CREATESPACE!
727 2015-07-12 03:58:32
Re: Bonus Points (23 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
Not everyone posts to Premium, Janet. I currently review the work of an author who posts in a private group.
My point is that there should not be points for posting to multiple groups. I post to several & I thought they had done away with having to use points for multiple group posts. I might be wrong and am killing myself with the posts.
728 2015-07-12 00:45:50
Re: Bonus Points (23 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
Mike Roberson wrote:How about an adjustment to the computations. I posted a poem last night over 7 points. I read a chapter in line review for 1.6 points. I think the base of the problem is in the calculations. Not to be whiny but just sayin. Mike
Did you post to different groups requiring points to post in that group?
Otherwise, that's a lot of points for a poem.
I thought they had fixed the multiple points for posting to different groups. That was one reason folks weren't joining groups that cost points. Then, many point groups changed to no points. It just doesn't make sense to have to pay points to post to groups when you have to pay for Premium.
729 2015-07-11 03:49:30
Re: Bonus Points (23 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
j p lundstrom wrote:Vern, are you saying that it costs more to post a poem than prose? and that the reason is to keep a balanced activity? and you are comparing that to artificial stabilization of currency? If I post a poem and label it "Short story," does that circumvent the artificially elevated rates? If, as I have seen, one posts a deconstructed poem (presented in prose form) and calls it "short story," will that cheat the system? And if we can cheat the system, was there ever any real reason to impose such a system?
And finally, should I get the status of Mama, Trains and Pickup Trucks changed to no points? It was meant to provide a source of amusement, not rip off hard-working writers who just want to take a little break and have fun.
Yes, if you post a poem as a short story or novel chapter, then you will "cheat" the system; assuming you are talking about a short poem and not an epic poem, then the very few words would require a fraction of the cost to post those same words as a poem.
You can cheat any system as you should be aware with all the hacking going on in the news. Why impose such a system in the first place is a rather meaningless question unless you think that everything must be done the same way. We write our stories the way we see fit, Sol makes his rules according to what he envisions. We don't all do things the same way; the most we can hope for is to be like Frank and at the end of the day, we can say, "I did it my way." Take care. Vern
Yes, that would circumvent the mega points used to post poetry, which according to Sol was b/c it takes a lot more ability to interpret and analyze a poem. (I asked once, many moons ago.) However, you only get like half a point for reviewing a poem. Likewise, if you publish it as a short story of very few words, the reviewer will only get half a point for reviewing. Just take a look at how few points you get for the Drabbles.
Now, understand. I don't review just for points, but I would like to be rewarded when it takes a lot of effort and time for a piece. If it takes 7 points for a poem, the review reward should be comparable.
730 2015-07-10 21:28:09
Re: #askELJames (13 replies, posted in Romance Inc.)
Janet Taylor-Perry, please share more of the disturbing erotica. We could all use the learning lesson.
Sent you a private message
731 2015-07-10 20:27:50
Re: Endurance Points (32 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
See comment in the other thread about points, Dirk. And I totally agree with your last paragraph. Can't say I agree with your second paragraph. You have to read to post. Maybe those folks, like me read and post, read and post.
732 2015-07-10 20:25:02
Re: Bonus Points (23 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
Absolutely, Tom, et. al. I don't remember short chapters taking so many points before, usually 3-4. Longer chapters, yes. And it's a chore to read some chapters that need a great deal of editing and you only get 1.5 points or something. Endurance? I stay with a work no matter how poorly written. It's the teacher in me. But sometimes I'll skip it and do another that requires less work on my part and come back to one that requires more effort when I have time.
733 2015-07-10 17:23:11
Re: Endurance Points (32 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
I suppose one other thing you can do (which I did) is if you found certain reviewers MOST helpful, message them and ask them to continue reviewing your later chapters.
734 2015-07-09 20:50:08
Re: Things that's great about the new TNBW (32 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
j p lundstrom wrote:Charles_F_Bell wrote:Well then, critiquing a blank page suits your purpose perfectly. No spelling, grammar,or punctuation errors there.
Bad ideas can only be expressed poorly. This is more obvious in non-fiction than fiction but for the latter it is true but usually hidden, perhaps even unknowingly by the author who may be "educated" in bad ideas and does not know better.
One could not have made Herr Hitler's writing better, and it is certainly a moral error to critique Mein Kampf only on the basis of his turgid and impenetrable style, and Steinbeck's content problem is an issue even if expression of that content into language by grammar, spelling and punctuation is not.
Charles,
I think you misunderstood. dags wasn't proposing to criticize the subject of another's work. Such a critique, without helpful suggestions, was one item in a list of reviews she finds less than useful. There's no need to jump on everyone who just might not agree with you.We do agree that even authors who have a wonderful command of language can write crap, and that no amount of skill will turn crappy ideas into beautiful writing. (Same thing, said twice--what do they call that?)
I do have a question, though: what was Steinbeck's content problem?
Affectionately, JP
Rather than go into the weeds on what could be an essay ("How Hitler and Steinbeck are the Same"), I'll stick to the issue that Blocking a reviewer because of his review for the reason he is obnoxious has flipside that suggests that the author/Blocker is insensitive to criticism on the basis of disagreement on content, and I think polite criticism of content is a valid criticism, even without particular authoring suggestions, and it is rude, unhelpful, and anti-social to block someone on that basis. Or for that matter, to block anyone for any reason other than truly obnoxious behavior.
Disagree or agree as far as that goes?
Yes, there is a difference between : "How dare you claim kittens are cute and cuddly!" and "How dare you suggest genocide!"
What do you think of blocking someone with whom you have had no interaction at all -- as some sort of pre-emptive strike? And yes, that has happened. Or blocking without explanation on what was so wrong with the one and only review? And yes, that has happened.
Seems time for new thread, Charles. Start one about the blocking BS. As far as I know, I've only been blocked by two people on the site. I could be wrong. I haven't blocked anyone. Even if their reviews are hurtful (which some have been), rude (which some have been), vindictive (which some have been), I haven't blocked a soul. I might not recip on a very unnecessarily cruel review but once, but I do recip. A few people need to learn the difference between constructive criticism and bitchiness (male or female). By the same token, if you stay at writing long enough, someone is going to hurt your feelings. SUCK IT UP, BUTTERCUP! As writers, we'd best grow thick skin. Yes. sounds like it's time for a new thread. This one has taken a nosedive.
735 2015-07-09 20:38:40
Re: Endurance Points (32 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
I love Matthew's idea! I'm like Mrs. P! I have way too many irons in the fire.
736 2015-07-09 04:18:44
Re: If you're looking for material to review (3 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
Ah, Ann. Just the thought reminds me of Phyl Manning (filliam) our dearly departed. Give me time to add another to my already long list.
737 2015-07-08 20:25:52
Re: Calling all TNBW Artists (6 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
I see the same thing as Dirk! But I can't draw either.
738 2015-07-07 20:39:02
Re: AND THE WINNER IS… (16 replies, posted in Cop Shop)
May this be one of many wins...you deserved this!
FYI, let the prize money be spent on a luxury. Or take my plan and buy 50 bucks worth of beer. Either way, enjoy!
LOL! Or, Don, you can keep me in business and get a luxury all at the same time. You can order all three of my books from Amazon for $45!
739 2015-07-07 19:27:17
Re: Site Bugs 2 (342 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
Dirk, when using the accents or such, see if that particular letter is available to be inserted as a symbol.
740 2015-07-07 18:08:02
Re: AND THE WINNER IS… (16 replies, posted in Cop Shop)
Well, the top four have already spoken. Great job, all.
741 2015-07-07 02:54:27
Re: What features do new members get and for how long? (6 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
Yay, vern!
742 2015-07-07 01:33:53
Re: What features do new members get and for how long? (6 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
I'm just not really sure. I know I read some notices from new members recently complaining about not being able to access inlines. Not sure if Sol and team fixed that. It shouldn't be available for us to do if they can't.
743 2015-07-06 23:39:16
Re: What features do new members get and for how long? (6 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
Ask Sol
744 2015-07-06 21:42:15
Re: Do I Need Chapter Titles in My Book? (5 replies, posted in Writing Tips & Site Help)
Titles are up to you. I uses titles as a way to outline the story. It's just the way my brain thinks. Each title has something to do with what happens in the chapter.
745 2015-07-06 04:30:46
Re: Things that's great about the new TNBW (32 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
I love the new site. I think I've figured out most of the bugs, many being just my lack of understanding. Those that were real bugs, Sol et. al. have worked hard to fix. My last concern about renewing my membership was laid to rest on the 3rd when putting in my new billing info went smooth as satin. The feedback, the folks, the forums, etc. just work so well now that I've played and learned to navigate. Thanks, to everyone for making this site work.
746 2015-07-03 20:44:07
Re: Using Third Person Omniscient POV (26 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
Yes njc, I forgot about them dropping the baby off. But is the scene with Frank not in Harry's dream? You're making me want to read them yet again.
747 2015-07-03 16:53:39
Re: Prologue's (37 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
A prologue and a forward are two different animals. The prologue should be short and give either a tiny bit about the past or a teaser about the future. It should make the reader want to know what it's all about. They really do add a lot to fantasy and historical fiction.
A forward is usually written by someone other than the author and introduces the book/topic of the story. Often these are found in nonfiction. Those in fiction might help to give some historical background for historical fiction or to set up a premise for the plot itself. When an author writes his/her own introduction or forward, it might be to just tell the reader how the story came about.
In all the novels I have, I only have one short introduction, but it's just me wanting to share with my readers why I wrote the particular story. I do utilize prologues, but they are most two pages. I've read forwards that were longer than the book's chapters. Usually I skip them and might go back later and read them. I thought about one for Head Count explaining the workings of the US census, but decided to just let the characters discuss it.
748 2015-07-03 16:36:22
Re: Using Third Person Omniscient POV (26 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
Yes, cobber, Harry is strictly limited POV. All from Harry's. Rowling did a good job with that. The only scene not in Harry's POV is in one of the later books in the chapter "The Other Minister" where she tells us all about the havoc Voldemort is causing when he comes back.
749 2015-07-03 02:32:42
Re: Prologue's (37 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
So true, vern.
750 2015-07-03 02:31:42
Re: Using Third Person Omniscient POV (26 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
I always write third person past tense omniscient POV. I like being god in my stories. The only time I go first person and limited POV is with memoir.