76

(21 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

This is right up my alley. My degree is Geometric Optics (a narrowed application of the Physics of Light). Reflected would be correct, technically ... and practically. To reflect is to simply redirect the path of the light source or image. To refract is to deviate the direction of the light as it PASSES THROUGH a medium. When light is reflected, that means it is not significantly passing through the medium - in this case, the streamers are the medium. Also, when light is reflected it can be distorted but, usually, not deviated.

A medium is anything rays of light either pass through or off of which they reflected. Sometimes a medium can absorb all the light, but that is a totally different thing that has nothing to do with this discussion.

Hope that helps.

77

(24 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Kdot wrote:

@Debbie: You don't need those elements to join the group. All genre are welcome

I do have a lamplight fantasy (sometimes called gaslight fantasy) I've been working on for years. I pulled it down some time ago but might repost. I'm a little too pragmatic for most of the typical fantasy. But I find lamplight fantasy has enough "real world" in it. It's hard to find much lamplight fantasy on the bookshelves. Good luck with your writing.

Alan

78

(24 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Dirk B. wrote:

The Medieval/Fantasy Magic group is very active. A bunch of us set up shop there years ago, each with a single thread about our respective WIP. We use the threads for brainstorming, writing questions, additional feedback about a review, and sometimes just for fun. I sometimes encourage new users to create a thread there for their own stories. Some of the threads aren't even about fantasy. At least three are sci-fi. My new thread is for a supernatural thriller. I considered placing it in the Mysteries & Thrillers group, but no one posts there. I tried out the Sci-fi group years ago, but couldn't get much feedback, so I moved to the Medieval group. I'm surprised people don't set up little cliques like ours in other groups. I've found the threads invaluable to my writing.


Hi Dirk,

Sounds like a pretty cool group of people. Congrats to all of you for keeping the discussion of your passion alive. Unfortunately for my, it's not a genre I care to read - have tried many times but just can't seem to latch into it. But, as you know, I have read some of your work and think you carefully work at your craft. Hope your group keeps on keeping on.

Alan

79

(24 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Just my opinion, but FWIW ...

I believe many folks do not post, except on isolated instances, for a couple of reasons. First, so many posts get sidetracked from the OP's question/comment that the post becomes unrecognizable  to its original intent. There's always a certain amount of drifting on almost all posts, but recently (the past year or so)  they seem to drift further and further into very loosely-related or non-related tangents.

Second, and the primary reason I don't post a lot, is no matter what you say, there's always someone who can't wait to tell you how stupid you are for saying whatever you said or whatever you asked. Polite disagreement is an endangered species. There's absolutely nothing wrong with a person disagreeing with you or having a different opinion. It's the manner in which they express it. A person with a different opinion than mine is welcome to tell me all day why - just do it with a little bit of courtesy and offer some reasonable suggestions for improvement. An intelligent and courteous defense of their position opposite mine is a strong tool to possibly make me reconsider my position. Maybe I'll change my opinion, maybe I won't. But I will listen.

However when you have nothing to say but "You're an idiot for thinking that way", "Maybe that works at the fifth grade level, but ...", "Maybe writing isn't your best option in life", "You need to throw this crap away and trying something different" etc. Why not simply say, "Well, I've found a few issues here that are important. Here are the problems I noticed and  I have a few suggestions that might help" - then offer those suggestions without first demeaning the person. Also, I give little attention to those who are rude, can't wait to criticize others but refuse to post any of their own work for review..

I've spoken with three other members here in private, and they all feel very similar about it. It's not a matter of thin skin or not being open to criticism. It's matter of simple courtesy and respect for your fellow writers.

80

(5 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Thanks, Marilyn. Some nice alternatives on that list. A couple in particular caught my eye. No pun intended - well, maybe a little.

Congratulations

82

(5 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Hi Dirk,

If the mid-sentence reference applies to only one possible person/thing/instance, a comma is not needed. If the reference applies to a possible plurality of those things, commas are needed. However, if you use commas, you need one before *AND* after the referenced person/place/thing.

Example:
My wife Diana is a great singer.  (She really is a great singer!)
Here, it is assumed I have but one wife (which I do!), thus commas are not needed. This references a singular person in that position (my wife). Thus, there is no doubt about whom I am referencing.

My son, Scott, is a great soccer player.
Here, I have more than one son (a plurality), thus the commas are needed to inform that Scott is not my only son, but the one referenced here. However,you need a comma before *AND* after the name. Just an opening comma, mid-sentence, is incorrect.

In the example you cite, I think you need commas before and after as you seem to imply there are other epithets in addition to  Bastardus Minusculus epithet.

You do not need a comma in front of epithet.

Hope this helps. Good luck with your writing!

Alan

Congrats to all! Good writing is not easy - those who excel at it deserve their well-earned recognition.

As I said on the other thread, I have no more to say on the issue.

85

(23 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

No chip on my shoulder - I just don't tolerate rudeness well.

My last comment on the issue.

86

(23 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Dallas, see my comment on the "Coontest" thread.

Dallas,

RE:  My misspelling of "contest". I have focal dystonia in my hands - makes typing as close to impossible as can be. It makes my fingers curl into tight claws when I attempt to use them. Look it up if you'd care to. I typically have 60 - 70 typos per book page in my novels, which I go back and manually correct - often takes as long as two hours to do so - that's per page, not per chapter. In my novels, I make the effort to correct the errors. In my reviews and forum posts, I don't. If you would read my profile, you'd see where I mentioned this. I put many, many hours into cleaning up my novel pages because that's what's needed and expected.

It doesn't reflect particularly well on you to make light of folks who work very hard to produce what many think is good work in spite of those obstacles. I have a good sense of humor, but I don't use it to belittle others. Plus, I have a 72- year-old significantly disabled wife to care for. I don't have time to go back and correct everything other than the novels. Most of the regulars here know that. It's not a matter of "poor me - they're picking on me". It's a matter of simple respect and courtesy to a fellow person. Know before you speak.


Here's a definition of Focal Dystonia relating to the hands:  Focal dystonia is a neurological condition, a type of dystonia, that affects a muscle or group of muscles in a specific part of the body, causing involuntary muscular contractions and abnormal postures. For example, in focal hand dystonia, the fingers either curl into the palm or extend outward without control.

Alan

FYI:  It took me 28 minutes to correct the typos in this short message.

Vern,

You raise a good question. I just reposted my entry - all three chapters in one post, as that's the way I interpreted Sol's reply. They're relatively short chapters so reading them as one unit isn't all that demanding. However, for folks who write long chapters, that might a problem getting reviewers. When Sol replies to your question, that should further clarify things for everyone posting hereafter.

Thanks!

Sol, should we post all three chapters as a single unit/post; or should we post each chapter individually? I thought about that right after I posted Chapter One of my submission. Also, is each author limited to just one entry? Thanks in advance.

Alan

91

(2 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Sounds great, JP. I'll have to check it out this evening. Thanks for the post!

Alan

92

(13 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Hi J P,

I've never thought about it, actually. We were never told not to use any variation the "to be" infinitive in a metaphor. This is the first time I've heard that.  Nor was this addressed in either of my Creative Writing courses in college. But perhaps, at 71, my memory serves me poorly. Still, I'm pretty sure I've never heard this alleged restriction before.

B Douglas Slack wrote:

Like Alan, I, too, prefer not to use the Oxford comma. Having said that, I will admit to putting one in if the meaning is unclear. If I read the sentence aloud, and take a breath at the right spot, a comma will go in before the "and". My second novel is nearing completion and I'm unwilling to go back through it and add any Oxford commas. Perhaps my attitude will change on the third novel.

Bill

Bill,

That would be quite a task - going back to insert the "missing' commas. I find the serial/Oxford commas distracting, but it seems that's the accepted direction these days. And, like you, I use commas, as needed, to imply a pause in the passage. Best to you, sir.

Alan

Hi Deck,

Thanks for dropping in with your reply - much appreciated. And I think the article you referenced does change my opinion. I'll start using it hereafter.  Although I don't think the court's decision resolves the grammatical aspect of it's use, it certainly suggests it would be a good idea to use it for certain clarity in all matters legal. And that's good enough to convince me my logic is faulty in practical application. Many thanks for clearing my mind on that!

Dirk,
Please see my reply, above this paragraph, to Deck. He has resolved the issue for me. Again, thanks for your input.


Alan

Dirk,

Your point is well taken. However, the way you presented it, the waiter was verbally telling the customer his entree options, rather than the customer reading them from a menu. In conversation, I can easily see where there would be easy confusion.

But in printed text, as on a menu, if the steak and fried chicken were grouped together as a single entree item, there would have been an "and" preceding the word "steak", such that it would read " ... lobster, salmon, hamburger, and steak and chicken." Discounting a typo in the printing, written/printed as such, I think rather it's obvious the steak and chicken are a combined, single entree item.

if you see a fault in my logic, please let me know. Although I am not totally adverse to using a serial comma, I prefer not to. And I am willing to accept a convincing argument that disproves my logic. God knows I'm wrong on a lot of things - just ask my wife!

Anyway, I'll be curious to see what others think. I appreciate your input very much. Thanks!

I typically prefer not to use them. But several reviewers have been pretty explicit (in a kind way) that they feel they are necessary. Just so there's no confusion, here's an example of what I mean about serial commas:

The perp was tall, lanky, fast, and deceptive.

My question is:  do I really need that serial comma between "fast" and "and"?

My junior high English teacher said it was optional. He never used it and I followed suit, not using it either. In college, my Creative Writing 101 professor strongly suggested we always use it, although technically not required. He simply thought it was more appropriate to do so. My Creative Writing 201 professor, said it was purely optional; either way is perfectly acceptable.

To me, it seems redundant to use both the serial comma plus the word "and" before the last item in the series. The word "and" informs the reader that the next item in the series will be the last one. I'd love to hear your opinion on the subject. Thanks in advance!

Alan

97

(15 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Dirk,

I've never been a big fan of supernatural; but when you start posting again, I'll check it out. Going back to the link I provided in my earlier post, the article, as you note, is more oriented to bloggers/non-fiction authors, but there's a lot there for novelists to consider as well.

You have some excellent folks helping you tidy up Galaxy Tales - good choices and great of them to help! Best to you,

Alan

98

(15 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

You're welcome. Based on your forum posts, I get the impression you're a pretty smart guy - I think you'll find your comfort zone with that, and any other things that give you pause - very quickly. I've not read any of your writing per se as it's not a genre I typically read. But I'll head over sometime this weekend and check out your work. See ya then ...

Alan

99

(15 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Hi Dirk,

I try to avoid them when I can. Following is my take on the short scenario you offered:

Joseph terminated the feed. “They’re insane! They just put the fate of humanity solely in the hands of Emperor Bastardus!” Joseph's words had barely left his mouth when an explosion rocked the prison. Everyone ran from their cells and looked for the source as a siren began to wail.

I also replaced "out of" with "from". I think it's more concise.

My opinion, for what it it's worth. Hope it helps at least a little bit. Good luck with your story!

Alan

PS:  Also, if you're interested, here's a pretty good article referencing transitional phrases. I use it when my own thought process fails me. You'll notice that of the many transitional examples they suggest/recommend, "just then" is not one of them:

https://smartblogger.com/transitional-phrases/

Hi Dirk,

I don't think I've ever once paid attention to how many scenes I've had in a chapter in any if the six novels I've completed. I simply let the chapter write itself until it's done. So, your post /question piqued my interest on that. After a brief scan of several of my novels, I found chapters with one scene that varied in length between 897 words and 2,896 words. And then I had a chapter with five scenes that was just over 2400 words.

I'd never given that any thought before, so it was interesting to go back and take a look. I've been a member here since 2008 and many years ago there was a writer who typically posted chapters with 4000 - 5000 words and had as many as seven or eight scenes. So, I guess it depends on genre, writing style and necessity to say what needs to be said in whatever chapter configuration that requires.

That really doesn't answer your question, I guess, but thought I'd throw in my nickel's worth (two cents won't buy anything these days). Good luck with your writing. Wishing you great success.

Alan