Re: Northern Skies - Janet!

K, the next chapter is posted. (1) You need more patience, young man, and (2) Your spreadsheet is out by approx. 36 hours. tongue

Re: Northern Skies - Janet!

janet reid wrote:

the next chapter is posted.

*crickets*






*crickets*






*smells armpit*






Nope, it's not too bad. Guess everyone is just busy. Except njc, not saying he isn't busy (for those that struggle to figure this out, K can translate Janet double-negative in no time), because he (njc, not K, although K might also be busy, but I'm talking about njc here) is busy (and I have pics to prove it too), but he's on top of this game and for his dedication and trouble and effort I've elevated him to the top of my "All time heroes and favourite reviewers"-list. You might notice a few names that have been elevated to this highly coveted position in the past: William Shakespeare, Stephen King, JK Rowling, just to name a few.






*crickets*







Seriously though, let me know if I've missed returning a few favours ... Rebecca, I'm planning a Drech marathon if not this weekend, next weekend, so you're sitting out this remind-Janet-gently-of-reviews-she-needs-to-get-to-catch-up round! tongue

ps - if the top of my list carrot isn't working, think of it this way: if I'm busy reading reviews (AND a little bit of writing in between), I don't have time to post ...

328

Re: Northern Skies - Janet!

I lazed at the conference and also got to hunt for a new car in my free time. When it rains, it pours. You are on my dance card,  so don't worry. Hey, can I start calling you Cricket? I only tag people with nicknames if I like them. Don't worry, Difk. You're next!

329

Re: Northern Skies - Janet!

Did I close this thread or did you do it in favor of crickets?

330

Re: Northern Skies - Janet!

Fixed. Crickets are back!

331

Re: Northern Skies - Janet!

Not that I would ever do it on purpose, but I can do that? I'm going to have to use that line when Alda is asked to do a healing spell or something...

Re: Northern Skies - Janet!

KHippolite wrote:

I think only the moderator (eg, you) can close threads

Thanks Amy, and yes, only the group moderator/creator can close, delete, sticky and moderate threads.

Re: Northern Skies - Janet!

KHippolite wrote:

I've had a few days off so it killed my review pace. That may seem strange, but I get the vast majority of my reviewing and writing done during the 4 hrs I spend commuting each day. It's the secret to my posting rate... I've got nothing to do but sit in the train and bang away at the keyboard

That's a tough one. I wouldn't mind to have 4 hours a day to write, but not on a train to work without much choice in the matter. But yes, what you're doing is the best you can do - use the time as much as you can (this also explains the lack of in-line reviews sometimes!).

4 hours is a pretty hard commute, so I hope your employer supports flexible working hours ... in your case, one day not going in to work would mean one day + 4 hours essentially.

Re: Northern Skies - Janet!

amy s wrote:

I lazed at the conference and also got to hunt for a new car in my free time. When it rains, it pours. You are on my dance card,  so don't worry. Hey, can I start calling you Cricket? I only tag people with nicknames if I like them. Don't worry, Difk. You're next!

So did you buy a new car?! Wanna share which make and model? smile

Re: Northern Skies - Janet!

*refresh page* nope, still crickets! LOL All good, as long as you guys are aware of the new chapter, I'm happy. Take your time! In the meantime, I'm going to keep myself busy with reviews and the forums a little bit. smile

336

Re: Northern Skies - Janet!

I just signed on a Jeep Renegade with the upgraded options in the Latitude package (power doors, locks, and keyless entry)  We had to do that to get the roof rails so we can haul tons of stuff on the roof.  It breaks my heart to let the Saturn go. She was such a loyal car! Kind of like putting a parent on an ice-flow and watching them sail away...

On a positive note, my youngest will explode with excitement when he realizes we got a blue car. The things that matter when you are five years old!

337

Re: Northern Skies - Janet!

That's got the ZF 9-speed tranny.  I just did a little reading.  Seems it can give you delays on certain downshifts, specifically those that involve disengaging and re-engaging the dog clutch.  I also have to see if I can get print copies of some of the 'animated' diagrams on the Wiki-P page.  They move too durn fast.  4 planetaries (two nested) with multilayer friction clutches and brakes, plus the dog clutches.  Compact design that requires taking power off a gear on the side rather than via an output shaft.  Weight: a little under 200 lb (86 kg mass).  Seems like it's used on everything from Fiat/Dodge to Land Rover.

Let me know how you like it.

338

Re: Northern Skies - Janet!

I will. I'd better, actually since I'm going to be paying for it for the next 6 years. Oh, I had to get a manual, so I don't have to worry about the downshifts. An autistic son with an intense interest in starting the car has made me fanatical about stick shifts. My neighbor's fence appreciates my thoughtfulness. And the pool behind it...

339

Re: Northern Skies - Janet!

Oooh.  Forgot about that.

Never Mind!

Re: Northern Skies - Janet!

amy s wrote:

I just signed on a Jeep Renegade with the upgraded options in the Latitude package (power doors, locks, and keyless entry)  We had to do that to get the roof rails so we can haul tons of stuff on the roof.  It breaks my heart to let the Saturn go. She was such a loyal car! Kind of like putting a parent on an ice-flow and watching them sail away...

On a positive note, my youngest will explode with excitement when he realizes we got a blue car. The things that matter when you are five years old!

Great little car!!!! Wishing you a million happy miles! smile
And yeah, to be five again .....

341

Re: Northern Skies - Janet!

Interesting thoughts. K (obviously) thinks like a guy and I've had others critique me in the past that I didn't write accurately from a male perspective. This was the first draft of the scene between Kha and Sil. A guy who read it said that sex for a man is about possession. (not in a negative way, either) It is about taking and controlling.  This is in contrast to a woman, where sex is about sharing and giving. We're just wired that way. I took the advice to heart and kind of changed the intent of the scene between Kha and Sil. Let's see if I can do it for K's exerpt...

Matthew considered the possibility. Catherine would make a perfect mistress. She was a widow, so there was no stigma at making her own decisions. She was barren, so he wouldn't have to worry about an illigitimate heir. As long as they were discreet, there were no drawbacks. It might be for just a short spell, of course,, but he'd never responded to a woman so intensely . Admiting that he wanted her was worth exploring in every way imaginable.

This wouldn't distract from the search for the blackguard.

342

Re: Northern Skies - Janet!

Notice though that the expected readership is female, so you can't go too deeply into the male perspective.  Enough to lend a corroborative verisimilitude to ... oh, fiddlesticks!

Re: Northern Skies - Janet!

This is getting complicated now! LOL

This is the mindset I was trying to convey ....

He wants her. And he wants her A LOT, more than any other woman before her. And he doesn't want her only once or twice either. But taking on a mistress while you're also trying to catch a bad-ass is probably not the best idea, you may run into time constraints. Then there is Catherine's suitability - same class, widow (i.e. independent, she can decide) and with discretion of course - so she would do quite well. With this, I was trying to show that at least Matthew isn't only thinking about his own physical needs and meeting them at any cost, but that he was considering the impact of this becoming known - and it would only be Catherine's reputation that would be at stake, i.e. he cares at least.

I like K's idea - they think the arrow was meant for Matthew, but the fact is, Catherine is clearly not Matthew, yet she was shot, so it could still be a massive plot to kill her (this would work well for the third book especially). Bringing out some of Matthew's protective instincts so to speak would be a more logical connection to the blackguard than my effort where Catherine could be a distraction.

But where I disagree with K is Matthew asking so many questions, what do I miss when Catherine isn't there? can I/we pull this off without being caught/how are we going to be discreet? He knows what he wants (her), he's not missing anything (yet), he's done it before with other women (without getting caught), discretion is his middle name (it's not hard to make happen, at his castle? pft, easy as.).

Then I agree again - the big uncertainty/risk is Catherine's agreement to it. This is where her being a widow starts to come into play - it is her decision. So the next question is, will she agree to being his mistress which is a bit more than a quick tumble.

So this is why the following is there:

Now all that remained was to convince the lady in question of the mutual benefits of such a liaison.
He grinned like a lad who just discovered his horse could talk.
He was looking forward to this pursuit for sure.

Anything else is easy to fix/sort out. So maybe I should lessen his confidence here (maybe, I don't want to alienate readers in the process).

So basically I need to expand more on Matthew's protective instinct and like Amy said (I like that analogy), what he wants (the control/possess factor) - and Catherine's independence (and not only the widow related one, her personality too) makes it much more of a challenge and reward.

Re: Northern Skies - Janet!

njc wrote:

Notice though that the expected readership is female, so you can't go too deeply into the male perspective.  Enough to lend a corroborative verisimilitude to ... oh, fiddlesticks!

Male romance readership is approx. 20% of the market and growing, a decade ago it was less than 10%. So yes, the majority of readers is female, but I'm hoping that NS will also appeal to the 20% of men reading this, hence all the action and why I think it would be good if I can portray the male psyche accurately too.

Re: Northern Skies - Janet!

I have big problems with the next chapter - I think it needs to be in Catherine's POV, but it looks more and more like it will work better in Matthew's. And I so do not want to write two chapters to see which one works best ....

346

Re: Northern Skies - Janet!

Depends. What do you want to write about? Sketch the chapter, otherwise you'll have to figure it out yourself.  FYI, I helped sort at the rummage sale today and have my eye on a couple hats as well as a balaklava. No coats for now, but I think my one son has a great jacket for you as long as you don't mind scrubbing out a few stains. I don't need it for Sean for at least a few years, so you might as well have it. I'll be sending off your care package next week after the sale wraps up.

A

Re: Northern Skies - Janet!

I've solved the POV issue whoo-hoo! By doing what I always do, use both POVs ... phew, that was a close one. and funny what difference a good night's sleep can do?! LOL

And also, the fact that Catherine can't have children should also be part of the equation (like Amy said), although it's not a big one - it will only make it heaps more fun if you don't worry about getting pregnant! smile

Winter clothes ... Okay, in addition to having the nicest caps in the world, and being really good at doughnuts, it looks like the US also do clothes for colder weather much better than what Perth do. Eastern/southern Aus isn't too bad, they also have good gear, but Perth sucks at it, because we don't really need it. And it would've been a waste to buy nice winter gear you don't need while visiting the colder side of Aus, so we just looked at the nice stuff and never bought it never thinking we would ever need it. When we knew we were coming over to this side, we then decided to upgrade our winter clothes when we got here. Aus is bloody expensive. BEST. DECISION. EVER.

Okay Amy, so we found one pair of gloves each, I have a beanie (so far husband and kids don't think they'll need it - it's game over the day they change their minds, I'm going to take them out and never let them forget - I'm a bad person IRL smile ) and long-sleeves/clothes you can layer. We found under armor (I think it's called) at pretty reasonable prices. We have a good pair of boots each too (from Aus - Perth is wet in winter too). No coats at the moment, but we each have a good windbreaker that's also waterproof - it won't be any good when it snows, I think, not warm enough, but with all the other layers, it might be enough. When we get there, we'll invest in a good coat each then.

So PM me with a list of stuff you have - but if it's Colin's gear that Sean can use later, I'd rather you hold on to it. The rest will be appreciated and used until it can't be used no more. I'll also let you know where the friendly courier can drop the package.

I'm still working on the scheme to get money to you beforehand - best I have is not to tell you where I live until I have your bank account details (if you wouldn't mind, your SSN, DOB - mmm, maybe I can get this one, so don't worry about it - what else, your mother's maiden name too, that'd be really nice hehehe). But I have a feeling you'll be really upset if I do that. So I'm still working on a cunning plan that you won't see coming and won't upset you too. Maybe enough wine that's worth your weight in gold .... I still have your address from the previous failed attempt.

You're the best! And everyone else that's been giving me really helpful advice too. You guys rock! smile

ps - I'm not going to check for spelling or closed parenthesis - deal with it! tongue

348

Re: Northern Skies - Janet!

Ok, I lost the sizes for you and kids. Your youngest is a boys 10, but give me sizes for Hubble, you, and oldest son. I have another friend going through her cast offs. I'm thinking that your youngest is going to make out like a bandit.

Re: Northern Skies - Janet!

KHippolite wrote:

Therefore, Catherine didn’t waste time to right her dress and after a cheeky curtsy...
>If I read this correctly, it means she did not fix her dress and is now prancing around with everything all hanging out

Ah, I think I figured it out... and it may be an across-the-pong thing, but the expression should probably be

"X wasted no time in doing Y"

which is very different from X didn't waste his time doing Y. Maybe it's an idiomatic expression. *shrugs*. Either way, I get the meaning now

I do this deliberately to keep you up at night K! wink

It can be stated better/more clearly, although you are so far the only one who interpreted it this way! smile

350 (edited by njc 2015-10-10 03:34:38)

Re: Northern Skies - Janet!

Oh, dear.

janet reid wrote:
KHippolite wrote:

Ah, I think I figured it out... and it may be an across-the-pong thing, but the expression should probably be

"X wasted no time in doing Y"

which is very different from X didn't waste his time doing Y. Maybe it's an idiomatic expression. *shrugs*. Either way, I get the meaning now

The difference is the word 'in'.  With no 'in', Catherine's dress is still up around her admirable front.  With 'in', the dress was set right expeditiously.

See The Lexicon of Intentionally Ambiguous Recommendation, also called LIAR.  (How do you read "I cannot recommend him too highly."  ?)