1,026

(99 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Janet Taylor-Perry wrote:

I'm sure you mean a depraved sexual monster. (Though s/he might well be deprived as well.)

On this topic though, male circumcision does offer health benefits, .....s.

Depraved\deprived damn spell checker....

I did stress 'circumcision for non-medical reasons several times,' so I was talking explicitly about the act in the context of traditions and rituals.

However, I would state that I come from a long line of people from an ancestry of large families in the British Isles and I don’t know of any male (none of whom to my knowledge were circumcised), who suffered health problems as a result of having a foreskin. That is a lot of males and a lot of lifetimes free from foreskin related medical problems.

In certain circumstances the amputation of a limb can have health benefits as can the removal of a lung or the clipping of an ingrown toenail…. Are you advising me that my health would tangibly improve if I underwent a surgical process to remove my foreskin?

Female circumcision is a savage, brutal and inhumane mutilation (IMO) but once again, my only point was that it is a ‘normal and accepted’ tradition within some cultures and completely abnormal and abhorrent practice from the point of view of other cultures within which there is no such tradition.

As is male circumcision as a religious tradition from the point of view of other cultures within which there is no such tradition.
I’m only talking about POV. Different cultures have different perspectives and things can look very different when one is viewed and judged from another.

Belgians will defend eating horse flesh because to them it is normality just as the arbitrary stoning of a woman to death for a perceived religious indiscretion is perfectly acceptable to another culture; just as the eating of beef is widespread in America where in Hindu and Sikh cultures across the Indian subcontinent it is considered an abhorrent and sacrilegious practice; just like cultures that practice female circumcision will defend it whereas they might consider male circumcision to be a mutilation, whilst you condemn female circumcision but promote male circumcision as advantageous….

I’m not judging any of that merely pointing out that what is normal in one culture can be totally abnormal within another.

We can all stand up to support and justify the practices and traditions within our own cultures whilst maligning the practices and traditions of other cultures. That’s what human tribes do. My point was only to mention the gulf of what is considered acceptable or normal between these various tribes, not to assess the purpose or perceived value of those traditions.

1,027

(99 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Jube wrote:

Male circumcision is widely used here in the U.S. …

And female circumcision is common in Africa.

I was making no judgement about the perceived rights and wrongs or pros and cons of mutilating the genitalia of children (for non-medical reasons); my point was only that these practices/customs/rituals/traditions which are part of the ‘normal’ and accepted cultural aspects of one society are completely alien and abhorrent to another culture that has no such practices.

However, upon the subject of circumcision and speaking personally; I am from a society and culture that does circumcise unless there is a specific medical necessity. So if a man came at my son’s penis or my daughters vagina with a knife, be he an official from a religious cult or not, I would defend the child with my life from what I’d perceive to be a maniac, a deprived sexual molester. It is just as unthinkable to me as if someone else cooked our family dog and served her up for a family meal.

Whilst in other cultures such would be normality.

1,028

(62 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I've never questioned whether people can cry or not (well, apart from my retort to you). The original question was, 'what does it mean when they do?'   Which (to me) poses the question, 'why would they cry?' Which was answered conclusively (in my opinion) by Linda Lee yesterday at which time I conceded the point she made.

1,029

(99 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

So you think the Hmong guy is a stereotypical rapist?

1,030

(62 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

njc wrote:

Are you saying that you cannot imagine-create a scene that will move you to tears, or that reading such a scene after you've written it will not still move you to tears?

Absolutley. Are you saying that you can?

1,031

(62 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Charles_F_Bell wrote:

Was your point somehow related to the allegation there is no such thing as pure fiction? That not stuffing real feelings and experiences into another guise is pure fiction that does not exist?  Perhaps you or Mr. Carver like to explain that.

My original point was that I could not understand an author who was motivated to cry by the act of proof reading a scene they'd written.

I did clarify that I was talking about creative fiction rather than non-fiction (memoir, or biographical pieces).

I considered it self-indulgent, sybaritic and precious of them and wondered how an author so emotionally embroiled within their product could rationally interpret harsh yet objective critique upon such a piece in a professional manner? 

My opinions upon the existence (or not) of 'pure' fiction is another kettle. A fascinating subject that I'd readily discuss if other feel the subject merits it?

However, I was reminded that the fictitious scene could cause the author to reminisce or associate with personal tragedy so I conceded the fact that reading one’s own fiction could therefore be an emotional experience that in turn could lead to crying

The original question posed for discussion and that I was addressing, was along the lines of 'what does it mean if you cry when reading your writing?' I surmised at the time that it was either superficial, over dramatic attention seeking or if genuine grief, an emotionally dysfunctional act that could be a symptom of mental illness depression, delusion (etc.).

My opinions upon the existence (or not) of 'pure' fiction is another kettle. A fascinating subject that I'd readily discuss if others feel the subject merits it?

1,032

(99 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

A great story and very interesting discussion njc, but I think this is a case of social/cultural confusion following a clash of values rather than a stereotypical rapist.

I don't think the Hmong guy was a rapist in the sense 'we' normally mean, he was merely following his social conditioning, his natural behaviour within his own culture. He loved the girl and wanted to marry her and this was the way it was done in his world.  Not a stereotypical rapist in the sense of that definition within western culture. The Hmong culture's defintion of courtship equates to the North American culture's definition of rape. A clash of cultures then?

The Hmong suitor, he is like the Korean refugees eating dogs as a dish of choice in Cincinnati in 1952 or the Romanian immigrants we watched last week last openly coaxing the ducks for the pot from an English village duck-pond with bread before merrily breaking their necks in front of local picnic families.  Or me on my first visit to the USA during the 80’in a MacDonald’s restaurant desperately scouring the place for a plate and a knife and fork and some vinegar for my fillet’o’fish, or asking locals in Miami, “Is there anywhere around here where I can get some fags?” (When requiring to purchase cigarettes). Or the Somalian first time flyer who shits on the floor of the aircraft toilet-room or the Belgian high-street butcher chopping up the horse for his customers dinner tonight. Or the Afghan who in an act of open commerce sells a young boy as a Bacha Bazi sex slave the same way we’d sell a pound of apples or the Jewish holy man who as we speak has taken a knife and is mutilating a male infant’s penis for the sake of his revered traditions… we none of us know we a doing something wrong when judged by the standards of an alien culture. No sir, these are not modern diversifications of ancient stereotypes, these are merely ducks out of water dependant upon whichever pond you a viewing them from (yes, a deliberate pun that plays upon my duck-pond experience of last week).

1,033

(99 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

dagnee wrote:

I am not vilifying anyone.

I simply stated how I approach people.

When it comes to creating a character the writer has a specific 'type' in mind, and I was merely encouraging writers to create rather than adhere to social constructs, which are limiting in their scope and turn otherwise fine writing into a boring and predictable exercise in reading.

For example, To Kill A Mockingbird was written in 1960 when the social norm was a two parent household, mother stayed at home and father worked. Instead of that traditional family unit, Harper Lee created a single parent household in which the father took an active role in making sure his children were able to read before they went to school. Taking it a step further, in 1960 racism was acceptable and no southern white lawyer would have ever mounted such a vigorous defense of a black defendant.

Harper Lee didn't write characters that fit into normal society, but ones that stood apart from it.

Besides, if I want to read about the world the way it really is, I read non-fiction.

smile

I see, so you were actually discussing social constructs, attitudes and North American political socialization rather than individual human stereotypes?

A 1960’s racist differs from a 2015 or 1930’s racist?  Sexism has evolved into another type of sexism?  Sex offenders might approach the act of rape differently now that they have Rohypnol and handcuffs at their disposal, but the psyche of a rapist is now as it was in 200BC.

Yes, if you want to read about the world the way it actually is, read non-fiction. But unless your fictional characters are believable to real world readers, then your fiction will flop. smile

1,034

(99 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Misogynistic? Not me I love women! I dream about waking in the morning covered with them.

1,035

(62 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Linda Lee wrote:

Dill's story got me thinking....Three weeks ago I began writing an entry for the superhero contest and grabbed something from my memory banks to depict the action between 2 kids in a warehouse. I'm in the middle of typing away about one of them leaping off a platform and I inexplicably burst into tears. And I don't mean I welled up, I exploded into a deep cry. Not only did it take me by total surprise at first, but it's very uncharacteristic for me.

I lost my brother about 8 months ago. He was still fairly young and it was unexpected. I didn't do a lot of crying. Mostly, I think because I was numb, and very distracted by having to tackle all the immediate concerns of my mother who'd been living with him. A few family members commented on my lack of visible mourning. I shrugged it off. I didn't need nor want to explain it to anyone even if I could.  Then during that writing session a few weeks ago, I came to the realization that the memory I was tapping into to depict those 2 kids in the warehouse was one of my brother and me.

That was the first thing I thought of when Janet first posed the question. I wasn't crying over what was written per say, I cried over a very real mental connection my brain made out of it. This time it happened to be tears, but I've had visceral reactions to writing that has challenged me, or angered me, or made me overly envious too. Sometimes it's fiction, other times not--the mental connection doesn't care, it just happens.

A touching story Linda and I am sorry for your loss. It kind of reminds me of a theory someone put forward on the old tNBW site; in that there is no such thing as pure fiction as we re-wrap our own real feelings and experiences into another guise.

1,036

(99 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Ancient gender stereotypes?

Of course if we conform to producing politically correct middle ground equality mush we'd be robbed of the power of great stories like 'Thelma and Louise' where real world sexism, machismo and sexist stereotypes deliver a prolific message upon those conditions.

Nowadays it is thought to be expected to produce a mixed gender, mixed sexuality, mixed race group of characters with at least one intelligent dominant alpha female and a slightly insecure yet sensitive metrosexual male.

The modern gender stereotypes are not real; they are the manifestation of liberal dreamers.

The world is a sexist, racist place where discrimination, machismo and feminism are as common place as people themselves. Sorry, but it is as true as human nature and your so called ‘ancient gender stereotypes’ walk amongst us, they work amongst us.

Write according to way it actually is, or the way you wish it to be, the choice is yours but don’t vilify those who write about reality.

Take a trip to the middle-east.

SolN wrote:

Note: If your membership expired, you will go down to one group. You may have your work ejected from the premium group and have to buy your way back in

This has been changed. Once work is published you will never need to pay again, even if you join other points groups, leave a point group and rejoin, etc.

My work seems to have retained that very symptom. Could it have pre-dated the change?

1,038

(99 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Linda Lee wrote:

....aaaaand Corra moves in for the Dill smack down....

Shake the grave and look what pops up!  The defender of inventors of irrelevant lingerie.

Tell you what, I've just invented the frontless bra!

Bam! Just like that and with some glossy marketing, you'll all want one.

If I can invent four more semi-useless contraptions tonight I'll have out invented womanhood for the whole of history.

SolN wrote:

If content was uploaded but not published on the old site, it exists in the same state on the new site.

If you come across an example where this is not the case, let me know and I will investigate. No one should have to pay double points.

Thanks Sol

I have a Novel in my portfolio called 'Eat my Shorts!' that has 7 chapters and was Published/disabled on the old site at the time of transition.

I can actually make the work 'active' - However the site tells me that 30 points are required if I want to add that published/active work to a group.

As far as I can tell, if the work is not added to a group, then although active it appears to be in some kind of limbo state... only I can see it?

I want to add it to the TheNextBigWriter Premium group.

The same condition exists for all my old pre-published work. It is 'active' (or can be made so) but to add it to a group costs points.

Cheers!

1,040

(62 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

vern wrote:

I'm going to have to agree with Dill since the original question was merely asking for an opinion and as we all should know, we all have one, and they don't always, actually seldom agree. As a matter of fact, my original response to this thread is more or less a case in point for Dill's position. As he stated, "I should think it differs dependant upon the circumstance. If it were memoir or non-fiction then I'd think it could be natural. If it is over a fictional scene they'd just invented then I'd say that the writer is emotionally dysfunctional." My original response stated that I had indeed shed a few tears on several occasions over my novel which happens to be a somewhat fictionalized memoir (aren't they all). But I don't recall having shed any tears over any other writing - I may well have, but if so it hasn't stuck with me as my own writing induced tears have.

So, I have to question how anyone could attack  (I will use that for lack of a better word at the moment) Dill's response to the question. You might disagree with his opinion as well as mine or anyone else's, but you can't logically argue with it or refute it; it is only an opinion, no more or less valid than yours or mine. The whole review process on this site is based upon others' opinions. You choose which to go with and ignore those you don't agree with, but you don't argue with them unless you are "emotionally dysfunctional" as Dill stated. That's my opinion. You can take it or leave it, but you can't argue against it in any meaningful manner. Take care. Vern

Rational, prudent, judicious, diplomatic, pragmatic, open-minded, considerate and progressive. Now that's the way to forum!

Vern, you have me welling up here  smile

1,041

(62 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

See, I could die of a broken heart but without turning a tear.

And yet I live in a world where it is assumed that if you don't cry you don’t care.

I recently attended the funeral of someone I loved dearly. A cousin taken by cancer far too young and a sweeter soul than her I’ve never met --truly.
It was tragic and my insides were in turmoil. I’m grieving still. I don’t suppose I will ever stop in one way or another.

I watched people crying during and after the service. Some of those close relations, her parents and siblings were in tatters. Some people on the periphery were crying too, I hated that. I know it is wrong and unjust of me but I thought their tears fraudulent. They never really knew her and wouldn’t feel the loss of her past the next Tuesday, let alone forever.  I feel that they cried because others cried and they no doubt cry at the drop of a hat because they are emotionally shallow, without dignity and self-indulgent thinking that crying it is the thing to do whilst staunch and respectful is right and proper in my book.

They also seemed to think that because I didn’t cry that I didn’t care whilst in truth they had a one off sad day but the fabric of my life, my family’s lives was irreparably torn for enternity.

I work with a young lady who cries crocodile tears on tap to cover situations where she has erred. I work with a lovely middle-aged woman who cries at nothing, Irrational floods of emotion over nothing and all due to the menopause, they say. 

I’m not a crier.

I’m not going to cry over something fictional that I’ve penned and I can’t relate to those who do.

I apologise for the offence this has caused.

TirzahLaughs wrote:

Some reviews don't get you points at all.
Others get you a limited amount of points.   I find I have to review 6 to 10 pieces to post a chapter...which I do find annoying but I figured I might just be doing it wrong.

Thanks Tirzabelle! I don't mind working for points to post new work. although 6 or 10 to one is a bit steep. Didnt used to be about 4 reviews to 1 published?

I do mind having to earn further points to make that published work active/inactive

1,043

(99 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Elisheva Free wrote:

Wow. I had no idea there were so many awesome female inventors out there. Thanks, Janet!

-Elisheva

Five? and one of them a 'world shaping' backless bra?

My God but you lot are clutching at straws.

Actually, it was me who invented the backless bra in haste and by accident during a fumble behind a carnival tent aged 16, inexperienced as I was in respect of the mysteries of lingerie fastening.

On the old tNBW site (which I came to know quite well), the writing member acquired points that were used for ‘publishing’ work on the site.
Once published, the articles/chapters/stories/poems could be made ‘live’ or’ disabled’ or active/inactive at will (i.e. at the cost of no further points.)

Although I reviewed and reviewed and acquired points and paid those points to publish pieces of writing… I find that here on the new site I have to pay again to make my pre-published content live or active as it now called.

A colossal amount of reviewing is called for in order to accumulate enough points to activate the work I’d already completed a colossal amount of reviewing in order to accumulate enough to publish in the first place?

36.03 points to reactivate my previously published few chapters an unfinished novel?

With most pieces paying  nought point something for a review  it’s a mammoth task to regain enough point to liven up my pre-published work.

And before I get hammered by sanctimonious skim-readers… I have absolutely no problems reviewing to gain points to publish new work. I just don’t feel it fair to have to pay twice, or thrice to re-enable work that is already published and paid for.

I'd like to pick up my 'published on tNBW' novel, six chapters in, where I left it is all.

B.T.W By ‘published’ I mean ‘posted’ here on tHNW not published in any commercial sense of the word.

1,045

(62 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Linda Lee wrote:

I think I see the point Dill is trying to make--but he could have framed it a bit less abrasively. I think Dill is trying to make the point that non-fiction is more authentically emotional because it has firm roots in reality......

Far too deep Linda smile  (And true, I'm strictly talking about fiction not memoir here)

It is just that I've never cried when I've written something. Never felt the urge or need and I can't imagine any circumstance when I would. It doesn’t mean that I don’t have emotions.

Because I don’t feel the crying coming on it means I can’t relate to those who do. I think they must be mad. Just as a ‘crier’ can’t relate to me.

I like being abrasive because it identifies the over sensitive and that helps when choosing who to review wink

1,046

(62 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Is 'emotions' crying?

Are tears and blubbing the credential or proof for feeling emotions?

The question was;

What does it mean as a writer when you're proofing and start to cry over a scene you wrote?

The question WAS NOT;

What does it mean as a writer when you're proofing and feel emotional over a scene you wrote?

Blimey, if the consensus argument within this thread is adhered to then anyone with Dacryocystitis (nasolacrimal duct obstruction) is unable to write convincing creative fiction?

As Bob Marley once sang; ‘No Woman, No Cry.’ Now that was an emotional song.

1,047

(62 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Janet Taylor-Perry wrote:

If you still cry, it's touched a real nerve. If the writer can't elicit emotion from the reader, then it's trash. Whether that emotion is grief, as in the excerpt I shared, or laughter or anger, doesn't matter. When I writer can feel the emotion of the character, that character becomes real. It's not mental illness--It's empathy. Get real! If you write a rape scene, and don't feel anger at even the fictitious villain, you need to re-examine yourself. If you write a scene in which your character has just made a crowd roar with laughter, and you don't think it's funny--It's not.

A writer is much like an actor. We get into character, often multiple characters. But when we walk away, we don't have multiple personalities. But while in the scene, we MUST feel the emotion we wish to convey. I'm proud to say that I've made myself cry, laugh, scream, sigh. So, if you think I'm crazy, just call me Sybil.

At the outset you asked;

Janet Taylor-Perry wrote:

What does it mean as a writer when you're proofing and start to cry over a scene you wrote?

Then you wrote;

Janet Taylor-Perry wrote:

we MUST feel the emotion we wish to convey. I'm proud to say that I've made myself cry, laugh, scream, sigh...

Sorry, but I don’t think you were asking a genuine/valid question in the first place. I think the question was loaded as you go on to demonstrate that you already know exactly what you think it means. You’ve also shown that you are not open to consider alternative theories.

I regret for falling for the trick question and I don’t know if you can comprehend that another person might not make themselves  cry, laugh, scream, sigh etc. with their own writing.

1,048

(62 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

j p lundstrom wrote:

Hey Dill, lay off. It's only natural to get so involved in your work it makes you emotional. You have to care about your characters to make them believable.  Then you put the whole thing away for a year or so, until you can be objective about cutting, changing and deleting stuff you once thought was golden. If you're still crying, put it away again.  JP

Well, it is only my personal opinion (that's why I opened with 'my theory'). I never said that my view upon matter is considered a law of the universe, or is a fact or even a consensus of opinion.  Hell, I never even claimed that any other person in the world sees it the way I do. I just said what I think.
The question was:

What does it mean as a writer when you're proofing and start to cry over a scene you wrote?

It didn’t include an instruction that if you reply with your own opinion that it must strictly conform with other peoples preconceptions and fervently held beliefs upon the subject  or you’ll  be told to ‘lay off.’

I once saw a guy get his foot blown off by a landmine. He sat with the boot containing his severed foot in his lap waiting patiently for a medivac chopper that took 35 minutes to arrive.

He didn’t cry.

What does that mean? Or more to the point, what do you think that is allowed to mean?

1,049

(99 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I walked home with Dill and returned in time to overhear Atticus saying to Aunty, “…in favor of Southern womanhood as much as anybody, but not for preserving polite fiction at the expense of human life,” a pronouncement that made me suspect they had been fussing again.  -- Harper Lee - To Kill A Mockingbird

1,050

(62 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Janet Taylor-Perry wrote:
Dill Carver wrote:
Janet Taylor-Perry wrote:

What does it mean as a writer when you're proofing and start to cry over a scene you wrote?

I should think it differs dependant upon the circumstance. If it were memoir or non-fiction then I'd think it could be natural. If it is over a fictional scene they'd just invented then I'd say that the writer is emotionally dysfunctional

I'd have to say the writer has written on level to elicit an emotional response--in this case, grief. At other times, I would hope to tug other emotions to the surface--joy, anger. If your writing doesn't get some sort of response from your reader, you need to go back to the first word and start over.

But we weren't talking about the reader, the subject is the author crying at their own creations. You are a creative writer composing fiction. My theory is that if you are so emotive that you cry at your own fiction then you are in no fit state to judge or listen to critique upon your own work. Making yourself cry about imaginary things as an adult is either unhealthily over indulgent (self indulgent) or a mental illness.