass. You've gotten your head stuck up there again.

Americans are out here, in the fresh air.

(He's not snuck, but he is stuck!) lol

403

(186 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Dill Carver wrote:

I have to rent an American film like 'the Outlaw Josie Wales' in order to actually hear someone say the word 'snuck'...

Aw! Here you go.

“I sound my barbaric yawp over the rooftops of the world.” —Walt Whitman smile

405

(186 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Tom Oldman wrote:

How about "knelt" and "kneeled"?

Interchangeable for me.

406

(11 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

If the opposite is happening in the other world, how would the same situations keep arising? I get a job at a Daycare, so opposite me doesn't get a job at a Daycare. Daycare me saves a a pilot's life at the grocery (killer peas), so non-Daycare me doesn't save a life? Or takes a life? Would the life taken be related to the life saved in the other world? If not, how can all these opposite reactions possibly stay related? The pilot I save in Daycare world goes out and crashes an airliner into the ocean, but this never happens in non-Daycare world because I wasn't there to save the pilot's life, yet the opposite is supposed to happen to everyone on the plane? And so on? Cool idea, but it seems like it might start to get exponentially confusing... smile

407

(186 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I'm also from Georgia. I say "snuck" and "sneaked" interchangeably. I would have said I use "sneaked" within my writing, but I was just looking at my manuscript and spied a "snuck" plain as day! I changed it to "sneaked." Which frankly sounds sleeker. That sucker snuck in! 

I was raised up North. I'm not sure if that makes a difference. I was right on the border of Kentucky, where everything is snuck and you'ns and taters and atrocities.

I don't think it sounds at all pretentious to say "sneaked." But "snuck" also sounds perfectly normal to me. I've always heard that word. Meanwhile, my spell checker keeps underlining it as a misspell!

You say that to all the girls you find under the mistletoe? Mr. Flapper! lol

409

(186 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Dill Carver wrote:

... to a British/English ear the word 'snuck' evokes sensations of banjo music and hillbilly imagery.

snuck

... lol

I've never seen Lambs. I was always afraid it would scare me. NOW I AM SURE. lol

mistletoe

speakeasy

Dill Carver wrote:

Santa Clause - (Not Jolly!)

insubordinate clause cool

A geography text book. I find the writing a little tedious. The plot a little humid.

jolly! (certainly not green, but possibly rather tall...)

Gone with the Wind in thirty seconds, with bunnies.

Anatidaephobia

WTF?

LOL

LMAO (apologies for all the cursing)

Ignorance.

Trump & Clinton

Evidence.

gravity

geostrophic (It really is the first word that comes to mind! I'm learning about how to read the sky for weather, ha ha.)

Weird phobias? Trypophobia! I've always been absolutely repulsed by pictures like the one on that page (linked.) I never knew it was an actual thing. My sister just sent me the link. It's a real phobia!

For years my family has teased me about my fear of nooks and crannies. I seriously shuddered when I saw that picture, before I read the rest. Must be some kind of cavewoman thing buried in my DNA!

http://cdnstatic.visualizeus.com/thumbs/4b/3b/life,quotes,words-4b3bdb21a0bedc983ccf379f135a3454_h.jpg

http://worldlyminds.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/30939_495306267158223_1518112415_n.jpg

Charles_F_Bell wrote:

A mean, mean MAN using yucky logic dispelled any veracity to anti-conceptual NEWSPEAK in an apology of a sort called 1984. Give it a try.

I've not read Ayn Rand's work thoroughly yet, though I've had it strongly recommended to me by a person I respect who is able to suggest reading which offers a viewpoint that opposes my own without also calling me a man- hater. (She is also a feminist.) The excerpts I have read of Rand's work frankly repulse me. I agree so far with very little that she argues.

However, I just read her theory on the anti- conceptual and must thank you: now I see what your issue is. Friend, that concept fully describes you.

I'm not sure where you got the idea that I consider men mean? You seem to fixate on this issue whenever you speak to me, which makes me wonder if, as with the anti- conceptual remark, you are projecting. I love men. As do many feminists. My issue is with pigs.

I also voiced no issue with logic, beyond suggesting that you seem to lack it. I spy another red herring. You seem fully unable to focus.

I will be bowing out of this conversation now, though I can only assume bait is forthcoming. As I said, I consider speaking to a person of your mentality a waste of my time.

Thanks for the book rec. It's been on my list.

I LOVE the L.M. Montgomery journals! I had only planned to read the one set during the First World War, but there are actually five volumes spanning her life. I went to the university library yesterday and borrowed three more. Now that I'm eyeing them, I realize I don't have time to read them right now. sad Maybe in December. But they are quite good. I feel like I'm in the past when I'm reading them. Which is funny because she was reading Pepys's diary in 1918 and said the same about that (paraphrased, because I didn't mark the page and can't recall the actual quote): "I feel I'm in the 1600s and keep getting hauled back to the present." smile