Hi, just posted review of Randy's revised chapter 1.  Three more to go in round 2, then I do need to get back to reviewing stories by people outside the group, and posting new chapters of my two books to use up some of the points I'm accumulating.
cheers

Hello again, getting back into the swing of this.  Just posted review of second chapter of Matthew's vol. 1 and should be able to get through the rest of my second pass through the stories over the next few days.

Hello just completed a review of a second chapter of Cobber's book.  Sorry I've been slow doing reviews but it is all the superheroes fault.  First I spend days trying to craft a story, then many more trying to read and review the other entries.

Finally, started on second round with review of Stephanie's novel, chapter 2. 
I spent way to long trying to finish a story for the superhero origins contest.  Got it posted a few days ago.

Hello, completed my review of first chapter of Jube's story ending my first pass through this eclectic mix of stories.

Ann Walters wrote:
alkemi wrote:

Hello Ann, I just conducted an experiment (science background showing through) using my review of the first chapter of your book.  I started an in-line review and saved it after one comment rather than submitting it.  I got a message to say it was saved but not submitted.  I then went looking for it.  I found it on my home page under feedback in the listing for 'New in-line review replies'.  The draft review showed up at the top of the list with the notations <<draft in line review>>.  If I click on the blue button with 'view' at the right side of that entry, the draft review comes up just as I left it and I can continue with the review.  When I'm done I presume it will go out if I press the submit rather than save button.  If it works you should get a review from me in the next half hour or so.
Hope this helps.


Thank you so much! They were even identified in red as drafts. All submitted properly now.

So a story with a happy ending - must be a fantasy.

Posted review of chapter one of Ann's book

Hello Ann, I just conducted an experiment (science background showing through) using my review of the first chapter of your book.  I started an in-line review and saved it after one comment rather than submitting it.  I got a message to say it was saved but not submitted.  I then went looking for it.  I found it on my home page under feedback in the listing for 'New in-line review replies'.  The draft review showed up at the top of the list with the notations <<draft in line review>>.  If I click on the blue button with 'view' at the right side of that entry, the draft review comes up just as I left it and I can continue with the review.  When I'm done I presume it will go out if I press the submit rather than save button.  If it works you should get a review from me in the next half hour or so.
Hope this helps.

Just submitted review of Raven's Curse.  Two more to go in this first round.

Completed review of Ch 8 of Randy's Kurdish Connection.  (I'd already reviewed chapters 1-6 before joining this group.)

completed review of chapter one of Matthew's story.

Thanks Jube, the honourary grammar professor.  I like the idea of having a 6 word rule for when to put a comma before and, but etc.  It may be arbitrary but it will simplify things.  I am trying to get with the programme, so to speak, when it comes to commas, but like you, it was an almost untouched subject in high school.  In fact, grammar was an almost untouched subject.  For us, English was a spectator sport, all reading (Shakespeare etc, but always bowdlerized), no writing.
Myth or no myth, I plan to continue to use commas where I think a pause is appropriate.  It seems like the way to encourage a reader to hear a sentence the way the author intended.
cheers

Oops, I failed to follow proper protocol and make this little posting when I submitted review of chapter 3 of Cobber's book earlier today.  I had reviewed chapters 1 and 2 some time ago.

completed my first review on Stephanie's book

Yeah, I also did some research and figured it out.  It would be good if all eight members set up the stories they want in the rotation in that way.

Thanks. Can you do some magic and make it show up on the groups Content page?

Hello Jube, I see you had this thread established before I even joined.  I wonder what criteria you used  for picking Excising Demons as my story to go into the cycle of reviews.  It is the most recent novel I have posted but may not be the most appropriate for this exercise.  First, it is a pretty old-style mystery story (some might say even a cozy mystery, but it doesn't really fit that sub-genre), and second it is the third book in a series.  So it may not fit with the interests of your group and because it is the third book there may not be as much scope for big new ideas from the reviewers as there would be for a stand alone novel.
I have another novel, The Souring Seas, up on the site.  It's a story about climate change and conflict between climate scientists and governmental leaders reluctant to address this issue.  It's a dystopia novel with some science, some romance, some intrigue, even some science fiction/fantasy elements, so may be a better candidate for getting the interest of the group members.  It is also the story that is more interesting to me.  I have had it active twice before and stepped back both times to rethink the story after input I got from reviewers on the site (Matthew Abbalack was  one of them).  I started posting Excising Demons while I thought about the latest revisions.
So which one should be identified as my 'entry' to the process?  Excising Demons that needs tweaking as I try to get the courage to finally prepare this trio of mysteries for publication, or the Souring Seas, a more adventuresome less formulated story that could be more interesting.  I would prefer the latter, but will go along with Jube's choice if that is the way you all want it to work in this group.

Hello all, I'm not sure if this is the place to post this.  Thank you all for inviting me to join this group.  When the group first showed up on the site I sympathized with the main objective, to encourage reviewers who would stick with a novel from beginning to end.  I applaud the effort and will try to live up to the objective.
Phil

SolN, you have two different maximum word limits in the description for this contest.  One in the overview and another in the rules.  Which one should we go with?

145

(5 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Well Tom, you could probably put shelves on the back of the door.

146

(16 replies, posted in Cop Shop)

Congratulations to Don and the three runner-ups, and thanks to JP, Janet Taylor-Perry and Janice Singleton for the effort they put into this.  It looks like vigilante justice Texas style won the day.  I would like to think that was not the way law enforcement was going in the real world, but things I see in the press don't lead to optimism.  Anyway, congrat Don, it was a great story even if the hero was a gun totting muscle car driving Texan with a humungous watch.
cheers

147

(3 replies, posted in Cop Shop)

Dagnee missed two in JP's quiz above.  Pudding is dessert and estate car is a station wagon.  Jumper can also have a more general meaning, anything we would call a sweater.
The list of words could go on for ever:  a van is called a lorry, a pantechnicon is a moving van, slow moving bumper to bumper traffic is called a tailback, aluminum is called aluminium ...
Incidentally, Elizabeth George is an American author who sets her stories in England.  I like Peter Robinson, an English author who has lived in Canada for years.  His mystery stories are set in Yorkshire.
cheers from Canada (not quite as foreign, at least we do not call aluminum aluminium)

148

(20 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I don't know if this is the best place to post this but on the topic of online grammar checking programs, I have found pro writing aid to be useful.  It has an extensive free version (much more comprehensive than the free version of autocrit for example) and seems to get better reviews than grammarly.  It has both a basic (free) and a premium (paid for) version.  I'm a cheapskate and never hope to make money from my writing so have only used the free version.  Anyway, for what it's worth, I have found it useful.
cheers

149

(11 replies, posted in Don't Push This Button!)

Hello members of the Don't Push This Button group.  I couldn't resist the challenge of a writing prompt based on the old black and white Rob Serling Twilight Zone series from the 1950s so here I am.  I started working on a story that I hope fits with my rather faded memory of the old series.  First draft is just about done.  I'll post it and you can tell me if it fits with what you are looking for.
cheers

Hello Norm, I know you have figured out where you are going with this and no longer want superacid solution.  However I couldn't resist making like a 41st century alchemist and describing a process that could generate an alkahest that would dissolve anything you need to recycle.  Hey, I always wanted to give up on mysteries and write sci fi.  Now is my chance.  So here goes.
Picture a conveyor belt made of perfluorosilene polymers (PFSiP).  It carries whatever you want to recycle into a long chamber also made of a PFSiP, one that is transparent so people can watch.  There has to be a force field where the conveyor enters the chamber to keep the atmosphere inside and outside separate.  Inside the chamber a 41st century superacid (much better than current superacids), one that dissolves anything except PFSiPs is sprayed from jets at the top of the chamber and observers can watch as the cars and other things on the conveyor melt away (all the plumbing and everything else has to be made from PFSiPs so they have to be a very versatile group of polymeric silicon compounds).  Gasses produced are sucked away by pumps to be recycled and the acid with all chemicals in material being recycled protonated to ions collects at the bottom.  This acid is so strong that all metals are dissolved and converted to cations and all organic material to (CH5)+ ions. This solution is drawn off to a mass spectrometer (and improvement on current technology because it can separate ions by their mass (current mass specs can only separate gases).  Once separated the metals and the carbon are reduced by strong electrical charge.  Neutral metals and CH5 fall out of solution and collected.  Superacid solvent is recycled back to chamber were it is sprayed on more stuff to be recycled.  CH5 is a very unstable and reactive compound that becomes feedstock for fuel and entire carbon plastics industry.  We wouldn't be able to handle it with 21st century technology but this is sci fi so I can blithely assume our 41st century chemists have figured it out.