Hello NJC, I know you provided input to several of my writing projects in the past, but I don't see any reviews of this one. Did you look at an earlier version that's been superceded?
Your reviews always caused me to stop and think. I'm not sure I always understood what you were getting at, but they did make me think. That's good isn't it?
Generally I am more comfortable with reviewers who start at the beginning because then I know they are seeing the story as I have tried to tell it, not jumping in somewhere. This story has been an evolving beast as I have made some significant changes to how it develops as a result of reviews (Matthew was one of the reviewers who made suggestions that altered the basic story, others have focused more on how I have told it).
Anyway, I think I would appreciate someone giving this a new look from the beginning, rather than jumping in at one of the later chapters that I am struggling with. Give me a day to make sure the early chapters on the site are the most up to date ones. I'll indicate the date in the comments section.

submitted reviews of chapters four and five of Randy's Cartel's Revenge.

Just posted reviews of next two chapters of Matthews Book 1.

Couldn't review another chapter of Stephanie's story so went on to Cobber's.  Posted reviews of chapters 41-44.

Hi all, Stephanie's story was next on my list for a review, but I can't find it. Anyone know what's happened?

just posted review of chapter 2 of Suin's Being Fifteen.

Do we need to worry about these rules? I thought the idea of this group was that we would post the most substantive and thoughtful reviews we could manage for the seven (now eight) books, following the order Jube set out. We also made a commitment to stick with the books from beginning to the end. Matthew has suggested that we should try to review two or three (or more?) chapters of a book at a time. This makes a lot of sense (especially for books with short chapters) and I think we all agree this is a good idea. I have been setting three points as my target for these multiple reviews, but I don't think the number is important, just that we all agree to go with whatever version is comfortable for each of us.
The problem I see with this whole process is that with eight books in the 100000 word length, it will take approximately three years to get through them submitting reviews once a week. Is this time for getting through the books, and the pace of reviewing reasonable?
Add to that requests, like the one we recently had from Cobber (a reasonable request in my opinion), and we have an even greater demand on our times.
Bottom line is each of us can only do what we can. If we all try, rules shouldn't matter.

Hey Jube, in your response to review I just posted on your chapter ten with question about story development, you say there is another chapter between number 9 where Sariki is introduced and the chapter ten I just reviewed - one that describes Sariki's brothers mission to the army camp.  It doesn't appear to be posted.

Posted today a review of chapter 10 of Jube's story.

Hello, I posted reviews of chapters 18-24 of State of Vengeance a few days ago, and chapters 25-29 today. They weren't thorough reviews, just a few comments as I try to get up to the final group of chapters that Cobber is most interested in.

Hello Cobber, i agree with CJ and njc. I can't make sense of this if I jump in at a later chapter, so I will continues from where I currently am, speeding up my review process as much as I can, unless you tell me that won't work.  If so, I can read chapters up to 41 without review and go from there. Post a message that tells us which you want.

Hello, i just posted the next chapter in Cobber's story. I saw his post on another topic, and will try to load up on chapters of this story. Apologies to other group members who may be neglected as I overdose on State of Vengeance.

Just completed reviews of chapters 2 and 3 of Randy's drug cartel story.  Experts often tell new writers they should write about what they know. I hope Randy isn't following that advice.

Just posted reviews of two more chapters of Matthews book.

During August when I was out of town for more than half the month, I received four chapter reviews and the two messages posted above. They were all stressing the same point. I need to make the story more about the people and less about the science. And to do this I need to animate my characters more and bring out their thoughts. I don't want to lose the science story in the process, but I do agree, I need to make the story about the people more compelling and use it to carry the science message. Bit difficult for someone trained to supress the emotional and focus on the facts, but I am trying and any help you can all offer me is really appreciated.
The other point that seems to work its way through these reviews and comments is conflict.  Maybe (probably) I'm being naive but I don't see need for conflict at every turn. Jacinta and Tony fight about religion. I don't see why I should add a sexual conflict to the situation. Tony knows Jacinta is not available and accepts it. I have conflict between Tony and Jacinta over religion, between Tony and Steve over science philosophy, Between Tony and the department over pure vs applied research. In addition there is uncertainty about Jacinta, about the meaning of the dolphins, about what Maria Consuela is up to. I plan to go ahead without adding more conflict at every turn until I get to my (hopefully) dramatic conclusion. My second version of this story (one I didn't share with others) was full of trumped up conflict, but after trying it for a while, I couldn't keep going with it.
So I am now relying on Tony and Beth's story to carry this. I hope all of the people in this little review group will continue to help me this part of the story more compelling. I think I can handle the science part, and if not, Don Chambers will undoubtedly point out my errors.
Thanks once again for all the help everyone has been giving me. I hope the reviews I provide are half as useful.

Today, I posted reviews of several chapters of Cobbers novel. I notice he's posted the final chapter and I wondered if he still wanted reviews of the early ones (I'm back at chapter 17 - it will be a while before I get to 53!).

Hello, I just completed reviews of chapters 9 and 10 of Stephanie's book.  When I came onto this forum to post that message I noticed the string of comments about process. I'll go to them next and offer my thoughts.

submitted reviews today for next chapter in Jube's story and back to first chapter again for Suin's

okay, Randy says I should move on to A cartel's revenge. I've posted a review of chapter 1

Hello, just posted reviews of two chapters of CJ's book.  I bypassed Randy because I didn't know which book we were supposed to move to now that the Kurdish Connection has gone on to bigger and better things. There seem to be three to chose from.

Hello all, I just posted a review of a chapter of Matthew's 'The girl who lost the earth'. I apologize to all for the my long absence. My real life got in the way and I couldn't focus on my fantasy life as a writer.  I hope all is back to normal and I can once again review with better regularity.

Congratulations Randy, you obviously put a lot of work into this book, and it made an amazing transformation from the version you first downloaded to the site to the one you have now. You truly deserve whatever success you achieve. Good luck

just submitted reviews of chapters 12 and 13 of cobber's story (12 was very short).

just posted review of chapter 8 of Stephanie's Day of Darkness.

Just posted my first foray into Suin's story about teens.