Re: The Archangel Syndrome

Yikes. My first act's final chapter, which was "in excess of 30 pages", has mushroomed even further to 38 pages. I'm not sure what I'm going to do with this bad boy. I'm not going to change it now, but I clearly have to do something with it eventually to hack it down to size (e.g., 20 pages or less is reasonable for this book's chapter lengths). That's a lot to cut!

I suppose I could treat it like a tie-in for the book, and use the tie-in to give a detailed version of the trimmed version in the book.

Re: The Archangel Syndrome

One possibility is to make half of it wrap up act 1 and the other half the second chapter of act 2 (Apollo is up first in act 2 since Joseph closed act 1).

228

Re: The Archangel Syndrome

If it's a bother, you might review how many characters live to the end.

Killing a few off nicely reduces the number of threads that need to be resolved. They should be driving in their exits (Cersei, that's not you) so we feel heightened tension going in. Each should try to divert their threads from reaching the final chapter by attaining sufficient closure. Preferably by unifying with the surviving characters. This will bind things nicely

Re: The Archangel Syndrome

You mean live to the end of the book or to the end of this nonstop chapter ("The Freudians")? No one dies in the chapter as it's more of a character development chapter for Joseph. I also introduced a young nurse named Catherine in it who is now among my favorite characters. She becomes somewhat like an older sister to Joseph. I'm considering punting other characters, so I can make room for her in the rest of the book. She's much more real than either Princess Stephanie (doormat) or Eve (Joseph's ex-doormat). As written, though, the chapter belongs at the end of act one, not the beginning of act two.

I have a similar problem brewing with Apollo's first chapter in act two, although not with regard to length but rather the fact that it doesn't really belong in act two either. It's an assassination attempt against the Imperial Family, staged by Nero to rally the support of the ruling elite, who are beginning to sour on his rule. The assassination attempt is where Caligula loses half his face. That's a great chapter to close out Apollo's first act, not to open the second ("The Young Leaders' Conference").

I think if I choose a moment of maximum danger to both Apollo and Joseph in their respective chapters above, then I could end act one on a cliffhanger for each of them. At that point, it seems more reasonable to wrap up those two chapters as the first pair of act two.

I'm still wondering if "The Freudians" is too weird compared to the rest of the book, though. Joseph is pretty much naked the whole chapter, and it gets stranger from there, although I think it all makes sense given the circumstances, some of which you don't realize until near the end of the chapter, when a few secrets are revealed. Terry seemed to like it; he said he hopes Catherine and Joseph will eventually get together, although it won't be that simple since Joseph is supposed to be coming to terms with being gay, and there is Christian, his intended love interest, to deal with. I could shift it, though, and make him bisexual if need be.

Re: The Archangel Syndrome

Quick survey for anyone who cares to vote:
- psychiatric wards in the year 4017 are referred to as brainial units, and psychiatrists are referred to as Freudians, which is also the name of the above noted chapter
- the other option is to call the psychiatrists brainials
- brainials would be a reasonable choice if all of this were to be taken seriously; Freudians seems a little odd, so it may be a better choice in this case

Any preferences?

231

Re: The Archangel Syndrome

Hmmm.  It seems unlikely that Freud would have won out over everything and everyone.  There are so many to choose from.  Of course, you could just use Kafka, or that destructive fraud, Bruno Betterheim.  Or you could go with Oliver Sacks, if you mean them to be places of dignity and true healing.

Re: The Archangel Syndrome

Kafka has a nice ring to it. But I assume most people would have to google it.

233

Re: The Archangel Syndrome

I suppose Doctor Caliogstro is out?

Re: The Archangel Syndrome

The main reason for Freudian was simply name recognition. It doesn't mean that in 4017 they'll agree with his beliefs and methods.

I previously considered shrinker, master-shrink, pill-shrinks, and talk-shrinks but didn't like any of them.

I reread some of the internet writings about Kafka. My favorite is this: ''Kafkaesque'' means ''having a nightmarishly complex, bizarre, or illogical quality." smile  Not sure how I would explain how his name became the future term for psychiatrist. Interestingly, Kafka died of tuberculosis at a fairly young age.

This one looks good, but virtually no one will have heard of him: Philippe Pinel is often considered the "father of modern psychiatry." He is most famous for his humane treatment of the mentally ill, as well as his contributions to the diagnosis and treatment of mental disorders. Among other things, he advocated not using chains on the mentally ill. Apparently shrinks of the past needed to be told this? Wow! His work paved the way for modern psychotherapy.

Given how kooky my book is, including a number of its memorable characters, I'd like to find a way to get Pinel's name in the book in some meaningful way. Having psychiatrists called Pinels (or something similar) would probably cause nothing but confusion, though. I could perhaps change the Brainial Unit to the Pinel Unit and leave it to readers to google. Meh.

An article on Bettelheim by one of his former patients/students pretty much paints him as an idiotic dick. He's worse than the head shrink of the Brainial Unit where Joseph is trapped.

I didn't read anything that would suggest why some variant of Sacks would be the word for shrink in the far future. Clearly a smart man and a significant contributor to the field, but if readers of my book were to google his name, they'd be scratching their heads as to why I chose his name. Still, future psychiatrists could then be called Sacksons. smile

Tzan-Tzas is a strong contender. I'd have to get across that these doctors are shrinks, but the reader would have to google the rest. That's the term for the shrunken heads produced by natives of the Amazon region who once practiced head hunting. smile

Brainial remains the boring fallback term.

235

Re: The Archangel Syndrome

He's worse than the head shrink of the Brainial Unit where Joseph is trapped.

I'd suggest Brainial Ward or Department instead of Unit.

Don't laugh, but for the staff, I'm partial to psychiatrist and shrink (as opposed to Freudians and Pinels) only because of term-occlusion.

(eg in VQ I could have called androids "Bills" or "Gates" or "Jobs"... maybe even "Babbages" but to do so, I'd need to do a lift to ensure the terms fit well and the world-history supports it. This would naturally put pressure on the competing terms that show up after she "dies" thereby crowding the story)

236

Re: The Archangel Syndrome

I also found Stargate very clean with its terms.

AIs: the Replicators. [Replicator is easy for the reader to parse - presumably, it replicates lol]
Hybrid: "Human-form Replicator"
Weapon: "Replicator disruptor cannon" and "Anti-replicator gun"
Specific Hybrid: Bob -> Replicator Bob

Compare to Battlestar:
AIs: Cylons
Hybrid: Skinjob or toaster
Weapon: (I checked the wiki and went cross-eyed)
Specific Hybrid: One of (15?) models eg groups of clones

Both are fine. I'm not knocking Battlestar. But Battlestar doesn't also have an Imperium to manage. It can devote all the page space it needs into one milieu.

Re: The Archangel Syndrome

Kdot, how do you feel about shrinkers and master-shrink? I tried both (and brainial) but found they were too bland. Hence the reason I'm looking for something sexier. Unlike other sci-fi stories, mine is a demented space opera with no need to remain 100% serious. In fact, going against norms is a hallmark of this story.

Admittedly calling them tsantsas requires a little setup, but all of the setup I've done for other names I've toyed with was indirect: the shrinks are addressed as doctors, Joseph is at the hospital because his parents fear a mental health problem, he's taken to a "branial" unit and is asked whether he considers himself mentally ill, he's placed in a rubber room, his clothes are taken away because someone suicidal could commit suicide using just clothes, and he's at the hospital to evaluate whether he has Archangel Syndrome.

Now, Joseph is not suicidal, but the head shrink takes away the clothes of all new patients to pressure them to cooperate with whatever tests and treatments are deemed appropriate. Joseph has been promised that he'll be given something to wear "soon" as long as he continues to cooperate. Also, he'll be allowed to contact his parents "in a few days" if he continues to cooperate.

In theory, that could allow me to use any of the terms discussed in my previous post (I realized that after posting), but tsantsas are a cool Easter egg in that they are, literally, shrunken heads. Admittedly, it requires a few brain cells to connect the shrunken heads of head hunters with shrinks, but once you've got it, it becomes obvious why this crazy story would use such an odd term for its psychiatrists.

A bit of trivia: There were two real-life cases in the not too distant past where patients hung themselves with just their underwear.

238

Re: The Archangel Syndrome

shrinkers and master-shrink <--- I can read these with having to pause and think
tsantsas <--- couldn't parse this one (not without a google or your explanation) As you say, it'd take some setup.

Re: The Archangel Syndrome

I googled for famous psychiatrists and there was virtually no one in the list that most people would recognize, certainly not more so than Freud. Barring some inspired term better than brainial, I'm going to go with the latter. Kind of plain but needs little to no explanation.

I'm curious, why do you suggest brainial ward instead of brainial unit?

240

Re: The Archangel Syndrome

Unit is closer to "thing"... fighting unit, computational unit, operational unit, units of measure, scaling unit, and so on. As a word it conveys little other than the concept of modularity. Wheras for the same number of letters, ward conveys health-care

Re: The Archangel Syndrome

Okay, last one:
- psychiatrists will be brain-masters
- a psychiatric ward will be either a brainial ward or a brain-mastering ward; I lean toward the latter; makes the terminology more consistent

EDIT: Brain-mastering ward is way too long (I use it a lot), so brain-masters and brainial ward win.


My thanks to all.
Dirk

Re: The Archangel Syndrome

I'm looking to finalize the name of the global church on New Bethlehem. I've been using the Libertarian Church, which is ok if I wanted to be totally serious. But why on Earth would I want to start now? smile  The Libertarian Church was founded a few centuries from now based on the Mammonists for Christ Movement of the 21st century, which was begun by the stinking rich for the stinking rich (a tax dodge).

Now, since later supporters of the Mammonist Movement truly came to believe you could serve both mammon and Christ, I figure they would push strongly for that to also be the name of the church: Mammonists for Christ Church. While that may seem ridiculous to outsiders, the members of that denomination believe fervently in their church and its views.

Stranger things have happened, especially in American politics. smile

Thus, I'm inclined to name it the way its followers would: Mammonists for Christ Church.

Thoughts?
Dirk

243

Re: The Archangel Syndrome

What are your posting plans for this vs Connor?

I've been kinda following in the background but haven't reviewed as yet. Curious which one is higher on your radar for completion.

Re: The Archangel Syndrome

I'm just finalizing a few things in act one of Archangel + I have to apply plenty of minor edits I've already received, then I'll stop working on it except for an expected trickle of further feedback from a few new reviewers.

I'm pretty sure you read fairly recent versions of everything in act one of Archangel except the final 3-part chapter. I haven't put all of act one back up yet post-crash to slow the influx of reviews (I'm falling too far behind my reviewers).

I also have plenty of recent suggested edits to add to Connor v1.

Doing all of the above will probably take until the end of August. After that, almost all my time will go toward Connor v2.

Re: The Archangel Syndrome

Queen Aussie: I would ask that you free my humatronic brain from this vessel as soon as this mission is over. I find naked apes exceedingly violent, even more so than their turd-flinging hairy brethren.

I'd love to see Alexa talk like that. tongue

Re: The Archangel Syndrome

Kdot, how many of your stories follow the traditional three-act story structure?

Star Wars, of course, follows it very closely. The story setup includes everything up to the murder of Luke's aunt and uncle. I haven't timed it in Star Wars, but the first act in three-act movies usually last about 30 minutes, which would be about 1/4 of Star Wars.

For my latest draft of Archangel Syndrome, I was trying to substantially reduce the length of the first act and was able to cut numerous chapters, but in fleshing out the rest of that act to what I consider a reasonable level of detail (including eventually cutting the length of the new "monster" chapter in half), I'm back up to about the same length (55,000 words, or 185 pages in a typical printed novel at 300 words per page).

Depending on which internet source you believe, a typical sci-fi story is 50,000-150,000 words or 80,000-120,000 words. I usually see the latter. For comparison, Dune is 190,000 words, Fellowship of the Rings (the longest of the LOTR books, albeit in the fantasy genre) is also 190,000 words, the first Harry Potter book is 75,000 words, and the longest Harry Potter book is 255,000 words.

I intend to self-publish, so I have some flexibility as to length, at least in terms of e-books, but the final printed book could easily be as long as Dune (about 600 pages using comparable words per page). Even if page count didn't affect the cost of the printed book, I suspect sci-fi readers would consider it very long.

What do you think? Too long? If I had to, I'm sure I could chop 25% from most of those opening chapters, but quite frankly, I don't want to. I already did that before fleshing out things I thought were needed. The monster chapter, where Joseph is thrown into the psych ward by his parents, is 10K words (though hopefully no more than 5-6K once I cut the hell out of it). But Joseph already decided to pursue his destiny (no matter what) after the cadet massacre, just as Apollo decided to pursue his destiny (no matter what) after the attack on New Bethlehem by psycho Dad.

Of course, neither of them leaves their respective planets for Neuer Mond until after Joseph is freed from the psych ward and Nero stages a phony assassination attempt (the one where Caligula's face is partially blown off and replaced by cyborg components), meaning one more chapter each before leaving.

What would you consider to be the end of act one/beginning of act two? Although the setting changes completely after those last two chapters, their decisions were made before those two chapters. This won't affect the overall story length, but I'm curious as to what you consider the dividing point.

In Star Wars, Luke didn't leave Tatooine until after they hired Han & Chewie and blasted their way out of Mos Eisley, meaning a few more chapters on the planet.

What do you think?

Thanks.
Dirk

247

Re: The Archangel Syndrome

Hmm how many? All of them. But one particular act may extend along multiple volumes.

For example, Fire's current story, "Act I" is everything from the beginning to the point where she's with the Uranians and realizes she's going to have to go on this mission. So that's currently all of Book 1 and half of Book 2.

Within this "Act I" and several smaller Act I-II-III groupings. such as "Begin Auction - Secure bee - Escape Auction"

Q: Too long?

This is hard to answer, but I can definitely say I don't feel the length of a book, but rather the strength of the reward for reading the ending. In this sense, Han Solo vs Kylo Ren ending left me unsatisfied. Unrewarded. And one may make a counter-point that sometimes life is random like that, and not every death has meaning, but I would argue this should have meant more and rewarded more. It wasn't far from the death of Superman or Optimus Prime, (both of which the companies chose to walk back but Disney decided to plough forward).

If the reward is great enough, no length is really too much.

consider to be the end of act one/beginning of act two

I have trouble dividing the acts unless I reach the end.

(I imagine you face the same dilemma if you tried to split Laurie's journey in the ship right now. You know she goes to town on the crew in the third act, but where exactly did Act I end and give way to Act II? I checked my notes. Formally, Act II starts in chapter 20 when Laurie commits on a course of action. A purist would say her first commit is much earlier, probably around the introduction of Alice where the journey-story changes direction to survival-story)

For yours, I can guess Act I culminates the destruction of Joseph's homeworld, but not knowing now much story comes after that, I could be way off.

My concept of "too long" is really how many disparate elements I need to track over how long a period. As long as there is character growth, I'm usually along for the ride.

Re: The Archangel Syndrome

Thanks.

Just to clarify, when I was asking about act 1 vs act 2, I meant within the first book. Joseph's homeworld doesn't get destroyed until the end of the first book, which leaves a nice opening for a book 2 if there ever is one, although Joseph's fate at the end of book 1 is currently unknown. He jumps off the cliff wanting to know if Michael (or God) will save him. Fade to black....

At the beginning of book 2, I intended Joseph to crash onto a rocky shelf sticking out 10-20 feet below where he jumped from. So, technically, God saved him :-)

As noted in my previous post, both teenagers commit one chapter (each) prior to them leaving their home planets for the Young Leaders Conference. So, I could end the act after the commit or after they leave their planets.

In Star Wars, Luke commits after his aunt and uncle are killed, but he doesn't leave the planet until after they get to Mos Eisley, hire Solo, and blast their way off the planet. According to a couple of online sites about story structure, act 1 of Star Wars 4 ends when Luke tells Ben he wants to go with him to Alderaan and become a Jedi.

So, Apollo's & Joseph's commits are the end of act 1. The commits are far powerful moments anyway than each of their last chapters on their planets.

Thanks for your help.
Dirk

Re: The Archangel Syndrome

Since it will probably take me a long time to finish cleaning up and publishing Archangel (since Connor v2 is the priority), I'm seriously considering publishing the first act of Archangel Syndrome as a longish novella (about 50K words) and putting that up as my first book. I would then take an occasional break from Connor (probably at the end of each act) to clean up and publish each subsequent act of Archangel as novellas 2-4, resulting in the following:

Novella 1 - the first act of Archangel. The two points in the first act where Joseph and Apollo commit to their destinies, determined that nothing will stop them, would be the end of this novella, give or take an epilogue/preview of novella 2. A trimmed version of Brain-Masters would then get punted to the beginning of novella 2. I could then restore to novella 1 one of my favorite deleted chapters (the one where Apollo is almost whipped to death at the Colosseum by Nero, after which Apollo has to undergo surgery without anesthesia).

Novella 2 - the entire second act of Archangel (the Young Leaders Conference), ending with the assassination of both Regent Mary and Nero. This act is currently rather short, even if I prepend a trimmed version of Brain-Masters to it, so it gives me the option to have the delegates visit Catholika and maybe one other planet. Depends on how much new material I care to write. Since the pope would be female, I have a few folks here I can choose as the pope (probably either Georgina or the Virgin Marilyn, both Protestants in real life). And I would definitely include a bit of crossover nonsense from the Connor books.

Novella 3 - the entire third act. Apollo is sworn in, is haunted by Nero (assuming the changes aren't too complex), up to where Apollo is overthrown and "hung" on New Bethlehem, including being accidentally decapitated as he is hung. Joseph accidentally ends up on a slaver ship, is enslaved on Earth, then imprisoned, then is rescued by Leonardo (the loonie taxi driver), and boards a transport for home, knowing an attack on New Bethlehem is now imminent.

Novella 4 - the fourth act of Archangel, consisting of the main battle and its aftermath, including the current epilogue, in which Joseph throws himself off a cliff, and Apollo concludes God is real and decides to build a Christian empire. I would reveal at the end of this novella the cause of the supernatural beings that plague Apollo and Joseph.

Beyond finally getting something published, an added advantage of doing this is I get enough room to flesh out each act of Archangel. In spite of cutting unnecessary chapters from act one about a year ago, by the time I fleshed out the rest of that act to what I consider an appropriate level of detail, I was back to a huge first act. I suspect the same will be true of subsequent acts, heading toward 200K total words. I always have the option at the end to put them together as one big book.

The main problem with these, I think, is that Joseph and Apollo don't meet at all in novellas 1 and 3, only in novella 2 and briefly at the end of novella 4. Naturally, they regularly interact via Galaxinet during novella 1 (via the Royals Forum, where they piss each other off).

Thoughts?
Dirk

250

Re: The Archangel Syndrome

You mean publish here or Amazon?