I'm sure you mean a depraved sexual monster. (Though s/he might well be deprived as well.)
On this topic though, male circumcision does offer health benefits, .....s.
Depraved\deprived damn spell checker....
I did stress 'circumcision for non-medical reasons several times,' so I was talking explicitly about the act in the context of traditions and rituals.
However, I would state that I come from a long line of people from an ancestry of large families in the British Isles and I don’t know of any male (none of whom to my knowledge were circumcised), who suffered health problems as a result of having a foreskin. That is a lot of males and a lot of lifetimes free from foreskin related medical problems.
In certain circumstances the amputation of a limb can have health benefits as can the removal of a lung or the clipping of an ingrown toenail…. Are you advising me that my health would tangibly improve if I underwent a surgical process to remove my foreskin?
Female circumcision is a savage, brutal and inhumane mutilation (IMO) but once again, my only point was that it is a ‘normal and accepted’ tradition within some cultures and completely abnormal and abhorrent practice from the point of view of other cultures within which there is no such tradition.
As is male circumcision as a religious tradition from the point of view of other cultures within which there is no such tradition.
I’m only talking about POV. Different cultures have different perspectives and things can look very different when one is viewed and judged from another.
Belgians will defend eating horse flesh because to them it is normality just as the arbitrary stoning of a woman to death for a perceived religious indiscretion is perfectly acceptable to another culture; just as the eating of beef is widespread in America where in Hindu and Sikh cultures across the Indian subcontinent it is considered an abhorrent and sacrilegious practice; just like cultures that practice female circumcision will defend it whereas they might consider male circumcision to be a mutilation, whilst you condemn female circumcision but promote male circumcision as advantageous….
I’m not judging any of that merely pointing out that what is normal in one culture can be totally abnormal within another.
We can all stand up to support and justify the practices and traditions within our own cultures whilst maligning the practices and traditions of other cultures. That’s what human tribes do. My point was only to mention the gulf of what is considered acceptable or normal between these various tribes, not to assess the purpose or perceived value of those traditions.